Department of International Health Regulations Coordination

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Industry Brief Apr Outline How is Alberta preparing? How is Alberta preparing? Albertas Health Response Albertas Health Response Albertas Operational.
Advertisements

Scaling up the global initiative on the implementation of the SNA and supporting statistics Meeting on Scaling up the coordination and resources for the.
Armand Racine Consultant Chemicals Branch
1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
WTO, Trade and Environment Division
SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY HARMONIZATION
1 Howard BATHO B.V.Sc. M.R.C.V.S. DG Health and Consumer Protection Directorate D Unit 1 HEAD OF IMPORT SECTOR
WTO - TBT Committee Ana Maria Vallina, PhD Coordination Among Regulatory Bodies: The Chilean Experience Ana Maria Vallina PhD Head of Foreign Trade Department.
Geneva, Switzerland, June 2000
Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) Training
Developing veterinary legislation in a WTO context OIE Global Conference on Veterinary Legislation 7-9 December 2010 (Djerba, Tunisia) Melvin Spreij Counsellor.
Standards and Trade Development Facility (STDF) A joint initiative in SPS capacity building and technical cooperation OIE Global Conference on Veterinary.
Overview of the Basel Convention and Basel Protocol: History and Goals Ms. Donata Rugarabamu Senior Legal Officer Secretariat of the Basel Convention Regional.
Overview of the Basel Convention and Basel Protocol: History and Goals Laura Thompson Legal Expert Secretariat of the Basel Convention Regional Workshop.
1 The International Health Regulations and Aviation Operations Cairo FAL Meeting, March 2004 William Cocksedge, IHR Revision Project WHO Geneva.
Responsible Care and its relation to Global Product Strategy.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
1 Trade facilitation: Benefits and Capacity Building for Customs UNECE International Forum on Trade Facilitation, May 2003 Kunio Mikuriya Deputy.
The Role of the Veterinary Services in Food Safety
OIE International Standards The OIE Standard Setting Process Regional Information Seminar for Recently Appointed OIE Delegates Brussels, Belgium, 18 –
Regional IPPC Workshops 2014 WTO Agreement on Trade Facilitation (ATF)
World Health Organization
Overview of the Rotterdam Convention.
1 Overview of CSME Issues of Interest Recent Developments and Future Considerations Presented by Desiree Field-Ridley Advisor - Single Market and Sectoral.
Modernization of Canada’s Yellow Fever Vaccination Program
Technical Requirements, WTO Rules and Trade
The Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures Lecture 37 Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
Presentation 4.2 CODEX STANDARDS ON SAFETY Section IV Food Quality and Standards Service (ESNS) Food and Nutrition Division. FAO.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
The Quality Management System
Central Asia Regional Health Security Workshop Co-organized with the Command Surgeon, US Central Command and the George C. Marshall European Center for.
LEGAL CAPACITY FOR STATES-PARTIES TO THE IHR (2005) INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS (2005) - STATE PARTY PROVISIONS & GOVERNANCE.
2st Regional Workshop: Improving Capacity for Diagnosis of Disease of Fish and Molluscs Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 2013, FAO Technical.
Health and Consumers Directorate-General (DG SANCO) Howard Batho, Head of import and OIE sector Unit D1, Animal Health and Standing Committees.
The International Food Standards and Recommendations Prof. Elisaveta Stikova M.D., Ph.D. School of Medicine University “St. Cyril and Methodius” – Skopje.
DPG HEALTH MEETING USAID CONFERENCE ROOM 6 NOVEMBER 2013 International Health Regulation (2005)
Overview of the Rotterdam Convention. Sub-regional Consultation for DNAs 2 Overview of the Rotterdam Convention Structure of the presentation Part 1 -Introduction.
Potential trade implications of CBD and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety MEA – UNEP meeting on Enhancing MEA and WTO Information Exchange 11 November,
Dr. Maria Almiron Epidemic Alert and Response Team Communicable Diseases Proyect Public Health Emergency Management in the Region.
SEARO –CSR Early Warning and Surveillance System Module International Health Regulations and EWAR.
CAPSCA Europe workshop, Paris, France, September 2011 Legislative aspects for IHR implementation at airports Thomas Hofmann Division of Communicable.
The Codex Alimentarius Commission
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.
Disease Surveillance and Epidemiology (DSE) – WHO Indonesia 1 |1 | International Health Regulations (2005) and EWARS Dr Nirmal Kandel, MBBS, MA, MPH Disease.
International Health Regulations (IHR) Dr. Ibrahim Gosadi & Dr. Salwa Tayel Family & Community MedicineDepartment May_
WHO / World Bank videoconference 19 September 2008
1 The Impact of Food Safety Control Malta June The Impact of Food Safety Control Malta June Enrico Casadei Food and Nutrition Division FAO,
ASDPE International Health Regulations (IHR 2005) Laboratory and Zoonosis update Dr Richard Brown, WHO Thailand Workshop on Laboratory Diagnosis for Zoonotic.
JOINT FAO/IAEA PROGRAMME of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture 1 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) &
1 OIE standards: Ante- and post-mortem meat inspection Stuart A. Slorach Chair, Animal Production Food Safety Working Group Regional Seminar for OIE National.
(CAREC) PAHO/WHO Serving 21 Member Countries in the English and Dutch Speaking Caribbean IHR: Responsibilities and Status of Implementation in CAREC member.
Tracy McCracken SPS Technical Advisor East Africa Region United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Kenya and East Aferica/Office of Regional.
T Mr.Willy Musinguzi, EAC. .Overview of EAC SQMT Infrastructure How EAC standards are Harmonized and Implemented How EAC Quality Infrastructure relates.
SANITARY & PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES IN PRODUCTION PROCESSING FOR TRADE (LIVESTOCK & LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS) BY DR. (Mrs.) MARLINE SAMBO WAZIRI fcsn, fieon, ficon.
1 The contribution of VICH to the global One Health approach VICH5 CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 2015, TOKYO Jean-Pierre Orand, Anses, France, OIE Collaborating.
National Food Control Systems
Legislative aspects for IHR implementation at airports
International Health Regulations (IHR)
The International Health Regulations and Aviation Operations
IHR: the framework for preparedness and response
Overview of the WTO SPS Agreement and the role of
The EAC Quality Infrastructure and WTO TBT Agreement.
Outline Responsible authorities for reporting under the IHR
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
HACCP Essential Tool for Food Safety
International Legal Framework
Implementation of OIE Standards into national legislations
Outline Background and overview IHR NFP operational framework
EU Food Safety Requirements: - Hygiene of Foodstuffs -
Presentation transcript:

Department of International Health Regulations Coordination OIE Global Conference on Veterinary Legislation Djerba, Tunisia 7-9 December 2010 Bruce Plotkin Department of International Health Regulations Coordination Departments of Food Safety and Zoonoses and International Health Regulations Coordination Health Security and Environment Cluster WHO HQ, Geneva, Switzerland 1

Outline of Presentation Codex Alimentarius: What is it? What does it do? Importance for national legislation International Health Regulations (2005): Background, overview, scope Key elements Importance of intersectoral collaboration Legislative assessment and revision: Lessons learned and practical suggestions

Codex Alimentarius Commission - what is it? - Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) is an intergovernmental body operating within the United Nations Joint initiative of FAO and WHO (since 1963) FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme 180 member governments, including the European Community as a member organization Approximately 20 technical committees Product is Codex Alimentarius (Latin for "food code")

Codex Alimentarius Commission - what does it do? - Creates harmonized international food standards with a dual purpose: “to protect the health of consumers” “to ensure fair practices in the food trade” Also promotes coordination of all food standards work undertaken by international governmental and non-governmental organizations Standards, when introduced into national legislation, contribute to ensure safety of foods Commission meets annually - discuss and adopt international food standards, guidelines For examples, at its recent 33rd session, the commission considered: guidelines on controlling bacteria in seafood throughout the food-chain; and setting maximum residues level for ractopamine in meat

Codex standards for food safety → Codex standards Voluntary / Non-mandatory Reference for policy & decision-makers Since 1995, international standards references under the SPS and TBT Agreements of the World Trade Organization (WTO) International standards in SPS for food safety → Codex standards for animal health → OIE (World Organisation for Animal Health) for plant health → IPPC (Int'l Plant Protection Convention)

FAO/WHO Guidelines for strengthening national food control systems (2003) ANNEX 6 – Guidelines for Developing a National Food Law A set of guiding principles as a general approach to the drafting of food legislation Applicable to different legal systems Complement an in-depth analysis of the legal and institutional framework that govern food production, import, export, distribution, handling and sale in a particular country Prompt countries to take full advantage of Codex standards and food safety & quality lessons learned in other countries

International Health Regulations (2005) A (very) short history 1969 IHR covered 3 diseases: YF, cholera, plague Revision started 1995 –adopted by all States in 2005 IHR in force, and implemented, globally since 2007 Legally binding on 194 States Parties Concerns during revision included - EIDs, Zoonoses e.g. Ebola/VHFs, BSE, Nipah, SARS, avian influenza, future serious potentially unknown international risks Global legal framework against international spread of serious disease Apply to government as a whole, not just particular ministry, department or agencies Broad / open disease scope for early warning/response & to catch emerging risks Overall framework: surveillance, response, support ,information sharing, capacities Does not replace existing regulatory regimes – Does mandate collaboration

Major innovations From control at borders to containment at source and development of core public health capacities in all countries From disease list to broad range of serious int'l public health risks From preset health measures to generalized rules and risk assessment in particular context

Purpose and Scope of IHR "to prevent, protect against, control and respond to the international spread of disease… "in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks "and which avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade" (Article 2)

Broad scope and coverage of IHR (2005) “Disease”: “an Illness or medical condition, irrespective of origin or source, that presents or could present significant harm to humans” “Event”: “a manifestation of disease or an occurrence that creates the potential for disease” "Public health risk": "the likelihood of an event that may adversely affect the health of human populations, …" Events/risks may be: Biological/infectious, chemical, radionuclear Known or unknown, emerging or re-emerging Transmissible by persons, transport conveyances, cargo/goods food/animals/products), vectors, environment, etc.

Government areas and functions affected by International Health Regulations Public health Environment Radio-nuclear and chemical activities / safety Customs Food safety Borders / immigration Agriculture (and animal health) International ports, airports, ground crossings Transportation (including dangerous goods) Collection, use and disclosure of public health information Activities of authorities at national, state/provincial/district, local levels.

Animals / products References to animals in the IHR arise in mainly 2 contexts: "Goods" – part of provisions throughout the IHR Defined as: "tangible products, including animals and plants, transported on an international journey, including for utilization aboard a conveyance" "Animals" – additionally referenced separately (examples): Definitions: infection/disinfection, contamination/decontamination, reservoir/vector Port/airport authorities responsible for removal and safe disposal of animal dejecta and other contaminated items on conveyances Designated ports/airports must have capacities to assess and care for affected animals by arrangements with local veterinary facilities for isolation, treatment Ship Sanitation Inspections / certificates include animal reservoirs Maritime Declaration of Health includes disclosure of sick animals

Key structures & mechanism National IHR Focal Point In all countries available 24/7 for urgent communications with WHO IHR Contact Point on urgent events under the IHR (for e.g. notification/verification/follow-up) involving any covered risks Responsible for obtaining information from all government sectors on IHR-covered events (should include animal health), and for disseminating information to them. Potential focus for intersectoral collaboration Has access to restricted IHR Event Information Site – information on selected (also OIE/FAO) Environment Radio-nuclear and chemical activities / safety Customs Food safety Borders / immigration WHO IHR Contact Point Located in each of WHO’s 6 regional offices – for communications with the National IHR Focal Points Works with WHO HQ, Country office and National government – on IHR events, technical support, capacity building

Key IHR elements for veterinary health sector & legislation: Public Health Operations (potentially zoonoses, animals) WHO: Global surveillance, assessment, support / response States: Notification/reporting/verification of urgent health events to WHO States: Collaboration with National IHR Focal Points WHO: Information sharing with States on selected urgent events with potential international implications States: Regulation of application of health measures to int'l trade, transport and travelers and sanitary requirements at international ports/airports, crossings Keys for implementation by veterinary health sector: Awareness of IHR requirements, and Timely collaboration with IHR unit, including information sharing, through NFP or other mechanism

Development of core public health capacities for surveillance and response All States Parties must develop/maintain national minimum public health capacities, including surveillance, assessment & response Required capacities: Detect, assess, control and report internally on public health events – according to specified criteria At all levels and throughout national territory Deadline for development: 2012/2014 Efforts to achieve these capacities ongoing worldwide Development monitored with States and WHO support Report on progress to the WHO World Health Assembly Includes your areas: Zoonoses and food-related risks Critical area for intersectoral collaboration

National IHR Core Public Health Capacities: Monitoring and reporting 8 Core capacities Legislation and Policy Coordination Surveillance Response Preparedness Risk Communications Human Resources Laboratory 3 levels National Intermediate Peripheral/Community Potential Hazards Biological Infectious Zoonosis Food safety Chemical Radio nuclear Events at Points of Entry

The requirements for intersectoral collaboration Required directly, and effectively indirectly under IHR (2005) Relevant mechanisms and provisions under the IHR (2005): National IHR Focal Point in all countries: Veterinary health sector a key authority with relevant public health information May also be other IHR coordinating authority National programme for meeting IHR Core capacity requirements – including zoonoses and food safety These are subjects of national/WHO monitoring & reporting to World Health Assembly Coordination with National IHR authorities: National veterinary legislation should be consistent with national organization for IHR implementation Ongoing legislative assessment and revision process regarding IHR (2005) rights and obligations – presents an opportunity for synergies and efficiencies

Assessment and revision of legislation Potential benefits: Enable veterinary health sector to carry out its necessary specific tasks Facilitate more efficient and effective functioning to achieve objectives Enable or facilitate implementation of country’s rights and obligations under the range of relevant international laws Empower the veterinary health sector Institutionalize the role and activities of the sector within the government Facilitate important inter-sectoral collaboration within government in activities relevant to veterinary health sector’s Good governance Potential challenges include: institutional, technical, informational, resource

Lessons learned in context of public health legislative assessment and revision Others in your government are probably also doing assessments / revision of legislation, some of which may relate to your intended legislation Legislation must be specific to domestic legal and governance systems, socio- political context Prioritize: What may need to be done most urgently What are most important elements for each State Consider options to expedite the legislative process if urgently needed Process needs to involve all relevant sectors, offices, levels May well save time / avoid obstacles later Process needs to involve not only options for high level legislation, but also regulations, rules, procedures that implement legislation operationally

Practical suggestions – Preparations Contact relevant government legal advisors for appropriate procedures – if needed Consider developing awareness materials such as cabinet papers to facilitate support Start early to identify / mobilize governmental, technical, financial, other resources Contact other States (particularly those with similar national contexts) who are doing, or have done, similar assessments and revisions for their lessons learned, collaboration Contact your country's national authorities concerned with implementing the IHR (2005) rights and obligations and other relevant national/international obligations (e.g. WTO/Trade): Facilitates awareness of full legislative landscape relevant to veterinary legislation Can ensure consistency and effective implementation in areas of mutual concern Start early to identify existing legislation, regulations, rules relating to your proposed legislation - can take surprising time, and if are problems better to know early

Resources: Guidance for full assessment Detailed, step by step guidance materials on WHO Website (IHR context) Most relevant: Brief Introduction: Considerations of Why, What, Who and How of legislative assessment and revision – as applied to IHR (2005) but much of it is generally applicable (and brief!) www.who.int/ihr/legal_issues/legislation/en/index.html

w w w . w h o . i n t / i h r Thank you