2008-2010 Surface Water Standards Triennial Review and Implementation Connie Brower Nikki Remington-Julie Grzyb-Sandra Moore NC Division of Water Quality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Whole Effluent Toxicity NPDES Program
Advertisements

Indiana Department of Environmental Management
Jennie Henthorn Henthorn Environmental Services LLC.
The Entergy facility is a boiling water reactor with a rated core thermal power level of 1912 MW, providing a gross electrical output of 620 MW. The facility.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WATER RECLAMATION DIVISION Orange County Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing July 14, 2009 Proposed Revisions to Orange County.
MDFW Hatchery NPDES Program Ken Simmons Chief of Hatcheries/Trout Project Leader.
STORMWATER PERMITTING UNRAVELED NCMA Water Quality Workshop Feb 19, 2015, Raleigh, NC Bethany Georgoulias, Stormwater Permitting Program.
Paonia/Collbran Low Flow Presentation Water Quality Work Group Meeting June 9, 2004.
Water Resources Update Water Quality Workshop April 1, 2015.
WQBELs Karen Holligan May 6, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
Implementation of Antidegradation Policies for Indiana Waters.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Evaluations of Heavy Metal Listings on the State of Massachusetts Integrated List of Waters Assabet.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Georgia Tech What is Dilution?? Ocean Plan (2001) p. 15: INITIAL DILUTION is the process which results in the rapid and irreversible turbulent mixing of.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
Hydrostatic Testing Draft General Permit Draft Permit Stakeholder Outreach Meeting April 23, 2015 Moderated by: Lillian Gonzalez, Unit Manager, Permits.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
1 IDEM Overview of March 14, 2008 Draft Antidegradation Rule Presented at the April 29, 2008 Antidegradation Stakeholder Meeting.
STATUS OF ECOLOGY’S DRAFT FLOW BLENDING POLICY WATER QUALITY PARTNERSHIP MEETING January 20, 2005.
School Budget (Draft)
Implementation Procedures (IPs) Brittany Lee Standards Implementation Team
Proposed Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations, and Proposed FY2007 Air Monitoring Guidance WESTAR Spring Business Meeting March 28, 2006.
 Rick Rusz, Supervisor of Groundwater Permits Unit, Water Resources Division, and decision maker for the Groundwater Discharge Permit.  Ginny Pennala,
EPA REGION VI MINIMUM QUANTIFICATION LEVELS (MQLs) WHAT THE “L” IS GOING ON? 25 th EPA Annual Pretreatment Workshop Addison, TX 8/5/09 Allen Gilliam ADEQ.
NPDES Wastewater Permitting Update 2015 NCMA Workshop Tom Belnick DWR/NPDES Permitting.
Wastewater Treatment Plant # 2 Engineering Services Council Workshop July 8, 2014.
1 Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Standards and Facility Regulation Review.
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
“No instrument has yet been devised that can measure toxicity! Chemical concentrations can be measured with an instrument but only living material can.
A quantification of groundwater seepage during drought and its importance for water quality modeling in the St. Vrain watershed Hannah Chapin Thomas Gerber.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
S.B Municipality Fees. S.B – Environment Budget Reconciliation Bill Enacted during the 2011 regular legislative session and becomes effective.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
1 State Pretreatment Program Update Deborah Gore Pretreatment, Emergency Response & Collection System Supervisor September 28, 2015.
PROPOSED BRUNSWICK COUNTY INTERBASIN TRANSFER PETITION REQUEST NOVEMBER 14, 2013.
PUBLIC HEARING September 15, Draft NPDES Permits for ArcelorMittal Facilities Indiana Harbor West, Central Wastewater Treatment Plant, Indiana.
NPDES Permitting for Coal Ash Ponds in North Carolina EMC Meeting January 12, 2012 Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D. 1.
Connie Brower NC DENR Division of Water Resources.
WQBELs Karen Holligan September 23, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Water Quality Standards Regulation (9 VAC ) Rulemaking: Bacteria, Ammonia, Human Health and Aquatic Life Criteria.
James River Chlorophyll Study Status Update: May 3, 2016 Chesapeake Bay Stakeholder Advisory Group John Kennedy, DEQ Office of Ecology.
12-31 EMC Approval of Broad River Basin Hydrologic Model November 8, 2012 Division of Water Resources NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
Department of Environmental Quality September 7, 2016 GWWMC Meeting 15 NCAC 13B.0840 SAMPLING and ANALYSIS PROPOSED RULE AMENDMENT Tony Gallagher, Waste.
Arkansas Dept. of Environmental Quality Regulation No
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Water Quality-Based Effluent Limits
Triennial Review of Water Quality Standards Proposed Rulemaking
Deborah Gore, September 26, 2016
Request Approval of (d) Listing Methodology
Arsenic Acceptable Ambient Level Revision
Clark Fork River Metals TMDL Development
EPA’s Partial Approval of North Carolina’s (d) List
Report of Proceedings Surface Water Quality Standards Triennial Review Environmental Management Commission November 13, 2014 Steve Tedder – EMC Hearing.
Committee Update: Review of Groundwater Standards/IMACs
ADEQ Approaches to the Assessment Methodology
303(d) List March 9, 2016 WQC Jeff Manning, DWR
Request for Approval to Proceed to Public Hearing on the Triennial Review of Surface Water Quality Standards.
Water & Wastewater Equipment Manufacturers Association March 22, 2017
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
EPA Region IV and ADEM NPDES Permit Coordination
Water Quality-Based Effluent Limits
Water Quality-Based Effluent Limits
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair Water Quality Division
Incorporating metal bioavailability into permitting – UK experience
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Presentation transcript:

Surface Water Standards Triennial Review and Implementation Connie Brower Nikki Remington-Julie Grzyb-Sandra Moore NC Division of Water Quality

Triennial Review The State is obligated under the federal “Clean Water Act” to review surface water quality standards every three years

Clean Water Act Requirements  Limit the amount of pollutants that can be present in surface waters  Outline conditions of the surface water that will ensure protection of the designated uses  Protection must include physical, chemical and biological integrity of the waters

Anticipated Major Changes: Triennial Review ( )  Chlorophyll a  Aquatic life metals standards  2,4 D standard (Water Supply only)  Clarifications and reorganization of Red Book regulations

Chlorophyll a  Current “max not to exceed” language modified to “not greater than 10 percent of data shall exceed”  Proposed change reflects DWQ’s current interpretation of the chlorophyll a standards  303(d) listing purposes  Addition of a regional standard for mountains and upper piedmont  25 ug/L

Mountain and Upper Piedmont Waters Per 2B.0202: all of the waters of the Hiwassee; Little Tennessee, including the Savannah River drainage area; French Broad; Broad; New; and Watauga River Basins; and those portions of the Catawba River Basin above Lookout Shoals Dam and the Yadkin River Basin above the junction of the Forsyth, Yadkin, and Davie County lines.

Review of National Criteria and Science  Since 1980’s - US EPA has published revisions to many metals  To date, North Carolina has not adopted those recommended changes  Proposed revisions to metals standards reflect the most current science

Metals Toxicity  Toxicity of metals is influenced by many factors such as….  Form and speciation of metal  pH, TSS, DOC, TOC, etc…  EPA’s national criteria take some of these factors into account  Dissolved metals  Hardness based criteria with equations

Dissolved Metals  Current standards are “total” metals  Dissolved metals better represent the bioavailable fraction  Dissolved fraction varies in natural waters  With the exception of Mercury and Selenium, DWQ has proposed the use of dissolved metals standards

Dissolved Metal Standards Implementation Upon permit renewal, once adopted, new criteria for metals will be used to calculate limits Permits are, have and must be written as total metals per 40 CFR (c)

Hardness Dependent Metals  For some metals: ↓ water hardness is associated with ↑ aquatic toxicity ↓ water hardness is associated with ↑ aquatic toxicity  Proposed numerical standards are based upon a default hardness of 25 mg/L  Metal specific formulas are also proposed to allow more localized applications of proposed standards

Metals Standards Implementation Some metals standards are hardness dependent NPDES permits must incorporate protective concentrations that consider instream water hardness Applicable in-stream hardness for use with metals equations: – –10th percentile of local 8 digit HUC

10 th Percentile Hardness by 8-Digit HUC Hardness Data: stations 37,530 samples

8-Digit HUC Hardness

Metal Current Total Aquatic Life Standard (ug/L) Proposed Dissolved Freshwater Standard (ug/L) Chronic 50 mg/L Hardness Chronic 25 mg/L Acute 25 mg/L Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium*2 / 0.4 trout / 0.51 trout Chromium (total)50Proposed for removal Chromium III *none24180 Chromium VInone1116 Copper *7 (AL)2.7 (AL)3.6 (AL) Iron1 mg/L (AL)Proposed for removal Lead * Nickel * Silver *0.06 (AL) 0.30 (AL) Zinc *50 (AL)36 (AL)

Stakeholder Concerns Goals Today – Provide links with guidelines to help answer questions for your permitted facility Who will likely receive permit limits and / or additional monitoring ? How can I calculate these predicted permit limits? How can I assess the economic impact of the proposed dissolved metal standards?

User Guide

Located under NPDES Wastewater website – Quick Links User Guide and Permit Limit Calculators to assist Permittees in understanding how the proposed Surface Water Standards (dissolved metals) will impact NPDES Permit Limits Permit Limit Calculators

Calculator 1 Estimates the Total Recoverable Metal Permit Limits for dissolved metals standards Uses: – –Proposed default hardness of 25 mg/L – –NPDES Permitted Flow (MGD) – –Receiving stream’s summer 7Q10 (cfs) Calculator 1 should provide conservative permit limit estimates for each facility because it uses the lowest hardness proposed under the revised regulations

Calculator 2 Also estimates Total Recoverable Metal Permit Limits for dissolved metals using: – –Combined hardness of permittee's 8- digit HUC hardness and the facility's effluent hardness, a mass balance approach – –A default hardness of 25 mg/L is used if the mass balance of the combined hardness data is less than 25 mg/L

Implementation: Hardness Determination For Stream hardness – –Use 10th percentile hardness of 8-Digit HUC For Effluent hardness – –Permittee data, NPDES will use the 10 th percentile of monthly effluent hardness values over a 1-2 year period. – –NPDES will request permittees to submit once/month sampling data with application for renewal. – –If no effluent hardness data, use 25 mg/L default value

What is my facility’s applicable hardness? To Determine a Permittee’s receiving stream’s allowable dissolved metal concentration use the following Hardness mass balance equation: (H in-stream, mg/L * 7Q10, MGD) + (H effluent, mg/L * Plant flow, MGD) (7Q10, MGD + Plant flow, MGD) Mass balance hardness less than 25 mg/L? Use default of 25 mg/L Mass balance hardness greater than 400 mg/L? Upper bound = 400 mg/L

CALCULATOR

To assess impact, complete Calculator 1 or 2 …. Observe current permit limits and estimated permit limits; gather laboratory metals data If effluent data equals or exceeds the estimated Permit Limits, assume limits & monitoring will be added to facility's next permit renewal If, for the last 5 years, all the effluent sampling data shows the metal as “less than the PQL” and the estimated permit limit is greater than the PQL, it is not likely a limit/monitoring will be placed in the NPDES permit

Remember to …. Examine Pre-treatment Impacts (if applicable) Staff have prepared information to assist you! Contact Deborah Gore or Dana Folley or

Fiscal Impact   NC General Statutes require an assessment of fiscal impact when regulations are modified   Fiscal Note must be completed and APPROVED by Office of State Budget Management (OSBM) prior to formal public comment period and public hearings

Fiscal Impact   DWQ mailed out requests for information on costs and benefits related to these proposals Monday, June 7 th   Deadline for submission of costs/benefits is Tuesday, September 7 th   From these documents, NC DWQ will draft a State required Fiscal Note for approval by OSBM   Public Comment period will begin after this Fiscal Note is completed and approved

Timelines   January/March 2010 – EMC granted our request to proceed to Notice of Public Hearings   June 7, websites available to assist permit holders   September 7 th – End of timeframe to submit fiscal information to DWQ for inclusion in OSBM Fiscal Note   Fall 2010: Staff develops OSBM Fiscal Note   Spring 2011 ?: Public Hearings announced…

Contacts Connie Brower Nikki Remington Julie Grzyb

Links to Website irev des

Hardness Dependent Equations Metals criteria are expressed as formulas Example: Chronic Standard for Copper.960 * e^0.8545[ln(hardness)] Source: NRWQC

Dissolved Standard Implementation A Translator is required to convert from dissolved metal standard to a total metal permit limit Translator answers the question: "What fraction of metal in the effluent will be dissolved in the receiving water?"