IPILIMUMAB UPDATE. Current Status GLOBAL STUDY –17 COUNTRIES : NORTH AMERICA, EU, AUSTRALIA –Canada 6 sites PATIENTS ENROLLED (as of May 19, 2009 9:20.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

Immune therapy in NSCLC Presentation – 劉惠文 Supervisor – 劉俊煌教授.
Chemotherapy Prolongs Survival for Isolated Local or Regional Recurrence of Breast Cancer: The CALOR Trial (Chemotherapy as Adjuvant for Locally Recurrent.
Facon T et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 2.
Efficacy and Safety of Three Bortezomib-Based Combinations in Elderly, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results from All Randomized Patients.
Should BRAF inhibitors be continued ‘beyond progression’? Is there a rationale for discontinuous dosing of BRAF inhibitors? Is there a rationale for alternation.
Modified Megestrol The Clinical Trials by : Carolina R. Akib
Robertson JFR et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(27):
Fabio Puglisi Dipartimento di Oncologia Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Udine Antiangiogenic Treatment Mediterranean School of Oncology.
1Stopeck A et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
The Effect of Zoledronic Acid (ZOL) on Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Bone Loss in Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Letrozole:
HERA: KEY DESIGN ELEMENTS, RESULTS AND FUTURE PLANS NSABP 17 SEPTEMBER 2005 Brian Leyland-Jones Minda De Gunzberg Professor of Oncology, McGill University,
Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma O’Day S et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 4. Hodi FS et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract.
Cabozantinib (XL184) in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): Results from a Phase II Randomized Discontinuation Trial Hussain M et.
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
Herceptin ® : leading the way in metastatic breast cancer care Steffen Kahlert.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
11 One vs Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor A Randomized Trial Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al.
NHL13: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study of Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment versus Observation Alone in Patients with Aggressive B ‐ Cell Lymphoma.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
CheckMate 025: A randomized, open-label, phase III study of nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma Padmanee Sharma, Bernard Escudier,
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
Two Year Estimate of Overall Survival in COMBI-v, a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Combination of Dabrafenib and Trametinib With Vemurafenib.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
Final Analysis of Overall Survival for the Phase III CONFIRM Trial: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg Di Leo A et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-4.
Improved Survival in Patients with First Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Treated with Vosaroxin plus Cytarabine versus Placebo plus.
Extended adjuvant treatment with anastrozole: results from the ABCSG Trial 6a R Jakesz, H Samonigg, R Greil, M Gnant, M Schmid, W Kwasny, E Kubista, B.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Cortés J et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster Discussion)
SNDA Letrozole (Femara®) Indication: First-line therapy in post- menopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Prior approval: Second-line therapy.
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
A Phase 1 Study of the Selective Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Delta (PI3Kδ) Inhibitor, Idelalisib (GS- 1101) in Combination with Rituximab and/or Bendamustine.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
S1207: Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients.
Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis of the IFM Trial Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Phase II Trial of Ipilimumab Monotherapy in Melanoma Patients with Brain Metastases Lawrence DP et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8523.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Surgery of colorectal metastasis in the Optimox 1 study. A GERCOR Study. N. Perez-Staub, G. Lledo, F. Paye, B. Gayet, M. Flesch, A. Cervantes, A. Figer,
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
Everolimus for Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors N Engl J Med 2011;364: R4. 박선희 / Prof. 동석호.
Phase I/II CheckMate 032: Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Advanced SCLC
Belani CP et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract CRA8000. (Oral Presentation)
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Statistical Considerations for Safety Assessment in Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Andrew Lloyd Biometrics Manager PSI Conference May 2017.
Pazopanib: the role in the treatment of mRCC
1 Stone RM et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 6.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 200.
A Single-Arm Phase IIIb Study of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab with a Taxane as First-Line Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dex vs High-Dose Dex in Rel/Ref Myeloma
Phase III Trial (MPACT) of Weekly nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Influence of Prognostic Factors of Survival J Tabernero,
Slide set on: McCarthy PL, Owzar K, Hofmeister CC, et al
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
CheckMate 204: Nivolumab + Ipilimumab in Pts With Advanced Melanoma and Asymptomatic, Untreated Brain Metastases CCO Independent Conference Highlights*
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Domenica 03 giugno Highlight a cura di Filippo de Marinis
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
Forero-Torres A et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 3711.
Adjuvant Therapy in Melanoma
Ipilimumab plus Dacarbazine for Previously Untreated Metastatic Melanoma1 Phase 3 Randomized Study of Ipilimumab (IPI) plus Dacarbazine (DTIC) vs DTIC.
Presentation transcript:

IPILIMUMAB UPDATE

Current Status GLOBAL STUDY –17 COUNTRIES : NORTH AMERICA, EU, AUSTRALIA –Canada 6 sites PATIENTS ENROLLED (as of May 19, :20 am EST) GlobalCanada –91 Enrolled1 Enrolled –23 Screen Failures1 Screen Failure –57 Randomized0 Randomized

Immune Modulation Via Anti-CTLA-4 Antigen-release From Cancer Cells APC CD28 TCR B7-1,2 Peptide/MHC Tumor CTLA-4 Attenuated or Terminated Proliferation APC IL-2 Unrestrained Proliferation Courtesy of Jim Allison ipilimuamb T cell

Benefit : Risk Study CA CA (N=217) 10 mg/kg (N=72) 3 mg/kg (N=72) 0.3 mg/kg (N=73) BORR a (95% CI) 11.1% (4.9, 20.7) 4.2% (0.9, 11.7) 0 Overall Survival, median months 11.0 (6.9, NR) 8.7 (6.9, 12.1) 8.6 (7.4, 13.0) Overall irAE rate70%65%26% Grade3/4 irAE rate25%7%0 Drug-related Deaths (<70 days)000 a Trend test: statistically significant trend (P = ) indicating a dose effect in favor of 10 mg/kg, which was influenced by the large difference between 10 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg.

Integrated Response Data Independent Radiologist Assessment (n=227) 21 patients (9.3%) had PR after PD diagnosis at Week 12 Studies CA and CA mg/kg only (N=227) Best overall response rate7.5 % Disease control rate, 27.8 % Best overall response, n (%) Complete response Partial response Stable disease Progressive disease Unknown 2 (0.9) 15 (6.6) 46 (20.3) 123 (54.2) 41 (18.1)

Ipilimumab and Comprehensive Historical Data:Survival at 1 Year Historical (42 Phase 2 Trials, N=2100): Korn EL, et al. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008;26: *CA : pretreated population 10mg/kg + placebo (N=25): Median OS 14.8 mo. ( ), 1-y survival 50.8% ( )

SAFETY

irAE = any adverse event associated with drug exposure and consistent with an immune mechanism after disease progression, infections etc are ruled out or deemed unlikely as contributing to the event Immune in nature and presumably a consequence of the intrinsic biological activity of ipilimumab. Supportive data, (autoimmune serology tests, biopsies): helpful but not necessary to deem an event an irAE What is an immune related AE?

Most frequent immune related AE 4 main categories of irAEs at the program wide level –Skin events: Rash/pruritis –GI events: Diarrhea –Hepatotoxicity –Endocrinopathy Algorithms for patient management are available for PIs and site personal

Safety and Tolerability of 10mg/kg (N=325) Drug-related adverse events (AEs) in 84.6% of patients –32.6% were Grade 3/4/5 Immune-related AEs (irAEs) in 72.3% of patients –25.2% were Grade 3/4 and occurred in 4 main types Gastrointestinal (12.3%); Liver (6.8%); Skin (2.8 %); Endocrine (2.5%) Complications: ~1% 5 deaths were considered at least possibly related to treatment –4 immune-related: multi-organ failure, hypovolemic shock, abnormal hepatic function, and acute glomerulonephritis –1 not immune-related: acute myeloid leukemia

Summary - safety Patient education is very important Most drug-related AEs were consistent with immune- mediated events and likely related to the drug irAEs were manageable and generally reversible within 2–6 weeks Complications were rare Management algorithms are effective in controlling adverse events and avoiding complications (e.g. perforation)

Time to onset of irAEs Median time to onset, weeks (n, 95% CI) TypeGrade 2-5Grade 3-5 Skin 3.6 (61, 3.1–4.1) 4.4 (9, 3.1–4.4) GI 6.6 (76, 5.1–8.0) 6.9 (40, 5.7–8.9) Liver 6.7 (23, 6.1–9.3) 6.7 (23, 6.1–9.7) Endocrine9.2 (16, 6.7–11.1) 10.1 (8, 7.0–11.4) Lebbé, C et al. Perspectives in Melanoma XII 2008; Abstract O-015.

Time to Resolution Grade 2-4 irAEs – 10 mg/kg Monotherapy 10mg/kg treated subjects Censored Monotherapy 10mg/kg treated subjects Censored Median: 2.29 weeks Median: 4.00 weeks Median: 20.1 weeks GILiver Endocrine Median: 6.14 weeks Skin Proportion not resolved Subjects at risk no Tx 10mg/kg Monotherapy 10mg/kg treated subjects Censored Week Monotherapy 10mg/kg treated subjects Censored Proportion not resolved Subjects at risk no Tx 10mg/kg Week Proportion not resolved Week Week Lebbé, C et al. Perspectives in Melanoma XII 2008; Abstract O-015.

Safety surveillance Review safety lab data before treatment Continue irAEs monitoring At the patient level Stringent treatment discontinuation guidelines Patient education on irAEs is a must Early diagnosis and prompt treatment is the key to control irAEs Treatment of an irAE per algorithm is highly recommended irAE low grade vigilance In some cases low dose steroids irAE high grade Vigilance, some cases hospitalization Most cases require high dose steroids Seeking specialist consult is highly recommended

Ipilimumab in the Adjuvant Setting PROTOCOL : CA

Primary: Recurrence*-free survival Secondary: –Overall survival –Distant metastases-free survival –Adverse event profile –Quality of life –Quality-of-life-adjusted-survival * Recurrence: Appearance of one or more new melanoma lesions: local, regional or distant Key Safety and Efficacy Variables

Stratification factors: Stage Region ( Region (North America, Europe, Australia)

≥ 18 years with complete and adequate resection of Stage III melanoma –Histological confirmed cutaneous melanoma, metastatic to lymph node –Stage IIIA (if N1a, at least 1 metastasis > 1mm); any Stage IIIB or IIIC –No in-transit metastases/Satellite metastases –No mucosal/ocular or melanoma of unknown origin –Documented disease-free (operating report or pathology report) –Full lymphadenectomy must be performed within 12 weeks prior to randomization. ** Specifications for the management of lymph nodes are in Appendix J of the protocol. –No prior therapy for melanoma except surgery –No non-oncology vaccines can be used 4 weeks prior or after any dose of study drug –No autoimmune disease. *Patients with vitiligo are eligible Patient Selection Criteria

Trial design (before treatment)

RANDOMIZATIONRANDOMIZATION W E E K 12 ENDOFTREATMENT ENDOFTREATMENT INDUCTION PHASE 1 administration every 21 days D1, D22, D43, D64 MAINTENANCE PHASE 1 administration every 12 wks up to 3 years or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal Trial design (treatment)...

ENDOFTREATMENT ENDOFTREATMENT FOLLOW UP Every 12 wks up to 3 yrs or distant progression then every 24 wks Trial design (follow up)...

Treatment Withdrawal: Patients will discontinue treatment and move to Follow-up Phase in the event of: –Recurrence (local, regional or distant metastases) –A major protocol violation (impact patient safety) –Unacceptable toxicity or an Adverse Event that is possibly, probably, or certainly related to treatment and meets one of the criteria that is listed in the protocol, sections 5.6.3, or –When in the Investigators opinion it is in the best interest of the subject –Treatment refusal or pregnancy –Unblinding

1.Institutional standard of care 2.Is the placebo arm justified? 3.Satellite Mets 4.melanoma of unknown primary 5.Prior radiotherapy 6.Safety profile 7.Others? 1 Lens M, J of Clin Onc, 2002 MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS “group discussion”

Satellite Mets

THANK YOU