IMF direction derived from cycloid-like ion distributions observed by Mars Express M. Yamauchi, Y. Futaana, R. Lundin, S. Barabash, M. Holmström (IRF-Kiruna,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Quantum Mechanics of Simple Systems
Advertisements

First composition measurements of energetic neutral atoms A. T. Y. Lui et al., GRL, Vol 23, pages: , 1996.
PHYS 218 sec Review Chap. 3 Motion in 2 or 3 dimensions.
Foreshock studies by MEX and VEX FAB: field-aligned beam FAB + FS: foreshock M. Yamauchi et al.
Session A Wrap Up. He Abundance J. Kasper Helium abundance variation over the solar cycle, latitude and with solar wind speed Slow solar wind appears.
Electromagnetic Waves
PRECIPITATION OF HIGH-ENERGY PROTONS AND HYDROGEN ATOMS INTO THE UPPER ATMOSPHERES OF MARS AND VENUS Valery I. Shematovich Institute of Astronomy, Russian.
Single particle motion and trapped particles
Martian Pick-up Ions (and foreshock): Solar-Cycle and Seasonal Variation M. Yamauchi(1); T. Hara(2); R. Lundin(3); E. Dubinin(4); A. Fedorov(5); R.A. Frahm(6);
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Force on an Electric Charge Moving in a Magnetic Field.
Energetic Particles in the Quiet Corona A. MacKinnon 1,2, M. DeRosa 3, S. Frewen 2, & H. Hudson 2 1 University of Glasgow, 2 Space Sciences Laboratory,
Motion in Two Dimensions
Heavy ion spectral breaks in large SEP events LWS Team Meeting CIT, Pasadena, CA Jan 10 th -11 th, 2008 Gang Li.
Expected Influence of Crustal Magnetic Fields on ASPERA-3 ELS Observations: Insight from MGS D.A. Brain, J.G. Luhmann, D.L. Mitchell, R.P. Lin UC Berkeley.
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
March 2, 2011 Fill in derivation from last lecture Polarization of Thomson Scattering No class Friday, March 11.
Electromagnetic Waves Electromagnetic waves are identical to mechanical waves with the exception that they do not require a medium for transmission.
Scalar and Vector Fields
Physics of fusion power Lecture 7: particle motion.
A proton is shot with a velocity v at an angle  to a uniform magnetic field B, which is directed along the x-axis as shown below. Assume that the only.
KINEMATICS OF PARTICLES PLANE CURVILINEAR MOTION
Chapter 4 Motion in Two Dimensions. Using + or – signs is not always sufficient to fully describe motion in more than one dimension Vectors can be used.
1 Mirror Mode Storms in Solar Wind and ULF Waves in the Solar Wind C.T. Russell, L.K. Jian, X. Blanco-Cano and J.G. Luhmann 18 th STEREO Science Working.
Oscillations & Waves IB Physics. Simple Harmonic Motion Oscillation 4. Physics. a. an effect expressible as a quantity that repeatedly and regularly.
Equations of Lines Chapter 8 Sections
Finite Gyroradius Effect in Space and Laboratory 1. Radiation belt (Ring current) 2. Auroral phenomena (Substorm current) 3. Shock acceleration and upstream.
ASEN 5335 Aerospace Environments -- Radiation Belts1 The Radiation Belts A radiation belt is a population of energetic particles stably-trapped by the.
Lecture 14 Magnetic Domains Induced EMF Faraday’s Law Induction Motional EMF.
Motion in Two Dimensions
Motion in Two Dimensions
Chapter 4 Motion in Two Dimensions. Kinematics in Two Dimensions Will study the vector nature of position, velocity and acceleration in greater detail.
Foreshock studies by MEX and VEX FAB: field-aligned beam FAB + FS: foreshock M. Yamauchi et al.
PAPER I. ENA DATA ANALYSIS RESULTS. The Imager for Magnetopause-to- Aurora Global Exploration (IMAGE) missionis the first NASA Mid-size Explorer (MIDEX)
Deflections We have already done programs on Gravitational Deflection (trajectories - PHYS 201, Vol. 1, #6) and Electric Deflection (cathode ray tube,
4 th SERENA-HEWG Meeting Key Largo, Florida,13-17 May, 2013 page 1 Success of the hybrid modelling technique in simulating the response of the Martian.
Oxygen Injection Events observed by Freja Satellite M. Yamauchi 1, L. Eliasson 1, H. Nilsson 1, R. Lundin 1, and O. Norberg 2 1.Swedish Institute of Space.
Advanced EM - Master in Physics We have now calculated all the intermediate derivatives which we need for calculating the fields E and B. We.
Equatorial signatures of an auroral bulge and a filamentation/demarcation of a transpolar arc observed by Cluster M. Yamauchi 1, I. Sandahl 1, R. Lundin.
Chapter 8 Charges in Magnetic Fields. Introduction In the previous chapter it was observed that a current carrying wire observed a force when in a magnetic.
Escaping ions over polar cap. Inner magnetosphere, Bow shock/Foreshock, and Ancient magnetosphere.
Group A: S. Bale(Tutor), B. Engavale, W.L. Shi, W.L. Teh, L. Xie, L. Yang, and X.G. Zhang 13,May rd COSPAR Capacity Building Workshop3 rd COSPAR.
Book Reference : Pages To understand that the path of a charged particle in a magnetic field is circular 2.To equate the force due to the magnetic.
Electric Field.
IMF derivation from Pickup Ions observed by ASPERA UT UT UT M. Yamauchi B ion ion motion in.
Analysis of Suprathermal Events Observed by STEREO/PLASTIC with a Focus on Upstream Events STEREO SWG - 20 Meredith, NH October 27-29, 2009 Josh Barry,
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our earlier lectures, we found the general equations of motion  We initially considered only the linear fields, but now we will.
MULTI-INSTRUMENT STUDY OF THE ENERGY STEP STRUCTURES OF O + AND H + IONS IN THE CUSP AND POLAR CAP REGIONS Yulia V. Bogdanova, Berndt Klecker and CIS TEAM.
Multiple Ion Acceleration at Martian Bow Shock M. Yamauchi 1, Y. Futaana 1, A. Fedorov 2, R.A. Frahm 3, E. Dubinin 4, R. Lundin 1, J.-A. Sauvaud 2, J.D.
Impact of CIRs/CMEs on the ionospheres of Venus and Mars Niklas Edberg IRF Uppsala, Sweden H. Nilsson, Y. Futaana, G. Stenberg, D. Andrews, K. Ågren, S.
Foreshock and planetary size: A Venus-Mars comparison M. Yamauchi, Y. Futaana, R. Lundin, S. Barabash, M. Holmstrom (IRF, Kiruna, Sweden) A. Fedorov, J.-A.
Cosmic Ray Positron Fraction Observations during the A- Magnetic Solar Minimum John Clem and Paul Evenson* * Presenter AESOP Departing Esrange, Sweden.
Techniques for mass resolution improvement achieved by typical plasma analyzers: Modeling and simulations 1 G. Nicolaou, 1 M. Yamauchi, 1 M. Wieser, 1.
Ch 9.6: Liapunov’s Second Method In Section 9.3 we showed how the stability of a critical point of an almost linear system can usually be determined from.
R. Maggiolo 1, M. Echim 1,2, D. Fontaine 3, A. Teste 4, C. Jacquey 5 1 Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (IASB-BIRA); 2 Institute.
Solar Magnetic Fields. Capacitors in Circuits Charge takes time to move through wire  V is felt at the speed of light, however Change in potential across.
M. Yamauchi1, I. Dandouras2, H. Reme2,
Sub-keV Phenomena of Dayside Ring Current
Ion Pickup Phenomenon upstream of Mars observed by ASPERA 3
Single particle motion and trapped particles
Figure 3. Inclination instability in the outer Solar system
1G. Nicolaou, 1M. Yamauchi, 1,2H. Nilsson, 1M. Wieser, 3A. Fedorov, 1D
Mars, Venus, The Moon, and Jovian/Saturnian satellites
Force on an Electric Charge Moving in a Magnetic Field
Force on an Electric Charge Moving in a Magnetic Field
M. Yamauchi1, Y. Futaana1, R. Lundin1, S. Barabash1, M. Wieser1, A
ESS 154/200C Lecture 19 Waves in Plasmas 2
Multiple Ion Acceleration at Martian Bow Shock
Multiple Ion Acceleration at Martian Bow Shock
Magnetic Fields Exert Forces on Moving Charges
Mars, Venus, The Moon, and Jovian/Saturnian satellites
Presentation transcript:

IMF direction derived from cycloid-like ion distributions observed by Mars Express M. Yamauchi, Y. Futaana, R. Lundin, S. Barabash, M. Holmström (IRF-Kiruna, Sweden) A. Fedorov, J.-A. Sauvaud (CESR, Toulouse, France) R.A. Frahm, J.D. Winningham (SwRI, San Antonio, USA) E. Dubinin (MPS, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany), E. Kallio (FMI, Helsinki, Finland) and ASPERA-3 team

Motivation To understand Mars Express (MEX) hot plasma and energetic neutral atom (ASPERA-3) data, it is important to have the magnetic field (B) measurement. However, MEX does not measure B (because of bureaucracy), and B is measured only on Venus Express. Therefore, any method to estimate B on MEX is helpful. Using Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) data is one method, but we here take another approach : Analyze gyromotion of ions observed by ASPERA-3 ion mass analyser (IMA) because ion motion in velocity space is a ring! (spiral motion in real space) Actually, the ring distribution is the "clearest signature" among many interesting phenomena seen in IMA Quick Look (mass and azimuth are integrated) UT UT UT B ion

(easy case) single azimuth plots  = 5~15  = 4  = 3  = 2  = 1 SW ring MEX orbit (light blue) during UT in the cylindrical MSO coordinates. R 2 = Y 2 +Z 2. average IMB average BS Mars IMA energy-time spectrograms for proton cannel at keV during 1334: :40 UT on 27 April Five different azimuthal sectors (φ) are presented except sector 0. The nearly 3-min cycle seen in the IMA data is due to the electric scan of the entrance direction from nearly -45° (elevation=0) to nearly +45° (elevation=15). The counts that are seen above the solar wind in the proton channel are due to contamination from alpha particles.

Ion motion with V 0 =0 velocity space trajectory V* X VYVY VXVX V* Y V* Z VZVZ V (SW frame) = V* (Martian frame) + V SW B Ions with V 0 =0 in Martian frame have an initial velocity -V SW in SW rest frame where E (electric field) =0. Ions in SW rest frame make simple spiral trajectory (simple gyration + constant parallel velocity), i.e, a simple ring in velocity space as indicated by blue dashed lines. Ring = within a plane  the minimum variance direction (N) is parallel to B! Viewing from +B Viewing from +E 3-D view Initial  velocity to B is V 0 cos 

Velocity space plots of the data

Velocity (in km/s) scatter plots of the H+ data (mass range : slightly contaminated by SW He++) during UT, 27 April 2005, in (a) MSO coordinates, and maximum(L)-medium(M)-minimum(L) variance coordinates determined from (b) manually selected ring data, and (c) automatically filtered data during UT. Azimuth=0 data are not shown (total 450 points). The circles and triangles denote the points belonging to the ring distribution by a manual inspection, with circles corresponding to 7-40 counts, filled triangles corresponding to more than 40 counts, and empty triangles corresponding to 4-6 counts. Non-ring data are shown using plus marks (blue: count is 7-40, light blue: count more than 40). Coordinates given (b) arranges the ring data fitting to a circle best passing through the origin.

However, IMA orientation is not always ideal Aligned in the azimuthal direction (points 2, 3, 4, 5 in the ion-motion illustration)  Linear alignment (small data range in M direction)  Minimum variance method gives clear L direction (// ±E), but not M & N directions.  We may not use ±N as estimate of B direction, but (1) E x V SW gives B Y /B Z orientation ! (2) B X /B (or  ) can be obtained intuitively IMA all-mass & all-azimuth data on , UT IMA light ion (H+ and He++) data (3~8 keV) for each azimuth at ~0608 UT & ~0623 UT  =5~14  =15  =1  =2  =3  =4

cf. beam-origin (V 0 ≠ 0) ring distribution case Alignment direction of the ring data by IMA ≈ Maximum variance direction (L X, L Y, L Z ) where L X << 1  B T =(0, B Y, B Z ) // V SW x E // (0, L Z, -L Y ) Sign of B If L = evolution direction, sign(B Z ) = - sign(L Y ) Tilt toward X (=  ) *  ' = angle between max energy (  MAX ) direction and solar wind direction * Ratio k = V MAX /V SW = (  MAX /  SW ) 1/2 If V 0 = 0, two angles must be the same, i.e.,  ' = , and k = cos(  )  If cos(  ') = k, most likely  =  '  MAX

Procedure & result (1) Manually select the ring distribution. (2) Apply the minimum variance method to determine L, M, and N. If the ring data is well arranged into a partial circle, ±N // B If not, (3) Examine |L X | < 0.3. If yes, L // -E SW. If not, remove the direction that corresponds to the lowest energy from the selected set of data and re-calculate a new L. (4) Manually obtain  MAX and  '. (5) Check if  MAX /4  SW ≈ cos 2 (  ') is satisfied. If yes, we have  ≈  ', where B X /|B| = sin(  ). (6) If possible, identify the evolution direction and determine the sign of L and E SW. B T is parallel to V SW x E SW. Using (3)~(6)  Changing IMF for event 0608 UT, northward IMF, X tilt ~ +35°~40°, Y tilt ~ -10° 0613 UT, northward IMF, X tilt ~ +35°, Y tilt ~ -45° 0623 UT, northward IMF, X tilt ~ +20°, Y tilt ~ -30° 0633 UT, X tilt > +40° Using (1)~(2)  Constant IMF for event UT, dawn-dusk oriented IMF, with X tilt ~ 20°

In-coming directions of ions Azimuth scan  Elevation scan  Electric scan IMA

summary MEX/IMA often observed partial ring distributions of protons in velocity space upstream of the Martian bow shock. Since ions are expected to gyrate around the IMF in velocity phase space, an ensemble of ions with nearly the same initial velocity (beam-like or zero velocity) forms such ring distribution when the IMF is relatively constant over a gyroperiod. Inversely, approximate IMF orientation can be derived from the observed ring distribution because the ring's plane must be perpendicular to the IMF. However, the actual derivation of the ring plane is very complicated because (a) the ring distribution is just one of minor component that IMA detects, and (b) IMA's viewing directions and angular resolution are very limited. Therefore, we developed method to obtain the IMF orientation from actual IMA data (see "procedure" above). There are three important steps: (1) Manually choose the ring data with the same V 0 : (automatic selection does not work). (2) Obtain maximum (L) and minimum (N) direction from the selected ring data. (3) After the quality check, use either N or L (see procedure). We applied actual IMA data. Two examples ( and ) are shown. It is possible to obtain the IMF orientation about 75% of BS traverals when IMA is in the best operation mode (highest post-acceleration to detect proton).

Selected ring data *1) L = (0.05, -0.02, 1.00) in MSO *2) M = (0.94, -0.34, -0.06) in MSO *3) N = (0.34, 0.94, ) in MSO , UT , ~0608 UT *1) L = (0.06, 0.99, 0.14) in MSO *2) M = (0.79, 0.04, -0.61) in MSO *3) N = (0.61, -0.15, 0.78) in MSO

H+ only (no He++) !  = 3  = 2  = 4  = 3  = 2 SW He ++ Ring H + SW H +

Distribution in velocity space

From ring data at ~0623 UT ( ) V L (km/s) V N (km/s) V M (km/s)

(easy case) SW ring

However, IMA orientation is not always ideal UT

cf. beam-origin (V 0 ≠ 0) ring distribution case