Overview HQMF Characteristics HQMF Structure and sections – About the ‘measure’ (MeasureAttributes) – Data Definitions – Logic Traditional usage in ‘quality’

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team December 13, 2013.
Advertisements

Query Health QRDA Requirements
1 HQMF Update Nov 7, HQMF Progression [2010] HQMF R1 [2011] eMIG-enhanced HQMF R1 [2012] QDM-based HQMF R1 + MAT (=MU2) [TBD] HQMF R2.1 [2013]
2014 Edition Release 2 EHR Certification Criteria Final Rule.
DR. CHRISTINA RUNDI MINISTRY OF HEALTH, MALAYSIA.
Result Status Relationships
Page 1 National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Program Management Systems Committee (PMSC). NDIA Earned Value Management Systems Intent Guide Overview.
Principles of Outbreak Management
Companion Guide to HL7 Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use Stage 2
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
S&I Data Provenance Initiative Presentation to the HITSC on Data Provenance September 10, 2014.
Azara Proprietary & Confidential Cervical Cancer Screening 2014 Measure Changes Improving Patient Outcomes through Data.
Use Case 16 Care Theme: Maternal & Newborn Health Use Case: Vital Registration and Care Coordination for Newborn Hearing Screening Primary Goal: Demonstrates.
Qualified Clinical Data Registries a Data Intermediary Model May 20, 2013 Data Intermediary Tiger Team.
Query Health Technical WG 8/2/2012. Agenda TopicTime Slot Announcements2:05 – 2:10 pm Specification, RI and Pilot Updates2:05 – 2:20 pm Comparison between.
Initial slides for Layered Service Architecture
Public Health Case Reporting Workflow Brief Profile Proposal for presented to the QRPH Planning Committee John P. Abellera, MPH September 29,
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Review of Population and Public Health Objectives Stage 3 MU
Method Validation and Verification: An Overview Patricia Hanson, Biological Administrator I Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Food.
Query Health Operations Workgroup HQMF & QRDA Query Format - Results Format February 9, :00am – 12:00am ET.
Query Health Technical WG 4/19/2012. Agenda TopicTime Slot Administrative stuff and reminders2:05 – 2:10 pm F2F Recap2:10 – 2:30 pm HQMF Translator UML2:30.
1 Health Level Seven (HL7) Report Out Population Science and Structured Documents Workgroup (SDWG) Riki Ohira September 22, 2011.
Query Health Distributed Population Queries Implementation Group Meeting October 25, 2011.
Interoperability Showcase In collaboration with IHE Use Case 3 Care Theme: Leveraging National Healthcare Registries in Care Delivery Biosurveillance Monitoring.
Query Health Concept-to-Codes (C2C) SWG Meeting #12 March 6,
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 6b EHR Functional Model Standards.
CDA State Pilot Project: Timeframe Nov-Dec 2011 – Recruitment and Pilot Design – DE (DHIN, DHIE, DPH) HAI reporting via NHSN (national health & safety.
1 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Current Framework and Fundamental Concepts  For those unfamiliar with the HITSP Harmonization Framework.
Data Segmentation for Privacy Agenda All-hands Workgroup Meeting May 9, 2012.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Public Health Reporting Initiative Stage 3 Sprint: Implementation Guide Development Phone: x
Us Case 5 Vital Registration and Care Coordination for Newborn Hearing Screening Care Theme: Maternal & Newborn Health Use Case 16 Interoperability Showcase.
6/4/2016 8:05 PM Healthcare Services Specification Project Decision Support Service (DSS) Overview and Areas of Active Discussion HL7 Clinical Decision.
Presented to: Verification and Validation Summit By: James Daum NextGen and Operations Planning Safety Manager AJP-1900 Date: November 05, 2009 Federal.
CDA State Pilot Project: Timeframe Nov-Dec 2011 – Recruitment and Pilot Design – DE (DHIN, DHIE, DPH) HAI reporting via NHSN (national health & safety.
PSO Common Formats for Patient Safety Event Reporting AHRQ Annual Conference 2008 William B Munier, MD, MBA 7 September 2008.
HL7 SDWG Topic October 29, 2015 David Tao.  HL7 Success! C-CDA 2.1 is cited, and Care Plan is in 2015 Edition Certification Final Rule  Common Clinical.
HeD Pilots Reportable Condition Knowledge Management System (RCKMS) CDC/CSTE/APHL S&I Framework October 11, 2011.
CDA State Pilot Project: Timeframe Nov-Dec 2011 – Recruitment and Pilot Design – DE (DHIN, DHIE, DPH) HAI reporting via NHSN (national health & safety.
Data Access Framework (DAF) Relationship to Other ONC Initiatives 1.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report on Gaps and Next Steps Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard Medical School.
Query Health Technical WG 6/14/2012. Agenda TopicTime Slot Announcements2:05 – 2:10 pm RI and Spec Updates2:05 – 2:10 pm QRDA Discussion2:10 – 3:00 pm.
Query Health Technical WG 5/10/2012. Agenda TopicTime Slot Administrative stuff and reminders2:05 – 2:10 pm RI and Spec Updates2:05 – 2:10 pm HQMF Consensus.
Primary Goal: To support case detection and investigation for the reportable infectious diseases (conditions) using electronic information exchanges between.
~ pertemuan 4 ~ Oleh: Ir. Abdul Hayat, MTI 20-Mar-2009 [Abdul Hayat, [4]Project Integration Management, Semester Genap 2008/2009] 1 PROJECT INTEGRATION.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Power Designer n See course web page for additional information on using Power Designer n Business rules – Come from a description of activities – Example.
Clinical Quality Workgroup April 10, 2014 Commenting on the ONC Voluntary 2015 Edition Proposed Rule Marjorie Rallins– co-chair Danny Rosenthal –co-chair.
QDM and vMR Harmonization. Background  Initial discussion at HL7 Working Group Meeting in January  Goal is to have one model for quality that can support.
CDA Overview HL7 CDA IHE Meeting, February 5, 2002 Slides from Liora Alschuler, alschuler.spinosa Co-chair HL7.
2016 MFRPS: Changes To Standard 10 Guy F. Delius, R. S. CSO Food and Drug Administration Office Of Partnerships Standards Implementation Staff February.
Case Study: HL7 Conformance in VA Imaging Mike Henderson Principal Consultant Eastern Informatics, Inc.
Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology Validation of Laika Usage Scenarios Dennis Wilson – Certification Technology Director, CCHIT.
© 2016 Chapter 6 Data Management Health Information Management Technology: An Applied Approach.
Outbreak Investigation
Monitoring and Evaluation: A Review of Terms
CDA State Pilot Project: Timeframe
HQMF Change Review Februrary 17th, 2017.
NYSDOH AIDS Institute Quality of Care Program eHIVQUAL
This is an archived document.
VSAC and Quality Measures
مدیریت داده ها و اطلاعات آزمایشگاه پزشکی
Metadata The metadata contains
, editor October 8, 2011 DRAFT-D
TRTR Briefing September 2013
Basic Data Provenance April 22, 2019
M & E Plans and Frameworks
Presentation transcript:

Overview HQMF Characteristics HQMF Structure and sections – About the ‘measure’ (MeasureAttributes) – Data Definitions – Logic Traditional usage in ‘quality’ – Numerator – Denominator – Exclusions (num, den)

Public Health eMeasure Framework Policy Development Policy eMeasure Specification Provider (EMR), Lab (LIMS), Information Exchange Analytics (HIE) Report Public Health Program Feedback

HQMF Characteristics Structured Documents – CDA Parent Not Patient-specific Written with Quality Measures in mind Human readable – Include measure attributes describing rule – Include data definitions – Include Reporting Requirements (Patient Population Rules) Machine Readable – Include data definitions – Include Reporting Requirements (Patient Population Rules) Can support expression of computable public health reporting requirements

HQMF Structure and sections Measure Information Measure Sets Pertussis Lab Pertussis Clinician Identifiers Titles Effective dates Available dates

HQMF Structure and sections About the ‘measure’ (MeasureAttributes) Author Verifier Description Measure type Guidance Measurement Period Transmission Format Notice of Use Topic Type

HQMF Structure and sections Data Definitions – Data definitions and logic for representing reporting criteria – Short name – Description Example: – "Laboratories: facilities that are permitted to perform laboratory analytical services" – "Isolation/detection of B. pertussis by culture: Isolation or detection of B. pertussis from any Culture method; and not preliminary results” – "Positive Bordetella pertussis Culture: Isolation of Bordetella pertussis from a clinical specimen" – "Positive B. pertussis by PCR: Positive B. pertussis nucleic acid by PCR" – "Positive B. Pertussis IgM by serology: Positive B. Pertussis IgM by serology" – "Positive B. Pertussis IgA by serology: Positive B. Pertussis IgA by serology" – "Positive B. Pertussis Ag by DFA: Positive B. Pertussis Ag by DFA" – "Care provided in Jurisdiction (Colorado): patient was treated by a provider in Colorado" – "Patient Resides in Jurisdiction(Colorado): patient lives in Colorado"

HQMF Structure and sections Population Criteria (Logic) – Combination logic describing a record of interest – Example AND: Laboratory AND: OR: Isolation/detection of B. pertussis by culture OR: Positive B. pertussis by PCR OR: Positive B. Pertussis IgM by serology OR: Positive B. Pertussis IgA by serology OR: Positive B. Pertussis Ag by DFA AND: OR: Patient Sought Care in Jurisdiction (Colorado) OR: Patient Resides in Jurisdiction(Colorado)

Ratio Measures (quality)

Table 1: Population Criteria Definitions for Proportional Measures PopulationDefinition Initial Patient Population (IPP ) All patients to be evaluated by a specific performance eMeasure who share a common set of specified characteristics within a specific measurement set to which a given measure belongs. Denominator (DENOM ) The same as the initial patient population or a subset of the initial patient population to further constrain the population for the purpose of the eMeasure. Denominator Exclusions (DENEX) Patients who should be removed from the eMeasure population and denominator before determining if numerator criteria are met. Denominator exclusions are used in proportion and ratio measures to help narrow the denominator. Numerator (NUMER) The processes or outcomes expected for each patient, procedure, or other unit of measurement defined in the denominator Of a proportion measure. Denominator Exceptions (EXCEP) Those conditions that should remove a patient, procedure, or unit of measurement from the denominator only if the numerator criteria are not met. Denominator exceptions allow for adjustment of the calculated score for those providers with higher risk populations.

Continuous Variable Measure

HQMF Examples HL7 Comments/Document update – Need 1 or more complete examples – Need to provide contextual examples throughout – Need to verify applicability to public health – Originally working with PHER for industry examples for each part of the document, but not as an integrated full example IHE PHrpt – Need examples – Need details for updated context

HQMF Implemented Sample Conditions NY Lead – demonstrates thresholds Tuberculosis – Aligns with PHDSC CDA for Public Health Pilot Pertussis – Aligns with PHDSC CDA for Public Health Pilot – Colorado Pertussis (was first available Pertussis) – Use case update for HIMSS – Atlas provisional HIMSS Public Health – San Diego Pertussis Report type of XD*Lab Report type of Pertussis CDA Case Report

HL7 HQMF Scoping and Additions Add capabilities for public health to express needs Base standard – does it prevent a public health requirement in the current standard Specifics of how to use HQMF for public health is an Implementation Guide or Profile Public Health ‘measure type’? – May be the same as a Continuous Variable Measure – Reporting criteria – Public Health ‘Policy’ descriptions – If a new measure type, it impacts several areas of HQMF draft

HQMF Public Health Profile or IG Typical Data Definitions – Measure Attributed Transmission Format – more structured – lab result Positive Result Preliminary/final Organism Result Susceptibility Method – Problems Suspected confirmed – Vaccine History Administration – Cause of Death Suspected confirmed – Jurisdiction – etc

Value Sets (pending in sample) – PHIN-VADS references (or example) – Embedded value set (examples) – Dynamic, Static references – Approaches for state vs national value set reference/maintenance Inheritance Subsets Extensions Drawn out example – Describe details of each section with PH example HQMF Public Health Profile or IG

Review Sample