INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History 1939-1945: Holocaust 1945-1949: Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki 1932-1972:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Human Subjects Research at the University of Michigan – Dearborn. Debra Schneider IRB Administrator (313)
Advertisements

Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Human Subjects Protections, Concepts, and Procedures Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Tom Lombardo, Ph.D., Director, Research Integrity & Compliance.
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
Top Ten Investigator Responsibilities When Conducting Human Subjects Research Thanks to Ada Sue Selwitz, Univ. of Kentucky and PRIM&R (Public Responsibility.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
THE ETHICS OF HUMAN PARTICIPANT RESEARCH Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University.
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
IRB 101: Introduction to Human Subject Research
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
Ethical Issues in Human Experimentation The Role of the IRB The IRB is an administrative body established to protect the rights and welfare of human subjects.
IRB Basics Helen Panageas New York University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Portion of slides courtesy of Suzanne M. Smith, University.
© HRP Associates, Inc. Ethics & Regulation of Human Subjects Research Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D., CIP President, HRP Associates, Inc.
Human Subjects Research Dr. John S. Irvine Chairperson, NMSU Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research
Human Subject Protection Judith Birk IRB Health / Behavioral Sciences.
Ethics in research involving human subjects
Human Subject Research Ethics
IRB Discussion Consent and Assent Issues in Vulnerable Populations December
1 Wheaton College INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Educational Research and the VCOM Institutional Review Board
A History of Human Research Protections and Institutional Review Boards Roger L. Bertholf, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pathology Chair, University of.
1 HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS Daniel R. Vasgird, PhD, CIP Office of Research Compliance West Virginia University (304)
Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One? Merle Rosenzweig Michael Unsworth.
Protecting Human Participants in Your Research and Classroom Projects NAU Institutional Review Board
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
The ethical conduct of research with human participants Nancy E. Kass, ScD Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of.
Human Subjects Research at ASU An Overview. Overview Definitions Historical Framework Federal Guidelines Human Subjects Research at ASU.
Adam Mills Human Subjects Office September 18, 2015 IRB Basics.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Theoretical and Conceptual Framework. THEORY Theory is: a generalized abstraction about the relationship between two or more concepts a systematic abstract.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research Back to Class 2.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
The Ethics of Research on Human Subjects. Research Activity on Human Subjects: Any systematic attempt to gain generalizable knowledge about humans A systematic.
Human Subjects Research Nellie Quezada-Aragon, Director Office of Compliance Dr. Luis A. Vazquez, Chair NMSU Institutional Review Board
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Joni Barnard IRB Information Session: EHE Workshop 10/13/2015.
Paul Hryvniak MS, CIP Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP September 30, 2014 Student Human Research Education Session Tel:
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
Chapter 3: Ethical guidelines for psychological research.
Class 9 Jeff Driskell, MSW, PhD
Ethics in Social Psychology
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Introduction to IRB (Institutional Review Board)
Mary Travis Director of Research Compliance
Protection of Human Subjects In Research
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
USC Institutional Review Boards
Intro to Projects – Research with Human Subjects
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
Human Participants Research
Research, Experimentation, & Clinical Trials
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS

2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki : PHS Syphilis Study : PHS Guatemala Inoculation Study : Milgram Study 1971: Stanford Prison Experiment 1970: Tearoom Sex Study : Willowbrook Children’s Study : Havasupai 1966: Beecher Paper 1947: Nuremburg Code 1974: National Research Act; First regulations published 1978: Belmont Report 1981: HHS regulations revised 1991: 15 federal agencies adopt the “Common Rule” 1980: FDA regulations issued 1999: Jesse Gelsinger dies at Univ. Pennsylvania 1951: Henrietta Lacks

The National Research Act of Established the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects in Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Established the concept of the IRB In 1978, identified ethical principles that should govern human research.

The Elements of the Belmont Report 4 Respect for Persons Protecting autonomy, having courtesy and respect for individuals as persons, including those who are not autonomous (e.g., infants, the mentally retarded, senile persons) Each person has individual rights Obtain informed consent, protect privacy, maintain confidentiality Beneficence Ensuring reasonable, non- exploitative and carefully considered benefits among persons and groups Equitable selection of subjects Includes all groups that may benefit but does not single out one group Justice Maximizing good outcomes for science, humanity, and the individual research participants while avoiding or minimizing unnecessary risk, harm, or wrong Provide benefit, protect from harm, limit risk Risk-benefit assessment, standard procedures used

The IRB is… 5 A group of people established to protect the rights and welfare of persons who participate in research. Part of this responsibility includes examining the ethical nature of the research and whether the proposed work follows Federal, state, and local laws.

What is Human Research? Human SubjectResearch Human subject means a living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains (1) Data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or (2) Identifiable private information. ) Research means a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. *The University of Arizona interprets generalizable to mean that results can be applied to the population at large. 6

What is NOT Human Research? 7 Work that is not Generalizable  Program Evaluations  Quality Improvement  Case Reports  Oral History See Investigator Manual appendix B: 103%20v pdf

What does research include? 8  Recruitment  Consenting process  Study intervention(s)/procedures  Identifiable data analysis Participate!

What is Informed Consent? 9  Consent is a process, not just obtaining a signature.  Consent should take into account the age, maturity, cognitive status, and language level of a potential subject.  Consent may involve the use of visual aids, information sheets, and/or videos.  Consent does not end with the signing of the consent form. As the study progresses, subjects should be updated with relevant information about the study and asked if they would like to continue (re-consent).  In some cases, it may not be appropriate or possible to consent subjects. The Federal regulations have provisions for when this can be done.

What are the types of review? 10 Projects are classified into three categories Exempt low risk Expedited minimal risk (no more risk than everyday life) Full Committee greater than minimal risk

The Review Process 11 Application Submission: Include Current Project Approval Form, Protocol, All Recruitment Materials, Consent Form(s), and questions or surveys

12 Research may not begin until the IRB has granted approval!

Stay Connected 13  Visit our website at:  Sign up for the IRB listserv to get the latest information: Click on ‘Quick Guide to Getting Started’  Contact us at: Mariette Marsh, MPA, CIP Assistant Director, HSPP (Direct) or (Main)