1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I K. PreliminaryNegotiations © F.H. Buckley

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I VI. Acceptance F.H. Buckley
Advertisements

The Essentials of Contract Law
E- CONTRACTING MIDTERM(2). Definition E- Contract- a contract that is entered into in cyberspace and is evidenced only by electronic impulses (such as.
Options and Rejections Contracts – Prof Merges
Mutual Consideration ● 9-1 What is Consideration? ● 9-2 Legal Value and Bargained-For Exchange ● 9-3 When is Consideration Not Required?
Agreement and Consideration in Contracts Chapter 7.
Pre-K Liability 2 Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 28, 2011.
PROMISSORY LIABILITY CREATING LIABILITY FOR PROMISE Mutual Assent Reliance Benefit Conferred + Promise Offer Acceptance Consideration Promissory Estoppel.
Reliance Contracts – Prof. Merges Sept. 8, Ricketts v. Scothorn.
Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany CONTEMPORARY BUSINESS AND ONLINE COMMERCE LAW 6 th Edition.
Chapter 9 Nature of Traditional and Online Contracts
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
Chapter 6 Contracts: Nature, Classification, Agreement and Consideration.
P A R T P A R T Contracts Introduction to Contracts The Agreement: Offer The Agreement: Acceptance Consideration Reality of Consent 3 McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I XII. PreliminaryNegotiations © F.H. Buckley
Business Law II Professor Pamela Gershuny Fall 2011.
CHAPTERCHAPTER McGraw-Hill/Irwin©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Acceptance THREETHREE.
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Relational Contracts I F.H. Buckley
Topic II Contract Formation Topics A-D. Requisites for Contract Formation [A] contract requires a bargain in which there is a manifestation of mutual.
Contracts: Concepts, Terms, and the Agreement
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 12: Consideration
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I XI.Irrevocable Offers F.H. Buckley
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I M.Indefinite Agreements F.H. Buckley
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I F.Offer and Acceptance F.H. Buckley
Formation of the Contract ----How the UCC changes the common law.
Offer and Acceptance Chapter 6. Because of its limited resources the court system is very selective in what it will enforce. Criminal laws and laws allowing.
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley
Introduction to Contracts. “The whole duty of government is to prevent crime and to preserve contracts.” Lord Melbourne, British Prime Minister.
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I J.Irrevocable Offers F.H. Buckley
Introduction to Contracts Chapter 8. Definition of Contract A contract is a promise or a set of promises for the breach of which the law gives a remedy.
Agreement By Dhoni Yusra. Introduction Contracts are voluntary agreements between the parties. One party makes an offer that is accepted by the other.
Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany CONTEMPORARY BUSINESS AND ONLINE COMMERCE LAW 6 th Edition.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 10 Agreement Chapter 10 Agreement.
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I P.Contract Modification F.H. Buckley
Nature and Terminology and Agreement in Traditional and E- Contracts Chapter 11 & 12.
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I XX.Contract Modification F.H. Buckley
COPYRIGHT © 2011 South-Western/Cengage Learning. 1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears,
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I J.Irrevocable Offers F.H. Buckley
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I P. Contract Modification F.H. Buckley
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I K. PreliminaryNegotiations © F.H. Buckley
By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I M.Indefinite Agreements F.H. Buckley
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. HOFFMAN v. RED OWL STORES, INC. 26 Wis.2d 683, 133 N.W.2d 267 (1965) Case Brief.
© 2011 South-Western | Cengage Learning GOALS LESSON 2.1 CONTRACT LAW BASICS Name the six essential elements of a legally enforceable contract Identify.
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I XIV.Indefinite Agreements F.H. Buckley
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 NATURE OF TRADITIONAL AND E-CONTRACTS © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. and the Legal Environment, 10 th edition by Richard.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. and the Legal Environment, 10 th edition by Richard.
9 - 1 Contracts Contracts Introduction Contracts are the basis of many daily activities. They provide the means for individuals and businesses.
2/7/2006Class 131 Class 13, Tuesday, Feb. 7 Announcements Thursday Friday240-54, incl. Problem 3-4 Today’s agenda Incomplete bargaining Walker v.
CREATION OF OFFERS Chapter 6-1. Contract Generally defined as agreements between two or more parties that create obligations.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. and the Legal Environment, 10 th edition by Richard.
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 10: Mutual Assent By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 AGREEMENT © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall CHAPTER 10.
Contract Law for Paralegals: Traditional and E-Contracts © 2009 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All rights reserved Nature of Traditional.
Chapter 12: Consideration
Chapter 11 Consideration
George Mason School of Law
Chapter 9 Nature of Traditional and E-Contracts
Chapter 4 Contractual Rights and Obligations
George Mason School of Law
George Mason School of Law
George Mason School of Law
George Mason School of Law
George Mason School of Law
George Mason School of Law
George Mason School of Law
NATURE OF TRADITIONAL AND
Chapter 9 Nature of Traditional and E-Contracts
Presentation transcript:

1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I K. PreliminaryNegotiations © F.H. Buckley

Relational Contracts  Should different principles apply when business parties propose to enter into a long-term relationship? 2

Relational Contracts  Should different principles apply when business parties propose to enter into a long-term relationship? Corporations Business Corporations Act Non-profit Corporations Act Close Corporations Act 3

Relational Contracts  Should different principles apply when business parties propose to enter into a long-term relationship? Partnerships Act 4

Relational Contracts  But generally no statutory default rules for contractual arrangements  Joint ventures  Distributorships  Long-term supply and requirements contracts  Employment Contracts  Franchise Laws 5

Some History: Legal Realism 6 The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience

Legal Realism 7 Roscoe Pound Louis Brandeis

Legal Realism 8  Use insights from other disciplines (“Law and …”)  The decline of law as an autonomous subject  An instrumental view of the law

Legal Realism and Contract Law 9  Look at how people bargain in fact Ian MacNeil (“the MacNeil”)

Relational contracts as different in kind from one-shot transactions 1.Relations are seen as semi-permanent 10

Relational contracts as different in kind from one-shot transactions 1.Relations are seen as semi-permanent 2.A lengthier process of negotiation where it may be difficult to identity the moment at which contractual duties arise 1.The preliminary agreement problem 11

Relational contracts as different in kind from one-shot transactions 1.Relations are seen as semi-permanent 2.A lengthier process of negotiation where it may be difficult to identity the moment at which contractual duties arise 3.The object of exchange is not easily quantified 12

Relational contracts as different in kind from one-shot transactions 1.Relations are seen as semi-permanent 2.A lengthier process of negotiation where it may be difficult to identity the moment at which contractual duties arise 3.The object of exchange is not easily quantified 4.Trust becomes more important 13

14 CooperateDefect Cooperate3 Defect40 Player 1 Relational vs One-short Contracts Defection dominates in one-shot bargains 

15 CooperateDefect Cooperate34 Defect0 Player 2   Relational vs One-short Contracts Defection dominates in one-shot bargains

16 But what about Iterated PD Games?  Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation (1984) Tit-for-tat as a dominant strategy for iterated PD games  Telser, A Theory of Self-enforcing agreements, 53 J. Bus. 27 (1980) 16

Preliminary Agreements How deals begin… 17

Preliminary Agreements Assume both parties sign the following:  “This letter is to memorialize our agreement in which you will ship 1,000 widgets from Los Angeles to my address by Monday next for $5,000.” A binding contract? Can the court gap-fill any missing terms? 18

Preliminary Agreements  Restatement § 33(2) The terms of a contract are reasonably certain if they provide a basis for determining the existence of a breach and for giving an appropriate remedy. 19

Preliminary Agreements  What if important terms are left out but the parties specify: “This constitutes a binding contract between us” 20

Preliminary Agreements  Restatement § 33(1) Even though a manifestation of intention is intended to be understood as an offer, it cannot be accepted so as to form a contract unless the terms of the contract are reasonably certain. 21

Preliminary Agreements  Restatement § 33(3) The fact that one or more terms of a proposed bargain are left open or uncertain may show that a manifestation of intention is not intended to be understood as an offer or as an acceptance. 22

Preliminary Agreements  What if they add: “No binding contract between us will exist until we have executed a final agreement”? 23

Preliminary Agreements  §21. INTENTION TO BE LEGALLY BOUND. Neither real nor apparent intention that a promise be legally binding is essential to the formation of a contract, but a manifestation of intention that a promise shall not affect legal relations may prevent the formation of a contract. 24

Preliminary Agreements  What if they add: “We agree that this letter agreement will be reduced to a binding definitive agreement”? Recall Ciaramella (220) and Adjustrite (228) 25

Preliminary Agreements  Restatement § 26. PRELIMINARY NEGOTIATIONS. A manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain is not an offer if the person to whom it is addressed knows or has reason to know that the person making it does not intend to conclude a bargain until he has made a further manifestation of assent. 26

Preliminary Agreements  Restatement § 27. Manifestations of assent that are in themselves sufficient to conclude a contract will not be prevented from so operating by the fact that the parties also manifest an intention to prepare and adopt a written memorial thereof, but the circumstances may show that the agreements are preliminary negotiations. 27

Coley v. Lang at

Coley v. Lang at 284 Lang shares 29 Coley IAS Inc. Asset sale to IASCO (old IAS shareholders)

Coley v. Lang at 284  What in Heaven’s name was the purpose of the deal? 30

Coley v. Lang  The Deal… On or before [17 days later] this letter agreement will be reduced to a definitive agreement binding upon all of the parties Until then Coley can bid on behalf of IAS [?] 31

Coley v. Lang  The Deal… Did the parties intend that the contract would be binding as of Sept. 1? 32

Coley v. Lang  The Deal… Can you think of a reason why Coley might have wanted out? 33

Coley v. Lang  The Deal… Does the court have enough information about the details of the deal to award specific performance?  What was missing? 34

Coley v. Lang  Did the parties intend this to be binding? “reduced to a definitive agreement” Elmore v. Parish on “agreements to agree” Leval good faith duties? 35

Coley v. Lang  Is this a suitable case for promissory estoppel? 36

Coley v. Lang  Is this a suitable case for promissory estoppel? No “definite and substantial” reliance over 18 days? 37

Coley v. Lang  Qu. the current version of Restatement § 90(1) A promise which the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance on the part of the promisee or a third person and which does induce such action or forbearance is binding if injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise. The remedy granted for breach may be limited as justice requires. 38

Coley v. Lang  Supposing you didn’t want litigation. How would you draft the agreement if you don’t want a binding contract? 39

Coley v. Lang  Supposing you didn’t want litigation. How would you draft the agreement if you don’t want a binding contract? The parties understand that this is not a binding agreement and that no liability will arise until a definitive agreement is signed. 40

Coley v. Lang  Supposing you didn’t want litigation. How would you draft the agreement if you don’t want a binding contract? The parties understand that this is not a binding agreement and that no liability will arise until a definitive agreement is signed.  Restatement § 21: “a manifestation of intention that a promise shall not affect legal relations may prevent the formation of a contract.” 41

Coley v. Lang  Supposing you didn’t want litigation. How would you draft the agreement if you want a binding contract? 42

Coley v. Lang  Supposing you didn’t want litigation. How would you draft the agreement if you want a binding contract? The parties understand that this is a binding agreement and that failure to sign a definitive agreement will give rise to liability. 43

Coley v. Lang  Supposing you didn’t want litigation. How would you draft the agreement if you want a binding contract? (2)The parties understand that this is a binding agreement and that failure to sign a definitive agreement will give rise to liability.  Restatement § 27 44

Coley v. Lang  Restatement § 27. Manifestations of assent that are in themselves sufficient to conclude a contract will not be prevented from so operating by the fact that the parties also manifest an intention to prepare and adopt a written memorial thereof, but the circumstances may show that the agreements are preliminary negotiations. 45

Coley v. Lang  Which term would the client want and why? 46