1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p. 43-45) EHP Compliance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures OCC – Chapter 6.
Advertisements

The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures HBA – Chapter 6.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FORESTRY DIVISION (323)
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
Environmental Project Commitments The Alberta Experience
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Grant Administrators.
National Environmental Policy Act of Establishes protection of the environment as a national priority Mandates that environmental impacts be considered.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Overview of the Environmental Assessment for Lease Issuance and Site Assessment Activities off Rhode Island and Massachusetts July 16-17, 2012July 16-17,
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
HUD Environmental Review Requirements November 30,2010.
Conservation Commissions and the Kinder Morgan Proposed Gas Pipeline PRESENTATION TO NORTHEAST MUNICIPAL GAS PIPELINE COALITION SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 MASSACHUSETTS.
2011 CDBG Recipients’ Workshop COMPLIANCE 9:30EnvironmentalRick 10:30BREAK 10:45Wage Rate ProvisionsMary Alice 11:00Uniform Acquisition Robert 11:15Conflict.
Presented to: Association of California Airports By: Peter F. Ciesla, Environmental Protection Specialist Date: September 21, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
FEMA’s EHP Review It is FEMA’s policy to integrate environmental and historic preservation considerations into its emergency preparedness, hazard mitigation,
Presented to: Hershey Aviation Conference By: Ed Gabsewics, Charlie Campbell & Suki Gill Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Environmental.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
FY 2010 Port Security Grant Program Grant Guidance Outreach Grant Programs Directorate and United States Coast Guard December 2009.
Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Grant Program.
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance Workshop EHP Compliance.
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
Design Phase Coordination and the Regional Environmental Coordinator’s Role.
West Texas Legislative Summit ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Environmental Regulations Affecting Transportation Carlos Swonke Director, Environmental Affairs Division.
Crafting Stormwater Programs Oregon Coastal Planners Fall Network Meeting October 9, 2008 Florence Event Center Alissa Maxwell, PE.
Tier II: Module 1C CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program.
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act ____________________ Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP Program Projects.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Proposed Action Purpose and Need A proposal to authorize, recommend, or implement an action in response to the need identified in the Purpose and Need.
SL Village Hall June 24, 2002 Village of Freeport, New York Freeport Electric Village of Freeport, New York Freeport Electric.
2012 Homeland Security Grant Program Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Mr. Sam Jonker-Burke Mr. Mike Curtis April.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Date Event Global Design Effort 1 CF&S Environmental Timelines & Radiation Impacts Jerry Aarons, PG/CHG (SLAC) Rod Walton, PhD (FNAL)
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015.
OFFICE OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Karl Morgan JUNE 2013 Karl Morgan JUNE 2013.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
Recreational Trails Program Federal Requirements.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Slide 1April 8, 2015, Financial Assistance Council Meeting.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
2011 HSGP Grant Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Mr. Sam Jonker-Burke Mr. Mike Curtis April 30, 2012.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 1 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP.
Emerging T&E Issues L. Peter Boice Conservation Team Leader 23 March 2003.
Office of Affordable Housing ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR THE HOME PROGRAM BY: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF AFFORDABLE.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Federal Environmental Requirements for Local Agency Transportation Projects Tom Holstein, , Donna Meyer, ,
McClain County Multi- Jurisdictional Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Image from
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS. KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF A SEP Projects must improve, protect or reduce risks to public health or environment. Projects.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
Railroad Towers ISSUES AND UPDATES FOR TOWERS PROPOSED IN RAILROAD RIGHTS OF WAY.
PRE-PLANNING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. OVERVIEW ASSESSING OWNER CAPABILITIES ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWING.
1 Demystifying Environmental and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance EHP Compliance.
FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA Overview of NEPA Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Nuts and bolts.
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Program Conserving America’s Birds Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA Migratory Bird Conservation for Federal.
Draft Environmental Assessment Report for Bradley International Airport October 2016
FY 2010 Port Security Grant Program
Programmatic Agreements
ACA Conference - September 2017
Construction Management & Inspection
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Presentation transcript:

1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance

2 What is an EHP Review?  Involves an analysis of pertinent project information used to determine the appropriate amount of documentation required for EHP compliance  All projects funded with Federal grant dollars must comply with EHP laws, regulations, and Executive Orders  Projects must be EHP approved before initiation  GPD certifies that a grant-funded project is in compliance with applicable EHP laws, regulations, and Executive Orders  Complex projects will typically require more information to reach a determination EHP Compliance

3 EHP Laws and Executive Orders NEPA National Historic Preservation Act Endangered Species Act Resource Conservation & Recovery Act Clean Water Act Coastal Zone Management Act Coastal Barrier Resources Act Clean Air Act Executive Orders: Environmental Justice Floodplains Wetlands EHP Compliance

4 What are EHP Considerations?  Endangered Species  Cultural Resources Historic properties Archaeological sites  Air and Water Quality  Noise  Fish, Habitat & Wildlife  Floodplains  Wetlands  Coastal Zones  Agricultural Lands  Environmental Justice  Socioeconomic Resources  Land Use  Hazardous Materials  Traffic  Geology ( Topography, Soils) EHP Compliance

5 Importance of Compliance Compliance Non-Compliance  Protection of natural and cultural resources  Improved project planning  Cost efficient  Programmatic and financial compliance  Efficient project implementation  Improved community relations  Project delays  De-obligation of funding  Negative publicity  Civil penalties  Lawsuits EHP Compliance

6 GPD EHP Review Process  Grantees are responsible for providing all relevant EHP materials to GPD  Grant funds may be used for preparation of EHP documentation  FEMA may be required to consult with State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), etc. EHP Compliance

7 Roles and Responsibilities  Grantees - Responsible for EHP compliance - Submittal of all EHP review packets to GPD  GPD Program Analysts (PA) - Point of contact between the grantee, GPD-EHP Team, and Regional Environmental Officer (REO) - Approval of projects with no potential for environmental and/or historic preservation impacts (Type A) EHP Compliance

8 Roles and Responsibilities  GPD-EHP Team - Point of contact for PAs and REOs - Approval of projects with no potential for environmental and/or historic preservation impacts if certain conditions apply (Type B)  REO - Review and approval of project with potential for environmental and/or historic preservation impacts (Type C) - Responsible for State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) consultation, with the assistance if necessary from GPD - Liaison with grantees and GPD EHP Compliance

9 Type A Projects  Projects with no potential for environmental and/or historic preservation impacts: - Planning - Classroom-based training and exercises - Field-based training at existing facilities with established procedures - Personnel - Mobile and portable equipment (PPE, radios, etc.), vehicles, and other equipment that does not require any installation EHP Compliance

10 Type B Projects  Projects with no potential for environmental and/or historic preservation impacts if certain conditions apply  Examples include: - Physical security enhancements - Equipment installation (structures less than 50 yrs old)  e.g. physical security/access controls  Typical questions - Does the project involve new ground disturbance or clearance of vegetation? - Does project utilize existing infrastructure? - Will work occur in the vicinity of historic properties? - Will work occur in or near water? EHP Compliance

11 Type C Projects  Projects that may have the potential for environmental and/or historic preservation impacts: - Additional analysis and documentation may be required to adequately address the impacts in compliance with applicable EHP laws and regulations - Environmental Assessments (EAs), Biological Assessments (BAs), or Memoranda of Agreement (MOAs) may be required - Public involvement may be required EHP Compliance

12 Type C Example: Modification of Buildings & Structures 50 + Years Old  Equipment installation (e.g. physical security/access controls) on, in, or in the vicinity of historic buildings, piers, bridges, etc.  Building renovation/hardening (e.g. doors, gates, windows) EHP Compliance

13 EHP Review Packet  A complete EHP review packet will provide the necessary information to expedite the EHP review  What are the required contents? - Detailed project description - Physical address of structure/facility or lat/long - Clear color photographs (ground-level and aerial) - Dimensions/acreage/square footage of structure and/or land affected - Extent and depth of ground disturbance for: New construction and structure modification Utility line placement Fencing, light posts, etc., installations - Height of communication towers - Special equipment being used, staging areas, etc. - Year building or structure was built (to include buildings or structures that are in the vicinity) EHP Compliance

14 GPD EHP Updates  CSID point of entry for all EHP review packets  Programmatic Environmental Assessment (PEA)  Screening Memo (see CD)  Authorized Equipment List (AEL) - Updated to reflect appropriate equipment  EHP Mailbox - For EHP related questions EHP Compliance

15 Tips for a Timely EHP Review  A clear and descriptive project description, with clear color photos and maps  Submit materials as soon as you receive your award notice or in your planning phase  Include any previous Master Plans or other environmental documentation  What work is being proposed, where will it take place, and how will it be carried out? EHP Compliance

16 EHP Points of Contact NameContact Information Adria Martínez Marquietta Brian Krevor Emily Marshall CSID GPD EHP EHP Compliance

Questions?