African Regional Patent Systems and the PCT: Brief Overview of the ARIPO Patent System WIPO REGIONAL FORUM ON THE ROLE OF PATENTS AND THE PATENT COOPERATION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplementary International Search (SIS) (PCT Rule 45bis)
Advertisements

1 Practical Impact of Recent PCT Changes on US Practice Maria Eliseeva Houston Eliseeva LLP American Intellectual Property Law Association October 15,
ARIPOs Initiative on Traditional knowledge and Access and Benefit Sharing. By F.K MPANJU Patent Examiner (ARIPO) Cape Town 19 th –24 th Nov
Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects STCU/NATO Workshop From Science to Business Kiev, Ukraine October 11, 2006 Judson R. Hightower.
WIPO Recentdv03-1 Changes to the PCT Regulations which came into effect on 1 January 2004.
Amendments to the PCT Regulations, Administrative Instructions and other practice changes as from 1 July 2008.
Key Decision Points in the PCT System
PCT Supplementary International Search Service (PCT Rule 45bis applicable from January 1, 2009)
Amendments to the PCT Regulations as from 1 January 2009 New publication languages Supplementary international search.
1 Geneva, October 2008 YUN Young-Woo IP INFORMATION & WIPO STANDARDS.
Copyright © 2010 IPOS All Rights Reserved How can small and medium sized IP offices search and examine patent applications efficiently and effectively?
The IP Experts 1 BY P. KANDIAH KASS INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD SHAPING BUSINESS STRATEGY THROUGH COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE STRATEGIC USE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
Developing an International Perspective: Using the PCT Jay Erstling Director, Office of the PCT World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Geneva,
THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) Practical Considerations in Managing PCT Applications Geneva, November 26, 2008.
From Invention to Patent -Patents as Tool for Economic Success- WIPO – INSME International Training Program IP and Management of Innovation in SMEs May.
SECOND WIPO INTER-REGIONAL MEETING ON SOUTH-SOUTH COOPERATION ON PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND ENFORCEMENT Cairo,
PCT REFORM: Why It Is Needed and What Lies Ahead Charles A. Pearson Director Office of PCT Legal Administration.
Creation of Pilot IP Fund Liis Käosaar-Sasi Dorel Tamm.
Trademark enforcement in Belarus AIPPI Baltic, Vilnius, 2013 Darya Lando, Head of Legal Department LexPatent, Minsk, Belarus.
2 nd WIPO Inter-Regional Meeting on South- South Cooperation on Patents, Trademarks, Geographical Indications, Industrial Designs and Enforcement Cairo.
1 Regional Cooperation and Innovation Development Dr. Aslim Tadjuddin Deputy Governor Bank Indonesia Regional Cooperation and Innovation Development Dr.
THE MADRID PROTOCOL SYSTEM AIPPI (Hyderabad 2011) Regina Quek One Legal LLC.
RECOMMENDATIONS BY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWYERS ON LEGAL REFORM MOSES NKOMO LL.B, MIP.
Theme 6: IP Infrastructure for Better Management of IP Assets:
H AGUE AND MADRID SYSTEMS Moses Moeletsi Chief Director: Policy and Legislation 11 August 2004.
Building a Competitive Edge: Protecting Inventions by Utility Models and / or Patents : Case Studies By P. Kandiah KASS International Sdn.Bhd. KASS.
BY SARAH NORKOR ANKU (MRS) LEGAL PRACTITIONER
WELCOME TO ALL PARTICIPANTS BY A.T.PATRE. ASSTT. CONTROLLER OF PATENTS & DESIGNS PATENT OFFICE, MUMBAI.
The Madrid system An update on the latest development Israel February 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs Sector.
Dr. Michael Berger, European Patent Attorney © Michael Berger Intellectual Property (IP): Patents for Inventions.
ΟΡΓΑΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΒΙΟΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΗΣ ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑΣ DRAFTING THE APPLICATION FOR THE GRANT OF A PATENT OR UMC DRAFTING THE APPLICATION FOR THE GRANT OF A PATENT OR UMC.
FINIDINGS OF A SURVEY ON RROs AND OTHER CMOs IN ARIPO MEMBER STATES Keitseng Nkah Monyatsi Copyright Officer African Regional Intellectual Property Organisation.
Patent Protection in Europe
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND YOUR RIGHTS Helen Johnstone Seminar 12 July 2006 EAST MIDLANDS INTERNATIONAL TRADE ASSOCIATION.
Patents- Practical Aspects of International Patent Procurement/Prosecution June 2015 Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Practice Overview.
India and the Madrid Protocol An update on the Madrid system AIPPI, Hyderabad October 14, 2011 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs.
IP LAW AND ADMINISTRATION IN TANZANIA Presented by: Leonila Kishebuka Deputy Registrar, Business Registrations and Licensing Agency [BRELA],
SOUTH-SOUTH AND TRIANGULAR COOPERATION PARTNERSHIPS AND FOR ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE: ARIPO AS AN EXAMPLE OF REGIONAL COOPERATION IN THE FIELD.
WIPO Global Symposium of Intellectual Property Authorities - Developing Global Intellectual Property Infrastructure for Promoting Innovation and Branding.
World Intellectual Property Organization THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS: OBJECTIVES AND BASIC FEATURES Tel Aviv, July 4,
WIPO-ARIPO Sub-Regional Training of Trainers Program on Effective Intellectual Property Asset Management by Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) Benefits.
Seminar Industrial Property Protection Prague, 4 June 2003 Patent Protection in Europe Heidrun Krestel Liaison Officer Member States Co-operation Programmes.
PCT FILING - ADVANTAGES© Dr. S. Padmaja, Managing Partner, iProPAT June 21, 2012.
TAIEX Seminar on IP rights The Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks Ankara - November 7, 2005 Marie Paule Rizo, WIPO.
1 IP Infrastructure for Promotion of Work Sharing - Japan’s Perspective - Koichi MINAMI Deputy Commissioner Japan Patent Office WIPO Global Symposium of.
IP Offices and the Implementation of the WIPO Development Agenda: Challenges and Opportunities September 18, 2009 Geneva Irfan Baloch World Intellectual.
ADVANTAGES FOR PAKISTAN AND OTHER DEVELOPING COUNTRIES IN JOINING THE MADRID PROTOCOL.
1 SADCOPAC Hon. E. M. Hachipuka (MP) Chairman. 2 Introduction Southern Africa Development Community Organization of Public Accounts Committees (SADCOPAC)
Trademarks and Brands The Role of WIPO
PCT PATENT COOPERATION TREATY By: Nico Reyes & Keziah Tan.
Conference on the Accession of the European Community to the Madrid Protocol The Accession of the European Community to the Madrid Protocol - the long.
BUSINESS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REGISTRATION IN GHANA BY MRS. SARAH NORKOR ANKU, STATE ATTORNEY REGISTRAR-GENRAL’S DEPARTMENT 27/1/2016.
NA, Yanghee International Application Team Korean Intellectual Property Office National Phase of PCT international applications April 26,
IP experiences and challenges of SMEs of the Republic of Tajikistan
What is intellectual property and
PCT-FILING SYSTEM.
Designing a Dynamic IP System in the Republic of Belarus
The OHIM Sabina Rusconi, institutional affairs and external relations department, OHIM Roving Seminar on the Conmunity Trade Mark System in China,
Introduction to the International World of Intellectual Property (IP)
The Smart Patenting Solution
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects
The IP International framework Seminar on the Role of IP for SMEs Damascus, November 17 and 18, 2008 Marco Marzano de Marinis, Program Officer.
SADC PROTOCOL ON WILDLIFE CONSERVATION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT
Protecting a Valuable Asset – How to Protect Your Brand With Madrid
EGYPO Organisational structure
Inter-University Council for East Africa (IUCEA)
Jonathan D’Silva MMI Intellectual Property 900 State Street, Suite 301
Presentation transcript:

African Regional Patent Systems and the PCT: Brief Overview of the ARIPO Patent System WIPO REGIONAL FORUM ON THE ROLE OF PATENTS AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) IN RESEARCH IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES NAIROBI, KENYA, MARCH 30 TO APRIL 1 , 2009 By ARIPO Secretariat

Presentation overview ARIPO Background; ARIPO, its Major Activities and Objectives; ARIPO and the PCT; Functions of ARIPO as a Regional Patent Office; Challenges

Brief History of ARIPO Lusaka Agreement was signed on 9 December 1976; Lusaka Agreement came into force on February 15, 1978; ARIPO Secretariat was established in Nairobi Kenya on June 1, 1981; 1982 ARIPO Secretariat moved to Harare, Zimbabwe; Harare protocol was signed on 10 December 1982; Harare Protocol in force on 25 April 1984; Harare Protocol was amended and linked to the PCT on 1 July 1994; Banjul Protocol on Marks – 24 November 1993; Banjul Protocol came into force on 6 March 1997; Harare Protocol was amended to include utility models on 1 January 2001.

IP Systems Before ARIPO FORMATION OF ARIPO LUSAKA AGREEMENT (1976) Copyright & Related Right, + TK HARARE PROTOCOL (1982) BANJUL PROTOCOL (1993) PATENTS INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS UTILITY MODELS MARKS

The ARIPO Office

Geographical Distribution of Member States of ARIPO The Gambia Sudan Somalia Sierra Leone Kenya Ghana Uganda East Africa Tanzania West Africa Zambia Malawi Mozambique Zimbabwe Namibia Swaziland Botswana Central & Southern Africa Lesotho

STAFF Affairs Committee GOVERNANCE STAFF Affairs Committee

Financing of ARIPO Fees Received from the two Protocols; Annual Contributions ( Self sustaining , Since January 1, 2008 ); Donor Funds (Normally not in cash but in Activities & Equipment).

The Main Objectives of ARIPO The main objective among others is to Pool Resources of its Member States together in solving IP related issues by; Harmonizing IP Laws and Coordinating IP Activities among the Member States; Centrally handling most of the matters related to IP including Grant & Registration of IP Rights on behalf of the Member States; Dissemination of Information Relating to IP; Capacity building; Stimulation Business, Human Resources and Institutional Building of IP in the Member States, etc.

OBJECTIVES ACHIEVING A REGIONAL APPROACH THROUGH ARIPO Promotion, Protection & Exploitation of IP Capacity Building Industrial & Economic Development Harmonization IP Integration

ACHIEVING A REGIONAL & GLOBAL APPROACH Main Areas of Action Standards, Norms setting and Training United Industrial,Economic & IP Policy Strategy United Developmental Strategy Information & Data Exchange System

Cooperation with other IP Offices and Organizations Member States Potential Member States ECOWAS WIPO Other IP Offices EAC ARIPO SADC WTO AU OAPI COMESA

The Harare Protocol Empowers ARIPO to grant Patents and register Utility Models and Industrial Designs on behalf of its Member States. All Member States of ARIPO (except Somalia) are party to the Harare Protocol and to the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).

The Main Objectives of The Harare Protocol Promote, Harmonize & Develop Industrial Property among the Member States of ARIPO; Facilitates the protection and management of patents, Industrial Designs and Utility Models in the Contracting States; ARIPO Patents, Industrial Designs & Utility Models are equivalent to a bundle of national registrations and their management is centralized and made easier; Only one Filing, one Grant, one publication, one agent is needed and All procedures like: renewals, amendments, representation, etc. are Centralized.

The Harare Protocol and the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) The Harare Protocol was effectively linked to the PCT on July 1, 1994 and had the following effects: Any applicant filing for a PCT application automatically designates ARIPO and its Member States;  The ARIPO Office acts as a Receiving Office under the PCT for such states and   The ARIPO Office may be elected in any PCT application and all contracting states of the Harare Protocol which are also party to the PCT.

Traditional Patent System Before The PCT Worldwide filing had to be done within 12 months from priority date (Paris Convention); Multiple formality requirements undertaken; Multiple searches; Multiple publications; Multiple examinations & prosecutions of applications; Translations & national fees payable within 12 months, etc.

Member States of ARIPO and the PCT Except Somalia, all ARIPO Member States are party to the PCT; Somalia is neither party to the PCT nor to the Harare Protocol; ARIPO is a Receiving Office for all Member States party to PCT; NA, TZ & UG are not Receiving Offices of PCT applications & ARIPO & WIPO are their only Receiving Offices; SZ closed her national route with regard to PCT applications & all PCT applications can only lodged through ARIPO;

Structure of a Patent Specification Abstract Claims Description Manner of Production & Utility Drawings Optional Best Mode Examples (Optional)

Elements of an International PCT Patent Application Request/Application form; Description; One or more claims Abstract (May be filed later without affecting the international; filing date); Drawings where applicable; Sequence listing where applicable and Indications containing references to deposited microorganisms.

ARIPO as Receiving Office –PCT Initial Formality Examination Applicant’s residence; Request form must be properly completed; Applicants & inventors must be identified; Specification must have a description & at least 1 claim; Three copies should be lodged; Fees or undertaking to lodge fees and ARIPO Office helps applicants to correct defects.

Actions after Initial Formality Examination of PCT applications at ARIPO Accord international filing date; Assign International application number e.g. PCT/AP/2009/000001; Make final formality checks; identify record, search and home copies undertake correspondence with applicant, IB & ISA and receive fees on their behalf, etc.

What is NOT immediately required for obtaining an International filing date Payment of fees on filing; Translation of the international application; Applicant’s signature; Title of the invention and Abstract and drawings.

Functions of ARIPO as a Receiving Office for PCT applications Specifies the ISA(s) for PCT applications in the International phase; Specifies the IEA (s) for PCT applications; Prescribes the languages in which PCT applications must be lodged at ARIPO; Fixes the amount of transmittal fee; Undertakes formality checks & accords filing dates, etc.

PCT Procedures at ARIPO Checks document list on PCT Request Form; Further Checks the physical requirements ARIPO advises applicant of application number, filing dates and defects if any; Record Copy plus fees is sent to IB; Search copy plus fees is sent ISA; Home copy plus receiving office fees kept by ARIPO; ISA for AP are EP, AT & SE

PCT Fees ARIPO Receiving Office Fees USD 50 (or equivalent in local currency); Basic fee to IB: 10% of USD1102; Search Fee to ISA 25% of the fee charged by EPO, About USD200; PCT-Easy reduction by Sfr.200- =USD 190 from Basic fee

Main Objectives of the PCT Lodging one application, with one Office & in one language; Formal examination by a single patent office; Good International search & examination reports; Provides more time (31 months at ARIPO) to the applicant; Strong patents are granted; Facilitates the provision of patent information, etc.

Correction of Defects AP helps applicants to correct defects; Bad defects-Application withdrawn,IB Informed; Fees already received- refunded to applicant

Refund of Fees by ARIPO as a PCT Receiving Office If no filing date accorded or If application withdrawn Before transmittal of Record Copy, Before Transmittal of Search Copy to the ISA Transmittal Fees refundable if none of the documents has been transmitted.

Time limits for ARIPO REGIONAL/NATIONAL phase of PCT Applications 31 months if no demand lodged before 19 months ( Chapter I); 31 months if demand lodged [Chapter II); Applicant has 60 days to comply with formality requirements; International filing date is also the filing date accorded by ARIPO; Priority data remain the same,

Processing of PCT applications in the Regional/national phase Initial Formality Examination; Accord Filing Date; International filing date is also the ARIPO filing date; Open Technical & Administrative files Accord AP Application Number e.g. AP/P/1998/0000010 Request for translations if necessary; Capture bibliographic data in the ARIPO AFPAT database;

Completed ARIPO Request Form 3; Something like a description; Mandatory Requirements for according a filing date and application number for ARIPO Patent Application Completed ARIPO Request Form 3; Something like a description; One or more Claims; Designation of at least one contracting state and Fees or undertaking to pay fees in 21 days.

Formality requirements in the Regional Phase Patent agent, if applicant is not resident in aqny member state; completion of the ARIPO Request Form; Assignments of invention needed only if applicants are not the same (not needed for PCT in regional phase); At least one Member State must be designated; Fees or undertaking that fees to be paid in 21 days; Physical requirements must be acceptable.

Substantive Search & Examination at ARIPO PCT search & Examination results are consulted & used; Applications must follow Administrative Instructions of the Harare Protocol; Patentability Criteria of Designated States are considered; Amendments are acceptable

Objectives of Search and substantive Examination at ARIPO Harare Protocol, Administrative Instructions must be adhered to; Limitations to Patentability in Member States are considred; Invention must be new, not obvious and industrially applicable; local databases consulted before grant; Invention (claims) must be clear & concise; Infringement & Litigation can be avoided; Monopoly Rights correctly given; Strong internationally recognized patents issued by the ARIPO Office.

Grant & Publication of an ARIPO Patent Six months after search & examination;if positive; Any Designated state can refuse the Grant of a patent; Grant & publication fees must have been paid; Has effect in all designated states ; patent Valid for 20 years in all designated States

Systematic presentation of Processing of patent applications at ARIPO

ARIPO Fees Application fees; Designation fees; Annual Maintenance fees; Grant & Publication fees; Any other fees as requested.

Applica Application fee 250 2. Designation fees per Schedule of Fees PATENTS Type of fees Amount (US Dollars, Applica Application fee 250 2. Designation fees per Country designated 75 *3. Examination Report fee (if no Examination report) 250 *4. Search Report fee (if no Examination report) 250 5. Publication fee 300 Surcharge for each additional page after 40 pages 15 Surcharge for each additional claim after 10 claims 40 6. Grant fee 300 7. Annual maintenance fees in respect of each designated State increasing by USD 20 per year 1st anniversary 40 2nd “ 60 3rd “ 80 4th “ 100

Schedule of Fees Utility Models in USD Application fee 100 Designation fee (per country) 20 Registration & Publication fee 50 Maintenance fees (per designated State): First year 20 second year 25 Third year 30 Fourth Year 40 Fifth year 50 Sixth year 60 Seventh year 70

General Advantages of the PCT system to ARIPO & the Region Increase of the number of applications; Simpler examination procedures; Local applicants have more time before filing world wide; PCT offers foreign & local investors with patentable technology; Free Technical Information & equipment; Training of local staff, etc.

Specific Advantages of using the PCT/ ARIPO Route Simplified procedure; Single application, protection in many states; Centralized renewal; Single representation in all states; Cheaper if compared to individual filings; Possibility of conversion to utility model or national patent ; Uniform duration of rights in all states, etc

Major Challenges to ARIPO & Its Member States Harmonization of IP laws of the Member States; Limited Resources to undertake all the Objectives & Projects of the Organization & its member States; Limited Capacity particularly in the National Offices to undertake & adopt Policies Developed in the Region; Limited knowledge & Information relating to IP among the citizens of the Member States; Limited Infrastructure e.g. Communication, in the Region; High cost of Obtaining,Promoting & Enforcing IP Rights; Perceptions that IP is too cumbersome and is therefore for the Rich, Developed Countries, etc.

Challenges continued Limited number of Schools with IP in their curricular in the region; Lack of National IP Strategies; Lack of IP Strategies in most institutions including universities in the region; Lack of adequate market & qualified personnel for IP Services; Lack of resources for capacity building in IP, etc.

African Regional intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) Physical Address: 11 Natal Rd Belgravia-Harare; Tel: +263-4-794065 to 794074; Fax:+263-4-794072/3; E-mail:mail@aripo.org, aripo@ecoweb.co.zw Website: www.aripo.org/ Thank you