Development of energy-dependent scaling for cosmic-ray neutron intensities and for in- situ cosmogenic nuclide production rates Marek Zreda - Arizona Devendra.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
10 Be 06NOV2012 Kelly Hughes. How is it produced? Cosmic Ray Spallation: – 10 Be results from 16 O being bombarded with highly energetic cosmic rays Muon-reduced.
Advertisements

Expected counting rates. FRS experimental setup Total load is limited by SC1 and MUSIC1.
Test Beam at IHEP,CAS ZHANG Liang sheng, Test Beam Group Introduction BEPC/BES Ⅱ will be upgraded as BEPC Ⅱ / BES Ⅲ, it is necessary to do beam test for.
The MAGIC telescope and the GLAST satellite La Palma, Roque de los Muchacos (28.8° latitude ° longitude, 2225 m asl) INAUGURATION: 10/10/2003 LAT.
Cosmic Ray Using for Monitoring and Forecasting Dangerous Solar Flare Events Lev I. Dorman (1, 2) 1. Israel Cosmic Ray & Space Weather Center and Emilio.
CRflux_protonAlpha_ ppt 1 Proton/alpha background flux models October 14, 2003 Tsunefumi Mizuno Background flux model.
Paul Evenson, Waraporn Nuntiyakul,
Search for spontaneous muon emission from lead nuclei with OPERA bricks M. Giorgini, V. Popa Bologna Group OPERA Collaboration Meeting, LNGS, 19-22/05/2003.
High Altitude Research Laboratory Astrophysical Sciences Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Gulmarg Kashmir. M. A. Darzi.
2. Land-Use Change (primarily tropical deforestation) 1. Burning of fossil fuels How Are We Increasing the CO 2 Concentration?
Cosmic-Ray Fluxes Present and Past Nathaniel Lifton, Marek Zreda, Darin Desilets, John Clem  Background  Objectives  Present-Day Fluxes  Instrumental.
Neutron Monitor Detection Efficiency John Clem University of Delaware 2004 Annual CRONUS Collaboration Meeting.
Neutron background measurement at LNGS: present status Measurement carried out in collaboration between LNGS ILIAS-JRA1 and ICARUS groups.
Long-term stability of Swiss neutron monitors
V. V. Parkhomchuk, S.A. Rastigeev BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia. ION SELECTION IN ACCELERATOR MASS SPECTROMETER BINP SB RAS.
UC White Mountain Research Station brings GLORIA to the White Mountains Upper summit area (within 5 vertical m of summit point) Lower summit area (between.
Martin Freer Materials Irradiation at University of Birmingham.
1 JASMIN Activation Experiments (T-972/993/994) Yoshimi Kasugai on behalf of JASMIN Activation team JASMIN Activation team Y. Kasugai, K. Oishi, H. Matsumura,
Cosmogenic Dating.  A group of isotopic methods of age determination based on accumulation of certain nuclides, which are produced only in the top few.
Preliminary validation of computational procedures for a New Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation (AIR) model John M. Clem (1), Giovanni De Angelis (2,3), Paul.
Ground Level Enhancement of May 17, 2012 Observed at South Pole SH21A-2183 Takao Kuwabara 1,3 ; John Bieber 1 ; John Clem 1,3 ; Paul Evenson 1,3 ; Tom.
Interactions of Neutrons
Quaesta Instruments Tucson Arizona Founded in 2008 Staff: 10 Electronic devices: radiation detection environmental monitoring data logging telemetry Off-the-shelf.
Possibilities for AMS experiments at ATLAS Philippe Collon, University of Notre Dame.
The PLANETOCOSMICS Geant4 application L. Desorgher Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern.
Cosmic-Ray Induced Neutrons: Recent Results from the Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation Measurements Aboard an ER-2 Airplane P. Goldhagen 1, J.M. Clem 2, J.W.
Neutron Monitoring Detector in KIMS Jungwon Kwak Seoul National University 2003 October 25 th KPS meeting.
Events 1. Figure 4 shows: Left panel – Negative values ​​ of the electric field and data of high energy neutrons (upper panel), thermal neutrons (lower.
Research into the effect of different latitudes on cosmic radiation using HiSPARC detectors BY PIP RUDGE.
Possible calibration methods for the final LXe calorimeter A. Papa 01/20/2004.
Gus Sinnis Asilomar Meeting 11/16/2003 The Next Generation All-Sky VHE Gamma-Ray Telescope.
Med Phys 3A03/3AA1 Practical Health & Medical Physics Communications D.R. Chettle, with D.F. Moscu TA: Helen Moise.
Systematic studies of neutrons produced in the Pb/U assembly irradiated by relativistic protons and deuterons. Vladimír Wagner Nuclear physics institute.
Aa GLAST Particle Astrophysics Collaboration Instrument Managed and Integrated at SLAC/Stanford University The Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST)
Cosmogenic Isotopes: Production Rates Matt Baillie HWR 696T 2/26/04.
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
Experimental Studies of Spatial Distributions of Neutrons Produced by Set-ups with Thick Lead Target Irradiated by Relativistic Protons Vladimír Wagner.
1 GEMMA: experimental searches for neutrino magnetic moment JINR: V. Brudanin, V. Egorov, D. Medvedev, M. Shirchenko, E. Shevchik, I. Zhitnikov, V. Belov.
RCCN International Workshop sub-dominant oscillation effects in atmospheric neutrino experiments 9-11 December 2004, Kashiwa Japan Input data to the neutrino.
Possible calibration methods for the final LXe calorimeter A. Papa 02/11/
Neutron Monitor Community Workshop—Honolulu, Hawaii
N_TOF commissioning INTC-P-249 Spokespersons: J.L.Tain, V.Vlachoudis Contactperson: V.Vlachoudis th Nov 2009 for the n_TOF collaboration.
Robert Cooper L. Garrison, L. Rebenitsch, R. Tayloe, R. Thornton.
The objective of the CRONUS-Earth Project is to simultaneously address the various uncertainties affecting the production and accumulation of in-situ cosmogenic.
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Radiation Fields.
February 7, Long Term Decline of South Pole Neutron Monitor Counting Rate – A Possible Magnetospheric Interpretation Paul Evenson, John Bieber,
The objective of the CRONUS-Earth Project is to simultaneously address the various uncertainties affecting the production and accumulation of in-situ cosmogenic.
Probe background, technology, calibration, MCNP D ARIN D ESILETS Hydroinnova.
Welcome to the CHARMS See – Tea Saturday, March 05, 2016 Comparison of ISOLDE yields with calculated in- target production rates Strahinja Lukić,
The Gulmarg Neutron Monitor Ramesh Koul Astrophysical Sciences Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Mumbai
Muon-induced neutron background at Boulby mine Vitaly A. Kudryavtsev University of Sheffield UKDMC meeting, ICSTM, London, 27 June 2002.
Neutron production and iodide transmutation studies using intensive beam of Dubna Phasotron Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics Institute of CAS Řež, Czech republic.
Precision Drift Tube Detectors for High Counting Rates O. Kortner, H. Kroha, F. Legger, R. Richter Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Munich, Germany A. Engl,
Christos Lamboudis HEP April. Athens Study of MDT response to neutrons and possible ageing effects Do we really need to worry about neutrons? Do.
STATUS REPORT ON THE “MASHA” SET-UP A.M.Rodin, A.V.Belozerov, S.N.Dmitriev, Yu.Ts.Oganessian, R.N.Sagaidak, V.S.Salamatin, S.V.Stepantsov, D.V.Vanin PAC.
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Helena Krüger PP Krüger, D Malan, C Diedericks
Akhmatov Z.A1, Khokonov A.Kh1,2, Masaev M.B1, Romanenko V.S1.
Physics-Based Modeling Robert Reedy (UNM), Kyeong Kim (U. Ariz
Project Structure Advanced Neutron Spectrometer on the International Space Station (ANS-ISS) Mark Christl NASA/MSFC Oct 23, 2015 Honolulu, HI 1 1.
for collaboration “Energy plus transmutation”
Data improvements Request for Isotope Production at the Missouri University Research Reactor Facility Need gamma production spectrum for incident neutron.
In-Situ Chlorine-36 Nicole Dix HWR 696T.
University of Delaware
Records of Cosmogenic Isotope Production Rates
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment
Application of neutron monitor data for space weather
Cosmic-Ray Fluxes Present and Past
EGU 2018, Vienna, 13 April 2018; abstract EGU
EGU 2018, Vienna, 8 April 2018; abstract EGU
Presentation transcript:

Development of energy-dependent scaling for cosmic-ray neutron intensities and for in- situ cosmogenic nuclide production rates Marek Zreda - Arizona Devendra Lal - Scripps John Clem - Bartol Darin Desilets - Arizona Neutron measurements Neutron modeling Artificial chemical targets

Energy spectra for neutrons and nuclides

Vertical cutoff rigidity (GV) for Epoch 1980

Spatial variations of neutron intensity Important discovery Attenuation length in the air for neutrons depends on energy Dorman function for neutrons depends on energy

Neutron Monitor

counter tubelead polyethylene John Clem -

Arizona mobile neutron monitor

Sample results from Arizona neutron monitor

Bare counter (BC) tubes? Lower energy sensitivity

Thermal neutron detector (counter) Specifications: Diameter 2.6 cm Length 39.2 cm Total pressure 1.03 MPa Voltage range V Water resistance up to 8 m Background counting rate 6 cts/hr Counting rate on Mt. Lemmon, AZ (2788 m) 3830 cts/hr Counting rate in Tucson, AZ (667 m) 900 cts/hr

Thermal neutron detector assembly

Sample results from our neutron detector

Comparison with previous models (attenuation lengths for high-energy and thermal neutrons)

Current data NM > 9 latitude surveys 2 comprehensive altitude/latitude surveys numerous NM stations BC 1 latitude survey 1 comprehensive altitude/latitude survey

Possible outcomes: (1) All nuclides scaled by NM (2) All nuclides scaled by BC (3) Low-E interactions scaled by BC, high-E scaled by NM (4) Many scaling functions Other results: Angular sensitivity E sensitivity Neutron spectrum from NM Muon sensitivity

Attenuation length for production of 36 Cl (lava-flow samples, Mauna Kea, Hawaii)

Comparison of targets with geological samples Geological samples Targets Cosmic-ray intensityEstimated (from geological records) Known Exposure durationDetermined (by geological dating) Known Exposure geometryUnknown (assessed, guessed) Known Exposure timeLong Short ChemistryComplex Simple Expected accuracyPoor Good Expected precisionGood Good Other things?????? ??????

Primary objectives (1) To determine attenuation lengths for production of nuclides - at known magnetic cutoff rigidity - for low- and high energy reactions (2) To relate these to measured attenuation lengths for neutrons Primary objectives (1) To determine attenuation lengths for production of nuclides - at known magnetic cutoff rigidity - for low- and high energy reactions (2) To relate these to measured attenuation lengths for neutrons Secondary objective (3) To determine absolute production rates of selected other nuclides Proposed target experiments

Experimental design matrix Hawaii, 13 GVCalifornia, 4 GV Target type O(n,x) 10 Be yes yes Primary 32 S(n,p) 32 P yes yes Primary K(n,x) 36 Cl yes yes Secondary Ca(n,x) 36 Cl yes yes Secondary Experimental design matrix Hawaii, 13 GVCalifornia, 4 GV Target type O(n,x) 10 Be yes yes Primary 32 S(n,p) 32 P yes yes Primary K(n,x) 36 Cl yes yes Secondary Ca(n,x) 36 Cl yes yes Secondary Proposed target experiments Objectives (1) To determine attenuation lengths for nuclide production (2) To compare with neutron attenuation lengths (3) To determine absolute production rates of selected other nuclides

High-energy reaction: O(n,x) 10 Be t ½ = 1.5 My E med = 140 MeV Target: H 2 O (water) Concentration: 100% Target size: kg Exposure time: >3 years Repeated exposure: no Measurement: AMS (Purdue) High-energy reaction: O(n,x) 10 Be t ½ = 1.5 My E med = 140 MeV Target: H 2 O (water) Concentration: 100% Target size: kg Exposure time: >3 years Repeated exposure: no Measurement: AMS (Purdue) Low-energy reaction: 32 S(n,p) 32 P t ½ = 14.3 days E med = 7 MeV Target: CS 2 Concentration: 100% Target size: L Exposure time: >2 months Repeated exposure: yes Measurement: Quantulus (Arizona) Selected targets - primary

Low-energy reaction: K(n,x) 36 Cl E med = 13 MeV Target: KNO 3 Concentration: 15% Target size: 20 kg Exposure time: >3 years Repeated exposure: no Measurement: AMS (Purdue) Low-energy reaction: K(n,x) 36 Cl E med = 13 MeV Target: KNO 3 Concentration: 15% Target size: 20 kg Exposure time: >3 years Repeated exposure: no Measurement: AMS (Purdue) Selected targets - secondary Mid-energy reaction: Ca(n,x) 36 Cl E med = 55 MeV Target: Ca(NO 3 )2 Concentration: 10% Target size: 40 kg Exposure time: >3 y Repeated exposure: no Measurement: AMS (Purdue)

Hawaii - 13 GV: Mauna Kea & Mauna Loa: several secure locations (government facilities) between the summit (~4 km) and the saddle (~1.6 km) Why Hawaii: high magnetic cutoff rigidity large elevation span much neutron/nuclide data exist permanent neutron monitor (Maui) Hawaii - 13 GV: Mauna Kea & Mauna Loa: several secure locations (government facilities) between the summit (~4 km) and the saddle (~1.6 km) Why Hawaii: high magnetic cutoff rigidity large elevation span much neutron/nuclide data exist permanent neutron monitor (Maui) Field locations California - 4 GV: White Mountains: several secure locations (government facilities) between the summit (~4 km) and the Owens Valley (~1.6 km) Why California: low magnetic cutoff rigidity large elevation span close to Arizona and Scripps permanent neutron monitor (Climax)