SuperB Physics Programme Adrian Bevan Strasbourg 23 rd September 2011

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

Electroweak Penguin B Decays: b→s,d  and b→s,d ll Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration LNS Journal Club.
Non-leptonic b → s,d decays (experiment) CKM 2014, Vienna, Austria 10-Sep-2014b -> s,d roundup, Fergus Wilson, STFC/RAL1.
Sharpening the Physics case for Charm at SuperB D. Asner, G. Batignani, I. Bigi, F. Martinez-Vidal, N. Neri, A. Oyanguren, A. Palano, G. Simi Charm AWG.
Fourth Generation Leptons Linda Carpenter UC Irvine Dec 2010.
Early LHC bound on W’ mass in nonuniversal gauge interaction model Kang Young Lee Konkuk University Seoul, Korea 양재교육문화회관
MSSM Precision tests of the flavours in the SM Model Indep. Analysis in  B=2 MFV, mainly high tan  scenarios Achille Stocchi (LAL-IN2P3/CNRS)
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
B. Dutta Texas A&M University Phys.Rev.Lett.100:181801,2008; arXiv: ; To appear Grand Unified Models, Proton Decay and Phase of Collaborator: Yukihiro.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
Current Methods of determining V ub I. Endpoint of the inclusive lepton spectrum II. Exclusive decays Methods of determining V ub with small theoretical.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
1 Physics Case of L=10 36 e + e - B Factory Achille Stocchi LAL-Orsay Université Paris-Sud and IN2P3-CNRS.
Bs and Bd mixing Silas Hoffman and Georg Steinbrueck Introduction Current and future measurements B s mixing and physics beyond the SM.
Search for resonances The fingerprints of the Top Quark Jessica Levêque, University of Arizona Top Quark Mass Measurement Top Turns Ten Symposium, Fermilab,
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
Summary of Recent Results on Rare Decays of B Mesons from BaBar for the BaBar Collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute Chateau Lake Louise February.
P Spring 2003 L14Richard Kass B mesons and CP violation CP violation has recently ( ) been observed in the decay of mesons containing a b-quark.
As a test case for quark flavor violation in the MSSM K. Hidaka Tokyo Gakugei University / RIKEN, Wako Collaboration with A. Bartl, H. Eberl, E. Ginina,
Rare Charm Decays Adrian Bevan IHEP, Beijing, 22 nd October 2011
QCD 与强子物理研讨会, 2010 年 8 月 4 - 10 日,威海 Prospects of Flavor Physics at the LHC 高原宁 清华大学高能物理研究中心 2010/8/61Y. Gao, Prospects of flavor physics at the LHC.
SuperB Physics Programme Adrian Bevan IHEP, Beijing, 21 st October 2011
Higgs boson spin/CP at LHC N. Godinovic (FESB-Split) on behalf of CMS collaboration Outline: Motivation S CP observables Significane for exclusion non.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
Physical Program of Tau-charm Factory V.P.Druzhinin, Budker INP, Novosibirsk.
ATLAS Dan Tovey 1 Measurement of the LSP Mass Dan Tovey University of Sheffield On Behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
1 Rare Bottom and Charm Decays at the Tevatron Dmitri Tsybychev (SUNY at Stony Brook) On behalf of CDF and D0 Collaborations Flavor Physics and CP-Violation.
Flavor induced EDMs with tanbeta enhanced corrections Minoru Nagai (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) Aug. 4, 2007 Summer Institute 2007 In collaborated with: J.Hisano.
K.K. Gan The Ohio State University New Results on  Lepton July 17, 2003.
SuperB Physics & Detector overview SuperB Miniworkshop, Oxford 18/19 th May 2011
At the Nicola Cabibbo Laboratory Tor Vergata, Italy Adrian Bevan: 1.
Charm Physics Potential at BESIII Kanglin He Jan. 2004, Beijing
1 Enhancement of in supersymmetric unified models Yukihiro Mimura (National Taiwan University) Talk at SUSY2015, Lake Tahoe.
Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.
Jonathan Nistor Purdue University 1.  A symmetry relating elementary particles together in pairs whose respective spins differ by half a unit  superpartners.
SuperB Adrian Bevan Recontres de Moriond XLIV, La Thuile, Italy 7-14 th March 2009.
Impact of quark flavour violation on the decay in the MSSM K. Hidaka Tokyo Gakugei University / RIKEN, Wako Collaboration with A. Bartl, H. Eberl, E. Ginina,
RECFA September Kenneth Österberg, University of Helsinki Experimental e + e - physics – LEP&LC DELPHI Major finnish LEP contribution analysis.
Search for dark-sector Higgs and gauge bosons at B A B AR Adrian Bevan 1July 2012 h'h' A'A' χ A0A0.
Update on Measurement of the angles and sides of the Unitarity Triangle at BaBar Martin Simard Université de Montréal For the B A B AR Collaboration 12/20/2008.
Direct CP violation in D  hh World measurements of In New Physics: CPV up to ~1%; If CPV ~1% were observed, is it NP or hadronic enhancement of SM? Strategy:
Nita Sinha The Institute of Mathematical Sciences Chennai.
Vanina Ruhlmann-Kleider DAPNIA/SPP (Saclay) V.Ruhlmann-KleiderPhysics at LHC, Praha Review of Higgs boson searches at LEP Introduction The SM Higgs.
F. Richard ECFA Study June 2008 A 4th generation scenario F. Richard LAL/Orsay Beyond the 3SM generation at the LHC era.
1 George Lafferty University of Manchester Charm 2006: International Workshop on Tau-Charm Physics June , Beijing Tau Physics from the B Factories.
EDMs in the SUSY GUTs Junji Hisano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) NuFact04 6th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories and Superbeams, Osaka University, Japan.
Anomalies in current data Concezio Bozzi INFN Ferrara May 22 nd, 2014.
Belle and Belle II Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
Beauty and charm at the LHC, Jeroen van Tilburg, FOM Veldhoven 2014 Jeroen van Tilburg Beauty and charm at the LHC: searches for TeV scale phenomena in.
The SuperB Project A major new particle physics centre Fergus Wilson, RAL/STFC On behalf of the SuperB Project STORI 2011, October 11 th 2011.
1 Quark flavour observables in 331 models in the flavour precision era Quark flavour observables in 331 models in the flavour precision era Fulvia De Fazio.
Kevin Flood California Institute of Technology Physics Prospects for the SuperB Factory June 2012 SSP 2012 KVI – Gronigen, the Netherlands.
SuperB Physics Adrian Bevan 1 st SuperB Collaboration Meeting, London th Sept. 2011
CLEO-c Workshop 1 Data Assumptions Tagging Rare decays D mixing CP violation Off The Wall Beyond SM Physics at a CLEO Charm Factory (some food for thought)
Fourth Generation Leptons Linda Carpenter April 2011.
SuperB: Other experiments session LHCb/LHCb upgrade (see LHCb web site/search Google) & NA62 Adrian Bevan Caveats: (i) this is based on the LHCb upgrade.
TDR and planning session
Present status of Charm Measurements
David B. MacFarlane SLAC EPAC Meeting January 25, 2006
Physics Progress and Plans Adrian Bevan
Complementarity between FCC-ee and FCC-hh Searches for BSM Physics
SuperB Physics Elba 2011.
Searching for SUSY in B Decays
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
Yasuhiro Okada (KEK/Sokendai) October 18, 2007
D0 Mixing and CP Violation from Belle
Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) FPCP 2004, Deagu, Korea October 7, 2004
SuperB: Physics.
Presentation transcript:

SuperB Physics Programme Adrian Bevan Strasbourg 23 rd September

Overview  Introduction  Data samples available at SuperB  Topics  τ physics  B u,d,s physics  D physics  Precision EW  Spectroscopy  Interplay  Precision CKM  Golden modes  Summary 2

Introduction  Current flavour physics landscape is defined by BaBar, Belle and the Tevatron.  We learned that CKM is correct at leading order.  Placed indirect constraints on NP that will last well into the LHC era. (e.g. H + searches).  SuperB will start taking data in 2016, and the first full run is expected in  LHCb will have re-defined some areas of flavour physics on that timescale [and take data through to 2017 shutdown].  LHC may (or may not) have found new particles.  Existing mass scale exclusions are model dependent.  In both scenarios results from SuperB can be used to constrain flavour dynamics at high energy. 3

4 J. Ellis

LHC Results on SUSY (slide from A. Cakir, Lomonosov XV) 5 So far no evidence for SUSY. The SUSY mass scale is now looking likely to be above 1TeV. This has interesting implications for some of our measurements. We need to make sure our benchmark processes and assumed scales are still valid as these contours are updated. Trivial SUSY doesn't exist.

6 J. Ellis Need to re-introduce neglected parameters (ignored because of the curse of dimensionality). Should use flavour data to constrain NP, currently only a sub-set of observables are used.... and small tanβ is dead.

e.g. MSSM: 124 (160 with ν R ) couplings, most are flavour related. Δ 's are related to NP mass scale. Introduction  Example: Consider MSSM as an illustration of SUSY  Simple, and being constrained by the LHC but general enough to illustrate the issue:  In many NP scenarios the energy frontier experiments will probe the diagonal elements of mixing matrices.  Flavour experiments are required to probe off-diagonal ones. 7

SUSY  e.g. MSSM with generic squark mass matrices.  Use Mass insertion approximation with to constrain couplings:  Can constrain the δ d ij 's using e.g. see Hall et al., Nucl. Phys. B (1986) Ciuchini et al., hep-ph/ δ measured with greater than 3σ significance 8 LHC constraints on the gluino mass, mean couplings are non-zero, and SuperB can provide an upper bound on Λ NP.

SUSY  e.g. MSSM with generic squark mass matrices.  Use Mass insertion approximation with to constrain couplings:  Can constrain the δ d ij 's using e.g. see Hall et al., Nucl. Phys. B (1986) Ciuchini et al., hep-ph/ δ measured with greater than 3σ significance 9 LHC constraints on the gluino mass, mean couplings are non-zero, and SuperB can provide an upper bound on Λ NP. e.g. if LHC excludes 1 TeV gluinos, and SuperB measures ( δ d 23 ) LR ~0.05 would imply Λ NP < 3.5 TeV.

Introduction  e.g. MSSM with generic squark mass matrices.  Use Mass insertion approximation with to constrain couplings:  Can constrain the δ d ij 's using e.g. see Hall et al., Nucl. Phys. B (1986) Ciuchini et al., hep-ph/ −0.01 −

The rest of this talk is an overview  More details can be found in the following references: Conceptual Design Report: arXiv: Valencia Physics Workshop Report: arXiv: Detector White Paper: arXiv: Accelerator White Paper: arXiv: Physics White Paper: arXiv: Impact Document: INFN/AE_11/1, LAL , SLAC- R-14548, MZ-TH 11/25 (on archive soon) 11

now submitted to the archive 12

Data samples available at SuperB  Two distinct modes of operation:  4S region: ϒ (1S) – ϒ (6S).  Charm threshold region: ψ(3770) and nearby thresholds. 13

Data samples available at SuperB  ϒ (4S) region:  75ab −1 at the 4S.  Also run above / below the 4S.  ~75 x10 9 B, D and τ pairs.  ψ(3770) region:  500fb −1 at threshold.  Also run at nearby resonances.  ~2 x 10 9 D pairs at threshold in a few months of running. 14

τ Physics  The programme includes  Charged Lepton Flavour Violation  CP Violation  τ EDM  τ g-2  Precision |V us | measurements [This talk] 15

Lepton Flavour Violation (LFV)  ν mixing leads to a low level of charged LFV (B~10 −54 ).  Enhancements to observable levels are possible with new physics scenarios.  Searching for transitions from 3 rd generation to 2 nd and 1 st, i.e. and  N.B. e − beam polarisation helps suppress background.  Two orders of magnitude improvement at SuperB over current limits.  Hadron machines are not competitive with e + e − machines for this. 16 Note: SuperB has only evaluated a few of the accessible modes.

The golden LFV modes: hb  Symmetry breaking scale assumed: 500GeV. c/o M. Blanke NP scale assumed: 500GeV. Current experimental limits are at the edges of the model parameter space SuperB will be able to significantly constrain these models, and either find both channels, or constrain a large part of parameter space. M. Blanke et al. arXiv:

BLUE RED ΔmsΔms Φ s + Δ m s Specific example: k  Only cleanly accessible in e + e − (golden modes: μγ, 3 lepton). Model dependent NP constraint. Correlated with other flavour observables: MEG, LHCb etc. Parry and Zhang Nucl.Phys.B802:63-76, Not updated to latest results from LHCb

Another model...   upper limit can be correlated to  13 (neutrino mixing/CPV, T2K etc.) and also to  e . SUSY seasaw = CMSSM + 3 R + Correlated results from T2K, MEG and SuperB Arganda et al., JHEP, 06:079, Combine information from: 2 nd  1 st generation transitions 3 rd  1 st generation transitions Neutrino mixing: θ 13.

Another model...   upper limit can be correlated to  13 (neutrino mixing/CPV, T2K etc.) and also to  e . SUSY seasaw = CMSSM + 3 R + Correlated results from T2K, MEG and SuperB Arganda et al., JHEP, 06:079, Combine information from: 2 nd  1 st generation transitions 3 rd  1 st generation transitions Neutrino mixing: θ 13. MEG (now) MEG (design) SuperB This model will be ruled out if we find μγ

B u,d,s Physics  The programme includes  Rare decays  CKM angles and sides  CPT [This talk] 21 [This talk]

B u,d physics: Rare Decays  Example:  Rate modified by presence of H + Currently the inclusive b to sγ channel excludes m H+ < 295 GeV/c 2. The current combined limit places a stronger constraint than direct searches from the LHC for the next few years. 22

B u,d physics: Rare Decays  Example:  Need 75ab −1 to observe pseudoscalar and vector modes.  With more than 75ab −1 we could measure polarisation. Constraint on ( ε, η ) now with 75ab − 1 e.g. see Altmannshofer, Buras, & Straub Sensitive to models with Z', RH currents and light scalar particles. (Theoretical uncertainties) (Experimental uncertainties) 23

b  sl + l −  SuperB can measure inclusive and exclusive modes:  Crosscheck results to understand source of NP.  Important as theory uncertainties differ.  Expect: 10-15,000 K*μμ and 10-15,000 K*ee events.  SuperB can study all lepton flavours:  Equal amounts of μ and e final states can be measured.  Need both of these to measure all NP sensitive observables.  LHCb will accumulate slight more events in the μμ mode.  Expect superior statistics wrt LHCb for ee mode.  S/B~ 0.3, c.f. S/B~1.0 for LHCb.  Can also search for K (*) τ + τ − decay. ... and constrain Majorana ν's using like sign final states.  Also of interest for D s decays to K (*) ll final states near charm threshold. 24

TDCPV in B decays (i.e. CKM angles β & α) 25  There are many redundant measurements of the CKM angles that are potential probes of NP.  Can also measure α using all modes: ππ, ρπ, ρρ, a 1 π

 Can cleanly measure A s SL using 5S data  SuperB can also study rare decays with many neutral particles, such as, which can be enhanced by SUSY. B s physics Little Higgs (LTH) scenario 26

D Physics  The programme includes  Mixing  CP Violation  Quantum Correlation based measurements  Rare decays [This talk] 27 [This talk]

Charm Mixing  Collect data at threshold and at the 4S.  Benefit charm mixing and CPV measurements.  Also useful for measuring the Unitarity triangle angle γ (strong phase in D  Kππ Dalitz plot). 28

The quest for the final angle of the CKM matrix: β c  The charm cu triangle has one unique element: β c  Precision measurement of mixing phase in many channels (<2°)  Constrain β c,eff using a Isospin analysis  Search for NP and constrain β c,eff ~ 1°.  Can only fully explore in an e + e − environment.  Data from the charm threshold region completes the set of 5 |V ij | to measure: needs SuperB to perform an indirect test of the triangle. AB, Inguglia, Meadows, arXiv:

Charm Mixing: Summary  Can perform a precision measurement of charm mixing.  TDCPV study of K + K − will provide a 1.3° measurement of the mixing phase (arXiv: ). 30

Rare D Decays 31  Use 4S and ψ(3770) data to search for a number of important channels: Measure of the long distance contributions to the di-muon mode. Enables us to understand if μμ exhibits new physics or not. Expect to reach sensitivities ~ SM rate is ~1 × Threshold running and D recoil techniques will play a role. Invisible final state is helicity suppressed in the SM. Sensitive to new scalar particles (e.g. Dark Matter etc). Experimentally need to use the D recoil technique to search for these states : i.e. fully reconstruct one D meson, and search for the rare decay using whatever is left. two-neutrino final state will be hard, irreducible backgrounds going down the beam pipe). invisible+γ may be another story. Work in progress See arXiv: See PRD82:034005, 2010

Precision EW Physics 32

Precision Electroweak  sin 2 θ W can be measured with polarised e − beam:  √s= ϒ (4S) is theoretically clean, c.f. b-fragmentation at Z pole. SuperB Measure LR asymmetry in at the ϒ (4S) to same precision as LEP/SLC at the Z-pole. Complements measurements planned/underway at lower energies (QWeak/MESA). Plot adapted from QWeak proposal (JLAB E02-020) 33

Spectroscopy 34

Spectroscopy  Wide range of searches that can be made:  SM searches, and understanding the properties particles, e.g. of X, Y, Z (establishing quantum numbers and resolving issues in the field).  Searching for light scalar particles (Higgs and Dark Matter candidates).  Di-lepton and 4-lepton final states can be used to test:  lepton universality (c.f. NA62, many possible measurements in this area).  models of Dark Forces (few GeV scalar field in the dark sector).  Remember that BaBar's most cited paper is the discovery of the D sJ. 35

Interplay  Combine measurements to elucidate structure of new physics. More information on the golden matrix can be found in arXiv: , arXiv: , and arXiv: ✓✓✓✓ ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓ ✓✓✓✓ ✓ = SuperB can measure this 36

Precision CKM constraints  Unitarity Triangle Angles  σ(α) = 1−2°  σ(β) = 0.1°  σ(γ) = 1−2°  CKM Matrix Elements  |V ub |  Inclusive σ = 2%  Exclusive σ = 3%  |V cb |  Inclusive σ = 1%  Exclusive σ = 1%  |V us |  Can be measured precisely using τ decays.  |V cd | and |V cs |  can be measured at/near charm threshold.  SuperB Measures the sides and angles of the Unitarity Triangle. The "dream" scenario with 75ab -1 37

38 Golden Measurements: General Benefit from polarised e − beam very precise with improved detector Statistically limited: Angular analysis with >75ab -1 Right handed currents SuperB measures many more modes systematic error is main challenge control systematic error with data SuperB measures e mode well, LHCb does μ Clean NP search Theoretically clean b fragmentation limits interpretation

Golden Measurements: CKM  Comparison of relative benefits of SuperB (75ab -1 ) vs. existing measurements and LHCb (5fb -1 ) and the LHCb upgrade (50fb -1 ). LHCb can only use ρπ β theory error B d β theory error B s Need an e + e − environment to do a precision measurement using semi-leptonic B decays. 39

40

 With the exceptions of y CP and K*μμ, there are no planned or existing experiments that will surpass SuperB precision in these modes for at least the next two decades.  The best place to measure the other 33 golden modes is SuperB! 41

Physics programme in a nutshell  Versatile flavour physics experiment:  Probe new physics observables in wide range of decays.  Pattern of deviation from Standard Model can be used to identify structure of new physics.  Clean experimental environment means clean signals in many modes.  Polarised e − beam benefit for τ LFV searches (unique feature).  Charm threshold running adds many more observables, and improves potential of SuperB (unique feature).  Measure angles and sides of the Unitarity triangle.  Measure other CKM matrix elements at threshold and using τ data.  SuperB is working on a TDR for  Will be followed by a physics book some time later.  Plenty of open areas for newcomers to work on! 42