Nan Hao, Erin K O’Shea. + How is an environmental stimuli transmitted into a cell? + How a cell respond to a specific signal? – Here the signal can be.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inferring Quantitative Models of Regulatory Networks From Expression Data Iftach Nachman Hebrew University Aviv Regev Harvard Nir Friedman Hebrew University.
Advertisements

Microarrays and Cancer Segal et al. CS 466 Saurabh Sinha.
Fuzzy K means.
Assigning Numbers to the Arrows Parameterizing a Gene Regulation Network by using Accurate Expression Kinetics.
Alexander van Oudenaarden Lab Final Presentation Mashaal Sohail
Uri Alon’s lab 10/02. Network of transcriptional interactions in E. coli Thieffry, Collado-Vides, 1998 Shen-Orr, Alon, Nature Genetics 2002.
The Frequency Dependence of Osmo-Adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Jerome T. Mettetal, et al. Science 319, 482 (2008); William J. Gibson.
Stochasticity in Signaling Pathways and Gene Regulation: The NFκB Example and the Principle of Stochastic Robustness Marek Kimmel Rice University, Houston,
2.7 Piecewise Functions p In real life functions are represented by a combination of equations, each corresponding to a part of the domain. These.
Naomi Ziv, Mark Siegal and David Gresham
Control of Gene Expression
Parimal Samir1, Rahul2, James C. Slaughter3, Andrew J. Link1,4,5, *
Cold Adaptation in Budding Yeast
1 Department of Engineering, 2 Department of Mathematics,
1 Department of Engineering, 2 Department of Mathematics,
Anders S. Hansen, Erin K. O’Shea  Current Biology 
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages e12 (July 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
1 Department of Engineering, 2 Department of Mathematics,
Computational Re-design of Synthetic Genetic Oscillators for Independent Amplitude and Frequency Modulation  Marios Tomazou, Mauricio Barahona, Karen.
Presynaptic Strontium Dynamics and Synaptic Transmission
Loyola Marymount University
Dynamic Heterogeneity and DNA Methylation in Embryonic Stem Cells
A mathematical model for transcription factor‐activated gene expression allows clustering of promoters and detailed quantitative characterization. A mathematical.
The Frequency Dependence of Osmo-Adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisae
Transcription Stochasticity of Complex Gene Regulation Models
Tai LT, Daran-Lapujade P, Walsh MC, Pronk JT, Daran JM
Noise in gene expression depends on the promoter class and on TF dynamics. Noise in gene expression depends on the promoter class and on TF dynamics. (A,
Dynamic Response Diversity of NFAT Isoforms in Individual Living Cells
Encoding and Decoding Cellular Information through Signaling Dynamics
Impulse Control: Temporal Dynamics in Gene Transcription
Neural Mechanisms for Drosophila Contrast Vision
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages e5 (September 2017)
Noise Induces Hopping between NF-κB Entrainment Modes
Clarissa Scholes, Angela H. DePace, Álvaro Sánchez  Cell Systems 
A coherent feed‐forward motif sharpens the Dnmt3b transcriptional output into a bistable switch. A coherent feed‐forward motif sharpens the Dnmt3b transcriptional.
Divisive Normalization in Olfactory Population Codes
Fuqing Wu, David J. Menn, Xiao Wang  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages e6 (May 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Michał Komorowski, Jacek Miękisz, Michael P.H. Stumpf 
SK2 Channel Modulation Contributes to Compartment-Specific Dendritic Plasticity in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells  Gen Ohtsuki, Claire Piochon, John P. Adelman,
Andrew D Basehoar, Sara J Zanton, B.Franklin Pugh  Cell 
Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco, David J. Heeger, Justin L. Gardner 
Slow Chromatin Dynamics Allow Polycomb Target Genes to Filter Fluctuations in Transcription Factor Activity  Scott Berry, Caroline Dean, Martin Howard 
Quantitative Imaging of Transcription in Living Drosophila Embryos Links Polymerase Activity to Patterning  Hernan G. Garcia, Mikhail Tikhonov, Albert.
Long Noncoding RNA in Hematopoiesis and Immunity
NF-κB Dynamics Discriminate between TNF Doses in Single Cells
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages e6 (April 2017)
Alon Poleg-Polsky, Huayu Ding, Jeffrey S. Diamond  Cell Reports 
Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco, David J. Heeger, Justin L. Gardner 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Transcription Factors Modulate c-Fos Transcriptional Bursts
Perfect and Near-Perfect Adaptation in Cell Signaling
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Ankit Gupta, Benjamin Hepp, Mustafa Khammash  Cell Systems 
Mathematical Modeling of the Heat-Shock Response in HeLa Cells
Stephanie Rudolph, Linda Overstreet-Wadiche, Jacques I. Wadiche  Neuron 
Antisense expression associates with larger gene expression variability. Antisense expression associates with larger gene expression variability. (A–D)
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 6, Pages 1-12 (August 2018)
Tuning width distributions.
The 3D Genome in Transcriptional Regulation and Pluripotency
Transcription Dynamics
Enhancer Control of Transcriptional Bursting
Presentation transcript:

Nan Hao, Erin K O’Shea

+ How is an environmental stimuli transmitted into a cell? + How a cell respond to a specific signal? – Here the signal can be any change in the environment.

Signal & Response

plasmids-and-my-battle-with-e-coli

+ Binding of transcription factor to gene promoter

+ Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) + Msn2 is TF that binds to DNA stress response element. + Stress stimuli: dephosphorylated, enter the nucleus, activate genes.

+ Observe how Msn2 respond to different stress – Glucose limitation – Osmotic stress – Oxidative stress

Top row: average of single –cell time traces of Msn2-YFP translocation Bottom row: representative single cell time traces of Msn2-YFP nuclear translocation

+ Sporadic, heterogeneous translocation burst after the initially relatively uniform nuclea burst.

+ Similarly uniform initial nuclear burst, fewer subsequence sporadic burst

+ Prolonged nuclear enrichment of Msn2

+ Observe how Msn2 respond to different stress + What is the gene expression corresponding to Msn2? – Hill equation – Curve fitting

+ Observe how Msn2 respond to different stress + What is the gene expression corresponding to Msn2? + How dynamical modulation would affect gene expression – Experiment – Computational model

+ Is it only the Msn2 nuclear localization level and time that matter, or is it influenced by the dynamic profile of Msn2 activation?

+ Area under curve of nuclear trace—max expression Single pu;se (black blue red) Oscillatory input (orange)

+ Max expression to Amplitude(change duration), Duration(change amplitude), Frequency

+ Observe how Msn2 respond to different stress + What is the gene expression corresponding to Msn2? + How dynamical modulation would affect gene expression + Hypothetical model simulation – Change parameters in computation model

+ Different TF binding parameter Kd, n, same promoter kinetic + AM is sensitive

+ Same binding parameter, different promoter kinetics k1,k2 + DM and FM are sensitive.

+ All different + Combines the results

+ Observe how Msn2 respond to different stress + What is the gene expression corresponding to Msn2? + How dynamical modulation would affect gene expression + Hypothetical model simulation + Analysis of a simplified model

+ Time scale of promoter transition