2009 ACEC/ODOT CONFERENCE ODOT’S 1R PROGRAM Liz Hunt, P.E. ODOT Pavement Services Engineer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACEC Conference March 5, 2012 Trudy Elsner P.E., Metro Maintenance, Engineering Services Sheila Johnson P.E., Metro Maintenance, Traffic Services.
Advertisements

ODOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Sheila Lyons, PE Local Area Government Conference 2011.
Executive Summary Introduction In 1988, by virtue of State Statute , the Nebraska State Legislature first assigned the Nebraska Department.
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee April 2, 2014 OVERVIEW | SOURCE OF PROJECTS PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT.
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
Statewide Traffic Engineers Meeting Rumble Strip(e) June 16, 2011 Simone Ardoin Assistant Road Design Engineer Administrator.
Safety Conversation: NLTAPA Conference Michael S. Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Federal Highway Administration.
“You Could Learn a Lot About Guardrail From a Dummy…
Funding Programs Surface Transportation Program (STP) Transportation Alternatives Program (TA) Congestion Mitigation / Air Quality (CMAQ) Highway Safety.
Presented by: Jerri Bohard, ODOT Transportation Development Division Administrator Paul Mather, ODOT Highway Division Administrator Travis Brouwer, ODOT.
Regional Asphalt Seminars Pavement Wedge Guidelines and Specifications EMMETT R. HELTZEL, P.E. STATE MAINTENANCE ENGINEER.
TRAILS AS TRANSPORTATION Design & Construction Michael J. Kubek, P.E. Ohio Department of Transportation, District 12 Production Administrator.
I-10 Exercise. Project Description Current and anticipated congestion due to rapid growth, one lane in each direction will be added to Interstate 10 from.
Maintenance of Traffic (MOT)
DUPAGE COUNTY MAYORS & MANAGERS TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MAY 24, 2012 LOMBARD, IL.
1 Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee June 25, 2014 PROGRAM RECAP AND ENDORSEMENT REQUEST PROPOSED HIGHWAY.
Part 3 – Markings. Dotted (not broken) lane lines shall be used for non-continuing lanes:  Lane drops  Auxiliary lanes  Deceleration lanes  Acceleration.
ALDOT HSIP FUNDING OPPORTUNTIES ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF SAFETY OPERATIONS SONYA BAKER TIMOTHY BARNETT MAY 13, 2015.
Introduction Transportation System Objectives : Military; Knit together the inhabitants of a territory by providing mutual access and communication; Economic.
AGENDA  PROJECT HISTORY  NORTHERN SECTION UPDATE  SOUTHERN SECTION OVERVIEW  INTERCHANGES  PROJECT SCHEDULE  UPCOMING ACTIVITIES  OPEN DISCUSSION.
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
Detours – Selection and Design Highways & Engineering Conference March 2, 2006.
Bureau of Materials and Research 2014 AASHTO RAC/TRB Annual Meeting High Value Research Sweet 16 Ann Scholz, P.E., Assistant Research Engineer
2014 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES Estimates Estimates 3 Point of the illustration? Document your assumptions.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Shared Roadways Lesson 14 (This picture shows bicyclists not.
Module 13: Highway-Rail Grade Crossings (HRGC)
Design Exceptions Presented by David Joe Polly PE, PLS, WRE Senior Standards Engineer Roadway Engineering Unit
Design Exceptions 101 Ed Fischer, State Traffic-Roadway Engineer Mike Morrow, FHWA Field Operations Engineer Kent R. Belleque, Senior Interchange Engineer.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E. Traffic Investigations Engineer, ODOT February 26, 2015.
Statewide Local Agency Project Delivery Conference SAFETEA-LU: Earmarks and Federal Programs Relating to Local Agencies Travis Brouwer ODOT Federal Affairs.
Transportation Safety Issues on our Indian Reservations Dennis Trusty Director- Northern Plains TTAP 2009 Transportation Safety Conference Pierre, SD.
. Efforts to Reduce Crashes on County Roads in Iowa.
LAKE COUNTY DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW AND PROGRAM PRIORITIES Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public.
Trail Funding Sources & General Information
"The Use of Condition Assessments to Improve Maintenance Level of Service in Texas" Joe S. Graff, P.E. Texas Department of Transportation.
Practical Design in ODOT Roadway Conference April 13, 2010 Cathy Nelson, PE Technical Services Manager/ Chief Engineer.
Local Government Section
Vegetation Control For Safety Russ Johnson – Maintenance Supervisor - WSDOT Don Petersen – Safety/Design Engineer - FHWA.
Project Scoping Fundamentals Alan Lively Project Delivery Specialist Local Government Section April 6, 2010.
Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System Report to the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee December 12,
C ONSIDERING L ARGE T RUCKS IN THE D EVELOPMENT OF T RAFFIC M ANAGEMENT P LANS Neil Boudreau, MassDOT State Traffic Engineer April 13, 2015.
1 Briefing on Draft Safety Element for the 2007 CLRP Michael J. Farrell Andrew J. Meese, AICP COG/TPB Staff TPB Technical Committee November 2, 2007 Item.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Lesson 13 (Some of these pictures show bicyclists not wearing.
The 2010 Evaluation of Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study Technical Advisory Committee Meeting March 2010 Thomas M. Welch, P.E. State Transportation.
2009 ROADWAY CONFERENCE 1R PROGRAM Cathy Nelson Steven Lindland.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Module 5 Work Zone Plan Sets Module 5 Work Zone Plan Sets Traffic Control Plan Development Course.
Louisiana Local Road Safety Program
2010 ROADWAY CONFERENCE 1R PROGRAM Steven Lindland.
FD05 STATEWIDE RESURFACING PROGRAM OVERVIEW DIANA RADCLIFFE, TEBM, ROADWAY PRESERVATION, DIV OF MAINTENANCE.
BIM Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge Inspection Course Grade Separation Inspection & Ratings Grade Separation.
Successes in Reducing Highway Fatalities Kathy Harvey, MoDOT State Design Engineer July 16, 2008 Albuquerque, N.M.
Mike McColeman, P.E. Assistant Maintenance Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation Defining Desired Outcomes Defining Desired Outcomes.
Highway Fatalities A National Health Crisis Highway Designers Can Help Turn Around By Anthony Kane Director, Engineering and Technical Services American.
FACS-STIP Tool – Overview (Features, Attributes & Conditions Survey – Statewide Transportation Improvement Program) April 2010 Presentation for Roadway.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Presentation to the Washington Transportation Commission March 16, 2010 Washington State Association of County Engineers.
SCOHTS Meeting April 28-30, Completed NCHRP Projects Report 641 – Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips.
KING COUNTY BRIDGES AND ROADS TASK FORCE Roads Services Division Financial Review September 16, 2015.
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
Temporary Pedestrian Accommodations in Utility Work Zones Rebecca Klein, PE Regional Work Zone Engineer ,
Maintenance and Temporary Traffic Control
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Publication No. FHWA-HRT Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning.
AASHTO – SCOPM Palm Desert, California October 23, 2009 Mn/DOT Performance Management - Setting our Direction.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 Funding Resources for Highway Safety (FY2001 Fed-Aid) $1.4 $5.6 Min. Guarantee Bridge Surface Transp. Program National Hwy.
Rating Grade Separations
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
ALDOT Pavement Preservation Policy
Overcoming Barriers to Implement Research Projects
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Presentation transcript:

2009 ACEC/ODOT CONFERENCE ODOT’S 1R PROGRAM Liz Hunt, P.E. ODOT Pavement Services Engineer

Issue  With rising material and construction costs and declining funding it is essential that ODOT’s Highway construction and maintenance programs ensure that all available dollars are directed to activities and projects which optimize the Highway System condition as a whole.

1R Technical Bulletin

1R Program Components  Annual bucket for preservation projects requiring only a single lift of paving.  Anticipated savings from developing projects under 1R standards (currently set at $7M/year) would be used to address substandard priority safety features.

1R Projects  Address pavement feature only  Adversely impacted safety features need to be addressed like raising a guardrail to accommodate an overlay.  Safety features addressed through separate program based on priority needs.

1R Standard Approval Process  Region  Pavement Services Unit  FHWA

Pavement Details

Eligible Projects  Single paving lift  Non-structural inlay or overlay (2 to 3”)  Leveling course allowed

Safety Feature Details

1R Roadside Inventory  ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTIONS  DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS (ADT – Speed)  STRUCTURES  SIGNS  GUARDRAIL  DRAINAGE FACILITIES  PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE FACILITIES  SPECIAL PROBLEMS (Clear Zone Safety Hazards)

Statewide Traffic Barrier Inventory

230 Transition

High Priority Barrier Features 1 - Un-connected Transitions 2 - Pre 230 Terminals 3 - Pre 230 Transitions 4 - Tongue & Groove Concrete Barrier 5 - Pre 230 Type 1 and 1A Guardrail 6 - Pre 230 Type 2 Guardrail 7 - Pre 230 Impact Attenuators 8 - Rebar Pin & Loop Concrete Barrier Loop Pin & Loop Concrete Barrier Transitions Impact Attenuators

Cost to Upgrade High Priority Features HIGH PRIORITY FEATURENUMBERCOST UN-CONNECTED TRANSITIONSIncluded in Pre-230 Terminals PRE-230 TERMINALS11,100 units $45,000,000 PRE-230 TRANSITIONS 1,000 units $ 6,000,000 T&G CONCRETE BARRIER 7 miles $ 3,000,000 PRE-230 Type 1 GUARDRAIL 140 miles $19,000,000 PRE-230 Type 2 GUARDRAILIncluded in Pre-230 Type 1 PRE-230 IMPACT ATTENUATORS 60 units $ 3,000,000 TOTAL $76,000,000

Required 1R Items  Replacement of striping and delineation  Gravel shoulders matched to paved surface elevation  Replacement of signal loops if impacted  Replacement of rumble strips  Adjust existing features as needed  Vertical clearance policy followed  Traffic mobility standards followed

Benefits of a 1R Program  Provides opportunity to plan and deliver projects strategically.  Allows more timely development of single lift preservation projects.  Simplifies project delivery – only impacted features are addressed.

Questions?