Geographical indications and their use to promote local products Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trademarks. Trademark A commercial symbol, word, name or other device that identifies and distinguishes products of a particular firm Trademark law entitles.
Advertisements

World Intellectual Property Organization The Protection of Geographical Indications: the Context Marie-Paule Rizo Head of the Design and Geographical Indication.
WIPO: South-South Cooperation Cairo, May 7, 2013 Trademarks and the Public Domain Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird, The.
WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON OMANI TRADITIONAL VALUES IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD Muscat, February 13 and 14, 2005 International Legal Framework for the Protection.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Workshop on wines for making a protected geographical indication Technical File Anabela Alves BELGRADE, SERBIA 30th of January 2013.
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
Geographical Indications Law: a new tool for Africa? All Africa House (UCT) Aug. 28, 2012 Seble Baraki Open A.I.R. Research Fellow.
Collective Marks and Certification Marks
Dr. Özlem Döğerlioğlu IŞIKSUNGUR Yaşar Üniversity Lecture Notes
Marcus Höpperger Acting Director
Chapter 11 Product Strategies: Branding & Packaging Decisions.
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Existing global and.
1 XI INT. CONGRESS AAAML A comparison of the three GI schemes in the EU A trade mark practioner’s perspective… Benjamin Fontaine Parma, March 2013.
AIPPI-MIE-MSZJF Budapest 2005 “Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU" Similarities and differences in the enforcement of trademarks and designations.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
Interface between patent and sui generis systems of protection of plant varieties The 1978 UPOV Act does not allow both systems to be applied to the same.
THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND TREATIES ADMINISTERED BY WIPO TK.
Geographical Indications (GIs) in the Implementation of Public Policies: Best Practices and the Socio- Economic Dimension of GIs Presented at the Second.
By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
Dr. Özlem Döğerlioğlu IŞIKSUNGUR Yaşar Üniversity Lecture Notes
Marketing Products identified by their origin (or Geographical Indications) A tool for rural development.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
Geographical Indicators Daniel Pick Economic Research Service.
Perspectives for Geographical Indications Teresa Mera June, 2009.
FUNDAMENTALS OF TRADEMARK LAW THE HONORABLE BERNICE B. DONALD U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN SEPT. 18, 2013 LAHORE, PAKISTAN.
Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP Geographical Indications: A United States Perspective AIPPI Hyderabad October 14, 2011 Stanton J. Lovenworth Chair,
The international framework for the protection of geographical indications Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN: AN OVERVIEW
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND COLLECTIVE MARKS
Trademark By: Dasmine Reddish. Road Map  Origins of Trademark  Characteristics of Trademarks  Goals of Trademarks  Sources Law of Trademarks  Successful.
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Overview of origin-linked.
Introduction to the GI system. Origin Linked Products (OLP) are products that have a specific link to their area of origin because of their reputation.
THE PROTECTION OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND THEIR ROLE IN TRADE AND COMMERCE TK.
IPR-INSIGHTS CONSULTING AND RESEARCH 1116 BUDAPEST, KONDORFA U. 10. TEL.: (+36-1) FAX: (+36-1)
Baker & McKenzie Presented by Gabriela Vendlova 3 December 2002 Intellectual Property Rights: Importance of Trademark Protection in the Digital World.
Cross-border Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Expressions Pedro A. De Miguel Asensio – UCM AIPPI 2011 Hyderabad.
Czech Presidency High Level Conference on the Future of Quality Policy of Agricultural Products and Foodstuff PDOs/PGIs: The point of view of GI producers.
CAPACITY BUILDING TRAINING PROGRAMME ON IPR, WTO RELATED ISSUES AND PATENT WRITING April 28-May 2, 2008 Session 10 GIs negotiations in the WTO and other.
Câmara dos Despachantes Oficiais CONFIAD Paneuropean Network Workshop on Customs Customs Valuation Fernando Carmo CONFIAD Paneuropean Network - President.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
EXAMPLES OF TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE  one of the main TBT issue at the moment is labelling (see Tuna report)  brief overview of marks and rules of.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Elements for the Organization of Geographical Indications under Article 22.1 of the TRIPS Agreement Warsaw,
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
Session 6 : An Introduction to the TRIPS Agreement UPOV, 1978 and 1991 and WIPO- Administered Treaties.
History of the GI system How it all started. History of the GI system Foods have be named after their geographical origin since Antiquity: examples: 5th.
Olivier Rukundo. Copyright provisions Article 6 A work, except a broadcast, programme-carrying signal or a traditional work, shall not be eligible for.
WTO and the TRIPS Agreement Wolf R. MEIER-EWERT WTO Secretariat A Business-oriented overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students WIPO, Geneva 20.
International Registration of GIs: Building on Existing Systems Matthijs Geuze WIPO.
CZECH PRESIDENCY HIGH LEVEL CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT QUALITY POLICY Prague, 13 March 2009 DRAFT CONCLUSIONS OF WORKSHOP B: EU.
Milano, TRADEMARK. A trademark is a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services produced or provided by one company from those of.
The need to keep technical subject matter available Prof. Luigi Mansani University of Parma Conference "Trademark Law and the Public Interest in Keeping.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
World Intellectual Property Organization Geographical indications: the international legal framework; latest developments Bratislava, December 1st., 2009.
Geographical indications of source Dr. Ioannis Kikkis, EPLO, Head of Intellectual Property dpt. 16 March 2015 Workshop on intellectual property protection.
Dispute settlement mechanism within the Lisbon system 6 December 2013 Massimo Vittori, Managing Director.
Intellectual Property Law Unit Two. Trademark Right Unit Two.
International Treaties regarding the Protection of Trademark.
Recent Developments at the International Level
SELLO DE ORIGEN “Seal of origin” Adding value to
Registering your brand
Existing Approaches on the National and International Levels
Geographical Indications
THE SCOPE OF PROTECTION OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS
IP Protection under the WTO
Session III: Case Studies of GIs
Community protection of geographical indications :
Department Of Commerce
Presentation transcript:

Geographical indications and their use to promote local products Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO

What is a geographical indication ? Historically, at the international multilateral level several terms have been used to refer to indications of geographical origin The following expressions are relevant: indication of source appellation of origin geographical indication

Terminology (1/3) Indication of source: not formally defined in any international treaty The Madrid Agreement on the Repression of False or Deceptive Indications of Source on Goods (1891) refers to : an indication on goods by which one of the countries (…), or a place situated therein, is directly or indirectly indicated as being the place of origin of the goods

Terminology (2/3) Appellation of origin (AO): defined in the Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration (1958): the geographical name of a country, region, or locality, which serves to designate a product originating therein, the quality and characteristics of which are due exclusively or essentially to the geographical environment, including natural and human factors Note: traditional appellations i.e. designations that are not constituted by a geographical name but have a geographical connotation (quality link), may be assimilated to appellations of origin. E.g. FETA (Greek cheese), REBLOCHON (French cheese), CAVA (Spanish sparkling wine)

Terminology (3/3) Geographical indication (GI) : this expression now has a specific legal meaning under the TRIPS Agreement (1994): indications which identify a good as originating in the territory of a Member, or a region or locality in that territory, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of the good is essentially attributable to its geographical origin Note: this definition is substantially equivalent to the definition of appellation of origin under the Lisbon Agreement: both provide for a quality link between the product and its geographical origin

Differences in the definitions ? Appellation of origin (AO)Geographical indication (GI) a geographical name an indication designates a product identifies a good no express reference reputation mentioned as to reputation possible characteristic link to geographical link to geographical environment origin clarification: natural no reference to natural and and human factors human factors

Informative value of GIs Information. GIs convey information: not only that the goods are different from similar goods, but also that the goods have an origin, quality and other desirable characteristics. Quality link. Essential to the notions of GI and appellation of origin. Direct causal link between the characteristics of the goods and their place of origin GIs denote certain characteristics, quality and reputation when used in connection with particular goods and products. This quality link has marketing potential and hence commercial value

Market value of GIs –Consumer preferences. Consumers appreciate quality and special characteristics in the goods they buy. This is especially true regarding food and agricultural products, but extends equally to other goods –Perceived difference. Consumers are prepared to pay a premium to obtain goods that are - or are perceived to be - special or different. E.g produced by traditional processes; manufactured with natural or local ingredients; use of special or unique raw materials; handmade with local traditional know-how

Use of GIs in commerce (1/3) Unique products. Every country or region produces goods that can be regarded as special or unique, because they result from a particular set of conditions, both natural and human, that does not occur in other places Tradition and culture. This applies particularly to countries and regions where traditional, hand- intensive production methods have been conserved. Those production methods constitute valuable traditional knowledge and skills, and are in fact expressions of traditional culture

Use of GIs in commerce (2/3) GIs as marketing tool. GIs function as distinctive signs to distinguish traditional and natural products in the marketplace. GIs can and should be used as marketing tools, e.g. by SMEs Additional value. The reputation of a GI can and often is established in conjunction with the use of trademarks. Both add value to a product if the products quality meets consumers expectations Especially valuable distinctive sign. A well reputed geographical indication can become as valuable as other distinctive signs (marks, trade names, etc) since it warrants a unique geographical origin and inherent product characteristics

Use of GIs in commerce (3/3) Geographical indications release their maximum potential when used to promote exports and take a foothold in foreign markets Need for co-organized or collective organization by the producers of the relevant goods, and modern marketing techniques Coordination can be achieved by private endeavor (cooperatives, syndicates or producers associations), and through a State-coordinated operation or agency. Best results achieved through a combination of both Several countries use government agencies to overview the recognition of GIs, assist in promoting exports of goods with GIs, and negotiate treaties with trading partners to have their GIs recognized

Relation between geographic indications and marks How can indications of geographical origin be protected? By recognizing them : – as geographical indications (or appellations of origin) – as marks Specificity vs. versatility: –Geographical indications (appellations of origin) are specific for conveying information on geographical origin and the quality link –Marks may be more versatile, easier to use (licensing, assignment) and may be recognized as such in more jurisdictions

What is a mark? A mark is any sign capable of distinguishing goods or services in trade (viz. TRIPS, Art. 15.1) Most marks are visible signs (perceptible by the sense of sight), and in particular word marks Word marks may consist of or include geographical names e.g. Manhattan (clothes), Ibiza (cars), Air France (transport services), Evian (spring water) A geographical name may be recognized and registered as a mark if it is not geographically descriptive (i.e. indicates geographic provenance) or geographically misdescriptive (i.e. likely to cause confusion as to geographic provenance)

Special types of marks: similar to AOs and GIs ? Collective mark: a mark owned by a collective organization, e.g. an association, federation of producers, syndicate, cooperative, etc. whose members are allowed to use the mark under the rules prescribed by the owner of the mark the mark indicates membership in the organization use of the mark by a member may require compliance with certain requirements in the members goods or services: quality, characteristics, geographical origin Certification mark: a mark owned by a certifying institution (public or private) who allows other persons to use the mark on their goods or services if the owner of the mark certifies compliance with specified standards or characteristics the mark indicates that goods or services comply with standards defined, applied or endorsed by the owner of the mark focus on the quality or characteristics of the product, which may include geographical origin

Geographical indications vs. marks (1/6) TRIPS (Art.1.1) gives WTO Members freedom to determine the appropriate method of implementing its provisions within their own legal system and practice. Therefore, protection of GIs can be accomplished in different ways. Countries are not obliged to have special, dedicated sui generis laws or registers for GIs Consequently, some countries do not have legislation on GIs but resort to collective marks and certification marks to comply with TRIPS obligations on GIs

Geographical Indications vs. Marks (2/6) Some practical differences between geographical indications and marks: –Inception: marks are coined (fanciful) or chosen purposely (arbitrary) to distinguish products; GIs are based on a particular preexisting geographical name, and generally have a background of tradition and history –Link to location: a mark has no inherent attachment to a region or community (carrier of corporate values); a GI is inherently attached to a particular geographic region or location, and can have cultural value (carrier of traditional local values)

Geographical Indications vs. Marks (3/6) Ownership: marks are privately owned; GIs normally have no owner or are collectively owned Assignment: marks can generally be assigned and thus relocated; GIs cannot be assigned independently Scope of protection may differ: GIs are protected against use in translation or transliteration; marks are protected as registered GIs are protected regardless of any particular form of presentation; marks are protected as registered GIs generally apply to goods only; marks may apply to goods or services

Geographical Indications vs. Marks (4/6) Grounds for refusal of registration: GIs will not be regarded as geographically descriptive in respect of the designated product; a mark (other than certification or collective) may not be registered if it is geographically descriptive User requirement: use of a mark is generally required to maintain registration; registered GIs are harder to cancel on grounds of non use (disuse must occur in country of origin) Enforcement of marks (including collective or certification) depends on owner; GIs may be enforced ex officio in many jurisdictions

Geographical Indications vs. Marks (5/6) Access to international systems –Marks may be protected internationally through the Madrid system for the international registration of marks -- large membership (+/- 80 Parties) –GIs may be protected internationally through the Lisbon system for the international registration of appellations of origin -- fewer members (26 Parties) Access to UDRP to solve domain name cybersquatting Marks OK GIs yet to be admitted on same footing as marks

Geographical Indications vs. Marks (6/6) Geographical indications and marks are complementary –They have different purposes: GIs indicate geographical origin and consequential characteristics of the goods; marks indicate commercial origin or commercial sponsorship of the goods –Producers often use marks and GIs simultaneously for best results. Marketing strategies must prevail –Where special protection for GIs is not available, alternative protection might be achieved through special types of marks: collective, certification

Concluding remarks