Second Annual Japan CDISC Group (JCG) Meeting 28 January 2004 Julie Evans Director, Technical Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principal Statistical Programmer Accovion GmbH, Marburg, Germany
Advertisements

EDOS Workgroup Update Laboratory Orders Interface Initiative.
EDOS Workgroup Update June 18, 2013 Laboratory Orders Interface Initiative.
Joint TC Meeting: EHR – RCRIM RCRIM Overview HL7 Working Group Meeting January, 2007 Presented by: Ed Tripp Program Director, eSubmissions Abbott (RCRIM.
Clinical Genomics Sub-team Sub-team is one of three that evolved out of the DIA Pharmacogenomics Standards Workshop. Workshop was product of collaborative.
What’s New with CDISC Wayne R. Kubick CDISC CTO.
SEND Standard for the Exchange of Nonclinical Data
Ginnie Mae MISMO Adoption Update Tamara Togans and Nicole Jackson Ginnie Mae January 13, 2014 MISMO Winter 2014 Summit The MISMO Winter 2014 Summit Education.
S&I Framework Laboratory Initiatives Update June 6, 2013.
Study Data Standardization Plan Kick0ff Meeting 23 July 2014.
© 2008 Octagon Research Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 PhUSE 2010 Berlin * Accessing the metadata from the define.xml using XSLT transformations.
Requirements for Standardized Study Data: Update on Guidance Ron Fitzmartin, PhD, MBA Data Standards Program Office of Strategic Programs Center for Drug.
Bay Area CDISC Implmentation Network – July 13, 2009 How a New CDISC Domain is Made Carey Smoak Team Leader CDISC SDTM Device Team.
Monika Kawohl Statistical Programming Accovion GmbH Tutorial: define.xml.
Accenture Accelerated R&D Standards Metadata Management – version control and its governance Kevin Lee CDISC NJ Meeting at 01/28/2015 We help our Clients.
HL7 Study Data Standards Project Crystal Allard CDER Office of Computational Science Food and Drug Administration February 13,
Industry Perspective on Challenges for Product Developers - Drugs Christine Allison, M.S., RAC Associate Regulatory Consultant, Global Regulatory Affairs.
1CDISC 2002 RCRIM – Standard Domains Agenda NCI Presentation Standard Domains Working Group Goals Introduction to FDA Information Model (FIM) Discussion:
Overview and feed-back from CDISC European Interchange 2008 (From April 21 st to 25 th, COPENHAGEN) Groupe des Utilisateurs Francophones de CDISC Bagneux.
RCRIM Projects: Protocol Representation and CDISC Message(s) January 2007.
Implementation of CDISC Standards at Nycomed PhUSE, Basel (19-21 October 2009) Nycomed GmbH, Dr. B Traub CDISC Implementation at Nycomed.
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
Briefing: HL7 Working Group Meeting Update for the VCDE Community Dianne M. Reeves Associate Director, Biomedical Data Standards NCI CBIIT VCDE Meeting.
Overview of CDISC standards and use cases along the E2E data management process Dr. Philippe Verplancke ESUG Marlow, UK 27 May 2009.
Kopenhagen, 22 April 2008 German CDISC User Group.
Research based, people driven CDISC ADaM Datasets - from SDTM to submission CDISC Experience Exchange and ADaM Workshop 15 Dec 2008 Zoë Williams, LEO Pharma.
WG4: Standards Implementation Issues with CDISC Data Models Data Guide Subteam Summary of Review of Proposed Templates and Next Steps July 23, 2012.
Optimizing Data Standards Working Group Meeting Summary
1. © CDISC 2014 SDS ELT Rules Team Update Stetson Line 08 Dec
Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 Fall Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 3b National and International Standards Developing.
1 SDS&ADaM sub-team 28 January 2004 Mineko FUJIMOTO Rieko ICHIHARA Kazue TOMITA Hiroaki MATSUDA.
CDISC©2009 February CDISC INTRAchange Carey Smoak Device Team Leader Li Zheng Submission Data Standards Team Member Thurday, April 2, 2009.
From PDF to RDF – Representing the CDISC Foundational Standards
CDISC Update December 2007 / January 2008 Pierre-Yves Lastic, PhD CDISC Board of Directors & E3C February 5, Paris.
MDIC 1 George Serafin Deloitte & Touche LLP MDIC Open Forum Quality System Maturity Model Update.
Research Study Data Standards Standards for research study data for submission to regulatory authorities Standard development divided into three parts:
CDISC User Group in Deutschland/Japan Hajime Shimizu (nickname: Akiba) CDISC Japan User Group introduction to team activity.
Company Confidential 1 AS9104/2A Oversight Standard Revision Report Tim Lee Project Chair September 11, 2012.
FDA Standards Development and Implementation Randy Levin, M.D. Director, Office of Information Management Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food.
CDISC – 17/12/2012 Carine Javierre Nathalie SABIN.
Geneva Branch INTRODUCTION TO CDISC Biometristi Italiani Associati – Seminario BIAS CDISC SDTM and ADaM: Moving from theory to practice SAS Institute –
Updates on CDISC Activities
© Copyright IBM 2007DIA ERS SIAC Presentation, January 2008 The HL7 RPS and SPL Standards - A High Level View Terry Hardin Sr. IT Architect Emerging Software.
Regulated Product Submission Eileen M. Girten, MS i3 Statprobe 1DIA Education SIAC.
DIA Trial Master File Reference Model
Basel, September 2, 2008 Work Stream Summary define.xml/eSubmissions.
Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting July 18, 2011.
Submission Standards: The Big Picture Gary G. Walker Associate Director, Programming Standards, Global Data Solutions, Global Data Management.
Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network Data Management and Coordinating Center (RDCRN DMCC) Rosalie Holland LDN Investigator Meeting at WORLDSymposium.
LOINC – SNOMED CT Cooperation on Content
Laboratory Orders Interface Initiative
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
Structured Data Capture (SDC)
define.xml/eSubmissions
28 January 2004 Mineko FUJIMOTO Motohide NISHI Masahiro YOKOKAWA
Second Annual Japan CDISC Group (JCG) Meeting
Accenture Accelerated R&D Standards Metadata Management – version control and its governance Kevin Lee CDISC NJ Meeting at 01/28/2015 We help our Clients.
SDTM Work Stream Basel, September 2, 2008.
Maintaining the Clinical & Nonclinical Study Data Reviewer’s Guides
CPT and Disclosure: Connecting Critical Processes
Traceability between SDTM and ADaM converted analysis datasets
Freundschaft Konferenz
Structured Data Capture (SDC)
CPT and Disclosure: Connecting Critical Processes
History and Evolution of CPT Releases
IT Considerations for CPT TEE Implementation
SDTM and ADaM Implementation FAQ
SDTM Work Stream Basel, September 2, 2008.
History and Evolution of CPT Releases
Presentation transcript:

Second Annual Japan CDISC Group (JCG) Meeting 28 January 2004 Julie Evans Director, Technical Services

CDISC Team Updates

SDS Team Update 2003 Progress (1) Release new V3 models as an HL7 document –Completed for V3.0 in June 2003; V3.1 planned for 5/04 Support FDA initiatives for standard tools with a pilot test of V3 models –Complete; an FDA public meeting reporting the results held on 10/2/03.

SDS Team Update 2003 Progress (2) Expand models with controlled terminology –A sub-team was created and produced a plan and draft document on initial controlled terminology standards; however, release has been delayed at request of FDA pending a SNOMED impact assessment; V. 3 and V.3.1 identify variables that will be subject to controlled terminology. Define new domains for commonly used data –3 new domains included in V3; 3-6 more ready to be included in V3.1. Support implementation in industry with additional documentation and support materials –Additional V3 documentation published in June and August Work in progress on implementation guide and change summary.

SDS Team Update 2003 Progress (3) Establish an ongoing standards maintenance process –Responsibility has been transferred to Julie Evans; maintenance currently managed by SDS team. Develop and adopt conformity policy and guidelines for the SDS –Complete – included in V3 Specification Assist in educational tutorials. –Ongoing. SDS training now performed by team member Jane Boone; other SDS volunteers include Fred Wood and Mike Walega.

SDS Team Update 2004 Goals Finalize Version 3.1 and support issuance of FDA Guidance Maintain model (1 maintenance release) Complete critical controlled terminology Provide additional domain models Provide additional training and implementation guides Provide support and maintenance function.

ODM Team Update 2003 Progress (1) Develop a minor release (V1.2) to address issues and enhancement requests from early adopters. –Draft was published in July; Final was posted early this month. Develop Schema version in conjunction with new minor release. –V1.2 includes a schema Develop a use case to support the use of the ODM for transferring SDS Metadata to the FDA. –Define.xml was developed and is being balloted as HL7 an informative document

ODM Team Update 2003 Progress (2) Continue to work with the Lab Team to develop a harmonized XML model. –Changes were made in Lab model to align with ODM Develop Archive, Lab Use, Metadata, EDC/M and other use case documents for publication, one per quarter. –Metadata Use Case is posted on website; Archive is in development Form a European sub-team in Q2 –Team has been formed and is very active

ODM Team Update 2004 Goals Develop the case for use of ODM for eSubmissions Harmonize with the SDS, ADaM and Lab models Harmonize with HL7 Develop an ODM Implementation Guide Produce maintenance release(s) Develop new ODM features as needed to support Regulatory Use and CDISC model harmonization

LAB Team Update 2003 Progress (1) Submit HL7 version of LAB model to ballot –CDISC LAB model approved as an HL 7 Version 3 message Post draft XML schema, revise with comments received and finalize – Developed XML implementation of the LAB model Post draft microbiology extension for review –Developed extensions for both Microbiology and ECG

LAB Team Update 2003 Progress (2) Harmonize with ODM model with mapping of LAB to ODM –Developed V1.0.1, which addressed issues of harmonization with other CDISC models Monitor and respond to feedback on LAB model Version 1.0 –Ongoing: published V1.0.1 to address feedback Collect, analyze, and publish metrics on model implementation –Published Case Study template

LAB Team Update 2003 Progress (3) Make presentations at industry meetings –Presented at Pharmaceutical SAS Users Group and IBM Seminars Hold Netmeeting(s) for LAB users group –Held LAB Roundtable at Interchange Finalize clinical trial laboratory test dataset for subsetting RELMA –Developed CDISC subset and submitted to LOINC Develop high level draft of pharmacogenomics extension –Began work on genomics extension and specimen handling extensions

LAB Team Update 2003 Progress (4) Develop and adopt conformity policy and guidelines for the Lab model –Developed draft conformity levels and profiles Assist in educational tutorials –Developed training workshop –Worked with training consultant on online training Additional accomplishments: –Worked with central laboratories to encourage sponsors to use LAB model. Some central labs now offering a discount to clients that are willing to use the CDISC LAB model as a data interchange format.

LAB Team Update 2004 Goals (1) Finalize Version of LAB Model, including XML implementation, Microbiology extension Post ECG extension for public comment, then finalize Further develop specimen handling and genomics extensions and post for public comment

LAB Team Update 2004 Goals (2) Continue to work to encourage awareness and adaptation of the LAB model by pharma and biotech companies Finish development of the online training program for the LAB model

ADaM Team Update 2003 Progress (1) Complete and post 3 statistical models with input from FDA statisticians. –Completed three statistical analysis models: Change from Baseline, Time to Event (Survival Analysis) and Categorical Analysis. Identify 2 additional analysis submission models for development. –Drafts of Linear Models Analysis, Safety Analysis position paper Continue collaboration with FDA on Safety Analysis –Presented Safety Analysis position paper at FDA

ADaM Team Update 2003 Progress (2) Develop and adopt conformity policy and guidelines for analysis submission datasets. –Tied to conformity for SDS V3.1 Develop and post position paper on imputation and data flags. Incorporate the concept in at least one data model. –Collaborated with SDS and developed ADaM standards for SAS date variable and imputation flags Develop and post position paper on documentation of the creation of analysis files. –Drafted plan for describing and standardizing creation of analysis datasets

ADaM Team Update 2003 Progress (3) Collaborate with SDS on the development of version-3 domain data models. –Provided feedback to SDS regarding V3. Assist in educational tutorials. –Provided input for training materials

ADaM Team Update 2004 Goals (1) Develop a model for analysis metadata. Provide input on upcoming FDA Guidance on Submission of Analysis Datasets. Develop a library of “real world” examples of issues and decisions that arise in the creation of analysis datasets from the source variables. Revise existing statistical models to conform to SDS V3.1 nomenclature and ICH E3 eCTD Draft Guidance. Complete Linear Models Analysis statistical model.

ADaM Team Update 2004 Goals (2) Identify and develop 2 additional analysis submission models. Continue collaboration with FDA on Safety Analysis Continue participation in the DEFINE.XML project. Collaborate with and participate in the development of the structured analysis plan with the Protocol Representation Group. Assist in educational tutorials relating to Analysis Datasets.