What about Japan?. Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5 Unit 6.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protecting the Public, Astronauts and Pilots, the NASA Workforce, and High-Value Equipment and Property Mission Success Starts With Safety “September 11th.
Advertisements

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
FUKUSHIMA RESPONSE George Attarian 1/21/2013. Fukushima Response Timeline: March 11: Event occurred March 18: INPO IER 11-1 issued (April 15) March 23:
Presented by: Muhammad Ayub Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Safety Enhancement at Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan Prospects of Nuclear Energy in.
Vermont Yankee Presentation to VSNAP 7/17/13 VY/Entergy Fukushima Response Update Bernard Buteau.
Albert Coons April 21, 2009 Emergency Preparedness and New Reactor Licensing Process: An Update on Where We Are Now Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Responsible CarE® Process Safety Code David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
Safety Implications of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Sheldon L. Trubatch, Ph.D., J.D. Vice-Chairman Arizona Section American Nuclear Society.
Health and Safety Executive The Fukushima Daiichi Accident – Report of HM Chief Inspector NuLeAF Meeting 21 October 2011 Andy Hall Deputy Chief Inspector.
ANS RESPONSE TO FUKUSHIMA LESSONS LEARNED Presented to: NESCC November 29, 2012 Washington D.C. Donald J. Spellman, Chair ANS Standards Board American.
Vermont Yankee Presentation to VSNAP 7/9/12 VY/Entergy Fukushima Response Bernard Buteau.
LFR plant assessment against a Fukushima-like scenario Technical Workshop to Review Safety and Design Aspects of European LFR Demonstrator (ALFRED), European.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” EMERGENCY PLANNING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
TRAINING AND DRILLS. Training and Drills Ensure A comprehensive, coordinated, and documented program as an integral part of the emergency management program.
CHAPTER 2 LIVING WITH TECTONIC HAZARDS Risk or Opportunity?
Nuclear Energy in 2013: Status and Outlook Briefing for Czech Technical University Scott Peterson, Senior Vice President Nuclear Energy Institute March.
U.S. Nuclear Energy Policy and Outlook After Fukushima Mark Holt, Congressional Research Service October 19, 2011.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response May 17, 2011.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP January 25, 2012 Green Power for a Digital World Presented by: Natalie Wood and Marvin Fertel.
Federal Emergency Management Agency Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Region I, Boston September 10, 2012.
A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework Commissioner George Apostolakis Presented at the Organization of Agreement States 2012 Annual Meeting Milwaukee,
ADM 677 Crisis Management in Educational Settings Karen McCuiston Kentucky Center For School Safety.
Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU Energy Forum 2011 Nuclear Safety Regulation in Romania Recent Developments.
1 Crisis Management / Emergency Management Overview.
Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP June 2, 2011 Embassy of Japan in Bulgaria.
1 BREI Conducted Comprehensive Independent Reviews of Passive Heat Removal Systems with Ejectors-Condensers Euratom DEEPSSI Project for the design and.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” WASTE MANAGEMENT SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
Fukushima Lessons Learnt and Follow-up Activities of Rostechnadzor Alexey Ferapontov, Acting Chairman Second European Nuclear Safety Conference
March 11, 2011 to Present. Presentation Overview Reactor Design and FeaturesChronology of EventsCurrent Status of Each ReactorRecovery Actions Kashiwazaki-Kariwa.
C O N T R A C T O R I N F O R M A T I O N E X C H A N G E Reister CE Presentation 1/98 1 Program Elements and Related Activities Rich Reister U.S. Department.
NFPA 1600 Disaster/Emergency Management and Business Continuity Programs.
Summary of Session 3 Post-Fukushima Operational Safety Improvements 1 Fred Dermarkar IAEA International Conference on Operational Safety Vienna International.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Developing a National Capability for Response Emergency Response Plans Lecture IAEA Post Graduate.
1 Verizon Florida, LLC Hurricane Season Preparation PSC Workshop – May 6, 2009.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Defence in Depth Safety Culture Lecturer.
Business Continuity and You! The Ohio State University Business & Finance Enterprise Continuity Program Quarterly Update July 2008Business and Finance.
CBIZ RISK & ADVISORY SERVICES BUSINESS CONTINUITY PLANNING Developing a Readiness Strategy that Mitigates Risk and is Actionable and Easy to Implement.
Breakout Session V: Mitigation Strategies for Beyond Design Basis External Events (NTTF Recommendation 4.2) Fukushima Regulatory Response Workshop April.
Safety of At-Reactor High-Density Storage of Fuel in Pools Steve Jones Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission International.
MEHB 513 Introduction on nuclear technology assignment GROUP MEMBERS:ID: SEEH CHONG CHIN ME YEE QIAN WAHME TING DING PINGME LIM JIA YINGME
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
Business Continuity Planning 101
Enhancing Safety at America’s Nuclear Energy Facilities U.S. Industry’s Fukushima Response Joseph Pollock, Nuclear Energy Institute Christopher H. Mudrick,
Enhancing Safety at America’s Nuclear Energy Facilities U.S. Industry’s Fukushima Response Joseph Pollock, Nuclear Energy Institute Christopher H. Mudrick,
Post-Fukushima Severe Accident Management Update Kim, Hyeong Taek KHNP- Central Research Institute July KINS Safety Analysis Symposium.
The March 2011 Earthquake and Tsunami in Japan: A Nuclear Perspective Mary Lou Dunzik-Gougar, PhD Associate Chair of Nuclear Engineering and Health Physics.
FLEX Mitigation Strategies Overview (Rec 4.2) Fukushima Regulatory Response Workshop April 5, 2012.
Response to NRC Information Requests for NTTF Recommendation 9.3 Sue Perkins-Grew Director, Emergency Preparedness NEI.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
Enhancing Safety at America’s Nuclear Energy Facilities
Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation NRC Order EA
Joseph D. Anderson, Chief
Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Events (MBDBE) Rule Implementation
NRC Cyber Security Regulatory Overview
WENRA Current activities of WENRA 4th GNSSN Steering Committee Meeting
Regulatory Control Training Workshop
Robert Kahler Branch Chief
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions
Fukushima Lessons Learned
Moving Forward From Fukushima Near-Term Task Force EP Recommendations
Session Name: Lessons Learned from Mega Projects
Group D4. - Nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear waste
NRC Update Nader Mamish, Director Emergency Preparedness Directorate
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response
BWROG – Emergency Procedures and Severe Accident Guidelines (EPG/SAG) Revision 4 Highlights Ken Klass (Talen Energy), Lesa Hill (Southern Nuclear) & Phillip.
Regulatory system in Hungary
New Regulatory Requirements in Japan
Presentation transcript:

What about Japan?

Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5 Unit 6

4

Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5 Unit 6

US Response Federal Regulations Industry Response

NRC Order NRC issued three orders 1.FLEX - companies to enhance protection of portable emergency equipment and to obtain additional equipment to ensure facilities can cope with events that may affect multiple reactors at a site 2.Reliable hardened vents for boiling water reactors with Mark I or Mark II containments 3.Requires additional instrumentation to monitor water levels in used fuel storage pools NRC issued three orders 1.FLEX - companies to enhance protection of portable emergency equipment and to obtain additional equipment to ensure facilities can cope with events that may affect multiple reactors at a site 2.Reliable hardened vents for boiling water reactors with Mark I or Mark II containments 3.Requires additional instrumentation to monitor water levels in used fuel storage pools

Industry Response Nuclear industry Fukushima Response Steering Committee provided responses to NRC Orders Coordinated through Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) –NEI is the policy organization for the nuclear technologies industry Nuclear industry Fukushima Response Steering Committee provided responses to NRC Orders Coordinated through Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) –NEI is the policy organization for the nuclear technologies industry

F L E X Approach for adding diverse and flexible mitigation strategies—or FLEX extended loss of alternating current (ac) power (ELAP) increase defense-in-depth for beyond- design-basis scenarios loss of normal access to the ultimate heat sink (LUHS) Approach for adding diverse and flexible mitigation strategies—or FLEX extended loss of alternating current (ac) power (ELAP) increase defense-in-depth for beyond- design-basis scenarios loss of normal access to the ultimate heat sink (LUHS)

FLEX Elements Portable equipment power and water to maintain or restore key safety functions Reasonable staging and protection of portable equipment from BDBEEs Procedures and guidance to implement FLEX strategies Programmatic controls that assure the continued viability and reliability of the FLEX strategies. Portable equipment power and water to maintain or restore key safety functions Reasonable staging and protection of portable equipment from BDBEEs Procedures and guidance to implement FLEX strategies Programmatic controls that assure the continued viability and reliability of the FLEX strategies.

Overview of FLEX Concept

Spent Fuel Pool Spent Fuel Cooling - Makeup with Portable Injection Source SFP Parameters - Reliable means to determine SFP water level –to prevent undue distraction of operators –and identify conditions when makeup/spray is required Spent Fuel Cooling - Makeup with Portable Injection Source SFP Parameters - Reliable means to determine SFP water level –to prevent undue distraction of operators –and identify conditions when makeup/spray is required

Flex Objectives & Guiding Principles The objective of FLEX to establish an indefinite coping capability to prevent damage to the fuel in the reactor and spent fuel pools to maintain the containment function Both by using installed equipment, on-site portable equipment, and pre-staged off-site resources. The objective of FLEX to establish an indefinite coping capability to prevent damage to the fuel in the reactor and spent fuel pools to maintain the containment function Both by using installed equipment, on-site portable equipment, and pre-staged off-site resources.

Off-Site Resources Pre-staged off-site resources will be housed at two locations One on the east coast and one near the west coast. –The west coast site will be in Arizona (phoenix metropolitan area. Pre-staged off-site resources will be housed at two locations One on the east coast and one near the west coast. –The west coast site will be in Arizona (phoenix metropolitan area.

Questions?

NISA Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency Regulatory and Technical Organizations International Japan United States

Palo Verde Containment and Fuel Buildings

San Andreas and Sonora Faults PaloVerde

“In Arizona, the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station sits in the "low" earthquake hazard area.” Lee Allison Arizona State Geologist arizonageology.blogspot.com March 13, 2011 Source (map): Arizona Geology, Volume 30, No. 1, Spring 2000 / Arizona Geological Survey Palo Verde

PaloVerde

Back-up Power Two redundant emergency diesel generators in each unit Two diesel fueled turbine generators shared by all units Four redundant sets of batteries in each unit

Emergency Preparedness

Full-scale Drills and Exercises held annually Joint Response –Palo Verde –State –Maricopa County –Local Groups and Agencies –Federal Agencies –Media Full-scale Drills and Exercises held annually Joint Response –Palo Verde –State –Maricopa County –Local Groups and Agencies –Federal Agencies –Media

Knowledge and Training

Key Points No Vulnerability to TsunamiNo Vulnerability to Tsunami Technical Differences/UpgradesTechnical Differences/Upgrades Significant Differences in Organizational Support (U.S. and International)Significant Differences in Organizational Support (U.S. and International) High U.S. Industry Standards/Unity/SupportHigh U.S. Industry Standards/Unity/Support Mitigation Strategies/Procedures in PlaceMitigation Strategies/Procedures in Place Extensive Emergency Preparedness (Palo Verde, Local, State and Federal)Extensive Emergency Preparedness (Palo Verde, Local, State and Federal) Lessons Learned / Continuous Improvement of Safety MarginsLessons Learned / Continuous Improvement of Safety Margins No Vulnerability to TsunamiNo Vulnerability to Tsunami Technical Differences/UpgradesTechnical Differences/Upgrades Significant Differences in Organizational Support (U.S. and International)Significant Differences in Organizational Support (U.S. and International) High U.S. Industry Standards/Unity/SupportHigh U.S. Industry Standards/Unity/Support Mitigation Strategies/Procedures in PlaceMitigation Strategies/Procedures in Place Extensive Emergency Preparedness (Palo Verde, Local, State and Federal)Extensive Emergency Preparedness (Palo Verde, Local, State and Federal) Lessons Learned / Continuous Improvement of Safety MarginsLessons Learned / Continuous Improvement of Safety Margins