James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 20, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for Our Future:
Advertisements

Scientific, Technical Assessment, and Reporting Scientific, Technical Assessment, and Reporting Partnering, Leadership & Management Partnering, Leadership.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
1 The Chesapeake Bay Program James Edward, Deputy Director EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office CAC meeting, June 1, 2012 EO Action Plan, Progress Report.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Specialist; UD Cooperative Extension Chair, Chesapeake Bay Program Water Quality Goal Implementation Team.
Update Chesapeake Action Plan – Report to Congress Strengthening the Management, Coordination, and Accountability of the Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership.
Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Framework Implementation.
 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Extension Specialist University of Delaware Cooperative Extension.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Citizens Advisory Committee February 27, 2014.
GIT 6 Role in Advising Management Board on Alignment Issues Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice-chair.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework Briefing CBP Partnership’s Communications Workgroup July 10, 2014.
CBP Partnership Approach for Ensuring Full Accountability of Best Practices and Technologies Implemented Jim Edward, CBPO Deputy Director CBP Citizen Advisory.
1 Jim Edward Chair, IRC April 13, 2014 Issues Resolution Committee: Recommendations to PSC on Key Issues Raised during the Public/Partner Comment Period.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17, 2013 Draft 4/1/13 for GIT 6 Review.
Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
Being Accountable/Communicating Assessment Information to the Public in 2012 Update to the Management Board April 2012 Margaret Enloe, ACB CBPO and Nita.
Drafting the New Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes – Decision/Actions From Management Board Meetings June 13 and 18, 2013.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17,
James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Environmental Protection Agency The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The New.
Citizen’s Advisory Committee / Local Government Advisory Committee Joint Meeting December 5, 2013 Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA)
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program, EPA 1 CBP Program Update on Bay Agreement Comments, Final Draft, and 2-Year Milestone Status Citizens.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan.
FY2012 ChesapeakeStat Development Team Enhancements – content, design, function 1.Redesign Goal Overview Pages Objective: Communicate the mission and vision.
Bay Guidance Programs. The Bay Program partnership includes: 19 federal agencies Nearly 40 state agencies and programs in DE, MD, NY, PA, VA,
Indicator Status Updates Overview Nita Sylvester, EPA CBPO Chair of STAR’s Indicator Workgroup.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17, 2013 Draft 4/5/13 for MB Review 1.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Citizen Stewardship Outcome Kick Off Meeting 11/18/2014.
Visual Decision Frameworks –Habitat GIT Adaptive Management based on annual review. Share progress and address challenges and opportunities Adjust management.
Abridged Chesapeake Bay Agreement: Initial Reactions WRTC September 6, 2013.
Key Functions & Responsibilities (from the old governance document) – Coordinates the program-level adaptive management system and assists the GITs in.
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
Nicholas DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Environmental Protection Agency The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The New.
State of the Chesapeake Bay Program Nick DiPasquale, CBP Director, EPA Executive Council Annual Meeting June 16,
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
CBP GIT Implementation Workgroup Structure Enhance Partnering, Leadership & Management Enhance Partnering, Leadership & Management Goal Implementation.
Chesapeake Bay Program
CRC Staffer Update Megan Hession Habitat Goal Implementation Team.
Quarterly Progress Meeting - May 2017
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System:
Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting
Chesapeake Bay Program Updates
Quarterly Progress Meeting - May 2017
Quarterly Progress Meeting - August 2017
Local Planning Process…
Concepts and Timeline for Developing a CBP Biennial Strategy Review System (DRAFT) October 31, 2016 (DRAFT)
Riparian Forest Buffers
Jim Edward Chair, IRC April 13, 2014
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next
Concepts and Timeline for Developing a CBP Biennial Strategy Review System DRAFT August 29, 2016 DRAFT 12/4/2018 DRAFT.
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System:
2016 – 17 Bay Barometer.
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Outcomes and Phase III WIPs
I AM RACHEL FELVER. Hello!
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for
Monitoring & Assessment, Adaptation Outcomes
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
CBP Organizational Structure
Presentation transcript:

James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 20, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Management Strategies

2 Clarity Clearer goals and more well - defined outcomes than previous agreements Flexibility Allow us to adapt our thinking and management decisions to adjust to changing conditions and circumstances Transparency & Accountability Partners set priorities & commit resources through management strategies What’s different?

How partners are working... Vision Principles GOALS OUTCOME CBP’s Executive Council (EC) agreed to Watershed Agreement GOALS & initial OUTCOMES Mgmt. Strategy CBP’s Principals’ Staff Committee (PSC) tracks OUTCOMES, ensuring they are measureable & achievable; adapting as needed CBP’s Management Board (MB) to manage and track the STRATEGIES, adapting them as necessary over time for success Mgmt. Strategy Mgmt. Strategy

Our Plan: Work toward 10 interrelated goals and 29 measurable, time-bound outcomes that will create a healthy watershed.  Goals articulate the high level aspects of the partners’ vision  Outcomes express specific, time-bound, measureable targets that directly contribute to achieving each goal.

Sustainable Fisheries Goal  B lue Crab Abundance Outcome  Blue Crab Management Outcome  Oyster Outcome  Forage Fish Outcome  Fish Habitat Outcome Vital Habitat Goal  Wetlands Outcome o Black Duck  Stream Health Outcome o Brook Trout  Fish Passage Outcome  SAV Outcome  Forest Buffer Outcome  Tree Canopy Outcome Water Quality Goal  2017 WIP Outcome  2025 WIP Outcome  Water Quality Standards Attainment and Monitoring Outcome Toxic Contaminants Goal  Toxic Contaminant Research Outcome  Toxic Contaminant Policy and Prevention Outcome Healthy Watersheds Goal  Healthy Watersheds Outcome Stewardship Goal  Citizen Stewardship Outcome  Local Leadership Outcome  Diversity Outcome Goals and Outcomes

Land Conservation Goal  Protected Lands Outcome  Land Use Methods and Metrics Development Outcome  Land Use Options Evaluation Outcome Public Access Goal  Public Access Site Development Outcome Environmental Literacy  Student Outcome  Sustainable Schools Outcome  Environmental Literacy Planning Outcome Climate Resiliency  Monitoring and Assessment Outcome  Adaptation Outcome Goals and Outcomes

Management strategy – A single document that summarizes the Partnership’s management process and the collective thinking for each outcome or related group of outcomes. What’s Next?

Key Elements of Management Strategies

Management Strategy Framework 2 Year Workplan

Assessing Progress Action 1 – (VA) Action 2 – (DE) Action 3 – (GIT)

Adapting Monitoring progress on actions/outcomes Assessing that progress (every 2 years) Determine if changes need to be made to actions we are taking or to assumptions related to condition response Will know whether any issue in making progress is the likely result of Actions not taken Actions taken but expected outcome response not seen

Process for Developing the Management Strategies GIT funding for MS development and metric development 1 st stage – Gathering the Players Assigned to GIT/workgroup/Action Team (screen shot of org chart) – each with a chair, a coordinator, and a staffer. Letter from Secretary Gill as PSC Chair GIT expertise on identifying stakeholders Web process for self-identified stakeholders

Science, Technical Analysis, and Reporting Science, Technical Analysis, and Reporting Enhance Partnering, Leadership & Management Enhance Partnering, Leadership & Management Maintain Healthy Watersheds Maintain Healthy Watersheds Protect & Restore Water Quality Protect & Restore Water Quality Sustainable Fisheries Sustainable Fisheries Protect & Restore Vital Habitats Protect & Restore Vital Habitats Foster Stewardship Foster Stewardship Goal Implementation Teams Who is developing management strategies? Management Board Management Board Scientific & Technical Advisory Committee Scientific & Technical Advisory Committee Local Government Advisory Committee Local Government Advisory Committee Citizens’ Advisory Committee Citizens’ Advisory Committee Action Teams Chesapeake Executive Council Principals’ Staff Committee Chesapeake Executive Council Principals’ Staff Committee Communications Workgroup Communications Workgroup Workgroups Stakeholders

CBP Structure and Outcome Lead Placement Enhance Partnering, Leadership & Management Enhance Partnering, Leadership & Management Goal Implementation Teams Maintain Healthy Watersheds (Healthy Waters, **Land Use Methods & Metrics Development, Land Use Options Evaluation Outcomes) Maintain Healthy Watersheds (Healthy Waters, **Land Use Methods & Metrics Development, Land Use Options Evaluation Outcomes) Protect & Restore Water Quality (2017 WIP, 2025 WIP, WQ Standards Attachment and Monitoring Outcomes) Protect & Restore Water Quality (2017 WIP, 2025 WIP, WQ Standards Attachment and Monitoring Outcomes) Sustainable Fisheries Sustainable Fisheries Protect & Restore Vital Habitats Protect & Restore Vital Habitats Foster Chesapeake Stewardship Foster Chesapeake Stewardship Ches. Bay Stock Assessment Committee (Blue Crab Abundance, Blue Crab Management Outcomes) Ches. Bay Stock Assessment Committee (Blue Crab Abundance, Blue Crab Management Outcomes) Stream Health Workgroup (Stream Health, Brook Trout Outcomes) Fish Passage Workgroup (Fish Passage Outcome) Agriculture Workgroup Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Workgroup (SAV Outcome) Wetland Workgroup (Wetlands, Black Duck Outcomes) Forestry Workgroup (Forest Buffer, Tree Canopy Outcomes) **Land Use Workgroup Urban Stormwater Workgroup Wastewater Treatment Workgroup Watershed Technical Workgroup Decision Framework Implementation Workgroup Education Workgroup (Student, Sustainable Schools, Environmental Literacy Planning Outcomes) Public Access Planning Action Team (Public Access Site Development Outcome) Land Conservation Action Team (Protected Lands Outcome) Milestone Workgroup Trading and Offsets Workgroup Maryland and Virginia Interagency Oyster Teams (Oyster Outcome) Maryland and Virginia Interagency Oyster Teams (Oyster Outcome) Invasive Catfish Task Force Tracking Workgroup BMP Verification Committee Evaluator Function Workgroup Local Engagement Workgroup Fish Habitat Action Team (Fish Habitat Outcome) Fish Habitat Action Team (Fish Habitat Outcome) Toxics Contaminants Workgroup (Toxic Contaminants Research, Toxic Contaminants Policy and Prevention Outcomes) Citizen Stewardship Workgroup (Citizen Stewardship Outcome) Local Leadership Workgroup (Local Leadership Outcome) Forage Fish Action Team (Forage Fish Outcome) Forage Fish Action Team (Forage Fish Outcome) Science Technical Analysis and Reporting Science Technical Analysis and Reporting Modeling Workgroup Indicators Workgroup Analytical Methods & Quality Assurance Workgroup Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup Nontidal Water Quality Workgroup Criteria Assessment Protocol Workgroup Building and Sustaining Integrated Networks (BASIN) Climate Change Workgroup (Monitoring and Assessing, Adaptation Outcomes) Diversity Action Team (Diversity Outcome) Reports to MB **GIT4 to lead the Land Use Methods and Metrics MS with the assistance of the GIT3 Land Use Wkgrp. = new workgroup/action team

Goal Implementation Teams Sustainable Fisheries Vital Habitats Healthy Watersheds Water Quality MD & VA Interagency Oyster Teams (Oyster Outcome) Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Workgroup Local Engagement Workgroup Land Use Workgroup Workplan Management Strategy: Oyster Outcome Cross-team Collaboration and Multiple Benefits

OutcomeParticipating Jurisdictions/CBCParticipating Agencies Sustainable Fisheries Goal Blue Crab AbundanceMD, VA, CBCNOAA Blue Crab ManagementMD, VA, CBCNOAA OysterMD, VA, CBCNOAA, USACE, FWS Forage FishMD, VA, DC, PA, CBCNOAA,FWS Fish HabitatMD, VA, DC, DE, PA, NY, CBCNOAA, DOI (FWS/USGS), USACE, NRCS Vital Habitats Goal WetlandsMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, NY, CBCDOI (FWS/USGS), NOAA, EPA, USACE, NRCS Black DuckMD, DC, DE, VA, NY, CBCDOI (FWS/USGS), USACE, NRCS Stream HealthMD, DC, PA, VA, NY, DE, CBC,DOI (FWS/USGS), EPA, USACE, NPS, NRCS Brook TroutMD, PA, VA, NY, CBCDOI (FWS/USGS), NPS, FS, USACE, NRCS Fish PassageMD, PA, VA, CBCFWS, NOAA, USGS, USACE Submerged Aquatic VegetationMD, DC, VA, CBCFWS, EPA, USGS, USACE Forest BufferMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, WV, NY, CBCFS, EPA, FWS, NPS, NRCS, USACE, DoD Tree CanopyMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, WV, NY, CBCFS, NPS, DoD Water Quality Goal 2017 Watershed Implementation PlansMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, WV, NY, CBCEPA, DHS, USACE, NRCS, DoD 2025 WIPMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, WV, NY, CBCEPA, DHS, USACE, NRCS, DoD Water Quality Standards Attainment and MonitoringMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, WV, NY, CBCEPA, USGS Toxic Contaminants Goal Toxic Contaminant ResearchMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, WV, CBCDOI (USGS/FWS), EPA, DHS Toxic Contaminant Policy and PreventionMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, WV, NY, CBCEPA, NOAA, DHS, FWS Healthy Watersheds Goal Healthy Watersheds OutcomeMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, WV, NY, CBCEPA, DOI (USGS/FWS), NOAA, EPA, FS, USACE Stewardship Goal Citizen StewardshipMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, CBCNPS, NOAA, EPA, NPS, FWS Local LeadershipMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, CBCEPA, NOAA, EPA, USACE, NRCS, FWS DiversityMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, CBCEPA, DOI, NOAA, NRCS Land Conservation Goal Protected LandsMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, NY, CBCNPS, EPA, DOT, USGS, DoD, FS, NRCS, FWS Land Use Methods and Metrics DevelopmentMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, CBCUSGS, EPA, FWS Land Use Options EvaluationMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, CBCEPA, USGS, NRCS, FWS Public Access Goal Public Access Site DevelopmentMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, NY, CBCNPS, FWS Environmental Literacy StudentMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, CBCNOAA, DOI (FWS/NPS/USGS), EPA, FS Sustainable SchoolsMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, CBCNOAA, EPA Environmental Literacy PlanningMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, CBCNOAA, NPS, EPA Climate Resiliency Goal Monitoring and Assessment OutcomeMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, CBCDOI (USGS/FWS), NOAA, EPA, NPS, USACE AdaptationMD, DC, DE, PA, VA, NY, CBCUSACE, NOAA, FWS, EPA, DOT, DOI (FWS/NPS/USGS) Participation in Management Strategy Development – Signatory Reps

Participation in Management Strategy Development – Self-Identified Stakeholders

Management Strategy Meetings Calendar managementstrategies/baybriefmeetings

Process for Developing the Management Strategies 2 nd stage – Research/information collection - Each is slightly different. Where there is a lot of history with a particular outcome in the CBP partnership, often use more traditional established workgroups to get the work done (e.g. SAV) Where the MS requires more investment from stakeholders traditionally outside the CBP partnership (diversity, local leadership), more research and investment in up front understanding may be necessary (focus groups, workshops, etc) 3 rd stage – Writing – Who holds the pen? Who is involved? 4 th stage – Review – MB/public 5 th stage – Edit/improve/release “finalize”

Decision-Making Process OR, after substantial negotiations consensus can not be reached…

Tracking Progress chesapeakebay.net/ managementstrategies

Review and Adoption

Learn more at watershedagreement Join the discussions at managementstrategies