1 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 European Society of Cardiology Congress 2012 Munich,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
V.: 9/7/2007 AC Submit1 Statistical Review of the Observational Studies of Aprotinin Safety Part I: Methods, Mangano and Karkouti Studies CRDAC and DSaRM.
Advertisements

Percutaneous Therapy of Pulmonic and Mitral Valve Disease Atman P. Shah MD FACC FSCAI Director, Coronary Care Unit Assistant Professor of Medicine The.
Steroids In caRdiac Surgery (SIRS) Trial
Widimsky P, Tousek P, Rokyta R, et al. Charles University Prague, CZ PRAGUE-7 Study (Hot Lines presenter)
STS 2015 John V. Conte, MD Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators Transcatheter Aortic.
ACC 2015 Michael J Reardon, MD, FACC On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators A Randomized Comparison of Self-expanding Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic.
Long-Term Outcomes Using a Self- Expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Deemed Extreme Risk for Surgery: Two-Year Results From.
SURGICAL ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION DURING MITRAL VALVE SURGERY THE CARDIOTHORACIC SURGICAL TRIALS NETWORK Marc Gillinov, M.D. For the CTSN Investigators.
Preliminary results from the C-Pulse OPTIONS HF European Multicenter Post-Market Study Holger Hotz, CardioCentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Antonia Schulz,
Between May 2013 and June 2014, we implanted the C-Pulse device in 7 male and 1 female patients with a mean age ± SD of 61.1 ± 9.4 years. Four had ischemic.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs. Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions Julinda Mehilli,
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
University Heart Center Hamburg
Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients Assessment.
Author Disclosures Differences in Implantation-Related Adverse Events Between Men and Women Receiving ICD Therapy for Primary Prevention Differences in.
The Use of Thoracic Endovascular Stent Grafting in Acute Aortic Tragedies as Compared to Open Surgical Repair Tyler J. Wallen, BA, Wilson Y. Szeto, MD,
The Risk and Extent of Neurological Events Are Equivalent for High-Risk Patients Treated With Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Thomas.
Randomized Trial of Ea rly S urgery Versus Conventional Treatment for Infective E ndocarditis (EASE) Duk-Hyun Kang, MD, PhD on behalf of The EASE Trial.
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis George L. Zorn, III.
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany Sabine Bleiziffer German Heart Center, Munich, Germany Johan Bosmans University Hospital.
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Saibal Kar, MD, FACC
The Studies of Oral Enoximone Therapy in Advanced Heart Failure ESSENTIALESSENTIAL Presented at The European Society of Cardiology Congress 2005 Presented.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
ADAPT-DES One-Year Results Assessment of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy with Drug-Eluting Stents A Large-Scale, Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study.
UC c EN. Through Medtronic sponsored research, the Transcatheter Aortic Valves clinical portfolio is studying over 11,000 subjects at over 125.
Martin B. Leon, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Investigators TCT 2010; Washington, DC; September 23, 2010 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Inoperable.
EVEREST II Study Design Multicenter Randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either percutaneous or conventional surgery for the repair or replacement of the mitral.
Perindopril Remodeling in Elderly with Acute Myocardial Infarction PREAMIPREAMI Presented at The European Society of Cardiology Hot Line Session, September.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
Date of download: 7/6/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Interventions in the Real.
Longest Follow-up After Implantation of a Self-Expanding Repositionable Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Final Follow-up of the Evolut R CE Study Stephen Brecker,
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest
Issues and Current Situations in the Development of Endovascular Treatment Devices for Pediatric Cardiology in the US – US Industry Dan Gutfinger, MD,
Patients at intermediate surgical risk undergoing isolated interventional or surgical aortic valve replacement for severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.
Device Navigation Leaflet Capture Distal tip Saddle CAUTION: Investigational Device Limited by Federal (United States) Law to Investigational Use.
Role of Device Therapy in FMR: Challenges and Opportunities
Highlights From the SAPIEN 3 Experience in Intermediate-Risk Patients Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Trial Investigators Professor.
on behalf of the EVEREST Investigators
David M Kaye MD, PhD on behalf of the REDUCE LAP HF Investigators
Raj R. Makkar, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Updates From NOTION: The First All-Comer TAVR Trial
A report from the STS/ACC TVT Registry
Final Five-Year Follow-up of the SYNTAX Trial: Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Patients With Three-Vessel Disease and/or Left Main Disease Patrick.
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis Description: The goal of the trial was to assess.
MedStar Washington Hospital Center Cardiac Catheterization Conference
University of Cincinnati Medical Center
First Report of Three-Year Outcomes With the Repositionable and Fully Retrievable Lotus™ Aortic Valve Replacement System: Results From the REPRISE I.
TAVI Passed the Exam and is Ready for Clinical Use in Inoperable Patients Disclosures Research Funding and Speaking Honoraria: Edwards Lifesciences.
Giuseppe Tarantini MD, PhD
Washington Hospital Center
The Impact of Live Case Transmission on Patient Outcomes during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results from the VERITAS Study Dr. Ron Waksman.
Early Feasibility Studies Investigator Perspective
EVEREST II 5-Year Report and Beyond
Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
Technology Update and Status of Current Clinical Trials
University Heart Center Hamburg
S.G. Worthley, MB, BS, PhD., S. Redwood, MD, PhD.,
Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Valve System : OUS Data
TRANSCATHETER MITRAL VALVE IMPLANTATION FOR SEVERE MITRAL REGURGITATION: THE TENDYNE GLOBAL FEASIBILITY TRIAL 1 YEAR OUTCOMES David WM Muller, MBBS,
MitraClip: A Therapeutic Solution for Patients with Severe MR – Not a Candidate for Surgery Brij Maini MD, FACC Regional Medical Director of Transcatheter.
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
Cardiovacular Research Technologies
The following slides highlight a presentation at the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials session of the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November.
Samir R. Kapadia, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Five-Year Outcomes after Randomization to Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Final Results of The PARTNER 1 Trial Michael J. Mack, MD.
Transcatheter versus medical treatment of symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation: a propensity score matched analysis Maurizio Taramasso MD, PhD from.
Presentation transcript:

1 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 European Society of Cardiology Congress 2012 Munich, Germany ACCESS-EUROPE Phase I A Post Market Study of the MitraClip System for the Treatment of Significant Mitral Regurgitation in Europe: Analysis of Outcomes at 1 Year Wolfgang Schillinger, MD on behalf of the ACCESS EU investigators ACCESS-EUROPE Phase I A Post Market Study of the MitraClip System for the Treatment of Significant Mitral Regurgitation in Europe: Analysis of Outcomes at 1 Year Wolfgang Schillinger, MD on behalf of the ACCESS EU investigators

2 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below. Affiliation/Financial RelationshipCompany Consulting Fees/HonorariaAbbott Vascular Abiomed AstraZeneca Edwards Lifesciences Servier St. Jude Medical

3 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair MitraClip ® System

4 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 MitraClip Therapy Worldwide Clinical Experience  Over 6,000 patients have been treated with the MitraClip device worldwide: 75% are considered high risk* for mitral valve surgery 67% have functional mitral regurgitation (MR)  1,905 patients have been enrolled in prospective clinical trials worldwide: 50% are considered high risk* for mitral valve surgery 60% have functional MR Estimates of worldwide clinical experience as of 7/20/2012. *Determination of high surgical risk based on: logistic EuroSCORE ≥ 20%, or STS calculated mortality ≥ 12%, or pre-specified high surgical risk co-morbidities specified in EVEREST II High Risk Study protocol.

5 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 Introduction  The ACCESS-EUROPE (ACCESS-EU) Study is a two-phase prospective, observational, multicenter, post-approval study of the MitraClip ® System for the treatment of significant MR ACCESS-EU Phase I enrollment started on October 2, 2008 and closed on April 13, The last follow-up occurred on June 15, ACCESS-EU Phase II was initiated on September 15, 2011

6 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 Purpose  To present 1-year outcomes in patients with significant MR treated with the MitraClip device in the ACCESS-EU Phase I Trial  To highlight data, including: Procedural and 30 day safety 1-year outcomes –Kaplan-Meier freedom from death –MR, NYHA Functional Class and QOL (MLWHF) –6 Minute Walk distance

7 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 Enrolling Centers: ACCESS EU Phase I 14 centers have enrolled MitraClip patients Enrolling CenterPrincipal Investigator UKE, HamburgDr. Baldus, Dr. Treede Universitätsmedizin, GöttingenDr. Schillinger Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, HamburgDr. Schäfer Krankenhaus Bernau, BrandenburgDr. Butter Deutsches Herzzentrum, MunichDr. Hausleiter Ospedale Ferrarato, CataniaDr. Ussia San Raffaele, MilanDr. Maisano CardioVasculares Centrum St. Katharinen, FrankfurtDr. Sievert Rigshospital, CopenhagenDr. Soendergaard, Dr. Franzen Segeberger Kliniken GmbH, Bad SegebergDr. Richardt Cardiocentro Ticino, LuganoDr. Mocceti Medizinische Hochschule, HannoverDr. Klein Universitätsklinikum, AachenDr. Hoffmann Herzzentrum, LeipzigDr. Thiele

8 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 Patient Accountability MitraClip Patients Treated in ACCESS-EU N = 567 N = 22 Data not available N = 45 Withdrawals 1-year follow-up complete 86% patient data available Discharge N = 551 N = 3 Data not available N = 13 Withdrawals 1 Year Follow-up N = 487

9 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 Baseline Demographics and Co-Morbidities Demographics and Co-morbidities EVEREST II RCT Device Patients N=178 EVEREST II High Surgical Risk Cohort N=211 ACCESS EU – MitraClip Patients N=567 Age (mean ± SD), years67 ± 1376 ± 1074 ± 10 Logistic EuroSCORE, (%) Mean ± SDNA 23 ± 18 Logistic EuroSCORE ≥ 20%, (%)NA 45 STS Mortality Risk, (%) Mean ± SD5 ± 412 ± 8NA STS Mortality Risk ≥ 12%, (%)648NA Male Gender, (%) Coronary Artery Disease, (%) Previous Cardiovascular Surgery, (%) Myocardial Infarction, (%) Cerebrovascular Disease, (%)82113 Moderate to Severe Renal Failure, (%)33142 Atrial Fibrillation, (%) NYHA Functional Class III or IV, (%)508685

10 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 Baseline Demographics and Co-Morbidities Demographics and Co-morbidities EVEREST II RCT Device Patients N=178 EVEREST II High Surgical Risk Cohort N=211 ACCESS EU – MitraClip Patients N=567 Mitral Regurgitation Grade ≥ 3+, (%) Ejection Fraction < 40%, (%)62853 Functional MR, (%) IschemicNA 42 Non-ischemicNA 58 Degenerative MR, (%)732923

11 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 MitraClip Implant Rate and Number of Clips Implanted 99.6% Implant Rate N=567

12 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 Post-Procedure and Discharge Results Post-Procedural and Discharge Results ACCESS EU – MitraClip Patients N=567 * Post-procedural, (median) ICU/CCU duration, (days)1.0 Length of hospital stay, (days)6.0 Discharge to, (%) Home with or without home health care79.6% (448/563) Skilled nursing facility / Hospital17.1% (96/563) Nursing home1.4% (8/563) Died prior to discharge2.0% (11/563) * Denominators smaller than 567 reflect missing data.

13 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 Site Reported Safety Events At 30 Days 1-Year Events* All Patients N=567 Logistic EuroSCORE ≥20% N=253 Logistic EuroSCORE <20% N=314 p-value Death19 (3.4%)11 (4.3%)8 (2.5%)ns Stroke4 (0.7%)3 (1.2%)1 (0.3%)ns Myocardial Infarction 4 (0.7%)2 (0.8%)2 (0.6%)ns Renal Failure27 (4.8%)16 (6.3%)11 (3.5%)ns Respiratory Failure4 (0.7%)3 (1.2%)1 (0.3%)ns Need for Resuscitation 10 (1.8%)7 (2.8%)3 (1.0%)ns Cardiac Tamponade6 (1.1%)3 (1.2%)3 (1.0%)ns Bleeding Complications 22 (3.9%)12 (4.7%)10 (3.2%)ns * As reported by the sites

14 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 Kaplan-Meier Freedom from Death At Risk0 Day30 Days180 Days360 Days All Patients Logistic EuroSCORE <20% Logistic EuroSCORE ≥20% Days 97.4% 95.6% 96.6% 1 Year 86.4% 76.3% 81.8% Logistic EuroSCORE <20% (N=314) Logistic EuroSCORE ≥20% (N=253) All Patients (N=567) p<0.05

15 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 Site Reported Safety Events At 1 Year 1-Year Events* All Patients N=567 Logistic EuroSCORE ≥20% N=253 Logistic EuroSCORE <20% N=314 p-value Death98 (17.3%)58 (22.9%)40 (12.7%)<0.05 Stroke6 (1.1%)4 (1.6%)2 (0.6%)ns Myocardial Infarction 8 (1.4%)5 (2.0%)3 (1.0%)ns Renal Failure49 (8.6%)29 (11.5%)20 (6.4%)<0.05 Respiratory Failure5 (0.9%)4 (1.6%)1 (0.3%)ns Need for Resuscitation 12 (2.1%)9 (3.6%)3 (1.0%)<0.05 Cardiac Tamponade7 (1.2%)4 (1.6%)3 (1.0%)ns Bleeding Complications 27 (4.8%)16 (6.3%)11 (3.5%)ns * As reported by the sites

16 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 Mitral Regurgitation Grade * * As assessed by the sites N = 327 Matched Cases 79% MR ≤ 2+ at 1 Year p<0.0001

17 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 NYHA Functional Class 72% NYHA Class I or II at 1 Year N = 343 Matched Cases II III IV II III IV I I p<0.0001

18 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 Quality of Life Score (MLHFQ) and 6-Minute Walk Distance Baseline1 Year N = 264 Matched Cases Mean improvement points 95% CI: (-16.0, ) p< MLHFQ Baseline1 Year p< N = 216 Matched Cases Mean improvement 59.5 meters 95% CI: (44.5, 74.6) 6MWT

19 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012  Patients treated in the ACCESS-EU study were elderly, symptomatic and had multiple major co-morbidities, indicating the high risk nature of this patient population.  A high device implant success and a low rate of a procedural safety events demonstrate that the MitraClip device can be performed safely in this complex patient population.  ACCESS-EU 1-year results show that the MitraClip device safely reduces MR and provides meaningful clinical benefits, including significant improvements in: −NYHA Functional Class −Quality-of-Life (MLHFQ) −Six-Minute Walk Distance Summary

20 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012  The MitraClip procedure provides significant clinical benefits to patients with severe MR in a real world setting consistent with results in controlled clinical trials.  The MitraClip therapy therefore provides a treatment option for a patient population with an important unmet clinical need. Conclusion