Chapter 8: The future geodetic reference frames Thomas Herring, Hans-Peter Plag, Jim Ray, Zuheir Altamimi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geodetic monitoring of crustal deformation in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica Hannu Koivula, Jaakko Mäkinen, Joel Ahola and Markku Poutanen Finnish Geodetic.
Advertisements

Where do precise orbits and clocks come from? Kristine M. Larson ASEN 6090 Spring 2010.
ILRS Workshop, 2008, A 33 Year Time History of the J2 Changes from SLR Minkang Cheng and Byron D. Tapley Center for Space Research.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | A | Cambridge MA V F.
The Community Geodetic Model (CGM): What is it and how does it relate to studies of lithospheric rheology? Jessica Murray, David Sandwell, and Rowena Lohman.
An estimate of post-seismic gravity change caused by the 1960 Chile earthquake and comparison with GRACE gravity fields Y. Tanaka 1, 2, V. Klemann 2, K.
Atmospheric Loading Nicole M. Shivers.  “The Earth’s surface is perpetually being displaced due to temporally varying atmospheric oceanic and continental.
Glacial Isostatic Adjustment Contributions to Tide Gauge, Altimetry and GRACE Observations Glenn Milne Dept of Earth Sciences University of Durham, UK.
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller.
2-3 November 2009NASA Sea Level Workshop1 The Terrestrial Reference Frame and its Impact on Sea Level Change Studies GPS VLBI John Ries Center for Space.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_MOD stations corrections Hana Spicakova.
Satellite geodesy. Basic concepts. I1.1a = geocentric latitude φ = geodetic latitude r = radial distance, h = ellipsoidal height a = semi-major axis, b.
Data centres and observablesModern Seismology – Data processing and inversion 1 Data in seismology: networks, instruments, current problems  Seismic networks,
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 43 Science and.
Facilitating Joint Analysis of Data From Several Systems Using Geophysical Models Hans-Peter Plag, William C. Hammond, Geoffrey Blewitt Nevada Bureau of.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna VIE_MOD station corrections Hana Spicakova.
Principles of Sea Level Measurement Long-term tide gauge records  What is a tide station?  How is sea level measured relative to the land?  What types.
Commission 3 Earth rotation and Geodynamics Véronique Dehant.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 10:30-12:00 Room
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Don P. Chambers Center for Space Research The University of Texas at Austin Understanding Sea-Level Rise and Variability 6-9 June, 2006 Paris, France The.
Figure and Gravity Figure of a planet (Earth) Geoid Gravity field
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 10:30-12:00 Room
E ARTHARTH EARTHEARTH. Is thE thiRd pLanet in thE sOlar systEm in terms of distance from the sUn, and the fifth largest. It is also the largest of its.
Generalization of Farrell's loading theory for applications to mass flux measurement using geodetic techniques J. Y. Guo (1,2), C.K. Shum (1) (1) Laboratory.
Regional and Global Measurements: The Reference Frame for Understanding Observations Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno, USA Zuheir Altamimi IGN,
Outline  Construction of gravity and magnetic models  Principle of superposition (mentioned on week 1 )  Anomalies  Reference models  Geoid  Figure.
NKG Working Group for Geodynamics Copenhagen, 23 –24 April, Tasks of a new Working Group on Absolute Gravimetry Herbert Wilmes Federal Agency for.
Practical issues (This lecture is based largely on: The shape of the gravity anomaly depends not on the absolute.
Determination of seasonal geocenter variations from DORIS, GPS and SLR data.
Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC February 2009.
Sea-Level Change Driven by Recent Cryospheric and Hydrological Mass Flux Mark Tamisiea Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics James Davis Emma Hill.
GGOS User Requirements and Functional Specifications Richard S. Gross Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA Global.
Thoughts on the GIA Issue in SNARF Jim Davis & Tom Herring Input from and discussions with Mark Tamisiea, Jerry Mitrovica, and Glenn Milne.
1 Geoid and Geoid Change: Discussion Topics Roger Haagmans, Boulder, 21October 2009.
(a) Pre-earthquake and (b) post-earthquake Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) images of North Sentinel Island. The.
Water storage variations from time-variable gravity data Andreas Güntner Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Section.
GPS: “Where goeth thou” Thomas Herring With results from Jen Alltop: Geosystems Thesis Katy Quinn: Almost graduated Ph.D
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
Workshops for Establishing a Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF) to Enable Geophysical and Geodetic Studies with EarthScope: Annual Report
State-of-the-art physical models for calculating atmospheric pressure loading effects 1 Geodätische Woche October, Köln, Germany Dudy D.
Geocenter Variations Derived from GRACE Data Z. Kang, B. Tapley, J. Chen, J. Ries, S. Bettadpur Joint International GSTM and SPP Symposium GFZ Potsdam,
GRACE Mascons and Hydrological Data for the Continents: GRACE ACCESS D. Rowlands (1), F. Lemoine (1), S. Luthcke (1), S. Klosko (2), D. Chinn (2), K. Akoumany.
Gravimetry Geodesy Rotation
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
Application of a North America reference frame to the Pacific Northwest Geodetic Array (PANGA) M M Miller, V M Santillan, Geodesy Laboratory, Central Washington.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 18 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Catherine LeCocq SLAC USPAS, Cornell University Large Scale Metrology of Accelerators June 27 - July 1, 2005 Height Systems 1 Summary of Last Presentation.
5/18/2994G21D-04 Spring AGU Realization of a Stable North America Reference Frame Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary, Sciences,
SPP Mass Transport and Mass Distribution in the Earth System Contribution of the New Generation of Satellite Gravity and Altimetry Missions to Geosciences.
Lecture 7 – Gravity and Related Issues GISC February 2008.
International Association of Geodesy Apr 17, GGOS2020 – Chapter 10 G. Beutler Astronomical Institute, University of Bern EGU Assembly Vienna April.
Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea and Jim Davis Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Towards a standard model for present-day signals due to postglacial rebound H.-P. Plag, C. Kreemer Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.
A proposal for a consistent model of air pressure loading as part of the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) Conventions Plag, H.-P. (1),
12.201/ Essentials of Geophysics Geodesy and Earth Rotation Prof. Thomas Herring
Ggim.un.org Positioning geospatial information to address global challenges Global and National Geodetic Reference Frames: how they are connected and why.
Last Time: Gravity Measurements may be surface-based (i.e., taken with instruments placed on the ground surface) or space-based ; absolute or relative.
Hydrogeodesy Training Session Approximately 15 attendees, Three seminars 1. Introduction to Hydrogeodesy 2. Introduction to Data Assimilation 3. Introduction.
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Reference Frame Representations: The ITRF from the user perspective
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Stable North America Reference Frame Working Group
Outline Construction of gravity and magnetic models Reference models
Dr. A‘kif Al_fugara Alalbayt Univerity
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 8: The future geodetic reference frames Thomas Herring, Hans-Peter Plag, Jim Ray, Zuheir Altamimi

02/07/07GGOS Chapter 82 Status The method of realizing the geodetic reference frame is still being debated. Current sections: –8.1 Concepts of frame and system –8.2 Reference frame formulation –8.3 Linking geodetic measurements –8.4 Potential field and geometric frames –8.5 Time variation of reference frame –8.6 Components needed for reference frame –[8.7 Solar system dynamic reference frames?] -- Should be included in 8.1, and 8.3.

02/07/07GGOS Chapter Concepts Two systems needed: Terrestrial rotating system and external inertial system. The terrestrial reference system is based on potential. Given a Cartesian frame, time dependent mass elements are assigned to each X,Y,Z coordinate. The integrals of potential for this system are divided into solid-Earth, fluid core and outer fluid envelope. Surface coordinates correspond to surface mass elements and in a consistent formulation, gravity and position changes are related. The problem is how to determine the motion of the mass elements?

02/07/07GGOS Chapter 84 Concepts Ideally, all forces and rheologies of system would be known and motions can be computed. Earth rotation variations would be the degree-1 toroidal components, averaged over a specific region, such as crustal layer, of the deformation field. Many of these forces are ready well known (e.g., tides), others such as plate tectonic forces can be approximated, and others are not well known but can be inferred from geodetic measurements (hydrographic loading) Develop a reference system that allows inputs from different geodetic components to realize the frame. Example next slide.

02/07/07GGOS Chapter 85 Example Concept Hydrographic/Atmospheric loading: –Atmospheric load from metrological analysis fields –Gravity missions such as GRACE measure changes in gravity which are interpreted as surface load changes. –The mass changes in the fluid envelope cause deformations in the solid Earth –The instantaneous realization of the reference frame would incorporate the loading deformations associated with the gravity changes accounting for the effects of the loading on the satellite tracking and EOP. This would be one effect of many. Other effects would be earthquake generated signals, atmospheric loading, internal stress changes in the Earth.

02/07/07GGOS Chapter 86 Height estimates at WILL from PBO combined data product RMS scatter 3.7 mm (no corrections)

02/07/07GGOS Chapter 87 Zoom during winter of 2006 Notice high correlation of estimates with atmospheric pressure loading. Brown curve is load signal from other mass inferred from the GRACE mission.

02/07/07GGOS Chapter 88 GRACE Expected load anomaly September 2006 Data obtained from the University of Colorado GRACE website: geoid.colorado.edu/grace/grace.php

02/07/07GGOS Chapter 89 Grace load anomaly April 2006 Data obtained from the University of Colorado GRACE website: geoid.colorado.edu/grace/grace.php

02/07/07GGOS Chapter 810 Amplitude of annual of load signal

02/07/07GGOS Chapter 811 RMS residual load signal after annual removed

02/07/07GGOS Chapter Reference Frame Formulation Temporal variations of site coordinates will be complex in general and as more is learned about the Earth, the motion complexity will increase. Sites would be divided into two types: –“Frame realization” sites that would have “simple, well characterized motions” (plate motion, GIA, loading not too effected by ocean effects). – Reference frame sites that could have more complicated motions (e.g., earthquake postseismic) but are needed to allow user local access to the reference frame. Anomalous station motion would be defined as a deviation of observed motion from predicted motion. Enough redundancy in the frame realization sites is needed to allow the detection of anomalous motion.

02/07/07GGOS Chapter Linking geodetic measurements Section to discusses issues of linking ground geodetic systems to satellite and celestial systems Linkage of geodetic systems e.g., collocation of ground systems versus linkage through orbits (corner cubes in satellites) Inertial frame from quasars and solar system dynamics

02/07/07GGOS Chapter Potential and Geometric reference frames Orthometric heights versus ellipsoidal heights In reference system definition, the gravimetric concept is imbedded however spatial resolution may not be adequate? Depends on future missions

02/07/07GGOS Chapter Time variations of reference frame Summary of the magnitudes of changes expected from various signals: –Plate tectonics –Glacial isostatic adjustment –Tidal (earth and ocean and ocean loading) –Loading atmosphere, hydrology, fluid core Document effects on position, rotation and gravity Most of this information is in other chapters

02/07/07GGOS Chapter Components needed Section looks at temporal, spatial resolutions and latency need from frame resolution. Temporal and spatial resolution possible with future gravity missions