Post-Resection CA 19-9 Predicts Overall Survival in Patients Treated with Adjuvant Chemoradiation; RTOG 9704 A. Berger, K. Winter, J. Hoffman, W. Regine,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IN THE NAME OF GOD. Outcomes after resection of locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy The American Journal.
Advertisements

First Efficacy Results of a Randomized, Open- Label, Phase III Study of Adjuvant Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide, Followed by Docetaxel with or without.
DEBATE: What is the Optimal Sequence of Therapies for Stage II-III Adenocarcinoma of the Proximal Stomach? Michael A. Choti, MD Department of Surgery UT.
Management of Pancreato- biliary Malignancy: Medical Oncology Perspective Robert A. Wolff, MD Professor of Medicine Department of GI Medical Oncology.
Controversies in Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer Parag Sanghvi M.D. Tasha McDonald M.D. Department of Radiation Medicine OHSU.
ANDREW NG PRINCE OF WALES HOSPITAL Role of primary chemoradiation in esophageal carcinoma.
Anal Cancer Rob Glynne-Jones Mount Vernon Cancer Centre on behalf of NCRI anal cancer subgroup.
Postoperative Radiation for Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The EP.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Key issues in trial design.
Hot topics in breast radiotherapy Mark Beresford.
References 1.Salazar R, Roepman P, Capella G et al. Gene expression signature to improve prognosis prediction of stage II and III colorectal cancer. J.
Pulmonary Metastasis From Osteosarcoma Multi-factorial analysis of survival at first lung involvement Ali Aljubran, Martin Blackstein for the University.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Intergroup trial CALGB 80101
Surrogate Endpoints and Correlative Outcomes Hem/Onc Journal Club January 9, 2009.
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Toxicity of Sparing Radiation to the Pathologic N0 Side of the Neck in Squamous Cell.
Adjuvant Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer in 2009: Where Are We?
Oxaliplatin/5FU/LV in adjuvant colon cancer: Updated efficacy results of the MOSAIC trial, including survival, with a median follow-up.
Phase II Trial of Continuous Course Re- irradiation Concurrent with Weekly Cisplatinum and Cetuximab for Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of The Head.
Discussion abstracts Alberto Sobrero MD Ospedale San Martino Genoa, Italy.
Pancreatic Cancer Ali Shamseddine MD Proessor of Medicine AUBMC
Background  Reports of long-term survivors (≥5 years) of locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) have focused mainly on HRQL or GI symptoms  Only.
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
11 One vs Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor A Randomized Trial Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al.
Metastatic Unresectable, not metastatic Resectable Treatment Pathways for Carcinoma of the Pancreas.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
CJ Allegra, G Yothers, MJ O’Connell, MS Roh, RW Beart, NJ Petrelli, S Lopa, S Sharif, and N Wolmark Neoadjuvant Therapy For Rectal Cancer: Mature Results.
THE OUTBACK TRIAL A Phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiation as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer compared.
Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Best of ASCO Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Ali Shamseddine, MD Professor of Medicine Head of Hematology/Oncology.
Local recurrence after rectal cancer resection is strongly related to the plane of surgical (PoS) dissection and is further reduced by pre-operative short.
Extended adjuvant treatment with anastrozole: results from the ABCSG Trial 6a R Jakesz, H Samonigg, R Greil, M Gnant, M Schmid, W Kwasny, E Kubista, B.
RADIOTHERAPYin VULVAR CANCER 2013 ANZGOG Kailash Narayan.
Background Carcinoma of the anal canal accounts for 1.5% of all digestive system malignancies in the United States. 1 The annual incidence continues to.
Correlation of Hand-Foot Skin Reaction (HFS) with Treatment Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer (PC) Patients (pts) Treated with Gemcitabine/Capecitabine plus.
‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial: Completed Treatment Analysis.
Pre-Operative Therapy for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: The Potential Role of Chemotherapy Robert A. Wolff, M.D. Associate Professor of Medicine.
Poster # 18, abstract # 4530 Long term results of a phase III study investigating chemoradiation with and without surgery in locally advanced squamous.
Preliminary Results of the MRC CR07 / NCIC CO16 Randomized Trial Short course pre-op vs selective post-op chemo-RT for rectal cancer Local Recurrence after.
Journal Club Dr. Eyad Al-Saeed Radiation Oncology 12 January, 2008.
Identification of localized rectal cancer (RC) patients (pts) who may NOT require preoperative (preop) chemoradiation (CRT). D. Roda 1, M. Frasson 2, E.
What Factors Predict Outcome At Relapse After Previous Esophagectomy And Adjuvant Therapy in High-Risk Esophageal Cancer? Edward Yu 1, Patricia Tai 5,
CCO Independent Conference Coverage*: The 2015 Annual Meeting of the CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 8-12, 2015 San Antonio, Texas.
D2 Lymphadenectomy Alone or with Para-aortic Nodal Dissection for Gastric Cancer NEJM July vol 359 R2 임규성.
Ο ρόλος των μη χειρουργικών θεραπειών στο μη μεταστατικό μυοδιηθητικό καρκίνο ουροδόχου κύστεως Γεώργιος Δ. Λύπας Παθολόγος Ογκολόγος Α’ Ογκολογική Κλινική.
DEPT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY Prognostic Value of Post-Radiotherapy FDG PET in Head and Neck Cancer after Intensity Modulated Radiation Treatment Heming Lu.
Adjuvant autologous renal tumour cell vaccine and risk of tumour progression in patients with renal- cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy: phase III,
Phase II HALO-202: nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine ± PEGPH20 in Untreated Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma CCO Independent Conference Highlights*
R. Michelle Sarin, MD Mentor: Jeffrey Fowler, MD
Aspirin Associated With Reduced Mortality in Patients With CRC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
Phase III Trial (MPACT) of Weekly nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Influence of Prognostic Factors of Survival J Tabernero,
Treatment With Continuous, Hyperfractionated, Accelerated Radiotherapy (CHART) For Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): The Weston Park Hospital Experience.
ASCO Recap Palak Desai, MD.
ESPAC-4: Adjuvant Gemcitabine/ Capecitabine Improves 5-Yr Survival vs Gemcitabine Alone in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma CCO Independent Conference.
Prognosis of younger patients in non-small cell lung cancer
A U.S. GI INTERGROUP TRIAL
Tertiary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer:
Benefits of switching postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer to anastrozole after 2 years adjuvant tamoxifen: Combined results.
NSABP Protocol C-08 Ming He MD.
Improved survival outcomes after resection of ductal adenocarcinoma in the body and tail of the pancreas: A single center 10 years’ experience Seong.
Untch M et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Jordan Berlin Co-Director, GI Oncology Program
Adjuvant Radiation is Required for Gastric Cancer
MJ O’Connell for the ACCENT Collaborative Group
ACT II: The Second UK Phase III Anal Cancer Trial
Alan P. Venook, MD University of California, SF
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
RTOG 9704: A Phase III Study of Adjuvant Pre and Post Chemoradiation 5-FU vs. Gemcitabine for Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma A U.S. GI INTERGROUP.
Presentation transcript:

Post-Resection CA 19-9 Predicts Overall Survival in Patients Treated with Adjuvant Chemoradiation; RTOG 9704 A. Berger, K. Winter, J. Hoffman, W. Regine, R. Abrams, H. Safran, A. Konski, A Benson III, J. MacDonald, and C. Willet

CA 19-9 Most important tumor marker for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Serum levels are an important predictor of recurrence and survival after resection. It is also related to Lewis blood group determinants. Pancreatic cancer patients with a Lewis negative (a-, b-) phenotype will have undetectable CA 19-9 levels. This phenotype is thought to occur in 10-15% of the population.

Impact of Post-operative CA 19-9 Levels In a study of 40 patients from FCCC, Montgomery et al determined that using a serum CA 19-9 cutoff value of 180 U/ml in the 1 to 3 month post-operative period was one of the most important determinants of survival and recurrence. They demonstrated that patients with a value >180 U/ml had a median survival of 13 months compared to 34 months for those with CA 19-9 ≤180 U/ml. This study eliminated those patients (n=8) with an undetectable CA 19-9 level. In a study by Berger et al, the median survival of 7 resected patients with undetectable CA 19-9 levels was 32 months. Montgomery AnnSurgOnc, 1997. Berger AnnSurgOnc, 2004.

RTOG 9704 538 patients entered over 4 year period with 451 analyzable. Largest adjuvant chemoradiation trial ever performed in pancreatic cancer. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Results presented at ASCO and ASTRO 2006 (manuscript submitted). Patients with pancreatic head tumors experienced improved survival. Secondary endpoints included an analysis of the prognostic significance post-operative CA 19-9 levels.

SCHEMA RANDO STRAT M I I Z FY E ARM 1: Pre-CRT 5-FU ARM 2: Pre-CRT GEM + Chemoradiation Post CRT 5-FU Nodal Status Neg. vs. Pos Tumor Diameter <3cm vs. ≥3cm Surgical Margins Pos. vs. Neg. vs. Unknown ARM 2: Pre-CRT GEM + Chemoradiation Post CRT GEM

TREATMENT Pre-CRT Chemotherapy: Starting 3-8 weeks after definitive tumor-related surgery: Arm 1: 3 weeks of continuous infusion (CI) 5-FU at 250 mg/m2/day. Arm 2: Gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m2, weekly x 3. Chemoradiation (CRT): Starting 1-2 weeks after completion of pre-CRT chemotherapy: Arms 1 & 2: 50.4 Gy @ 1.8 Gy/fx for 5.5 weeks and CI 5-FU, 250 mg/m2/day, during XRT. Post-CRT Chemotherapy: Starting 3-5 weeks after CRT: Arm 1: 3 months of CI 5-FU [(4 wks on + 2 wks off) x 2]. Arm 2: 3 months of Gemcitabine [(3 wks on + 1 wk off) x 3].

CA 19-9 Testing Red cell phenotyping for Lewis Ag a and b were performed—if both were negative, the patient was considered Lewis Ag negative and assigned a CA 19-9 level of zero. All other patients had serum sent to central laboratory for CA 19-9 determination. 385 patients had analyzable CA 19-9 levels that met protocol eligibility; 66 patients had levels which could not be determined. Analysis was performed for all patients (n=385), patients with pancreatic head tumors (n=335), and for patients with non-head tumors (n=50).

Table 1—Baseline Demographics Gender n % Male 225 58 Female 160 42 Primary Tumor Location Head 335 87 Everything Else 50 13 N-Stage N0 127 33 N1 258 67 AJCC Stage (5th Edition) Stage I 47 12 Stage II 71 18 Stage III 233 61 Stage IV A 34 9 Surgical Margins R0 154 40 R1 133 35 Unknown 98 25 Race White 339 88 African American 23 6 Other CA 19-9 (U/ml) ≤180 220 57 >180 Lewis Antigen Negative 132

RESULTS There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics by CA 19-9 level except that CA 19-9 levels >180 were associated with larger tumors (p=0.048). There were no significant differences in overall survival between ≤ 180 and undetectable groups. 97% of patients with CA 19-9 >180 were dead at last follow-up while 74% were dead in the <180 group. Median survival in >180 group was ~9 months, while in ≤ 180 group, it was ~21 months. 3-year survival by CA 19-9 group— Undetectable=24% ≤ 180=30% >180=≤9%

Table 2—Multivariate Analysis Overall Survival Adjustment Variables Adjusted HR p-value Treatment (Gem vs. 5-FU) 1.23 (0.97, 1.54) 0.08 CA19-9 <180 vs. ≥ 180 <180 vs. Lewis Antigen Negative 3.58 (2.40, 5.34) 1.12 (0.87, 1.44) <0.0001 0.37 Nodal Involvement (No vs. Yes) 1.46 (1.13, 1.89) 0.004 Tumor Diameter (<3 vs. ≥ 3cm) 1.07 (0.83, 1.37) 0.60 Surgical Margin Status Negative vs. Positive Negative vs. Unknown 1.24 (0.94, 1.63) 0.96 (0.71, 1.30) 0.13 0.78

Figure 1—Survival Curve for all patients by CA 19-9 grouping Lewis Antigen Negative CA19-9 ≥ 180 Lewis Antigen Negative p = 0.25 CA19-9 ≥ 180 p = < 0.0001 Patients at Risk CA19-9 < 180 Lewis Antigen Neg. CA19-9 ≥ 180 220 132 33 164 94 10 93 46 3 56 29 39 21 22 10

SUMMARY A post-resection CA 19-9 level ≤ 180 U/ml corresponds to a 72% reduction in death in all patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer compared to patients with CA 19-9 > 180 U/ml. This is independent of treatment, margin status, size of primary tumor, and nodal involvement. Post-resection CA 19-9 was a prognostic factor in all patient groups (all, head only, non-head lesions) with HR of 3.58, 3.52, and 4.61, respectively. The incidence of Lewis Antigen negative patients (34%) may be higher than previously thought; these patients have survival which is comparable to patients with CA 19-9 levels ≤180 U/ml.

CONCLUSIONS Post-resection CA 19-9 is an important prognostic factor in patients undergoing adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients with post-resection CA 19-9 levels >180 U/ml have a very poor survival (median=9 months). These patients should be considered for additional/prolonged chemotherapy.