The Oregon Road User Fee Concept and Pilot Program Presented to National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission Washington DC September.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Public Transit Alliance (NuPTA) RIPEC Study: Transportation at a Crossroads (2002) Growing Smart with Transit: A Report of the Transit 2020 Working.
Advertisements

IntelliDrive for Safety, Mobility, and User Fee Project Cory Johnson Mn/DOT IntelliDrive Program Engineer.
Interstate 2.0: a 21 st -Century Network Financed by All- Electronic Tolling by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation.
1 This document and its contents are the property of The University of Iowa’s Public Policy Center National Evaluation of a Mileage- Based Road User Charge.
Oregon’s Road User Fee Pilot Program Presented to International Fuel Tax Agreement Managers’ Workshop September 2006 PowerPoint Presentation provided by:
Road Pricing Anthony M. Rufolo Systems Science Seminar May 7,2010.
Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance Act 374 of 2009.
October 10, 2013 Federal Transportation Revenue Options Discussion.
Oregon Mileage Fee Concept and Road User Fee Pilot Program Presented to WASHTO Construction and Materials Committee Portland, Oregon April 8, 2008 James.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
County Transportation System Governor’s Transportation Advisory Committee September 14, 2012 Abbey Bryduck, AMC Policy Analyst.
Colorado Transportation Finance and Implementation Panel Overview Fort Morgan,Colorado September 13, 2007.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Enabling Congestion Pricing in the.
Road charging and vehicle taxation - the EU perspective
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
Exploratory Study: Vehicle Mileage Fees in Texas Ginger Goodin Richard T. Baker Texas Transportation Institute Research sponsored by the Texas Department.
Value Pricing for Transportation in Washington, D.C. Martin Wachs, Director Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Berkeley.
THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY TRUST FUND IN CRISIS THE IMPACT ON SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Jack Basso Chair Mileage Based User Fee Alliance.
1 The Oregon Project: How to Put Together the Pieces of Road Usage Charge Legislation Minnesota Mileage Based User Fee Alliance Workshop St. Paul, Minnesota.
IBTTA Washington Briefing Washington, D.C. March 30, 2015 Jonathan L. Gifford, Ph.D. George Mason University / Research.
Presentation to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Peggy Catlin, Deputy Executive Director.
New Revenue Subcommittee Recommendations. Criteria Elasticity Elasticity Ability to phase in Ability to phase in User-based User-based Yield Yield Ease.
Tolling and Congestion Pricing Patrick DeCorla-Souza Office of Innovative Program Delivery Federal Highway Administration Presentation to Transportation.
Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Fees What’s been done? What’s happening? What do you need to know? Trey Baker Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University.
THE CONDITION OF OUR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE How Do We Adequately Finance Our System?
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Oregon’s Road User Fee Pilot Program Presented to NEACT LaGrande, Oregon August 4, 2005 James Whitty, Manager Office of Innovative Partnerships and Alternative.
The Challenge of Financing Oregon’s Highways
The Oregon Experiment – and Iowa Too! Conclusion In the future, gas tax revenue will not be the primary source for funding our roads.
Oregon’s Experiments in Closing the Transportation Funding Gap Presented to Focus Georgia April 25, 2007 James Whitty Manager, Office of Innovative Partnerships.
Congestion Pricing I. Introduction II. Need and purpose of multimodal system Traffic gridlock reflects an imbalance between road supply and road demand.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
Highway Trust Fund Primer Published July 27, 2015 National Journal Presentation Credits Producer: Chris Danello, Katharine Conlon Director: Jessica Guzik,
Beyond the Crossroads National Conference on Transportation Infrastructure and Regulatory Policy May 27, Denver, CO Future Infrastructure Needs,
Urban Road Pricing: US DOT Congestion Initiative and Urban Partnerships 14 th World Congress on ITS IBEC Special Session October 10, 2007 Beijing Exhibition.
Prepared for Transportation Planning Board presented by Arlee Reno Cambridge Systematics, Inc. in cooperation with K.T. Analytics November 16, 2005 Status.
Abstract Transportation sustainability is of increasing concern to professionals and the public. This project describes the modeling and calculation of.
Convergence of Transportation Policy and RFID Enabler of Future Transportation Policy Chris Body Mark IV Vice President, Business Development.
Tolling and Pricing Opportunities Under the Federal-aid Highway Program January 2006.
Civil and Environmental Engineering 1 Norway’s toll rings: Full scale implementations of urban pricing Dr. Terje Tretvik - SINTEF, Norway IMPRINT-EUROPE.
Finance and Infrastructure Subcommittee Financing Recommendations.
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
State Public Transportation Partnership Conference Reauthorization of the Surface Transportation Programs Jack Basso Director of Program Finance and Management.
Advanced Technology Approach to Assessing Road User Charges: Research Progress  David J. Forkenbrock  Director, Public Policy Center  University of.
Central Kentucky Regional Policy Group Juva Barber Executive Director.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements I-95 Corridor Coalition EPS Summit September 19, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Jeffrey F. Paniati.
Interstate 2.0: a 21 st -Century Network Financed by All- Electronic Tolling by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements NTOC Summer Meeting September 7, 2007 Washington, DC Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator,
A A S H T O S P R I N G M E E T I N G 1 7 M A Y B E D F O R D S P R I N G S, P A 1 Surface Transportation Authorization: Review of Mid-Course.
Status of Funding and Authorization Subcommittee's of Traffic Engineering and Operations and Management Manchester NH 2009 Ken Kobetsky.
1 Alternative Financing Methods and Roles of Different Levels of Government Presentation to the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing.
CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2040 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE, PART 2 April 25, 2013.
Trucking Industry Perspectives on Transportation Funding Greg Owen Head Coach Ability/Tri-Modal Talking Freight – December 16, 2009.
Term Paper Presentation Course: CVEN 632 Presented by: Shailendra Matoria Evaluating Electronic Toll Collection System against Conventional Toll Plaza.
Darrin Roth American Trucking Associations, Inc. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROAD PRICING.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
PG Funding and Management Strategies Paris Some thoughts on Road Pricing.
What Part Does Transportation and Land Use Play in Tackling Climate Change & Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Gordon Garry Director of Research and Analysis,
Solving the SR-520 Problem © 2005 Chaisy, Hurvitz, Jiang, Jun, ShinnersSlide 1 (of 37) Solving the SR-520 Problem prepared for UTRAN prepared by INSTEP.
13 March 2014 By a California Country Mile The Business Case for Road Usage Charging Matthew J. Dorfman and Travis P. Dunn D’Artagnan Consulting, LLP.
Transportation Revenue Sources Presentation to the Discovery Institute October 6, 2004 Amy Arnis Deputy Director Strategic Planning and Programming Washington.
Road Services Funding Options Bridges and Roads Task Force October 28,
43 RD ASECAP STUDY & INFORMATION DAYS 2015 A Multimodal, Smart and Safe European Transport System: The Key Role of Motorways Epic Sana Hotel May.
Nevada Transportation Conference
THE CONDITION OF OUR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE
John W. Lawson Chief Financial Officer
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Alternative Solutions to Shrinking Tax Revenues
How to Put Together the Pieces of Road Usage Charge Legislation
Presentation transcript:

The Oregon Road User Fee Concept and Pilot Program Presented to National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission Washington DC September 5, 2007 James Whitty, Manager Office of Innovative Partnerships and Alternative Funding

Road User Fee Task Force Legislative Mandate: “To develop a design for revenue collection for Oregon’s roads and highways that will replace the current system for revenue collection.”

Solution: A Mileage Fee A per-mile charge on in-state mileage Replaces fuel tax

Mileage Fee Collection Challenges Start up and operations costs Collection enforcement Integration with current system Seamless transition System redundancy Ease of use by motoring public

Collection Possibilities Centralized Collection Operations costly Collection enforcement problematic No gas tax integration No system redundancy Not motorist friendly √ Collection at Fuel Pump Solves all structural issues

Oregon’s Mileage Fee Concept: Two Purposes Create a reliable, broad-based charge to replace fuel tax as principal road funding mechanism Create an electronically collected charge to assist management of road congestion levels 1 2

Zones – NOT location detail Charge on miles driven within Oregon by zone. Zone 1 = in state Zone 2 = out of state Zone 3 = rush hour

Data Transmission Miles collected electronically by zone

Process data and charge the proper fee

The Receipt Fuel tax deducted from fuel purchase price Mileage fee imposed as part of fuel purchase csr R# 1 S# 1 T# :55 AM 06/09/06 Leathers Fuels SE Powell Blvd Portland, OR Pump# 1 Unleaded ST Fuel (4.68) VMT Fee: 5.12 Rush Hour: 40 In-Oregon: 28.6 Non-Oregon: 0 No Signal: 0 Subtotal Total Cash Thank You !

What About… Heavy trucks? Non-equipped cars? Integration with the gas tax?

Integration with fuel tax Bulk of revenue stream remains at distributor level Mileage fee gradually becomes predominant Fuel tax retained guard against system failure and tampering

Vehicles No retrofitting Components installed in new vehicles prior to sale Service Stations Capital costs: $35 m Annual operating costs: $1.6 m Capitol Costs for Full Implementation in Oregon

Privacy No vehicle location data stored in vehicle No data transferred except mileage totals within zones Data transferred only at time of fueling via short range radio frequency

Multi-Jurisdictional and Variable Pricing Applications Local Option Defined boundaries Differing rates Area Pricing Higher rates at peak periods

Road User Fee Pilot Program April 1, 2006 to March 25, 2007

Preliminary Results Successes Zone differentiation Mileage counting Transaction administration 85% Vehicle identification 100% Transmission accuracy 91% Acceptance Needs More Work Perfect vehicle identification Improve cash transaction time Lessons Learned Retrofitting extremely difficult Technical assistance to stations

Final Results: Fall 2007 Technology assessment Administrative assessment Behavior assessment Steps to statewide implementation

Key Steps to Implementation of Mileage Fee Refine technologies and investigate alternatives Define manufacturing standards Address concerns of fuel distribution industry Integration with other revenue collection systems Study effects Sociological Economic Environmental Income Energy

Additional Uses: Facility Pricing Tolling new bridges or roads

Additional Uses: Cordon Pricing Point charges without cameras, back room operations or central billing

Additional Uses: Pricing On-Ramps Managing traffic flow on limited access highways without additional physical infrastructure Point charge or distance charge

Road User Fee Pilot Program Website