Personalized Learning The next step on the path towards maximizing our students’ potential!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CASS Network of 21 st Century School Systems Rocky View School Division – February 15,2011.
Advertisements

Understanding the Six Types of Family Involvement
 A strategic plan is a guiding document for an organization. It clarifies organizational priorities, goals and desired outcomes.  For the SRCS school.
Parents as Partners in Education
Recognizing Educational Success, Professional Excellence and Collaborative Teaching The Case for RESPECT.
Department of Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction Kahle Charles, Director of Curriculum.
Determining CLIMASP Competencies Jerash University Development of Interdisciplinary Program on Climate Change and Sustainability Policy- CLIMASP Development.
Partnership Next Generation Learning for. Will Discuss ~ Why Do We Need to Move to Next Generation Learning? What is Next Generation Learning? What is.
Virginia M. Barry, Ph.D., NH Commissioner of Education, welcomed conference participants.
THE BASICS OF FLEXIBLE CREDIT FOR OHIO’S STUDENTS Jim Harbuck October 4, 2010.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Scaling Innovations and Leading Change toward Systems of Personalized Learning Kentucky Valley Education Cooperative Gene Wilhoit, Executive Director Center.
LEARNING FOR THE 21st CENTURY
Transition from Cradle to College and Career Mary N. Watson, Director Exceptional Children Division NC Department of Public Instruction.
A New Assessment for English Language Learners TESOL K-12 Dream Day March 26, 2014.
BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT 1. Opportunities to strengthen existing school partnerships for student achievement WELCOME & SESSION OVERVIEW.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE SESSION STEM Education: Communication Tools and Collaboration Opportunities May 20, /20/11Superintendents Community of Practice.
A Framework for Change Next Generation Leadership Academy Lexington, Kentucky 12 September 2013 Gene Wilhoit Executive Director.
Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.
Rethinking Computers and Instruction.  2007 report released by ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education).  Indicates ALL students, regardless.
Public Forum School District No. 78 (Fraser-Cascade) April/May 2011.
Partnership for 21 st Century Skills (P21) 21 st Century Citizenship February 28, 2013.
WEST VIRGINIA SUPERINTENDENTS’ LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE National perspective on education reform Gene Wilhoit CCSSO June 24, 2010.
How to Frame an Ed.D. Program The following are a set of examples of how programs can be framed to make them unique and focused around the values of the.
What will learning look like in the future?. Why should the future look different? Movie: Learning to change, changing to learn “For the last 100 years.
West Sound STEM Network Working Together to Improve STEM Learning.
1 Facilitating a Transformation in Education Dialogue on Leadership Dr.Garry McKinnon October 9, 2013.
The College Board Standards for College Success CCSSO – SEC State Collaborative Alignment Study CCSSO-SEC Meeting and Content Analysis Workshop San Diego,
Early Learning: Status and Way Forward Introduction to the Conference.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
  “The Common Core State Standards are an example of states recognizing a problem, then working together, sharing what works and what doesn’t.” - Former.
 Members did online research  Members visited other schools  Members listened to kids  Members listened to parents  Members discussed what we want.
Common Core State Standards Where we are as a district and as a state 1.
Orientation to the Self-Assessment Process in Head Start.
A Focus on Health and Wellbeing Wendy Halliday Learning and Teaching Scotland.
Gene Wilhoit, Executive Director Center for Innovation in Education Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board Retreat July 21, 2014.
Presented to: [District] Staff DATE RECOGNIZING EDUCATOR EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Put Your Classroom On A 21 st Century DI-IT Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated Classroom Environments Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated.
Ken Skrzesz, Coordinator of Fine Arts All Rights Reserved, Kenneth Skrzesz, 2015.
Title I Parent Meeting Statesville Road Elementary 22 August 2014.
November 30, 2015 Discussion Draft. Beginning with the End in Mind.
Curriculum for Excellence Health and Wellbeing. Purpose of this session  To present key aspects of Health and Wellbeing in Curriculum for Excellence.
Welsh Baccalaureate Key information.
21 st Century Skills for Education Leaders: How do we prepare our students for the new global economy? Partnership for 21 st Century Skills Teaching &
Carmen Coleman Center for Innovation in Education Next Generation Leadership Academy 23 July 2015.
Implementation of Competency Education in K12 Systems Insights from Local Leaders November 8, 2015 iNACOL Symposium Pre-Conference Workshop.
Building The Next Phase in Ontario’s Education Strategy. “Great to Excellent” Building The Next Phase in Ontario’s Education Strategy “Great to Excellent”
21 st Century Skills and Mathematics: Preparing Every Child for the 21st Century ASSM 2009 Annual Meeting.
Re-Envisioning Teacher Preparation to Meet the Expectations of Tomorrow Gene R. Carter March 30, 2012.
_Macros Learning in the 21st Century Learning in the 21 st Century – Students as Self-Directed and Self-Assessing Learners PowerPoint Slides at.
Part I “Many Voices, One Vision. Colchester Schools.”
Carmen Coleman, Center for Innovation in Education, UKY Jean Garrity, Institute for Personalized Learning, WI Adriana Martinez, Council of Chief State.
Family Engagement Framework Vicki Myers, Ph.D. Special Assistant Family and Community Engagement Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Monique Toussaint.
Universal Design for Learning in Public Policy. The National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard NIMAS (2006) A harbinger of the future.
“Technology Integration for the New 21 st Century Learner” Presentation by: Tyler Hensley.
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
Planning Effective 1. 2 The elements of an effective lesson design is a rich learning experience for to begin with understanding where they need to go.
The Iowa Journey toward CBE Sandra Dop, PhD, Consultant for 21 st Century Skills Iowa ASCD Conference June 27, 2013 IOWA Department of Education.
October 20, 2010 Niagara Falls. 2 Personalized Learning A Vision for the 21st Century.
Orientation to the Self-Assessment Process in Head Start.
Education Transform Resources
The Dual Capacity-building Framework for Family-School Partnerships
An Introduction to the 8 Components of MCL
Competency-Based Learning Guiding Coalition | Introductory Webinar
School Strategic Planning 2022
Champions for Children
Jersey Shore Area School District Comprehensive Plan
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Presentation transcript:

Personalized Learning The next step on the path towards maximizing our students’ potential!

Our Objectives What is Next Generation Personalized Learning? How can it benefit our children?

3 Sir Ken Robinson

CCSSO Innovation Lab Network Kentucky Maine New Hampshire New York Ohio West Virginia Wisconsin Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO)

Council of Chief State School Officers “Of 26 state education agencies (SEAs) that stepped forward to be part of this bold effort, six demonstrated both readiness and capacity to establish an Innovation Lab-comprised of the SEA, district(s), school(s), and partners-within their state. These pioneering states include Kentucky, Maine, New York, Ohio, Wisconsin, and West Virginia.”

Council of Chief State School Officers “Through the PNxGL, state and local education leaders, CCSSO, the Stupski Foundation, and other key partners will transform current systems of schooling to a new design for public education. This ambitious effort will shift practice and policy at the local, state, and federal levels through a shared vision and collective action.”

Our Association With CESA #1 Mr. Jim Rickabauh – Executive Director of CESA #1

What is Next Generation Learning? A personalized system of education that prepares each child for life, work and citizenship in the 21 st century. Critical attributes: 1. Personalized learning 2. Authentic student voice & agency 3. World-class knowledge and skills 4. Performance-based learning 5. Anytime, everywhere opportunities 6. Comprehensive systems of learning supports

Next Generation Personalized Learning The Foundations of Personalized Learning 1.Learner Profiles 2.Customized Learning Paths 3. Proficiency Based Progress

“Customized, Personalized Education for All Students, Not Defined by Time or Place!”

institute/knowledgebase/in stitutevideo.cfm To view the Walker Elementary video go to the below address: It’s the second video on the page.

In Next Generation Learning Environments: ……. Mastery requires that a student apply content and skills in performance based scenarios. ….. Students will follow customized learning paths as they master Common Core Standards. ……. Learning time is determined by mastery and not grade level.

21 st Century Foundation Skills  Reading  Writing  Literacy  Numeracy  Thinking skills  Inquiry  Problem solving  Innovation  Teamwork  Cross-cultural understanding  Technology literacy  Self-reliance  Environmental literacy  …………..

Personalized Learning

A Case for Personalized Learning We now know so much about how humans learn ……  Learning is an active, social process  Motivation is a key component for effective learning  Learners bring different knowledge to a new learning challenge  Learners start from different places and follow different routes to the same learning outcome

Personalized Learning Imagine an education system …. That recognizes and responds to the uniqueness of every single learner That is flexible in where, when, and how learning takes place Where parents are effectively engaged in their child’s learning Where teachers are facilitators of learning Supported by technology Focused on student outcomes rather than system inputs

Within Next Generation Learning Environments: ELO + NxtGL =  MASTERY Students become more engaged, take greater ownership of learning, cultivate habits of mind, increase inquiry and solution- building, decrease desire to give up

Let the Journey Continue!!