Pharmacokinetics of Saquinavir hard gel (Invirase) when combined with Atazanavir 8.11 D Prelutsky 1, P Salvato 2, R Falcon 3 1. Washington University School.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Challenges to Pediatric Antiretroviral Treatment Elaine Abrams, David Hoos MTCT-Plus.
Advertisements

Daniel Everitt, MD; Erica Egizi MPH Global Alliance for TB Drug Development, New York Helen Winter, PhD University of Otago, New Zealand 2012 International.
VIREAD (Tenofovir DF) Update. Viread Update  Pharmacokinetics  Safety & Tolerability  Efficacy  Virology.
Antiretroviral Combinations James A Zachary MD LSU Health Sciences Center HIV Outpatient Clinic December 13, 2004
Ayurvedic Medicine Ayurveda, meaning “the science of life,” originated in India more than 5,000 years ago. Ayurveda describes the world as a system of.
Poster will be available at after September 10 th 2006 ABSTRACT AN2690 is a new novel antifungal being developed for the treatment of onychomycosis.
Background  Hypertrigliceridaemia is common in patients with HIV, especially those taking protease inhibitors (PIs) or with lipodystrophy.  Although,
Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy in Treatment-Naive Patients Charles B. Hicks, MD Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2013.
Salvage Antiretroviral Therapy Guiding Principles, Strategies and the Role of Resistance Testing.
Role of Antiretroviral Therapy, Viral Replication, and HIV Infection in Atherosclerosis Priscilla Y. Hsue, Peter W. Hunt, Jeffrey N. Martin, Amanda Schnell,
Clinical Pharmacology Overview From the Antiviral Perspective Kellie Schoolar Reynolds, Pharm.D. Pharmacokinetics Team Leader Office of Clinical Pharmacology.
Charge to the Committee Kimberly Struble, Pharm.D. Regulatory Review Officer Division of Antiviral Drug Products.
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
Assessing the Response to Hepatitis B Immunizations in HIV-Positive Adults: Results from the 550 Clinic cohort study Camila Calderon 1, Anupama Raghuram.
M Mirochnick 1, A Stek 2, EV Capparelli 3, B Best 3, D Holland 3, J Connor 3, SK Burchett 4, C Hu 5, E Smith 6, JS Read 7, and PACTG 1026s Protocol Team.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
BHIVA Clinical Audit Management of patients who switch therapy; re-audit of patients starting therapy from naïve.
The Immunologic Efficacy of Antiretroviral Therapy among HIV-infected Patients in North America and Africa Elvin Geng* 1, Eric Vittinghoff 1, Jean Nachega.
5th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy – Rome 2004 Posters - L. Akagi.
1 Review of Antiretroviral Therapy in Adults HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
Clinical Aspects of Treatment with Tipranavir Dr Kevin Curry Boehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.
Changes in Renal Function in Patients Treated with Tenofovir DF (TDF) Compared to Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs) Joel E. Gallant,
Generously supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Veteran Affairs, and National Institutes of Health,
TO EVALUATE EARLY ANTIVIRAL RESPONSE AND SAFETY OF A DUAL BOOSTED PROTEASE INHIBITORS REGIMEN INCLUDING LOPINAVIR/r (LPV) PLUS AMPRENAVIR (AMP) OR FORTOVASE.
Guidelines published as an update on 2003 guidelines. About 8-9 pages. New data only Guidelines published as an update on 2003 guidelines. About 8-9 pages.
INTRODUCTION Evaluation of Outcomes in Patients Starting Antiretroviral Therapy During Hospitalization Leigh E. Efird, PharmD 1, Manish Patel, PharmD 1,
The Positive Predictive Value of World Health Organization (WHO) Immunologic Criteria for Treatment Failure in a Public Health Antiretroviral Delivery.
HIV Principles in Primary Care and Triage of the HIV patient David Aymond, MD, AAHIVM.
Arnold School of Public Health Health Services, Policy, and Management 1 Drug Treatment Disparities Among African Americans Living with HIV/AIDS Carleen.
Immune Discordance on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy Can Still be Regarded as a Therapeutic Success Nur F. Önen MD, MRCP 1, Rachel Presti MD PhD.
Lipoatrophy and lipohypertrophy are independently associated with hypertension: the effect of lipoatrophy but not lipohypertrophy on hypertension is independent.
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
Update on HIV Therapy Elly T Katabira, FRCP Department of Medicine Makerere University Medical School Scaling up Treatment Programs: Issues, Challenges.
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Treatment- Experienced (TE) Patients Infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week Combined Analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 & 2 Studies.
The Effectiveness of generic Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy for the treatment of HIV infected Ugandan children Presenter: Linda Barlow-Mosha MD,
Poster # 873 *Sharon Nachman SUNY Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY Background: RAL is a potent selective HIV-1 integrase inhibitor.
1 The impact of ongoing illicit drug use on virologic suppression in HIV-infected injection drug users receiving HAART Authors: Harout Tossonian, Jesse.
Brett-Smith, ATAC, 2/24/02 Stavudine Extended Release (Zerit ® XR; d4T XR) Stavudine Prolonged Release Capsules ATAC Meeting 2/24/02.
GS-9350: A Pharmacoenhancer Without anti-HIV Activity AA Mathias, P German, M Lee, C Callebaut, L Xu, L Tsai, B Murray, H Liu, K Yale, D Warren and BP.
Reesink H, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/28/09.
12th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections February 22-25, 2005 Boston, Massachusetts, USA Poster No. 830 Hematological Benefit of Switching.
The effect of fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics, and safety of ivabradine in healthy subjects Adina Popa 1, Laurian Vlase 2, Maria Neag 3, Dana Muntean.
PO 2726; IAS; Vicriviroc (formerly SCH ): Antiviral Activity of a Potent New CCR5 Receptor Antagonist D. Schuermann, C. Pechardscheck, R. Rouzier,
Rivaroxaban Has Predictable Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) When Given Once or Twice Daily for the Treatment of Acute, Proximal Deep Vein.
Updated Results of a Phase I First-in-Human Study of the BCL-2 Inhibitor ABT-199 (GDC-0199) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic.
Overview of Drug Interactions Between Brecanavir (BCV) and Other HIV Protease Inhibitors (PIs) M Shelton, S Ford, M Anderson, S Murray, J Ng-Cashin XVI.
Serum levels of aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole, clinical response and side effects Linas Martinaitis Erasmus =)
DIONE – 24 week efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of DRV/r QD in treatment-naïve adolescents, 12 to
Treatment Failure HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
A Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Study of Drug-72 and Drug-12 Department of Mathematic & Statistics York University Yufeng Lin Xiaofeng Zhou.
Design of the RESIST Study Program Dr Kevin Curry Boehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.
1/11/01 Pediatric trials for ARV experienced children Coleen K. Cunningham Epidemiology of treatment experience in pediatrics How does the smaller number.
OUTCOME OF STAVUDINE INDUCED PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY IN HIV-1 POSITIVE PATIENTS SWITCHED OR SUBSTITUTED TO A NON-STAVUDINE- BASED REGIMEN Dr P Gorejena-Chidawanyika.
Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Low-Frequency HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations and.
Copyright © 2008 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analyses for Raltegravir.
Slideset on: Gathe J, da Silva BA, Cohen DE, et al. A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen is noninferior to twice-daily dosing and results in.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
First-Line Treatment of HIV Infection With Either NNRTI- or PI-Based Regimens Effective for Long-term Disease Control Slideset on: MacArthur RD, Novak.
Genotype-directed dosing for Efavirenz
Treatment-Naïve Adults
undetectable (undetectable-6.25)
Treatment of Latent TB Infection (LTBI)
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients ASTRAL-5
Atazanavir + ritonavir vs. Lopinavir-ritonavir CASTLE Study
St Stephen’s Centre, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, United Kingdom
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION
Presentation transcript:

Pharmacokinetics of Saquinavir hard gel (Invirase) when combined with Atazanavir 8.11 D Prelutsky 1, P Salvato 2, R Falcon 3 1. Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; 2. Diversified Medical Practices, Houston, TX, USA; 3. Roche Laboratories, Nutley, NJ, USA Background: Previous studies have demonstrated similar Mean C min values when Invirase or SQV soft gel (Fortovase) is boosted with Ritonavir 1,2. This has lead to increased interest in Invirase as the preferred formulation due to better tolerability. The pharmacokinetics of Atazanavir (ATV) with Fortovase have recently been described in healthy volunteers, showing a significant boosting effect of Atazanavir on Fortovase 3. Little is known about the pharmacokinetics of Atazanavir combined with Invirase in HIV-Infected adults. Methods: We are reporting a multi-center, observational study of 12 HIV infected patients taking varying doses of Invirase with 400mg of Atazanavir once daily with food. Doses of Invirase included 600mg TID, 1200mg QD, and 1600mg QD. Results: N=12, all male, mean age was 42 years, all prior antiretroviral treatment experienced. Mean CD4 88 (range zero-244). The Mean and Median C min levels for patients taking 1200mg Invirase QD were 309 and 250ng/ml respectively. With a dose of Invirase 600mg TID, we observed 143 and 160ng/ml for Mean and Median C min values. Patients receiving 1600mg Invirase QD had Mean and Median C min values of 153 and 120ng/ml. Conclusions: In this limited observational study, Invirase, when given with Atazanavir, resulted in C min levels which indicate that Atazanavir acts as a significant pharmacokinetic booster of Invirase. 7 of 11 patients achieved a C min level above the EC 50 of SQV of 50ng/ml. Formal PK studies will need to evaluate the optimal dose for the combination of Atazanavir with Saquinavir hard gel (Invirase). Abstract The use of protease inhibitors (PI) has evolved since their introduction. Commonly, protease inhibitors are pharmacokinetically boosted by coadministration with a cytochrome p450 cyp 3A4 inhibitor like Ritonavir. This combination leads to increases in PI exposure and T ½, allowing for more effective therapy with more convenient dosing. Ritonavir, while an effective boosting agent, has been associated with side effects such as hyperlipidemias and GI intolerance. Atazanavir is a new PI which is currently under review for market approval by health authorities. Atazanavir has shown the ability to boost Saquinavir soft gel (Fortovase) levels 5 to 6-fold when coadministered in healthy volunteers 3. O’Mara demonstrated C max, AUC and C min levels of 6589ng/ml, ng●hr/ml and 92ng/ml for healthy subjects taking Fortovase 1600mg with Atazanavir 400mg both dosed once daily. No data has ben published on the interaction of Saquinavir hard gel (Invirase) with Atazanavir or the interaction of Atazanavir with Saquinavir in HIV-infected patients. When boosting with Ritonavir, previous studies 1,2 have demonstrated similar Mean C min values when Saquinavir hard gel (Invirase) or Saquinavir soft gel (Fortovase) is given. This has lead to increased interest in Invirase as the preferred formulation due to better GI tolerability, smaller tablet size and easier storage. Background Methods PatientgenderAge (years) Baseline at initiation of ATV CD4 (cells/ml)HIV-RNA (copies/ml) St. Louis 1Male ,000 2Male ,000 3Male4264> 750,000 4Male41125> 750,000 5Male ,000 6Male521899,740 Houston 7Male3718> 750,000 8Male ,000 9Male417038,500 10Male ,000 11Male ,000 12Male360531,250 Table 1: Baseline Characteristics Due to the paucity of data of this combination therapy in HIV infected individuals, random C min Saquinavir levels were obtained in 4 patients at the St. Louis site. Significant inter-patient variability was observed. Adherence was assessed by patient interview and felt to be appropriate. Table 2: Saquinavir-hgc (Invirase) random pre-dose C min levels PatientATZ400 & SQV1200 mg qd 1700 ng/ml 2300 ng/ml 3200 ng/ml 438 ng/ml Median 250 ng/ml Mean 309 ng/ml In follow up, some patients were evaluated more comprehensively with Saquinavir C max levels drawn 3 hours after an observed dose, followed by C min levels 24 hours after the observed dose. PatientDose C max, drawn 3 hours post DOT dose C min, dawn 24 hours post DOT dose 1 ATZ 400 & SQV1200 mg qd 630 ng/ml<25 ng/ml* 2 ATZ 400 & SQV1200 mg qd 2200 ng/ml70 ng/ml 3 ATZ 400 & SQV1200 mg qd 547 ng/ml348 ng/ml 5 ATZ 400 & SQV1200 mg qd 50 ng/ml60 ng/ml 6 ATZ 400 & SQV1600 mg qd 993 ng/ml45 ng/ml Median 630 ng/ml Mean 884 ng/ml Median 60 ng/ml Mean 105 ng/ml Table 3: Patients with C min and C max values during directly observed (DOT) dosing cycle *: value counted as 0 ng/ml for statistical analysis At the Houston site of this observational study, several patients had initiated treatment with Atazanavir 400mg qd & Saquinavir hard gel (Invirase) 600mg tid. C min Saquinavir levels were assessed. For patient convenience the dose of Saquinavir was switched to 1600mg once daily and C min levels were repeated after at least 14 days on the new therapy. Table 4: Saquinavir-hgc (Invirase) pre dose C min levels Patient ATZ 400mg qd & SQV 600mg tid ATZ 400 & SQV 1600 mg qd 7180 ng/ml143 ng/ml 8160 ng/ml97 ng/ml 989 ng/ml298 ng/ml ng/mlnot available 1189 ng/ml23 ng/ml ** 12Not drawn74 ng/ml Median 160 ng/ml Mean 143 ng/ml Median 120 ng/ml Mean 153 ng/ml While the results of this observational study give an initial impression of the interaction of Atazanavir with Saquinavir hard gel (Invirase), drug levels obtained in routine patient care settings may be influenced by multiple factors including adherence, incorrect timing of dose and lack of standardized food intake. In addition the levels reported here were obtained from more than one laboratory. Limitations Conclusions In this limited observational study, Invirase, when given with Atazanavir, resulted in C min levels, which indicate that Atazanavir acts as a significant pharmacokinetic booster of Invirase. 7 of 11 patients achieved a C min level above the EC 50 for SQV of 50ng/ml. Formal PK studies are needed to further characterize the interaction between Invirase and Atazanavir. Does the boosting effect of Atazanavir on Saquinavir hard gel (Invirase) differ from the boosting effect on Saquinavir soft gel (Fortovase)? – Our data does not allow for a direct answer of this question. The interaction of Atazanavir and Fortovase was evaluated in formal PK in healthy individuals 3, while our data with Invirase was obtained in routine care settings in HIV-infected individuals. – Nevertheless the Saquinavir levels achieved in this cohort are significantly higher than those achieved by Invirase alone, supporting the claim of Atazanavir being a significant booster for Invirase. Formal PK studies will need to evaluate the optimal dose for the combination of Atazanavir with Saquinavir hard gel (Invirase) 1.The 9 th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (Abstract S29e). Seattle. Feb 24-28, The 3 rd International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy (Abstract MoPp B2007). Washington DC. April The 7 th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (Abstract 504). San Francisco, CA. Jan 30 - Feb 2, References Contact Ron Falcon MD Roche Laboratories Inc. 340 Kingsland Street Nutley, NJ USA **: drawn late at 29 hours post dose. Value censored for statistical analysis     Multi-center, observational study of 12 HIV infected patients, taking varying doses of Invirase with 400mg of Atazanavir once daily with food, along with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Patients on concomitant NNRTI therapy were excluded. Drug levels were obtained as part of routine medical care in HIV specialized care facilities in St. Louis and Houston, USA. All patients had been on therapy at least 14 days, ensuring levels were obtained at steady state. In some patients levels were repeated. For some levels, the medication dose was taken as observed therapy (DOT), followed by 3 hour post dose Cmax and 24 hour post dose Cmin levels. The St. Louis site used Quest diagnostics and Specialty labs. The Houston site used TDM labs The 4 th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy