Curriculum Approval. Designing a Program What are the goals of the program? How should the program be structured to achieve these goals? What are the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENSURING EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP in the Colleges/Faculties/Departments A reflection by John SK Ayim 20 th Feb
Advertisements

Office of the Vice-Dean, Programs: What we do and what is new
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
External Reviews of Departments and Programs, Overview Amy Mullin, Interim Vice-Principal Academic & Dean.
Swift Curricular Approvals: What Does it Take? Michigan State University - Office of the Provost – University Curriculum and Catalog Academic Program Submission.
Florida A&M University College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Institute of Public Health NLM Presentation Doctorate in Public Health Degree Program.
TCNJ Program Review Overview. Purpose Meet Middle States (MSCHE) Expectations Provide structure of periodic review and update of strategic plans Provide.
Retention Plan  Between 2007 and 2009, several committees, including A&S department chairs, issued recommendations for student retention.  Their.
CSU Chico Web Site A Unified approach to Governance, Management, and Accessibility.
FACULTY MEETING September 26, 2008 Marty Wood Assistant Dean for Undergraduate Education Chair, SOE Curricula & Courses Committee.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Library Evaluation Evaluation by the Valley Library (for new.
Catalog & Program Changes “A meeting to discuss proper submissions to the undergraduate and graduate catalogs.” March 31, 2014 Southern Illinois University.
Curriculum Overview Office of the Registrar University Curriculum and Catalog Rev. 12/12.
Building an Online MSW Program from the Ground Up Mary Ann Forgey Cathy Berkman.
Notes by Juan Manfredi February 11,  Passed by Arts and Sciences faculty in April 2002 and published in the A & S Gazette on April 15, 2003 (Vol.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
External Examiners Conference Overview of University and Structures Beryl Furey-King Head of Quality Management.
Academic Affairs BOT Orientation 29 August 2011 Dr. Chula King Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
Fall Convocation Week September finish approval of GEP departments start submitting courses for approval into Goal Areas October GEC starts review.
August 23, 2010 Faculty Senate. Core Curriculum Task Force Members *Tina Butcher, Co-chair, Associate Provost for Undergraduate Education Ellen Roberts,
Request from University Graduate Council for Revision to UFS Bylaws.
 To provide an electronic academic program and course approval system for creating, modifying, and accessing degree programs, individual courses, and.
AMU DoQuP FINAL REPORT MD, PhD, Associate Professor G.Ahmadov Azerbaijan Medical University Bishkek, April 22, 2015.
Primary Functions of Program Directors Leadership Curriculum Management and Coordination Coordinate Program Assessment Marketing, Recruitment and Admissions.
Curriculum Policies Universities should have a policy that enables the creation of new courses and the modification of existing courses in a way that ensures.
The Rowan University Curriculum Process Janet Lindman History Department Senate Curriculum Committee Chair x3995.
Tenure and Promotion Processes Arlene Earley Carney Vice Provost for Faculty and Academic Affairs.
Going forward, what might the endgame look like?.
External Reviews of Departments and Programs, Overview Amy Mullin, Interim Vice-Principal Academic & Dean.
1 Faculty Motivation and Policies Steven R. Hall Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair of the MIT Faculty.
Institution program proposal is developed using campus processes (Review by department/division, university curriculum committee, faculty senate, dean,
Approved 1/26/2001 – Revised 11/26/2002 GRADUATE PROGRAM CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT, STAFFING AND ASSESSMENT PROCESSES EXECUTIVE COUNCIL DECIDES TO RECOMMEND.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
 UNC Charlotte will soon offer Acalog/Curriculog as an electronic academic program and course approval system for creating, modifying, and accessing.
Committee Report Senate Academic Affairs Committee (SAAC) October 13, 2015 Derrek B. Dunn, Ph.D. School of Business and Technology 1.
The Office of Curriculum Systems
University of North Carolina General Administration Policy: The Code/Policy Manual Responsible: UNC General Administration University Policy Responsible:
KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1)
Quality assurance and graduate student support Fred L Hall Former Dean of Graduate Studies at University of Calgary, McMaster University,
Curriculum Workflow Process Form A – Change an Existing Course. Request minor course changes to active graduate and undergraduate programs. Department.
Joint and Double Degrees at the University of Toronto Miranda Cheng International Student Exchange Office.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
Committee Report Senate Academic Affairs Committee (SAAC) April 11, 2016 Derrek B. Dunn, Ph.D. School of Business and Technology 1.
P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.
STUDENT LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE WILLY PALOMO, JOHN MCHUGH, ALEXIS BURR, KAJAL SINGH, MIKO SIEWENIE, ALYSSA BEAUCHAMP, MICHAEL JOHNSON, AND HAMID NADIRUZZAMAN.
Course Substitutions & Course Waivers Proposed New Policy AGC 1 st Presentation September 08, 2015 Patti Trepkowski and Diane Patrick.
Presented by Rob Till, Chair UAC Craig Bain, Chair UCC Bruce Fox, Chair LSC & member of UAC Niranjan Venkatraman, member UGC & UAC 1 3/10/14.
Office of the Provost University Curriculum and Catalog
The Evolution of a QEP: One Institution’s Mid-Cycle Report
Organisational Structure
Academic Program Review
New Program Proposal Workflow Chart
Navigating Approval Processes: Finding your Sherpas
Expectations for Degree Programs: Curriculum & Assessment
Approval Process Undergraduate – UCC
CSU International Programs (IP)
Curriculog Online Proposal Tool for Courses & Curricula
SCHEV Strategic Plan Priorities
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location
Extend an Existing Degree, Certificate, Minor, or Option Program:
Program Approval Process (new* or significantly modified)
New Certificate Program
New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program
How to Propose a Class First, you will need to ensure that you have the support of the department and the chair for the proposal.
Cyclical Program Review
Faculty Governance at NU
Vice Provost for Graduate Education and Dean of The Graduate School
Program Modification “Academic Year 2019” Assumption University
Presentation transcript:

Curriculum Approval

Designing a Program What are the goals of the program? How should the program be structured to achieve these goals? What are the appropriate courses at each stage? Does the program meet the Degree Learning Expectations?

UTQAP Approval process for new and greatly modified programs laid out in University of Toronto Quality Assurance Process (UTQAP) Based on COU Quality Assurance Framework Revised process approved by Ontario Universities Council on Quality Assurance (September 2012) UTQAP also spells out program review process

New Programs When is a program “new”? When it has substantially different learning outcomes (goals) and program requirements from existing programs Applies to Specialist, Major programs, not to Minors

Examples Major in Environmental Studies – No comparable program Specialist in Management and International Business – Study abroad, work abroad components

Criteria for Approval Are goals (learning outcomes) appropriate? Will structure of program achieve goals? How do goals fit with Degree Level Expectations? How will the program meet these? Are available resources adequate?

Approval Process for New Programs Program must be appraised externally Sign-off from Dean’s Office, Provost’s Office Divisional Approval Central U of T Approval Approval by Quality Council of Ontario Time required: 2 years

Major Modifications UTSC has undergraduate programs in almost every area. Most proposals commonly represent initiatives that build upon our extensive existing programming, and consequently constitute major modifications, rather than truly new programs.

Examples Health Informatics: new stream in Computer Science Specialist Major in Media Studies: substantial revision of curriculum and consequent learning outcomes. New freestanding Minor: Creative Writing

Definition of Major Modification Addition of new Specialist or Major where there is an existing Specialist or Major – e.g. new Major in Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution where a Specialist already exists. Changes to program content that affect learning outcomes, but do not meet threshold for a “new program”. Creation of a new freestanding Minor. Addition of a new stream. Addition of, or substantial changes to, admission requirements of a program.

Example of a Major Modification Addition of admission requirements to Psychology and Mental Health programs

Approval Process for Major Modifications Approval by Department - most important step Sign-off by Dean’s Office Approval by Academic (Affairs) Committee Report to Provost’s Office Report to AP&P Report to Quality Council Criteria for approval same as for new programs