05/04/2011 Public Hearing Added value of collective redress for improving the enforcement of EU law: entering a new debate Jérôme P. Chauvin Director Legal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Armand Racine Consultant Chemicals Branch
Advertisements

Policy Recommendation on Competitive Issues of PSI Re-use First draft … and beyond … Warsaw, October 20 th, 2011.
Who is the boss? What determines the PSI value chain characteristics… Marc de Vries LAPSI Conference Brussels, 24 January 2012.
A European Single Market for All Jacqueline Minor, Director, Horizontal Policy Development, Directorate General For the Internal Market and Services European.
Seminar "Open Government in the Making" Brussels, 4 October 2012 Andrea Halmos European Commission, DG CONNECT Unit H3 Public Services.
1 Reflections on the future Cohesion Policy DG Regional Policy European Commission.
VICTIMS RIGHTS in EU law Daphne III – AG Call KICK-OFF Meeting 21 January 2013 Centre Albert Borschette, Brussels.
Public hearing European Standardization: improving competitiveness through a new regulatory framework - European Parliament / IMCO 6 key messages on European.
Establishing a standardised methodology to measure JEREMIE impact Álvaro Navarro Innovation and Development Agency of Andalusia, Spain Brussels, 20 th.
Local Government Finance BUSINESS RATES AND POOLING.
10 YEARS AFTER 2004 EU ENLARGEMENT THE BENEFITS & IMPACT OF MODERN RETAIL Brussels, 18 March 2014.
The civilian consequences of competition law violations Copenhagen 28 September European Commission, DG Competition How can we construe a European.
EU Energy and Competition Law: Influence On Russian Trade and Investment Interests Ivan Gudkov, MGIMO-University, May, 31, 2013.
CONSUMER ADR and COLLECTIVE REDRESS Professor Dr Christopher Hodges Head of the CMS Research Programme on Civil Justice Systems Centre for Socio-Legal.
Financial Services and Consumer redress Unit DG SANCO The Commission‘s initiative on Collective Redress.
1 Regional policy The Resource BOOK of PPP case studies Second International workshop on PPP Brussels 5th July Roberto Ridolfi.
Comments on the 2011 draft SGEI Package Damien Geradin Covington & Burling, Tilburg University and College of Europe Bruges, 30 September 2011.
Konstantinos M. Karyotakis Maria Bakatsaki Vassilis Moustakis Technical University of Crete, Greece The Entrepreneurial Facet of Public Administration.
Ⓒ Olof S. Evaluating agricultural and rural policies: an EU Commission perspective for CAP2020 Tassos Haniotis, Director Economic Analysis, Perspectives.
Strengthening Incentives for Compliance through Certification, Ratings, Liability, Insurance requirements A review of possible instruments, strengths,
ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION : SOME REFLECTIONS ON LAW AND PSYCHOLOGY Workshop: Arbitration & Psychology Brunel University, London 24 May 2013 Dr Pablo Cortés.
Building User Trust Online Sarah Andrews International Conference on the Legal Aspects of an E-Commerce Transaction The Hague October 2004.
GovernEE GovernEE – Good Governance in Energy Efficiency Legal constraints and opportunities for improving EE of public and historic buildings.
Konsument Europa/ European Consumer Centre (ECC) Sweden ADR in cross-border disputes - practical examples 3 rd October 2013 Vilnius Ms. Jolanda Girzl Konsument.
WHY BUSINESS NEED MEDIATION? dr. sc. Srđan Šimac Judge of the High Commercial Court of the Republic of Croatia and President of Croatian Mediation Association.
Animal Welfare EU Strategy Introduction Community Action Plan The Commission's commitment to EU citizens, stakeholders, the EP and.
Competition, consumers & affordable prices in liberalised energy markets J. Minor, European Commission, Director, Consumer Affairs IV World Forum on Energy.
1 Public Procurement of Innovations a driver for future health in Europe - Stockholm, 13 October 2009 Public Procurement Directives supporting innovation.
VICTIMS’ RIGHTS New EU Directive establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime 20 September 2012 CABVIS Conference.
Commission's report on economic consequences of Country-by-Country Reporting (CBCR) Conference “Banking transparency: Managing risks, Maximizing Opportunities”
GIZ study “Financing of VET - Advisory Approaches
Learning Objectives Explain why government is necessary in a Market economy Understand why government must provide public goods Explain why externalities.
IFRRO Legal Issues Forum Brussels – 9 June 2011 Martin Delaney Legal Director.
SEMINAR ON OUT-OF-COURT DISPUTES RESOLUTION OF CONSUMER DISPUTES Belgrade, 27 th and 28 th June 2013 Sava Centar.
POWELL, GOLDSTEIN, FRAZER & MURPHY LLP ORIGINAL IDEAS. UNCOMMON SOLUTIONS. U.S. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGREEMENTS Presented by Larry Fullerton Vienna,
Law Enforcement in the EU Tamás Molnár The European Commission Directorate General for Health and Consumers ODR Conference Vienna.
C.H. Montin, Tbilisi, 12 November Tbilisi, 12 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Defining the problem (issue), the.
Tabitha Bonney Deputy Head of International Policy Development Office of Fair Trading.
Identifying obstacles in the Single Market: Tom CORRIE, MARKT.B.TF1 Baltic Sea Strategy and the Internal Market conference 17 September 2010 The role of.
Session 4: Collective Claims of Consumer Asscociations Patrick von Braunmühl Federation of German Consumer Organisations (vzbv)
Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry European Commission The New Legislative Framework - Market Surveillance UNECE “MARS” Group meeting Bratislava,
Sectorial Experience with Natura 2000 By Ben Delbaere, Deputy Director, ECNC 6th Meeting of Natura 2000 Management Working Group - 23rd November 2011 (Brussels)
Opt in vs. Opt out Emmanuel Gybels. 2 Introductionary remark : there is not one answer to this question – approach varies depending on type of claim and.
Alternative dispute resolution: providing consumers real effective redress Pedro Oliveira Legal Adviser 3 October 2013, Vilnius Lithuanian Presidency Conference.
Consumer collective redress in the EU : The Loch Ness Monster ? Monique Goyens Director-General Presidency conference Vilnius – 4 October 2013.
Building a Capital Markets Union for the EU. Capital Markets Union: A Commission priority Growing businesses critical to jobs and economic growth in Europe.
Chapter Four The American Legal System In this chapter, you will learn about:  How the American legal system is structured  The difference between criminal.
European Commission Taxation and Customs Union EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION The changing relationship between tax.
Date: in 12 pts MARKET SURVEILLANCE IN THE EU ROLE IN THE NLF - EU ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS Rita L'Abbate European Commission DG ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY.
MCCAA Conference Friday 14 th March 2014 New measures on the EU single market for telecoms Grace Attard, ACR, EESC Pauline Azzopardi, ACR.
EU Agency for Fundamental Rights
CONFLICTS AND CONFIDENTIALITY
Competition Law and its Application: European Union
Ariane de Dominicis – DG Environment
Competition and Antitrust Compliance Programs for Business
Regulatory Adjudication in Resolution of Disputes
Business sector engagement and Consumer Awareness October 3rd, 2017
European External Investment Plan
An Integrated Industrial Policy for the Globalisation Era
A comparative study in Saudi Arabia and China
Commission proposal for a Directive on
The Role of Bilateral Donors in supporting capacity-building in the area of ICT Open Consultations on Financing Mechanisms for Meeting the Challenges.
The European Consumer Centres Network (ECC-Net)
Boosting Social Enterprises in Europe December 3-4, 2015
Animal Welfare EU Strategy
Expensive commercial practices
2nd Biennial conference on the STOP program
INNOVATION DEALS: A NEW APPROACH TO REGULATION
Jean Bergevin European Commission GROW.F5 –
Airport Charges: Looking for the Right Scope
Presentation transcript:

05/04/2011 Public Hearing Added value of collective redress for improving the enforcement of EU law: entering a new debate Jérôme P. Chauvin Director Legal Affairs & Internal Market 5 April 2011, Brussels J. Chauvin Public hearing on collective redress

Entering a new debate Justifications for action are shifting In the past -lack of consumers confidence in cross-border shopping -improve means of redress -compensation-driven objective New element in the debate: enforcement objective CompensationEnforcement of redress EU law 2 J. Chauvin Public hearing on collective redress 05/04/2011

EU tradition of public enforcement of EU law Private actions economic compensation But public enforcement has always been main tool for correct application EU law, especially in complex areas such as competition The same applies at national level (national competition and other inspection authorities) Public enforcement driven by general interest considerations 3 J. Chauvin Public hearing on collective redress 05/04/2011 mainly

Risks of shifting from public to private enforcement of EU law Collective actions as enforcement tool in the EU: would require incentives to work Make it user-friendly (safeguard discussion) Provide funding This is the approach taken by the US system Exactly what we want to avoid in the EU 4 J. Chauvin Public hearing on collective redress 05/04/2011

Private enforcement of EU law: increasing costly litigation Private enforcement = more litigation Litigation as enforcement tool: more costly than public enforcement At a time where courts are « overloaded, understaffed, underfinanced » At a time where most Member States are reducing legal aid Not right solution Court should be the last resort and not main tool 5 J. Chauvin Public hearing on collective redress 05/04/2011

Trying to solve different issues with a one size fits all problems Consultation trying to deal with different objectives -Enforcement (injunctive relief) -Redress (compensation) 6 J. Chauvin Public hearing on collective redress 05/04/2011

Problems related to public enforcement What are the real problems? -Lack of means of the Commission -Lack of means of the national competition authorities -Lack of finance -Problem inherent to the system of public enforcement? More discussion needed/better definition of problem 7 J. Chauvin Public hearing on collective redress 05/04/2011

Redress problem We support efficient means of redress for parties harmed by breach of law Non-judicial route preferred -More flexible/Less costly/Quicker/Less confrontational ADRs to deal with cross-border cases Stronger commitment needed to improve ADRs Use of existing intruments (ECC, CPC, Solvit, FIN net,…) Sectoral approach? 8 J. Chauvin Public hearing on collective redress 05/04/2011

The way forward Clarify the objective Find appropriate solutions without upsetting legal traditions Improve redress by providing/promoting ADRs Non-judicial route more attractive/efficient Judicial collective action: -costs for society/benefits for consumers? -thorough impact assessment needed -justification for action 9 J. Chauvin Public hearing on collective redress 05/04/2011

Added value of collective redress for improving EU law enforcement Probably not a good idea We support: -Improving redress means ADRs -Improving public enforcement of EU law Two different issues different solutions needed Using the same instrument for both objectives = wrong route 10 J. Chauvin Public hearing on collective redress 05/04/2011

Thank you for your attention! J. Chauvin Public hearing on collective redress 05/04/2011