Lisbon System Protection of Geographical Indications - international legal framework National Roving Seminars on Geographical Indications Chennai, January.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doha's Impact on TRIPS: Balancing Geographical Indications Protection Clark W. Lackert Chair, INTA International Amicus Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Advertisements

Sui generis system for the protection of non-agricultural geographical indications – the Hungarian example András Jókúti Legal and International Department.
World Intellectual Property Organization The Protection of Geographical Indications: the Context Marie-Paule Rizo Head of the Design and Geographical Indication.
5th Liaison Meeting on Trade Marks
International Plant Protection Convention CPM 7, Rome March 2012
2 Industrial Property 1. Introduction: notion of industrial property 2. International legal framework 3. Main substantive treaties in the field of industrial.
Dubai Conference May 2004 Molengraaff Institute Center for Intellectual Property Law (CIER) 2 OVERVIEW Domain Concepts Methodologies Problematic Issues.
WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON OMANI TRADITIONAL VALUES IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD Muscat, February 13 and 14, 2005 International Legal Framework for the Protection.
Neil WILSON Director, Functional Support Division Brands and Designs Sector Seminar on WIPO Services and Initiatves Global IP Systems The Madrid, Hague.
Geographical Indications: Prospects for the development of the International Legal Framework Tegan Brink Australian Permanent Mission to the WTO, Geneva,
Geographical indications and their use to promote local products Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
1 CHALLENGES TO THE LISBON SYSTEM Presentation by Mihály Ficsor, Vice-President, Hungarian Patent Office WIPO/INPI Forum on Geographical Indications and.
Workshop on wines for making a protected geographical indication Technical File Anabela Alves BELGRADE, SERBIA 30th of January 2013.
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
Geographical Indications Law: a new tool for Africa? All Africa House (UCT) Aug. 28, 2012 Seble Baraki Open A.I.R. Research Fellow.
Trademark enforcement in Belarus AIPPI Baltic, Vilnius, 2013 Darya Lando, Head of Legal Department LexPatent, Minsk, Belarus.
Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications Parma, June International Registration Burkhart Goebel Partner, Lovells, Madrid Chair of the INTA.
Marcus Höpperger Acting Director
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Existing global and.
1 XI INT. CONGRESS AAAML A comparison of the three GI schemes in the EU A trade mark practioner’s perspective… Benjamin Fontaine Parma, March 2013.
AIPPI-MIE-MSZJF Budapest 2005 “Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU" Similarities and differences in the enforcement of trademarks and designations.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
Geographical Indications Intellectual Property & Competition Law Presentation By: Brinda Sreedharan Ravi Teja Rethu Kumari.
THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND TREATIES ADMINISTERED BY WIPO TK.
By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU 13th Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU 13th AIPPI-MIE International Conference Budapest, September.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
Geographical Indications in the WTO and the Doha Negotiations Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications WIPO/Italian Foreign Affairs Ministry Parma,
Perspectives for Geographical Indications Teresa Mera June, 2009.
Let’s Have An Other Look At The Lisbon Agreement Matthijs Geuze WIPO.
Enforcement measures of GIs through sui generis protection, unfair competition and consumer protection law GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND TRADEMARKS: A GLOBAL.
The international framework for the protection of geographical indications Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN: AN OVERVIEW
Introduction to the GI system. Origin Linked Products (OLP) are products that have a specific link to their area of origin because of their reputation.
Importance of Intellectual Property Central issue in multilateral trade relations –Need for organization to see that there are intellectual property procedures.
Cross-border Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Expressions Pedro A. De Miguel Asensio – UCM AIPPI 2011 Hyderabad.
Czech Presidency High Level Conference on the Future of Quality Policy of Agricultural Products and Foodstuff PDOs/PGIs: The point of view of GI producers.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
1 FAO-EBRD Project Tbilisi, Georgia – 27 November 2007 TRIPS - GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS - Wolf R. Meier-Ewert WTO Secretariat.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Elements for the Organization of Geographical Indications under Article 22.1 of the TRIPS Agreement Warsaw,
“Legal frameworks for the protection of Geographic Indications” Carmen Bullon FAO Development Law Service.
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
Session 6 : An Introduction to the TRIPS Agreement UPOV, 1978 and 1991 and WIPO- Administered Treaties.
History of the GI system How it all started. History of the GI system Foods have be named after their geographical origin since Antiquity: examples: 5th.
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
Geographical Indications and WIPO Recent Developments Marcus Höpperger, WIPO.
WTO and the TRIPS Agreement Wolf R. MEIER-EWERT WTO Secretariat A Business-oriented overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students WIPO, Geneva 20.
International Registration of GIs: Building on Existing Systems Matthijs Geuze WIPO.
Current trends in EPA negotiations in relation to IPRs Fleur Claessens.
CZECH PRESIDENCY HIGH LEVEL CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT QUALITY POLICY Prague, 13 March 2009 DRAFT CONCLUSIONS OF WORKSHOP B: EU.
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the Turkish Patent Institute Istanbul, September 13 to 15, 2011 WIPO TRAINING OF TRAINERS PROGRAM.
REVIEW OF THE LISBON AGREEMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION: LATEST DEVELOPMENTS Florence Rojal Legal.
Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
World Intellectual Property Organization Geographical indications: the international legal framework; latest developments Bratislava, December 1st., 2009.
Geographical indications of source Dr. Ioannis Kikkis, EPLO, Head of Intellectual Property dpt. 16 March 2015 Workshop on intellectual property protection.
Dispute settlement mechanism within the Lisbon system 6 December 2013 Massimo Vittori, Managing Director.
International Treaties regarding the Protection of Trademark.
Recent Developments at the International Level
Existing Approaches on the National and International Levels
Geographical Indications
…around the World Click to edit Master text styles Protecting Geographical Indications... …around the World Click to edit Master text styles Second.
THE SCOPE OF PROTECTION OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS
IP Protection under the WTO
Community protection of geographical indications :
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin The Lisbon System facilitates the protection of appellations of origin.
Presentation transcript:

Lisbon System Protection of Geographical Indications - international legal framework National Roving Seminars on Geographical Indications Chennai, January 29-30, 2009 Bangalore, February 2-3, 2009 Kolkota, February 5-6, 2009 Matthijs Geuze, WIPO

Lisbon System Content of the Presentation Global Overview of GI Protection Systems Subject-Matter of Protection Definitions Scope of Protection International Registration of GIs and AOs GIs in WIPO

Lisbon System Global Overview of GI Protection Systems

Lisbon System GI Protection Landscape Around the World Laws focusing on business practices Sui generis legislation –concerning specifically defined characteristics of the product or methods of their production Trademark law Other means of protection

Lisbon System Terminology Landscape appellation of origin indication of geographical origin agricultural and food product label appellation dorigine controlée viticultural area agricultural and food product certificate protected designation of origin indication de provenance vin de pays protected geographical indication geographical designation denominación específica geographical indication indication of source denominación de origen quality wine produced in a specified region reserved descriptiontable wine

Lisbon System Scope of Protection Landscape Use of a recognized GI by a person not eligible or authorized to use it, without any test as to the nature of that use Use which is "false", "incorrect", or "does not correspond to the place specified" Use which might mislead, deceive or create a false impression regarding the geographical origin of the products Misuse, imitation or evocation, even with delocalising qualifiers Use of a GI on products which, while originating in the indicated area, do not meet the production or product requirements on which the use of the GI is conditional Use damaging or exploiting the reputation, irrespective of whether the public is misled Acts contrary to "good practice" or "honest commercial practices Conduct liable to mislead or deceive the public Non-authorized use of reputation or goodwill

Lisbon System Recognition and Protection of a GI In the Country of Origin Abroad

Lisbon System International Protection of GIs Recognized and Protected in their Country of Origin Paris Convention (1883) Madrid Agreement (1891) (repression of false and deceptive indications) Madrid Agreement and Protocol (1891, 1989) (international registration of marks) Lisbon Agreement (1958) Bilateral Agreements TRIPS Agreement (1994)

Lisbon System Subject-Matter of Protection

Lisbon System Geographical Indications - subject-matter of protection Indication of a Connection between Characteristics of Products and their Geographical Origin typicality reputation

Lisbon System GI Definition Landscape: - common denominators of the elements by which definitions aim to capture the value-added of GIs Typicality –quality or characteristics of a product that make the product unique and which allow the product to be identified geographically Reputation –(1) degree of recognition by consumers of the typicality of products and (2) the collective goodwill that they represent on the market

Lisbon System Basis and Justification for Protection Quality or Characteristics Reputation Link between the Geographical Origin and the Quality, Reputation or Other Characteristics of the Product

Lisbon System WIPO Standing Committee Document SCT/10/4, paragraphs Quality legal criterion, allowing a product to be identified qualitative link different for GI than for AO ? disadvantage for countries whose GIs are industrial products ? products derived from traditional knowledge ?

Lisbon System WIPO Standing Committee Document SCT/10/4, paragraphs Characteristics natural and human factors –products derived from the terroir –products derived from traditional knowledge (TK) any element that contributes to the typicality of the product

Lisbon System WIPO Standing Committee Document SCT/10/4, paragraphs Reputation history of the product distinctive character of the product consumers perception

Lisbon System WIPO Standing Committee Document SCT/10/4, paragraphs Link with the geographical origin explains the relationship between the geographical area where the product originates and its quality, reputation or other characteristics critical element for determining the delimitation of the geographical area Some systems only require delimited zones to differ in geological terms from others

Lisbon System The TRIPS and Lisbon Definitions

Lisbon System Definition - TRIPS Geographical Indication Indication which identifies a good as originating in the territory of a Member, or a region or locality in that territory, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of the good is essentially attributable to its geographical origin

Lisbon System Lisbon Agreement Recognized and Protected in the Country of Origin (Article 1(2)) a product with a certain reputation, as defined in Article 2(2); whose appellation meets certain qualifications, as defined in Article 2(1); and is protected by virtue of some formal means (law, decree, judicial decision or registration)

Lisbon System Lisbon Agreement - Definition of Country of Origin (Article 2(2)) Requirement of Reputation The country whose name, or in which is situated the region or locality whose name, constitutes the appellation of origin which has given the product its reputation

Lisbon System Lisbon Agreement - definition of required qualifications (Article 2(1)) Appellation of Origin The geographical denomination of a country, region, or locality, which serves to designate a product originating therein, of which the quality or characteristics are due exclusively or essentially to the geographical environment, including natural and human factors

Lisbon System Scope of Protection under TRIPS

Lisbon System TRIPS Agreement: Scope of Protection Incorporation of provisions Paris Convention (Art.2.1) Definition (Article 22.1) Basic level of protection (Article ) Additional protection for wine and spirit GIs (Article 23) Exceptions (Article ) Negotiations (Article 24.1) National treatment and MFN (Article 3-5) Procedures (Article 62) Enforcement (Part III) Dispute settlement

Lisbon System Standards of Protection (Article 22.2­4) Any GI shall be protected against … Any use in the designation or presentation of a good which misleads the public as to its geographical origin Any use which constitutes an act of unfair competition within the meaning of Art.10bis of the Paris Convention Registration of trademarks which can mislead the public as to the geographical origin of products Deceptive geographical indications

Lisbon System Standards of Protection (Article 23) GIs for wines or spirits shall benefit from additional protection against... Any use of the GI which identifies a wine or a spirit not originating in the area indicated Country allowed to opt for enforcement by administrative action only Registration of trademarks not having the geographical origin indicated Homonymous GIs (for wines)

Lisbon System Exceptions Generics (Article 24.6) Prior Trademark Rights (Article 24.5) Other Prior Use (Article 24.4) Use of Ones Own Name in Business (Article 24.8) GI Not Protected in Country of Origin (Article 24.9)

Lisbon System WTO Dispute Settlement - Panel Report on GI Issues Two cases concerning EC Regulation 2081/92 US vs EC (wt/ds174) Australia vs EC (wt/ds290)

Lisbon System Scope of Protection under Lisbon

Lisbon System Lisbon Agreement: Scope of Protection (1) Usurpation Protection shall be ensured against any usurpation or imitation, even if the true origin of the product is indicated or if the appellation is used in translated form or accompanied by terms such as type, etc. Records Lisbon Conference 1958, p.815 Infringement of the exclusive rights of the holders of the right to use the appellation through unlawful appropriation – in certain legislations called usurpation or counterfeiting – or fraudulent imitation

Lisbon System Lisbon Agreement: Scope of Protection (2) Unfair Competition - Article 4 Lisbon Confirms the protection that may already exist in a member country by virtue of other international instruments, national law or court decisions Records Lisbon Conference 1958, p.816 Apart from usurpation or counterfeiting, there are a whole range of acts that may qualify as acts of unfair competition and are to be prohibited

Lisbon System International Registration of GIs and AOs

Lisbon System International Registration of GIs Negotiations in the WTO

Lisbon System TRIPS Agreement Article 23.4 In order to facilitate the protection of GIs for wines, negotiations shall be undertaken in the Council for TRIPS concerning the establishment of a multilateral system of notification and registration of GIs for wines eligible for protection in those Members participating in the system. (Spirits added by the Doha Ministerial)

Lisbon System International Registration of GIs The Existing Systems: Lisbon and Madrid

Lisbon System Lisbon and Madrid applicable in respect of all categories of products

Lisbon System 26 Member States Africa (6):Algeria, Burkina Faso, Congo, Gabon, Togo, Tunisia America (6):Costa Rica, Cuba, Haiti, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru Asia (4):Georgia, Islamic Rep. of Iran, Israel, DPR of Korea Europe (10): Bulgaria, Czech Rep., France, Hungary, Italy, Moldova, Montenegro, Portugal, Serbia, Slovakia

Lisbon System Renewed Interest in Lisbon Increase in Membership since 1997 Assembly established Working Group –to explore possible improvements to the procedures under the Lisbon Agreement –first meeting: March 17 to 20, 2009

Lisbon System Madrid Union 84 members Agreement only 6 Protocol only 28 Agreement and Protocol 50 (Including EC)

Lisbon System Legal Effect Effect of international registration –extension of protection to countries other than the country of origin –indefinite (in principle) Except in a country that... –issued a refusal (within the prescribed time-limit), or –invalidated the effect of the international registration in its territory

Lisbon System

Lisbon: 887 registrations in force France508 Czech Rep. 76 Bulgaria 51 Slovakia 37 Hungary 28 Italy 28 Georgia 20 Cuba 19 Mexico 11 Algeria 7 Portugal 7 Tunisia 7 DPR of Korea 6 Peru 4 Montenegro 2 Moldova 1 Israel 1

Lisbon System Effect of Lisbon registration Records Lisbon Conference 1958, p –Other countries will know the precise appellation to be protected –These countries will be required to take position with regard to the appellation –They may refuse protection but, if they dont, they should, in principle, prevent the appellation from becoming generic Rule 16 Lisbon Regulations –Procedure for notification of invalidation

Lisbon System Effect of a refusal Article 5(3) The competent authority is entitled to declare, within a time-limit of one year, that protection cannot be ensured Requirement to indicate the grounds for such a refusal Records Lisbon Conference 1958, p.817 Refusal can be based on any situation of fact or law preventing the grant of protection The grounds for refusal constitute the basis for negotiating a possible understanding

Lisbon System

GIs in WIPO International Registration Technical Assistance to Member States Protection of Traditional Knowledge Symposia Standing Committee on the Law of TMs, IDs and GIs Arbitration (Domain Names)

Lisbon System THANK YOU Matthijs Geuze WIPO