Summary Slide Management of Intellectual Property Rights Enterprises, R&D Organizations and Universities Wayne H. Watkins - University of Akron.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMMERCIALIZATION AS A TENURE CRITERION: A POWERFUL INCENTIVE FOR FACULTY INVENTORS Stephen W.S. McKeever Vice President for Research and Technology Transfer.
Advertisements

SOME KEY ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION IN A NATIONAL IP STRATEGY PART SIX – IP Policy for R&D Institutions and Universities OGADA TOM Innovation and Technology.
IP MANAGEMENT IN UNIVERSITIES
CHINA - IP Issues Silas Brown Briffa East Midlands International Trade Association Wednesday 12 July 2006.
University Intellectual Property Offices as Focal Point Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, June 2000 Sponsored by the World Intellectual Property Organization &
1 RIT: Support Infrastructure, Policies and Procedures – Perceptions, Myths and Reality Varda Main Director Technology Licensing Office.
Development of Intellectual Property Policies at Universities and Research Centers Mr. Ryszard Frelek, Division for Certain Countries in Europe and Asia,
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Office of Economic Development University of South Carolina Taking a leading role in Economic Development.
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
North Carolina State University © 2014 Technology Transfer Outcomes February 27, 2014 Research Retreat Kelly B. Sexton, Ph.D. Director Office of Technology.
University Technology Transfer Presentation to Legislative Biotechnology Task Force 29 September 2005 Gene A. Merrell Assistant Vice President - Research.
Intellectual Property and CRDs February 19, 2015.
Technology Transfer at UIC © 2009 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Presentation to the Software Commercialization Symposium April.
Industrial Partnerships & Technology Transfer Keeping Your Name Out Of The Gossip Columns Of Nature and Science BC Cancer AgencyJ. D. Litster March 24,
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. (ISURF) and the Office of Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (OIPTT) Kenneth Kirkland, Executive.
RESEARCH PRODUCTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OGADA T. and MBAYAKI A. CAMPUS BASED RESEARCH WORKSHOPS TOWN CAMPUS 3 May 2006.
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
The Interface between Universities Public Research Institutions and SMEs Training of Trainer’s Program, Teheran 10 June 2015 By Matthias Kuhn, MBA University.
WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.
Technology Transfer and Assessment of Intellectual Assets Gerald J. Siuta, Ph.D. President Siuta Consulting, Inc. ( Vice President.
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System Margaret Sampson Partner, Vinson & Elkins LLP U. T. System Board of Regents’ Meeting Technology.
A Dual Role Principal (Rector) of Heriot-Watt University Chair of the regional economic development company.
PROMOTING TECHNOLOGY TO INDUSTRY Technology transfer objectives: enhance commercial value of invention promote technology to partner / investor identify.
1 Knowledge | Innovation | Technology Overview of Risk Management in University Technology Transfer David N. Allen, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for.
Organizing a Technology Licensing Office (TLO) Jon Sandelin Senior Associate Emeritus
IP Institutional Policy “Ten Questions Method” Santiago, October 21 – 24, 2013.
University Technology Transfer: Issues and Opportunities Mark Crowell Research Administration for Scientists (T. Quigg) 7 December 2001.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
IP Audit Prelude to IP Strategy June, 2005 Maputo, Mozambique Intellectual Property and New Technologies Division.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY IP Policy for Universities Tamas Bene, IP manager University.
Commons, Networks, and Technology Transfer Gerald Barnett Director, Intellectual Property Management University of California, Santa Cruz.
World Intellectual Property Organization DCPPS 1 presented by Mr. Vladimir Yossifov WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INNOVATION SUPPORT SERVICES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT.
Ignite Technology Transfer NUI Galway Technology Transfer Office Seamus Coyne, Ph.D Neil Ferguson, Ph.D Commercialisation Executives Technology Transfer.
Privatizing the intellectual commons: Universities and the commercialization of biotechnology Nicholas S. Argyres Senior Associate Dean-Faculty and Vernon.
The structure of an IP Institutional Policy “Ten Questions Method” Sofia, Bulgaria November 25 and 26, 2015.
Academic Technology Transfer Operations and Practice Knowledge Economy Forum IV Istanbul, Turkey March 22-25, 2005 Alistair Brett Oxford Innovation.
Intellectual Property Basics: What Rules Apply to Faculty, Staff, and Student Work Product? Dave Broome Vice Chancellor and General Counsel October 15,
Stephanie Roof, CRA Proposal Manager Sponsored Projects Administration BALL STATE UNIVERSITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER.
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY Clemson, South Carolina. Clemson University  History  A&M College  Land Grant  Engineering & Agriculture Centric  South Carolina.
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
Why an Intellectual Property Policy? Sofia, November 24 and 25, 2015 Mr. Evgeniy Sesitsky, Department for Transition and Developed Countries, World Intellectual.
Intellectual Property Valorization
Intellectual Property at USC October 27, 2003 Dr. Michael Muthig.
USCRF Board Meeting February 2004 University of South Carolina Taking a leading role in Economic Development.
Wayne Huebner Vice Provost for Research University of Missouri-Rolla Rolla, MO presentation to: F 3 August 15, 2006 Research UMR: Serving the needs.
HOW DO PATENTING AND LICENSING AFFECT RESEARCH? JOAN S. LEONARD VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE The National Academies.
Privatizing the intellectual commons: Universities and the commercialization of biotechnology Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind Journal of.
WIPO Guidance – Intellectual Property Policy for Universities and Research Institutions for Countries in Transitions Prague, April 21 and 22, 2016 Mr.
IP Management at the University of Sussex Russell Nicholls IP Manager Empowered by Knowledge.
OTC FELLOWS PROGRAM INFORMATION SESSION Fall 2016.
Technology Transfer Office
Taking Discoveries from Lab to the Market
Technology Transfer Office
Intellectual Property 101
Annex: Berlin Contract
Universities and the Commercial World
Technology Transfer 101 An Overview of the Process
Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind
Director Department for Transition and Developed Countries
Taking Discoveries from Lab to Marketplace
Intellectual Property 101
Partnering with Business and Industry
Engineering Noontime Session March 18, :00-1:00 PM
Intellectual Property &Technology Transfer
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System
Presentation transcript:

Summary Slide Management of Intellectual Property Rights Enterprises, R&D Organizations and Universities Wayne H. Watkins - University of Akron

Jakarta, Bandung & Surabaya Sponsors: World Intellectual Property Organization & Republic of Indonesia © Wayne H. Watkins 2001

Presentation Overview Introduction –Property Systems –Culture & Environment Management of Intellectual Property –Creation of Intellectual Property –Mining of Intellectual Property –Assessment of Intellectual Property –Exploitation of Intellectual Property The Challenge/The Opportunity

Property Systems Origins of Property Rights Quality of Life in Relation to Property Systems Creative Works as Property

General Characteristics of Property Rights – Right to possess – Right to enjoy – Right to dispose

Intellectual Property Types Know-How Trade Secret Trade Mark Copyright Patents Plant Variety Protection Other

Universities & Some R&D Organizations - Roles & Culture Teaching Research Service

Industry & Some R&D Organizations - Roles and Culture Provide goods and services for a profit As compared with Universities, Industry tends to be: –Secretive –Short time frame –Applied rather than basic research –Profit driven

Intellectual Property Creation - Universities U.S. Morrill Act of 1862 U.S. Federal Funding of Defense Related Research - World War II – Cold War U.S. Bayh Dole Act of 1980 Currently evolving Need Balance

Effect of Bayh Dole Spawned Biotechnology Industry Significant advances in other technology intensive industries –Telecommunications –E-commerce –Medical –Advanced Materials

Intellectual Property Creation - Industry $264 Billion R&D in U.S. 75% Industry Sourcing of technology – trend towards acquisition Shift from manufacturing to IP Transfer and brokering of IP Globalization Role of IP in Industry

University Intellectual Property Policies Evolving Seek to Strike a Balance –Work Made for Hire –Teacher Exception Rule –Academic freedom

Key Elements of a Successful University Intellectual Property Policy Ownership –Work for hire – employment agreements –Inventions –Instructional Materials –Academic Works –Sponsored research –Use of University resources Administration Sharing of Rewards

Industry Work for Hire Employment agreements –Inventions rights –confidentiality Scope of employment Sharing

Identification & Mining of Intellectual Property Disclosure systems Direct contacting Targeted development Third party mining

Confidentiality & Publication Industry –Maintain as trade secret University –Traditional release of Scholarly Works –Proprietary/Contract research –Publication delays –Partitioning proprietary information from publishable results at the initiation of the contract if possible –Incorporating students and accommodating degree requirements for publication of Scholarly Works

Assessment of Intellectual Property Technology validation Protection availability Commercial viability Internal & external assessments

Exploitation of Intellectual Property Licensing Startups Sale or donation Release to inventors Lock out

Value to Universities Royalties and Fees Sponsored Research Revenues Faculty Recruiting Student Recruiting Practical Experiences for Students & Faculty Credibility with Stakeholders (Legislature)

Pitfalls Unrealistic Expectations Conflict of Interest Conflict of Commitment Administrative Costs Sponsor Rights Commercial Sponsors vs. Disinterested Inquiry

Value to Industry Profits Competitive Position Public relations Recruiting

Success Criteria for Exploiting Research Intellectual Property Research Capacity Vision Commitment Administration Support Organizations Market Definition

Case Studies

Intellectual Property and Industry Driven by R&D Investment Pace increasing Trend to sourcing technologies Employee turnover Stockholder perceptions

Intellectual Property and the University High Profile During Past 10 Years Fundamental Culture Change Appropriateness of Direction Questioned Traditionalist Views Sometimes Vehemently Opposed to the Entrepreneurial Style Embraced By More Progressive Faculty and Institutions Now Accelerated by Agency Funding Changes

The Challenge The Opportunity

Related Topics (as interest dictates) Research Parks Business Incubators Entrepreneurship Institutes Relationships with Economic Development Agencies Research Planning Sponsored Research Issues Conflict of Interest

Related Topics (continued) Conflict of Commitment Research Compliance Research Misconduct Confidentiality Agreements Material Transfer Agreements Distance Education Inter-Institutional issues

Related Topics (continued) Professional Associations –Licensing Executives Society (LES) –Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM).

Possible University Office of Technology Commercialization MISSION STATEMENT THE MISSION OF THE UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION IS TO BENEFIT THE PUBLIC, THE UNIVERSITY AND ITS FACULTY BY TRANSFERRING RESULTS OF UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INTO SOCIETY VIA LICENSING AND NEW BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT.