EVLA Overall System Specifications Rick Perley EVLA Project Scientist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 National Radio Astronomy Observatory The EVLA -- Status, Future Rick Perley National Radio Astronomy Observatory.
Advertisements

National Radio Astronomy Observatory June 13/14, 2005 EVLA Phase II Proposal Review EVLA Phase II Computing Development Bryan Butler (EVLA System Engineer.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 9/25/2012Prototype Review Meeting.
Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting December 14-15, EVLA Hardware Testing Rick Perley With much essential help from Barry Clark, Ken Sowinski,
Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting May , EVLA Technical Performance Rick Perley With much essential help from Barry Clark, Ken Sowinski,
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 Cross Correlators Walter Brisken.
J.M. Wrobel - 25 June 2002 PROPOSALS 1 PROPOSAL WRITING TUTORIAL Outline 30 minutes: Lecture on Generic Issues 60 minutes: Small Groups Write Proposals.
C. ChandlerEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, Scientific Commissioning Plan Claire Chandler.
Hunt for Molecules, Paris, 2005-Sep-20 Software Development for ALMA Robert LUCAS IRAM Grenoble France.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 03/15/2012Preliminary Design Review.
Basic concepts of radio interferometric (VLBI) observations Hiroshi Imai Department of Physics and Astronomy Graduate School of Science and Engineering.
Rick PerleyNSF Mid-Project Review May , EVLA Technical Performance Rick Perley With much essential help from Barry Clark, Ken Sowinski, Vivek.
National Radio Astronomy Observatory May 17, 2006 – Legacy Projects Workshop VLA/VLBA Large Projects Jim Ulvestad Assistant Director, NRAO.
EVLA Computing Overview Gareth Hunt EVLA Advisory Committee 2002 June
EVLA Early Science: Shared Risk Observing EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Claire Chandler Deputy AD for Science, NM Ops.
Solar observation modes: Commissioning and operational C. Vocks and G. Mann 1. Spectrometer and imaging modes 2. Commissioning proposals 3. Operational.
Tenth Summer Synthesis Imaging Workshop University of New Mexico, June 13-20, 2006 Antennas in Radio Astronomy Peter Napier.
P.Napier, Synthesis Summer School, 18 June Antennas in Radio Astronomy Peter Napier Interferometer block diagram Antenna fundamentals Types of antennas.
R. HaywardEVLA Feeds CDR - System Requirements 17 Feb EVLA Feeds CDR System Requirements.
Mark McKinnon EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting May 8-9, Project Overview Mark McKinnon Project Manager.
The Expanded Very Large Array: Phase I Science and Technical Requirements Rick Perley NRAO - Socorro.
Overall Data Processing Architecture Review EVLA Monitor and Control Interfaces July , 2002EVLA Data Processing PDR Bill Sahr.
Making MOPRA go! Lucyna Kedziora-Chudczer Friend of the telescope (UNSW)
Correlator Growth Path EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Michael P. Rupen Project Scientist for WIDAR.
C. ChandlerEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, Transition Operations Claire Chandler.
JVLA capabilities to be offered for semester 2013A Claire Chandler.
1 EVLA System Commissioning Results EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Rick Perley EVLA Project Scientist.
Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, 2007 EVLA Antenna and Array Performance Rick Perley.
EVLA Software Bryan Butler. 2007May22EVLA SAGE Meeting2 Requirements and Goals of EVLA Software Maximize scientific throughput of the instrument At a.
Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting May , Scientific Impact of Descopes Rick Perley.
Observing Modes from a Software viewpoint Robert Lucas and Philippe Salomé (SSR)
SAGE meeting Socorro, May 22-23, 2007 EVLA Science Operations: the Array Science Center Claire Chandler NRAO/Socorro.
P. NapierEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 8-9, EVLA Advisory Committee Project Overview P. Napier, Project Manager Management, Schedule,
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
Large Area Surveys - I Large area surveys can answer fundamental questions about the distribution of gas in galaxy clusters, how gas cycles in and out.
ASKAP: Setting the scene Max Voronkov ASKAP Computing 23 rd August 2010.
P.NapierEVLA Advisory Comm, 14 Dec 2004 Project Overview Peter Napier, EVLA Project Manager Status 2003 Committee Response.
14 June, 2004 EVLA Overall Design Subsystems II Tom Morgan 1 EVLA Overall Software Design Final Internal Review Subsystems II by Tom Morgan.
Mark McKinnon NSF Mid-Project Review May 11-12, Baseline Project Definition Mark McKinnon Project Manager.
Rick Perley 2 Nov 2001 EVLA Correlator Conceptual Design Review 1 Science Drivers for the EVLA Correlator Rick Perley EVLA Project Scientist 2 Nov 2001.
Rick PerleyNSF Mid-Project Review May 11-12, Scientific Impact of Descopes Rick Perley.
Rick PerleyEVLA Front-End CDR – On the Sky Tests April 24, EVLA Front-End CDR On the Sky Tests.
Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting December 14 – 15, EVLA `Descoping’ Options Rick Perley.
Rick PerleyEVLA Phase II Definition Meeting Aug 23 – 25, The Expanded Very Large Array Phase II Baseline Plan and Constraints.
Rick PerleyEVLA Feeds CDR 17 February Performance of the L-Band Feed Rick Perley.
10 January 2006AAS EVLA Town Hall Meeting1 The EVLA: A North American Partnership The EVLA Project on the Web
Computing Introduction Gareth Hunt EVLA System PDR 2001 December 04.
P.NapierEVLA Advisory Committee, 10 June, EVLA ADVISORY COMMITTEE PROJECT OVERVIEW Scope Organization Schedule Budget, personnel.
Overall Data Processing Architecture EVLA timeline and priorities.
Transition Observing and Science EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Claire Chandler Deputy AD for Science, NM Ops.
SAGE meeting Socorro, May 22-23, 2007 WIDAR Correlator Overview Michael P. Rupen Project Scientist for WIDAR & Software.
Imaging issues Full beam, full bandwidth, full Stokes noise limited imaging Algorithmic Requirements: –PB corrections: Rotation, Freq. & Poln. dependence,
EVLA Availability - or - When Can I Use It?
Observing Strategies for the Compact Array
EVLA System PDR System Overview
Rick Perley National Radio Astronomy Observatory
Shared Risk Observing Claire Chandler EVLA SSS Review, June 5, 2009
EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting
Scheduling Toolkit Observation Scheduling Boyd Waters, NRAO
Some Illustrative Use Cases
Early indications of performance
Gustaaf van Moorsel September 9, 2003
Feed & Front End PDR—Sys. Reqts
EVLA Operations Jim Ulvestad
Transition Observing and Science
EVLA Construction Status
EVLA Advisory Panel Mtg. System Overview
Requirements Bryan Butler.
Rick Perley NRAO - Socorro
EVLA Technical Performance
Presentation transcript:

EVLA Overall System Specifications Rick Perley EVLA Project Scientist

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June EVLA Design Philosophy The EVLA Project has never intended to build an entirely new telescope. The design approach has always been to maximize the increase in observational capabilities by combining: –Existing infrastructure (array, antennas, people …) –Modern technologies It was clear early in the design process that an order- of-magnitude improvement in all key observational capabilities was both feasible and practical.

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June EVLA Science Goals An order-of-magnitude improvement at modest cost sounds good, but the expenditure must be justified by the potential science return. Important design philosophy – the EVLA, like the VLA, is to be a general-purpose, flexible instrument, for astronomical research. A series of meetings resulted in a wide-ranging comprehensive science case, which was included in the proposal to the NSF for Phase I funding.

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Top-Level EVLA Technical Goals An early review of potential capabilities resulted in the following top-level technical goals: Complete Frequency Access (300 MHz – 50 GHz) with the best ‘G/T’ at each band. Up to 8 GHz (per polarization) instantaneous BW A wide BW, extremely highly linear, full- polarization correlator with at least 16,000 channels, up to 1 Hz resolution, pulsar binning, subarraying, and VLBI-ready capabilities.

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Top-Level EVLA Technical Goals Improved low-surface brightness imaging capability A factor of ten increase in resolution, with excellent imaging capability. Be able to incorporate VLBA antennas in the future. Improved operations and user interaction capability.

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June The Two Phases An early decision: -- split the project into two phases. Phase I: Essentially an upgrade to the VLA. –Funding secured (mostly – final word on correlator funding expected shortly) –Two components of the original Phase I plan were deferred to Phase II, primarily for budgetary reasons. Phase II (Completion Phase): Primarily an expansion. –Not yet funded – a proposal is under development. –Will be discussed tomorrow

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June EVLA Technical Goals The top-level EVLA goals were presented to meetings of our scientific users, with the questions: What potential science can you foresee? What further capabilities are needed to get the best science from this instrument? The responses (in the form of typical and extreme observational programs) enabled a more detailed set of technical goals for the project. The more detailed ‘Level 2’ technical goals are:

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Antenna -- Mechanical Pointing: –Blind: 6” rss between 30 and 70 degrees El. –Referenced: 3” rss between 20 and 70 deg. El. –OTF: 4” rss at drive rates up to 1 deg/min – 8”, rss, at rates from 1 to 2.5 deg/min. Subreflector Positioning –Limits on focus, horizontal, rotation, and tilt positioning, and band change speed which are each about a factor ~2 tighter than current. Note: These goals are close to values already achieved – there is no specific EVLA budget for improvement.

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Antenna -- Mechanical Antenna Slew/Settle –< 5 seconds, when angular motion is less than 30 arcminutes. Driver for the above: Mosaicing and OTF imaging at high frequencies. Cassegrain Feed Positioning –5 arcminutes. Driver: Hi-Fidelity, full-beam imaging (feed illumination offsets place phase gradient across primary beam).

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Antenna - Electrical Efficiency Band (GHz)RequiredTarget 1.2 – – – – – – – – – – 0.45 Driver: EVLA Sensitivity Goal of < 1  Jy in 12 hours.

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Antenna -- Electrical Main-Beam Similarity –Power variation < 3% of peak, within FWHP. –Phase variation < 0.2 deg (L-band) to 5 deg (X- band and higher) with FWHP. Illumination Centroid –Centroid within 10 cm of the antenna center. Driver: Minimization of computing efforts for full-field and mosaic imaging.

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Antenna - Electrical Polarization –Stability (stable weather, within FWHP, 8 hr) RCP and LCP polarization ellipses stable to in axial ratio, and 2 degrees in position angle. –Ellipticity and Orthogonality RCP and LCP on-axis AR to be 0.9 to 1.0 RCP and LCP major axes orthogonal to 10 degrees. –‘Squint’ Stability Separation of R and L beams to remain constant to 6 arcsec. Driver: High-fidelity polarimetric imaging.

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Antenna - Electrical Receivers –Tsys –Ae/Tsys BandTsysAe/TsysSEFD

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Antenna-Electrical Performance Variation over Frequency: –Increase of Tsys within any band, relative to best value, to be less than 3dB over full bandwidth 1 dB within inner 85% of BW Driver: To ensure sensitivity goal over wide bandwidth.

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Antenna - Electrical Receivers –Power Linearity Better than 0.5% over input power range of 15 dB. Driver: Accurate (relative) flux density calibration Better than 2% over input power range of 50 dB. Driver: Solar observing, and tolerance to RFI. –Time Response 0.5% power linearity condition to be maintained on 20 ms timescale. Driver: OTF imaging and solar flare observations

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Antenna-Electrical Temporal Phase Stability –1-  variations < 0.5 ps on timescales < 1 sec. –Slope < 0.2 ps/min over durations < 30 min. Variations about this slope < 1.4 ps. –Angle-dependent phase changes less than: 0.7 ps for any angle change 0.07 ps for antenna angle changes < 10 degrees. Driver: Phase-coherent capability at 50 GHz.

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Antenna - Electrical Receivers – Bandpass Characteristics –Amplitude Stability Variations (power) < 0.01% on timescales < 1hr, over frequency scales < 0 /1000. –Phase Stability Phase variations < 5 millideg, on timescale < 1 hr, over frequency scales < 0 /1000. Driver: Sensitive absorption line studies (high spectral dynamic range).

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Antenna - Electrical Receivers – Bandpass Characteristics –Gain Slope Power gain variations < 3dB across full bandwidth Gain variations – limits on gain slope which vary with band. –Gain Ripples < 0.25 dB on band-dependent frequency scales –Phase Ripples < 2 electrical degrees, on band-dependent frequency scales. Driver: To limit closure errors to reach dynamic range goal of 70 dB.

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Antenna - Electrical Receivers – Tolerance to Power Spikes –Ability to absorb 10 mW for 1 second without permanent physical damage. –Driver: To handle RADARSAT-like emission seen through the main beam.

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Time Accuracy Time –System time accurate to 10 nsec. Driver: Pulsar timing observations.

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Correlator Bandwidth –Variable, up to 8 GHz per polarization Polarization –Full polarization capabilities. Frequency Resolution –Variable, from ~ 1 MHz to 1 Hz. Number of Channels –At least 16,384 Time Resolution (dump speed) –Better than 10 msec

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Correlator Pulsar modes –Binning capability, with > 1000 bins, each with full spectral capability and 200  sec time res n. Subarray capability –At least 5 simultaneous subarrays. Phased Array capability –Required, for each subarray. Linearity (spectral dynamic range) –> 50 dB (H 2 O masers, tolerance to RFI)

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Correlator Baseline Range –To continental scales VLBI capabilities –VLBI-ready (tape or real-time) RFI tolerance –> 50 dB spectral linearity –Ability to avoid strong RFI Driver: To enable the EVLA to achieve its science goals!

Proposal Preparation and Submission Observation Preparation Observation Scheduling Monitor and Control System AntennaFeedReceiverIF System Local Oscillator Fiber Optics Transmission System Correlator Image PipelineData ArchiveData Post- Processing Figure 3.1. Principal EVLA Subsystems NRAO Data Management Group (e2e project) Canadian Partner EVLA Project Primary data flow Control and monitor flow

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Operational (M&C) The specific requirements for the M&C System are given in EVLA Memo #15 (Benson and Owen). Key Top-Level Goals: –Replace the ModComps, and control current VLA hardware. Continue to use existing control scripts (OBSERVE/JOBSERVE) –Control a hybrid VLA/EVLA, during the transition phase. –Control the EVLA, the NMA, and fiber-linked VLA Antennas

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Operational (M&C) Specific Scientific Goals for the M&C System include the following –Spectral Line Imaging –Mosaicing –Observations of solar system objects –Solar observing –Astrometry –Rapid response to transient sources –VLBI/VLBA observing

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Operational (M&C) Specific Scientific Goals for the M&C System include the following (cont.): –Pulsar observing –Total Power measurements –NMA/PT Link/future real-time VLBA –Miscellaneous (currently unplanned) items.

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Operational (M&C) Scientific Goals include: –Recommended minimum output data rate –Hardware reconfiguration times –Subarrays –Interferometer model –Management of correlator modes and times –Special observing modes – phased array, reference pointing, focus, tipping scans, holography, survey modes –Support for special hardware: GPS, API, WVR, etc. –RFI detection, avoidance, excision –Archive of monitor data and observation parameters

Rick PerleyEVLA Advisory Panel Meeting 10/11 June Astronomer- Instrument Interfaces Part of the e2e project. –Proposal Submission and Handling –Observation Preparation and Scheduling –Observation Control and Feedback –Data Archive –Pipeline Processing – default images –Data Reduction Software