PLMLC Leadership Series London Region Day 1 Ellen Walters, YCDSB Shelley Yearley, TLDSB Monday February 28, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Through Instructional Rounds
Advertisements

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
K–12 Session 4.3 Standards for Mathematical Practices Part 3: Looking for the Practices through Observation Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core.
Implementing the CCSS Through Coaching Atomic Conference December 2, 2014.
Webinar on Instructional Rounds
MULTILINGUAL & MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Consistency of Assessment
Sharon Rodriguez, Coordinator, Elementary Instruction Alicia Bernal, Coordinator, Secondary Instruction Lizza Irizarry, Coordinator, EL Programs September,
Leadership Role in Creating an Effective Mathematics Classroom.
School Improvement Planning. Helen Timperley, “Using assessment data for improving, teaching practice”, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Discourse. Student Discourse How would you define student discourse? “IS considered student discourse” “IS NOT considered student discourse”
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
1 Welcome! Professional Learning for Adolescent Literacy Leaders, Coaches and Administrators October 2011.
Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
PLMLC Leadership Series Thunder Bay Region Day 2 Brian Harrison, YRDSB Connie Quadrini, YCDSB Friday February 4 th, 2011.
A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Puget Sound ESD December
Literacy Partner’s Meeting Wednesday, October 22 nd Moderated Marking: The What, The Why, The How.
Voices From the Field Name: Vince Campolongo Board: Wellington Catholic DSB Learning Team Facilitator (Professional Learning Cycle) 1.
A Network Approach To Improving Teaching and Learning Center Point High School Instructional Rounds in Education.
Provoking Action to Make Gains Student achievment Equity Public confidence.
PLMLC Leadership Series Thunder Bay Region Day 1 Brian Harrison, YRDSB Connie Quadrini, YCDSB Thursday February 3 rd, 2011.
Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.
ELA: Focus on Collaborative Conversations & Writing FCUSD Instructional Focus Meeting Sara Parenzin September 20, 2012 Welcome! Please sign in and start.
Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.
Lisa Pruitt Program Director, District and School Support Services.
February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership in the Common Core February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership for the Common Core NYSED Principal.
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Spring, 2014 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Branching Out September 26, Welcome Back! Where are we now? Where are we going? PLN! Introductions…
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
Supporting High Quality Teaching and Learning Instructional Rounds Institute Jamie Spugnardi Liz Storey February 8, 2011.
Leadership: Session #2C. Goals for Session Explore enabling structures, conditions and processes for using data and setting goals –Focus: Equity and Assessment.
Tier I: Implementing Learning Walks & Instructional Rounds OrRTI Conference Tara M. Black, M.Ed. May 9,
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Fall, 2013 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
PLMLC Leadership Series Thunder Bay Region Day 1 Brian Harrison, YRDSB Connie Quadrini, YCDSB Thursday February 3 rd, 2011.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
PLMLC Leadership Series London Region Day 1 Ellen Walters, YCDSB Shelley Yearley, TLDSB Monday February 28, 2011.
PLMLC Leadership Series Thunder Bay Region Day 2 Brian Harrison, YRDSB Connie Quadrini, YCDSB Friday February 4 th, 2011.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
GSS as a Professional Learning Community. What do we already know about PLC’s?
PLMLC Leadership Series Thunder Bay Region Day 1 Brian Harrison, YRDSB Connie Quadrini, YCDSB Thursday February 3 rd, 2011.
The School Effectiveness Framework
June 2010 Planning Session. Welcome and Introductions Name Role School / Board.
PLMLC Leadership Series London Region Day 2 Ellen Walters, YCDSB Shelley Yearley, TLDSB Tuesday March 1, 2011.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
A Sound Investment A Sound Investment 1. Learning Goals Gain an understanding of FL and where it fits Establish a network of colleagues Increased awareness.
Deepening Student Impact Via Instructional Practice Data Joe Schroeder, PhD Associate Executive Director, AWSA.
Implementation Training
MONITORING: THINK BIG ACT SMALL System Implementation and Monitoring (SIM) June 2016.
Superintendents’ Network Welcome! Apprentice Facilitators And Coaches.
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
1 Session #1 Superintendent’s Network January 7, & 28, 2009 “I wanted to change the world. But I have found out that the only thing one can be sure of.
Supporting Regional AfL in K-12 Mathematics through Networked Professional Learning Panel: Eleanor Newman, Tammy Billen, Danielle LaPointe-McEwan, Sharon.
ESD Regional Workshop Year 2 Workshop 1. WSLA Year 2  Workshop 1.
School-Based Teacher-Led Instructional Rounds FEBRUARY 25, 2016 ARTS AT THE CAPITOL THEATER (ACT) MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL WILLIMANTIC, CONNECTICUT.
ESD Regional Workshop Year 2 Workshop 1
Coaching for Math GAINS
Math Leadership Network
Coaching for Math GAINS
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca
Presentation transcript:

PLMLC Leadership Series London Region Day 1 Ellen Walters, YCDSB Shelley Yearley, TLDSB Monday February 28, 2011

Interactive Session Activity Make connections between the 5 Core Capacities of Effective Leadership and Board Improvement Planning

Connecting to the Core Capacities Identify conditions, processes and/or structures that enable increased student achievement in mathematics. idea per sticky note. Share with your group. Pile them and look for themes and trends based on Core Capacities Using the 5 Core Capacities of Effective Leadership organizer, place piles in the appropriate capacity. Record one theme per pile on an 8.5x11” paper. Post on wall Core Capacity organizer.

5 Core Capacities of Effective Leadership Identify conditions, processes and/or structures that enable increased student achievement in mathematics. Group Share

Using Data Plan: –needs assessment –validation of goals Act: –communication of motivation and rationale –sharing of context –indicators of success Observe: –qualitative data and quantitative data –formal and informal collection processes Reflect: –impact of influence –next steps –gaps in data considered, goals established, actions

Conversation Starters - Data Ontario Leadership Strategy

Data Dump Metathink Document (Page 1)

Data Dump Metathink Document (Page 2)

What other data might we include? For elementary contexts: Learning Skills and Work Habits Report card marks –compared by student to EQAO results –comparison of student achievement over time –mark distribution trends over grades/divisions Attendance data –who is absent, when, why Assessment data –board assessment tools

EQAO Results: Primary Division

EQAO Results: Junior Division

Data Template

Visit #1 - Sept/Oct 2010 Planning: What will we do? 1. Considering the Needs Assessment section of the Improvement Planning Assessment Tool, describe the process used for your board’s needs assessment? 2. How did the evidence used inform this plan? How was it used to make the commitments / investments you have identified? 3. How do your SMART goals represent the areas of greatest need for students? 4. How do the strategies leverage achievement of the SMART goals? 5. What lessons did you learn from the monitoring process you had in place last year? 6. Do you have questions, feedback or ideas related to the Board Improvement Plan for Student Achievement?

Visit #2 – January, 2011 Monitoring: How are we doing? Referring to Visit #2 questions, identify which of the 5 Core Capacities for Effective Leadership connect to the Monitoring questions provided? Group Share

Exploring the 5 Core Capacities of Effective Leadership Consider the following leadership challenge: How do I support schools in monitoring the improvement of mathematics teaching and learning?

Focused Discussion Groups Choose a focused discussion group based on the 5 Core Capacities of Effective Leadership. Referring to the Monitoring questions, identify which of the 5 Core Capacities of Effective Leadership focus you have selected. Use the monitoring questions to guide your discussion with respect to mathematics. Visit one other capacity.

Focused Discussion Groups What challenges emerged during your discussion? What opportunities were presented?

The Instructional Core City, Elmore, Fiarman, Lee (2010) Adapted by Ministry of Education, Student Achievement Division

The Seven Principles of the Instructional Core Instructional Rounds in Education: A Network Approach to Improving Teaching and Learning by City, Elmore, Fiarman, Lee (2010 )

Seven Principles of the Instructional Core 1.Increases in student learning occur only as a consequence of improvements in the level of content, teachers’ knowledge and skill, and student engagement. 2.If you change any single element of the instructional core, you have to change the other two. 3.If you can’t see it in the core, it’s not there. 4.Task predicts performance.

Seven Principles of the Instructional Core 5.The real accountability system is the tasks that students are asked to do. 6.We learn to do the work by doing the work, not by telling other people to do the work, by having done the work sometime in the past, and not by hiring experts who can act as proxies for our knowledge about how to do the work. 7.Description before analysis, analysis before prediction, prediction before evaluation.

Key Math Messages Brainstorm with your partner your board’s key messages in mathematics. Whole group share

Mathematical Literacy Criteria 1.Focus on Important Mathematics 2.Teaching for Conceptual Understanding 3.Establishing Math Talk Learning Communities 4.Consistency and Alignment of Assessments 5.Assessment for Learning 6.Differentiating Instruction 7.Use of Manipulatives and Technologies 8.Mathematical Processes

Sharpening the Focus: 3 Instructional Nudges 1.Fearless Speaking and Listening 2.Questioning to Evoke and Expose Thinking 3.Responding to Provide Appropriate Scaffolding and Challenge

Ensuring coherence between system planning and school improvement planning for mathematics begins with a needs assessment that takes into account school, administrator and teacher readiness and allows for differentiated entry into the cycle of planning and implementation. Plan Act Observe Reflect Supporting the Instructional Core

Using the data/evidence: examine student data and work to identify areas of need determine/access professional learning in order to address areas of need and to differentiate to reach all co-plan, co-teach, co-assess examine student data and work to determine impact, lessons learned, next steps for student and educator learning STUDENT LEARNING TEACHER LEARNING 28 Professional Learning Cycle Mathematics Leadership Learning Cycle SYSTEM LEARNING

Planning Time  Consider the mathematics challenge in your district where you wish to invest some energy and exert some influence.  What do you and your district partner need to know and/or consider in order to initiate the Mathematics Leadership Planning Cycle to address this challenge?  Capture your ideas in the ‘plan’ area of the Mathematics Leadership Learning Cycle

Reflect on your Learning Using your 5 Core Capacities of Effective Leadership placemat, record new insights gained from this afternoon’s session. Consider: –How has my new learning shifted my thinking? –How will I implement this new learning back in my board / school(s)?

Final Thoughts Questions? Comments?

Pre-Reading for Day 2 Research Jigsaw form groups of 5 and assign one reading to each individual –CIIM (lengthy) –PRISM (multiple reports, each short) –Gap Closing (short) –LNS CIL-M (short) –CLIPS (lengthy) Like-Role Leadership find a like-role partner and select one article to read –LNS Monograph re: Collaborative Teacher Inquiry –Evaluating Networked Communities (Katz and Earl) –Networked Learning Communities (Katz) –LNS Monograph re: PLC Those who would like to read the materials for tomorrow in advance are welcome to do so.