MQXF RRP® Strand for Q1/Q3 A. K. Ghosh MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
May 9, 2012D. R. Dietderich, LARP CM-18 Cable Fabrication Plans and Experience D.R. Dietderich Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory bnl - fnal- lbnl -
Advertisements

LARP MSM Conductor, Cable and Procurement - A. Ghosh1 Strand, Cable and Procurement BNL -FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Magnet Systems Meeting Jan 09, 2014.
Outline: Goals for the cable development at CERN. Main parameters of the cable. Cable development work for a cable width of 15.1 mm and for a cable width.
Oct , 2013, CDP D.R. Dietderich LARP Conductor & Cable Review 1 Conductor Development Program Support for LARP and HiLumi LARP- HiLumi Conductor.
Nb3Sn Cable and Insulation for LARP High-Gradient Quadrupole Magnets
11 Oct , 2013 by Video LBNL Cable Experience for HiLumi HiLumi LARP/LHC Strand and Cable Internal Review Oct , 2013 by Video D.R. Dietderich,
Coil Design and Fabrication Miao Yu Outline Introduction Coil Design –Coil Pole –Coil End Parts –Coil Insulation Coil Fabrication –Winding.
Innovation with Integrity Klaus Schlenga Washington, March 25, 2015 Bruker response to the FCC specifications.
MQXF Design and Conductor Requirements P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
DOE Review of LARP – February 17-18, 2014 QXF Conductor and Cable Arup K. Ghosh Feb
TASK Conductor Studies First Proposal CERN – 09 th July 2015 EuroCirCol Meeting – WP5.
Collaboration Mtg, St Charles, IL 10/5-6, 2005 A. Ghosh1 Conductor R&D Plan Arup K. Ghosh BNL.
Status of MQXF Conductor LARP Update
QXF Cable Status D.R. Dietderich Conductor Working Group Video Meeting, Sept. 17, 2014.
CERN/CEA Collaboration agreement No. KE2275/TE WP4 – Nb 3 Sn technology development Pré-Kick-off meeting 03/07/2014.
MQXF Cable for Q1/Q3 D.R. Dietderich MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
HiLumi-LHC / LARP Conductor and Cable Internal Review October 16 th and 17 th 2013 H. Felice LARP Short Magnets Fabrication and Test experience relevant.
11 T Nb3Sn Demonstrator Dipole R&D Strategy and Status
Plans and schedule for QXF Giorgio Ambrosio and Paolo Ferracin Joint LARP/CM20 HiLumi meeting Napa Valley, CA, USA 8-10 April, 2013 The HiLumi LHC Design.
Quality assurance of the QXF- Q2 Nb 3 Sn cable mass production C. Scheuerlein, 6 November 2014 HL-LHC/LARP International Review of the Superconducting.
MQXF Design and Conductor Requirements P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
Large Hadron Collider Accelerator Research Program Dimensional Changes of Nb 3 Sn Cables during Heat Treatment LBNL: Ian Pong Dan Dietderich.
15 Th November 2006 CARE06 1 Nb 3 Sn conductor development in Europe for high field accelerator magnets L. Oberli Thierry Boutboul, Christian Scheuerlein,
Outline: Main characteristics of the FRESCA2 cable Main characteristics of the strand Strand stability, an issue to avoid magnet quench at low field Procurement.
LARP Meeting April 2006LARP Magnet Program – D.R. Dietderich LARP Cable R&D D.R. Dietderich LBNL.
MQXF Q1/Q3 Conductor Procurement A. K. Ghosh MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
D.R. Dietderich Frascati, Italy Nov , 2012 RRP-NbSn Conductor for the LHC Upgrade Magnets RRP-Nb 3 Sn Conductor for the LHC Upgrade Magnets A. K.
Conductor Review Oct 16-17, 2013LARP Strand :Specs. Procurement, Measurement- A. Ghosh1 LARP Strand: Specifications, Procurement and Measurement Plans.
1st FNAL-CERN Collaboration Meeting Fermilab, May 13, 2011
Hi-Lumi Conductor Procurement A.Ballarino, B. Bordini, L. Oberli HL-LHC/LARP International Review of Superconducting Cable for the HL-LHC Inner Triplets.
E. Todesco OUTPUT OF THE CABLE REVIEW E. Todesco and the QXF team CERN, Geneva Switzerland CERN, 10 th December 2014 QXF design review, CERN.
LARP Meeting, Oct. 6, 2005 D.R. Dietderich, LBNL1 LARP Cable R&D FY05 & FY-06 Plans D.R. Dietderich, LBNL Geneva, IL October 5-6, 2005 bnl – fnal – lbnl.
Outline: Strand R&D and strand procurement and inventory. Main parameters of the cable without a core. Results obtained during the cable development without.
Task 6: Short Period Nb3Sn Superconducting Helical Undulator George Ellwood
Stress review - CERN, Review on stress sensitivity Part I R. Flükiger B. Seeber Group of Applied Physics (GAP) University of Geneva 1.
24 Th January Status of the Conductor Development Status of the manufacturing for Alstom Status of the manufacturing for SMI L. Oberli.
HL-LHC/LARP Cable Review, CERN, Nov Lessons Learnt in LARP- A. Ghosh 1 Lessons Learnt from LARP experience Arup. K. Ghosh HL-LHC/LARP International.
1 Cable Functional Specification March Conductor Working Group Arup K. Ghosh (BNL)
29 th September 2009 EuCARD-WP7 HFM Conductor specification and procurement Luc OBERLI CERN, TE-MSC-SCD.
Long Quad (LQ) & High Gradient (HQ) Series Alexander Zlobin bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program DOE LARP review Fermilab, June.
April-20, 2015MQXF Strand :Specification choices - A. Ghosh1 MQXF Strand: Available Implementations of various Cu/No-Cu in RRP April-20, 2015 LARP-CERN.
Logo area 11 T Wire: Procurement Strategy and QA/QC B. Bordini, A. Ballarino, M. Macchini Acknowledgments: thanks to E. Charifoullina for her contribution.
Answers to the review committee G. Ambrosio, B.Bordini, P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
LARP Collaboration Meeting 15 Nov 1-3, 2010 A2C- Materials Working Group Arup Ghosh (coordinator), Emanuela Barzi, Dan Cheng, Dan Dietderich, Soren Prestemon,
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 LHQ Goals and Status Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab 2 nd LARP / HiLumi.
LARP DOE Review July 13-14, 2009Materials – Conductor Support - A. Ghosh1 LARP DOE Review July , 2009 FNAL 2.4 Materials – Conductor Support Arup.
Conductor Requirements for Magnet Designers DOE- Conductor Development Program Daniel R. Dietderich Superconducting Magnet Program Office of Science ICFA.
LARP Collaboration Meeting 15 Nov 1-3, 2010 Conductor Procurement and Qualification Arup K. Ghosh (BNL) bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research.
CERN QXF Conductor Procurement and Cable R&D A.Ballarino, B. Bordini and L. Oberli CERN, TE-MSC-SCD LARP Meeting, Napa, 9 April 2013.
QXF Cable with Annealed Wire D.R. Dietderich QXF Working Group Video Meeting, Feb. 12, 2014.
MQXF Cable for Q1/Q3 D.R. Dietderich MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
Procurement of Nb 3 Sn strand, cable fabrication, and quality control for the U.S. Hi-Lumi LHC Accelerator Upgrade Project Lance Cooley, Fermilab L3 manager.
CERN Cabling Experience FRESCA 2, 11 T Dipole and MQXF A. Ballarino
FCC Conductor Development at KAT-Korea
Lessons learnt from CERN experience
MQXF cable with RRP wires for Q2
MQXF Design and Conductor Requirements
Coil Design and Fabrication
Development of Nb3Sn (and Bi-2212) strands in preparation for the FCC
11 T cable development and procurement strategy at CERN
MQXF Goals & Plans G. Ambrosio MQXF Conductor Review
Development of High Current Nb3Sn Rutherford Cables for NED and LARP
CERN Conductor and Cable Development for the 11T Dipole
Mechanical stability and QXF coil winding
MQXF Short Models Status and Plans
Procurement of Nb3Sn strand for coils assembled at CERN
MQXF cable with RRP wires for Q2
Detection thresholds in LARP Magnets
Development of Nb3Sn wire for high magnetic field at WST
Development of Nb3Sn in Japan
Presentation transcript:

MQXF RRP® Strand for Q1/Q3 A. K. Ghosh MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN

Outline Introduction RRP® Strand RRP® 108/127 Strand for MQXFS1 – Design change for RRR Control RRP® 132/169 MQXF strand Present status of wire performance – Comparison of vendor and LARP data on Ic – Ic and RRR optimization Strand Magnetization Cable and Insulation RRR of Extracted strand Summary 11/5/2014 Arup Ghosh2

Introduction The 1 st Short model MQXFS1 magnet is using coils made with 108/127 strand. Subsequent Short model and Long prototype MQXF magnets will use 132/169 design wire (smaller filament diameter) 11/5/2014 Arup Ghosh3 For the MQXF Q1/Q3 Magnets we will most likely use RRP® wire from Oxford Superconducting Technology Strand diameter 0.85 mm Ti-Ternary Nb 3 Sn Cable is a 40- strand Rutherford Cable with stainless steel core

RRP ® strands with smaller filaments – Smaller sub-elements can minimize flux jumps and improve stability. – Filament Magnetization decreases Smaller Filament Size Courtesy of Jeff Parrell (OST) 4 169

Sub-element (Filament) diameter D s Cu/Non-Cu=1.2, 45.5% SC R=Cu/Non-Cu=1.2, 45.5% SC, 54.5 % Cu 5  0.85 mm strand with132 filaments has the same sub-element size as the mm wire with 108 filaments that is used in HQ Table of Sub-element diameter in  m

Ti-Ternary 108/127 Strand Production From prior experience we found that RRR is not well controlled in the “standard” RRP-wire. (details in a later presentation by A. Ghosh and D. Dietderich) For the LARP order of 410 Kg which used 12 billets, OST introduced a small design change in the sub-element This production was used to resolve RRR control 6 billets use standard Tin content (Nb/Sn ratio=3.4) 6 billets use 5%-Reduced Tin content (Nb/Sn ratio=3.6) Reduced Tin has significant impact on the RRR of the copper. Side-effect: Marginal decrease in J c. Piece lengths have been very good; some billets drew down in a single piece.

MQXF Strand Specification 11/5/2014 Arup Ghosh7 ProcessRRP® or PIT Nb3Sn Strand Diameter, mm0.850 ±.003 Ic(15 T) at 4.2 K, A> 361 n-value> 30 Ic(12 T) at 4.2 K, A (Reference Only)(> 632 ) Ds, µm (sub-element diameter)< 50 Cu : Non-Cu volume Ratio 1.2  0.1 RRR (after full reaction) ≥ 150 Twist Pitch, mm19 ± 2 Twist DirectionRight-hand screw Strand Spring Back, deg.< 720 Magnetization Width at 3 T, 4.2 K, mT< 300 Minimum Piece length, mTBD for Q1/Q2/Q3

Specification for MQXF Strand LARP-M-8007 Rev.0 132/169 Nb/Sn ratio > 3.4 to meet RRR 8 J c (15 T) > 1400 A/mm 2 Process Ti-Ternary RRP® Nb 3 Sn Strand Diameter, mm0.850 ±.003 Ic(15 T) at 4.2 K, A> 361 n-value> 30 Ds, µm (sub-element diameter)< 50 Cu : Non-Cu volume Ratio 1.2 ± 0.1 RRR (after full reaction) ≥ 150 Twist Pitch, mm19 ± 2 Twist DirectionRight-hand screw Strand Spring Back, deg.< 720 Magnetization Width at 3 T, 4.2 K, mT< 300 Minimum Piece length, m550 High temperature HT duration, h ≥ 48

RRP 132/169 strand for MQXF short model magnets 9 LARP had an existing PO of 255 Kg (~55 km) for 108/127 under specification LARP-M-8004-Rev. B Contract was revised to change design to 132/169 Process Ti-Ternary RRP® Nb 3 Sn Strand Diameter, mm0.85 ±.003 Ic(15 T) at 4.2 K, A> 361 Ic(12 T) at 4.2 K, A> 684 n-value> 30 Ds, µm (sub-element diameter)< 60 Cu : Non-Cu volume Ratio> 1.1 RRR (after full reaction) ≥ 150 Twist Pitch, mm14 ± 2 Twist DirectionRight-hand screw Minimum Piece length, m750 High temperature HT duration, h ≥ 48 Exception:I c (15 T) > 350 A

RRP 132/169 strand for MQXF model magnets 10 LARP had an existing PO of 255 Kg (~55 km) for 108/127 under specification LARP-M-8004-Rev. B This was converted to 132/169- strand with “reduced-Sn”, using Nb Type-1. Exception to I c (15 T) specification: 350 A (compared to 361 A) Strand qualified using HT schedule: 210C/48h + 400C/48h + 665C/50h 9 billets were made I c, RRR and Cu/non-Cu measurements made at OST for samples taken from the front-end and back-end of each billet. I c and RRR measurements made at BNL using samples reacted with the same nominal HT schedule

MQXF strand 132/169, “reduced-Sn”, OST data 210C/48h + 400C/48h + 665C/50h 11 Exception to LSL UCL-Upper Control Limit LCL – Lower control limit LSL – Lower specification limit AVG – Average  – Std. Dev Ic-AVG needs to be increased in production to meet LSL of 361 A

RRR of the billets with the same HT 12  RRR is well above specification minimum of 150 Average RRR 315 ±  32

Cu/Non-Cu ratio 13 Average Cu/Non-Cu 1.21  0.035

Comparison of BNL and OST data 11/5/2014 Arup Ghosh14 I c ( 15T ) BNL I c ( 15 T) OST I c ( 12 T) BNL I c ( 12 T) OST I c ( 15 T)_OST/ I c ( 15T )_BNL I c (12T )_OST/ I c ( 12 T)_BNL RRR BNL RRR OST Average %99.3%  % 3832 H, TIc_OSTIc_BNLn_OSTn_BNL OST and LARP measurements are very consistent Samples were reacted and measured at each facility Round Robin Test of samples reacted at BNL

Optimizing 132/169 for MQXF 15 Specification Limits There is headroom in RRR to increase I c by using longer times at 665 o C or slightly higher temperature 670 o C Or by adjusting the Nb/Sn ratio

Longer times at 665 o C 11/5/2014 Arup Ghosh C50 h100 h Average, A , A % Increase in I c

Magnetization of MQXF 132/169 ΔM = 238 mT at 3 T, 1.9 K ΔM expected to be ~ 200 mT at 3 T, 4.5 K 5/5/ X. Wang Measurements performed at OSU By M. Sumption and X. Xu ΔMΔM

Magnetization of 0.85 mm,108/127 and 132/169 at 1.9 K 18  Magnetization scales with filament diameter 108/127 Scaled by 89% Strands have same J c and Cu/Non-Cu ratio X. Wang Measurements performed at OSU By M. Sumption and X. Xu

Cable Insulation at LARP Insulation is braided directly on cable – New England Wire Technology (NEWT) Using S-2® glass (from AGY) with 933 Silane sizing – 48 carriers – 2 ply yarn, twist pitch 75 mm Several lengths of QXF cable has been insulated – Using braiding parameters to yield target specification of  mm thickness – 10-stack measurements at 5 MPa are used to determine insulation thickness – Thickness can be readily adjusted to meet any change to present specification. 19 Each Cable length ~ 170 mMeasurement at 5 MPa ~170 mmm Cable IDI st Cycle2 nd Cycle3 rd Cycle 1050Z Z Z Z Z-A Z-B

Summary The “reduced-Sn” design change increases RRR manufacturing margin with minimal loss of J c. – Implemented for all billets in process and future procurements. RRP® 132/169 wire can meet strand specs – Manufacturing margin in I c needs to be increased by good control of the Nb/Sn ratio, and by reaction optimization LARP plan implements 132/169-strand in MQXFS2 magnet and all MQXFL prototypes. Strand procurement has been planned to meet cable manufacture and coil winding schedule. (Later Presentation) Specification and Production QA plan and documents is being finalized this fiscal year for pre-production lots and preparing for issuing call for RFP(Request For Proposal) for the production. 20

21 End of Presentation