MANJUL BAJPAI GOA - 29.03.2008 EVOLUTION OF JUDICIAL MECHANISM IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS IN INDIA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India An introduction.
Advertisements

POLICIES GOVERNING TELECOM SECTOR THE FIRST ATTEMPT TO FORMALIZE A POLICY STATEMENT WAS MADE IN 1994 WHEN THE NATIONAL TELECOM POLICY 1994 (NTP 94)
TWO DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA GOVERN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SECTOR AND THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECTOR THESE TWO DEPARTMENTS.
Consumer Disputes Settlement under Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 Presentation by: Madhav Joshi Chief Legal Officer Tata Teleservices.
Amrit Lal Saha, Advocate Gauhati High Court President, Consumers’ Protection Association, Agartala (Member CAG registered with TRAI) Vice Chairperson,
By Harmeet Singh.  When India became independent in 1947,it already had about 82,000 telephone connections which rose upto 3 million in year 1985.
MANJUL BAJPAI Indore – “DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND REDRESSAL OF CONSUMER GRIEVANCES IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS”
“Status of Dispute Settlement Mechanism in the Telecom Sectors in India” 20 th October, 2007 Srinagar Presentation by Kuldeep Goyal CMD BSNL.
CONSUMER RIGHTS UNDER THE TELECOM REGULATORY ACT, 1997 AND REDRESSAL OF CONSUMER GRIEVANCES By B.K. Sinha Chief General Manager Assam Telecom Circle BSNL.
TDSAT Seminar 20 th October, 2007 Srinagar Consumer Rights under the TRAI Act, 1997 & Redressal of Consumer Grievances by Indu Malhotra Sr. Advocate Supreme.
Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Telecom Sector BSNL Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Telecom Sector A Management Perspective K.Sridhara,CGM,TN Telecom Circle.
Efficacy Of Dispute Resolution in Broadcasting & Cable Sector © & Presented By: Ashok Nambissan Note: Views expressed are those of the author alone.
Industrial Relations & Industrial Disputes. Industrial Relations  The term ‘Industrial Relations’ refers to relationships between management and labour.
Click to edit Master title style The only time a Tata phone won’t be accessible. Please switch off your mobile phones during presentations. Be safe and.
1 GROUP-8. 2  To provide for electronic delivery of public services by the Government to all persons.  To ensure transparency, efficiency, accountability,
Cable TV Industry – INDIA
PRESENTATION ON DISPUTE SETTLEMENT AND PROTECTION OF CONSUMER RIGHTS IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS UPAMANYU HAZARIKA Advocate HYDERABAD.
“Status of Dispute Settlement Mechanism in the Telecom Sector in India” 24 th March, 2007 Ahmedabad Presentation by A.K. Sinha CMD BSNL.
TDSAT Seminar- Guwahati, Dec of 15 Status of Disputes Settlement Mechanism in Telecom & Broadcasting Sectors in India Association of Unified Telecom.
Pradeep S. Mehta Secretary General CUTS International Jaipur, India CONSUMER REDRESSAL IN THE TELECOM AND CABLE SECTORS.
Presentation by: Pradeep S. Mehta Secretary General, CUTS International STATUS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM.
Last Topic - Constitutions of United States and its silent Features Silent Features 1.Preamble 2. Introduction and Evolution 3. Sources 4. Significance.
Evolution of Judicial Specialization in Environmental Law – United States Asian Judges Symposium Manila, Philippines July 2010.
Dispute Resolution Mechanism in Telecom Sector in India MTNL Mumbai.
Efficacy of Regulatory adjudication Presentation by Madhav Joshi Tata Teleservices Limited.
1 Protection of the rights of consumers in Energy sector Malkhaz Dzidzikashvili 27 June - 3 July, 2008 Georgian National Energy and Water Supply Regulatory.
MANJUL BAJPAI AHMEDABAD STATUS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS IN INDIA.
The Judiciary  Article III  Courts decide arguments about the meaning of laws, how they are applied, and whether they break the rules of the Constitution.
MobileOne ™ helping the world goMobile™ 30 th August, 2008 Status of Dispute Settlement Scenario in Telecom & Broadcasting Sectors By Madhav Joshi, Tata.
CONSUMER RIGHTS UNDER TRAI ACT, 1997 TDSAT SEMINAR, BOMBAY 25 TH SEPTEMBER, 2004 RAMJI SRINIVASAN.
CHAPTER 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution
- Arijit Maitra P A Legal.  In India reforms started in to permit private participation in the POWER & TELECOM Sector.  reforms introduced.
Topic 1: The Australian legal system 1.Basic concepts 2.Classifying law 3.Origins of Australian law 4.The federal system 5.The separation of powers.
Slide 1.2 Introduction to Department of Telecommunications: Telecommunication services started in India in the year 1851 with the First Electric telegraph.
Jump to first page MANJUL BAJPAI M U M B A I – DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM SECTOR IN INDIA.
1 FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE CENTRE AMENDMENT BILL Briefing to the Select Committee on Finance 10 June June 2008.
Regulatory Framework & Dispute Resolution in the Telecom Sector By Mr. S C Khanna Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India 14 th May,
5/22/2003Luthra & Luthra, Law offices1 ELECTRICITY BILL, 2003 Presented by Mohit Saraf Partner Luthra & Luthra Law Offices May 22, 2003.
TDSAT Seminar 20 January 2008 Kolkata, India Settlement of Disputes & Protection of Consumer Rights by RAMJI SRINIVASAN Advocate.
 Section 407 : Definition  Section 408 : Constitution of National Company Law Tribunal  Section 409 : Qualification of President and Members of Tribunal.
Presentation By R K Arnold I.T.S. Secretary, TRAI TDSAT Seminar, Chennai on Dispute Resolution in Telecom.
Status of Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Telecom and Broadcasting Sectors in India 25 th November 2006 Asim Abbas, Vice President (legal), Bharti Airtel.
Dispute Resolution Mechanism International Seminar – TDSAT Hotel Imperial – 29 Oct 2004 New Delhi EVOLVING SCENARIO IN THE TELECOM SECTOR ITS IMPACT &
The Proposed ICASA Amendment Bill – A Critique Presenter - Kate Skinner – SOS Coordinator 25 August 2010.
Disposal and pendency of cases in the Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) Limited empirical study and results Upamanyu Hazarika Senior.
Democracy and Constitutions Texas Constitutions p
Consumer Rights under Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 & Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – a Background Analysis.
MANJUL BAJPAI AHMEDABAD – “REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN TELECOM, BROADCASTING AND CABLE SERVICE SECTORS”
Panel Discussion on “Status of Dispute Settlement Mechanism in the Telecom, Broadcasting and Cable Sectors in India” 18 th December 2005 Presentation by.
re-constituted as a federation Courts approved by the Federation Council (Article 127) 80 Subjects Regions 2 major cities Moscow, St Petersburg.
Telecom scenario in India D.Ismail,SDE/RTTC.. 20 years Back In India DOT was the Only One Service Provider-On service-Land lines(Roll 1) Based on.
MANJUL BAJPAI Mumbai – “DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS”
National Company Law Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal By Dr P V S Jagan Mohan Rao M Com, LL B, FCS, FCMA, Ph D, MCJ (Master of communication & Journalism)
First: The legislative power The legislative branch of government is responsible for making and enacting the laws of the state and appropriating the money.
Good Morning ! Institute of Cost Accountants of India Trivandrum Chapter May 28, 2016 CS Bilu Balakrishnan ACIArb, FCS Deputy General Manager (Corporate.
Dispute Settlement Scenario in Telecom Sector By S C Khanna Secretary General Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India 15 th May 2010.
MANJUL BAJPAI Lucknow –
MANJUL BAJPAI CHANDIGARH –
Regulatory Adjudication in Resolution of Disputes
DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCENARIO IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
Adjudication, Regulation, Telecommunication
Canadian Law.
Chapter 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution
Presentation on Legislative Framework & Licensing
Calicut Branch of SIRC of ICAI
Judicial System in India
Victorian Court Hierarchy
WELCOME.
Presentation transcript:

MANJUL BAJPAI GOA EVOLUTION OF JUDICIAL MECHANISM IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS IN INDIA

Telegraph Act, DoT’s monopoly - No competition, so no Regulator or Adjudicator Privatisation (1990s) – NTP-94 - competition introduced - Independent Regulator required TRAI proposed as a non-statutory body Standing Committee recommended statutory status to ensure independence and effectiveness. Supreme Court emphasized TRAI’s independence TRAI Act, 1997 enacted

January 1997-June 1999 TRAI had limited adjudicatory powers - Service Providers inter se or between Service Providers and Group of Consumers - on -Interconnection- Revenue Sharing - Quality of Service - Consumer Interest Service Provider defined as meaning the Government including a Licencee TRAI exercised adjudicatory powers qua DoT in latter’s capacity as Licensor DoT challenged TRAI’s powers contending that DoT as Licensor cannot be equated to a Service Provider High Court held that TRAI had no such powers qua DoT in latter’s capacity as Licensor Two years of Litigation - Mostly License issues - virtual Vacuum

June January 2000  No separate dispute settlement Forum was available to entertain disputes between Licensor and Licensees  NTP-99 – TRAI to act as Arbitrator for settling disputes between Licensor and Licensee.  Government issued notification to implement this policy.  TRAI never acted as Arbitrator  Government withdrew this Notification

Post January 2000  TRAI Act was amended in January 2000  TDSAT was established  Significant changes over earlier law:  Separation of Regulatory and Adjudicatory functions  Vested with both Original and Appellate jurisdictions  Can adjudicate upon “any dispute”  Empowered to adjudicate disputes between Licensor and Licensee  Appeals now lie directly to Supreme Court  It also empowered the Government extend the TRAI Act to Cable and Broadcasting Sectors.  In January 2004, TDSAT was empowered to settle disputes in Cable and Broadcasting sectors also.

THE WAY AHEAD UTDSAT - a success story UFastest and maximum disposals UTelecom Law is a specialized field UGovernment must ensure that the knowledge and expertise gained during litigation must be passed on to the succeeding Chairperson and Members. This can be done – one - by making timely appointments and – two – by ensuring overlap between the outgoing persons and incoming persons.

THANK YOU