Mark R. Powell U. S. Patent & Trademark Office The Patent Process Mark R. Powell U. S. Patent & Trademark Office

Forms of Intellectual Property Patents Trademarks Copyrights Trade Secrets

Patents Historical Context Definition Federal Statutes 35 U.S.C. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Patenting vs. Trade Secrets The bargain: protection of the invention as a reward for disclosing it to others How this advances technology in general

What Patents Can Protect Virtually any item, compound, or process made by man Exceptions vary by laws of individual countries

Timelines In general, one year limit from public disclosure to filing Invention “for sale” starts the bar even if discussions private Invention recordation at Science Centers may begin critical one-year period

Types of Applications Utility Designs Plant Provisional Applications Continuing Applications

Patent Applications Title, abstract, declaratory documents Specification Background Summary of Invention Detailed description and drawings Claims

Specification What should be included What is not necessary Examples of inadequate disclosures resulting in invalid patents

Claims Exact statements of precisely what the invention encompasses Claims are what are substantively examined and eventually allowed or finally rejected Broad vs. narrow Examples

Patent Examination Laws and regulation similar world-wide Whole application reviewed for technicalities (regulations—form) and well as substance (patentability) Search Action rendered by examiner

Conclusion of Examination Allowance Final rejection Appeal Filing of continuing applications Abandonment

Patent Allowed to Issue Means that you can prevent others from practicing the invention covered by the claims Does not necessarily mean that you can practice it yourself Licensing or sale of patent rights

Inventorship Those who contribute ideas that are embodied in the claims A sole inventor must have conceived the ideas in all claims Those who contribute ideas, but whose ideas don’t make into claims are not inventors

Introduction to the Patent Cooperation Treaty

The Patent Cooperation Treaty A United Nations Treaty signed in June of 1970 at the Washington Diplomatic Conference became operational in June of 1978 administered by the International Bureau (IB) of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in Geneva, Switzerland

Purposes of the PCT To simplify the process of filing foreign patent applications To give every regional or national patent Office designated by the applicant the benefit of a search by a major patent Office an optional examination by a major patent Office

PCT Contracting State A country which is a signatory to the PCT Eighteen (18) Contracting States in 1978 Currently one hundred and twenty-three (123) Contracting States Patent protection is available in each PCT Contracting State through either a national patent Office a regional patent Office or both

States designated for regional protection Regional Patents States designated for regional protection AP ARIPO Patent EA Eurasian Patent EP European Patent OA OAPI Patent BW Botswana GH Ghana GM Gambia KE Kenya LS Lesotho MW Malawi MZ Mozambique SD Sudan SL Sierra Leone SZ Swaziland TZ United Republic of Tanzania UG Uganda ZM Zambia ZW Zimbabwe AM Armenia AZ Azerbaijan BY Belarus KG Kyrgyzstan KZ Kazakhstan MD Republic of Moldova RU Russian Federation TJ Tajikistan TM Turkmenistan AT Austria BE Belgium BG Republic of Bulgaria CH Switzerland CY Cyprus CZ Czech Republic DE Germany DK Denmark EE Estonia ES Spain FI Finland FR France GB United Kingdom GR Greece HU Hungary IE Ireland IT Italy LI Liechtenstein LU Luxembourg MC Monaco NL Netherlands PL Poland PT Portugal RO Romania SE Sweden SI Slovenia SK Slovakia TR Turkey BF Burkina Faso BJ Benin CF Central African Republic CG Congo CI Côte d’Ivoire CM Cameroon GA Gabon GN Guinea GQ Equatorial Guinea GW Guinea-Bissau ML Mali MR Mauritania NE Niger SN Senegal TD Chad TG Togo Regional patent only

States designated for national protection National Patents States designated for national protection NA Namibia NI Nicaragua NO Norway NZ New Zealand OM Oman PG Papua New Guinea PH Philippines RO Romania SC Seychelles SG Singapore SY Syrian Arab Republic TN Tunisia TT Trinidad and Tobago UA Ukraine US United States of America UZ Uzbekistan VC Saint Vincent and the Grenadines VN Viet Nam YU Serbia and Montenegro ZA South Africa HR Croatia HU Hungary ID Indonesia IL Israel IN India IS Iceland JP Japan KP Democratic People’s Republic of Korea KR Republic of Korea LC Saint Lucia LK Sri Lanka LR Liberia LT Lithuania LV Latvia MA Morocco MG Madagascar MK The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MN Mongolia MX Mexico AE United Arab Emirates AG Antigua and Barbuda AL Albania AU Australia BA Bosnia and Herzegovina BB Barbados BR Brazil BW Botswana BZ Belize CA Canada CN China CO Colombia CR Costa Rica CU Cuba DM Dominica DZ Algeria EC Ecuador EG Egypt GD Grenada GE Georgia

Number of international applications received 110,065

Traditional patent systems (months) 12 File applications abroad File application locally Local patent application followed within 12 months by multiple foreign applications claiming priority under Paris Convention: multiple formality requirements multiple searches multiple publications multiple examinations and prosecutions of applications translations and national fees required at 12 months 1

Report & Written Opinion of the ISA PCT System Chapter I 30 20 International publication (months) 12 18 OR Enter national phase File first application File PCT International Search Report & Written Opinion of the ISA File Demand International preliminary examination 30 Local application followed within 12 months by the PCT, claiming priority under the Paris convention Chapter II - one set of formalities requirements - international search - international publication - optional international preliminary examination - translations and national fees required at 20 or 30 months, and only if applicant wants to proceed with national phase entry

The two phases of the PCT International Phase Chapter I (mandatory) designated Offices Chapter II (optional) elected Offices National Phase (stage)

The international application A single application is filed in one language filed in one patent Office the receiving Office (RO) usually the applicant's home patent Office treated as a national application in each designated State as of the international filing date Compliance with the form prescribed for the international application must be accepted by all designated States during national stage

Chapter I proceedings International application filed International search performed by the International Searching Authority (ISA) International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority prepared Optional amendment to the claims only filed with the International Bureau (IB) of WIPO under Article 19 after Search Report mailed International application, International Search Report and Article 19 amendment published by IB published pamphlet sent to designated States by IB Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority not published with pamphlet

Chapter II proceedings Demand electing at least one eligible State is filed with a competent International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA) may include amendments to description, claims and drawings under Article 34 Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority is considered the Written Opinion of the IPEA A second Written Opinion will be prepared only in very rare circumstances International Preliminary Report On Patentability or “IPRP” (form PCT/IPEA/409) is prepared by IPEA and sent to applicant and IB sent to elected States by IB

Steps for national stage entry Prepare translations of the international application into languages required by the desired patent offices as applicable translations should be “accurate” amendments, even those considered to be minor in nature, should not be made to the translation applicant may file amendments to the application in each DO/EO Transmit translation and necessary fees to each desired national or regional patent office previously designated/elected

Purpose of national phase Once national phase entry requirements have been met, each designated/elected Office decides whether to grant a patent or reject the claims Under old system all expenses associated with foreign filings, translations, filing fees, and local associates, had to be provided for in each country before the end of twelve months from the priority filing date. Under PCT, the expense of the translations, local filing fees, and local associates can be put off--up to thirty months from priority filing date. Gives a lot of time to find out whether or not the invention is patentable and/or commercially viable in each country.

Advantages of the PCT To file in up to 123 countries with a single international application To delay the expenses associated with translations foreign filing fees local associates To provide an early indication of pertinent prior art To give extra time for assessment of commercial viability in designated States Under old system all expenses associated with foreign filings, translations, filing fees, and local associates, had to be provided for in each country before the end of twelve months from the priority filing date. Under PCT, the expense of the translations, local filing fees, and local associates can be put off--up to thirty months from priority filing date. Gives a lot of time to find out whether or not the invention is patentable and/or commercially viable in each country.

January 2004 changes Enhanced international search and preliminary examination (EISPE) system Change to time limit for filing a demand for international preliminary examination Automatic designation and election of Contracting States Simplified fee system

PCT resources PCT and Regulations under the PCT, the PCT Newsletter, the PCT Applicant's Guide, etc., available on the Internet at the following URL: http://www.wipo.int/pct/en/index.html

Contact Information mark.powell@uspto.gov www.uspto.gov

Thank You!