Proximal Protection during Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention using the Proxis™ Embolic Protection System The PROXIMAL Trial Laura Mauri, MD, MSc, FACC,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENDEAVOR IV Acronym: ENDEAVOR IV. Lead investigator: Dr Martin Leon from Columbia University, New York Source: Transcatheter cardiovascular Therapeutics,
Advertisements

THE USE OF HISTORICAL CONTROLS IN DEVICE STUDIES Vic Hasselblad Duke Clinical Research Institute.
Protection Devices in PCI-Treatment of Myocardial Infarction for Salvage of Endangered Myocardium Study Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific.
Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst The AMEthyst Trial A prospective randomized controlled study.
Distal Protection: PRIDE, CAPTIVE Symbiot III, AiMI Dr James Cotton MD MRCP Heart and Lung Centre Wolverhampton.
Radial versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome the RIFLE STEACS study Enrico Romagnoli, MD PhD Principal investigators:
FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE versus ANGIOGRAPHY
FFR vs Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation
CPORT- E Trial Randomized trial comparing medical, economic and quality of life outcomes of non-primary PCI at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs. Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions Julinda Mehilli,
2 Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal RESOLUTE US Study Laura Mauri MD, MSc on behalf of the RESOLUTE US Investigators Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
University Medical Center Groningen Thrombus aspiration during primary PCI FZ Thrombus Aspiration during Percutaneous coronary intervention in Acute.
The AiMI Trial Arshad Ali, MD, David Cox, MD, Nabil Dib, MD, Bruce Brodie, MD, Daniel Berman, MD, Navin Gupta, MD, Kevin Browne, MD, Robert Iwaoka, MD,
The Radial Artery Patency Study Investigators Radial Artery and Saphenous Vein Patency more than 5-years Following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Results.
Proxis Proximal embolic protection in saphenous vein graft and infarct PCI Dan Blackman Leeds General Infirmary Advanced Angioplasty 2006.
CPORT- E Trial Randomized trial comparing outcomes of non-primary PCI at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery.
SPIDER Saphenous Vein Graft Protection In a Distal Embolic Protection Randomized Trial Simon R. Dixon MBChB, William W. O’Neill MD William Beaumont Hospital,
Intracoronary Eptifibatide Bolus Administration During Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization for Acute Coronary Syndromes With Evaluation of Platelet.
ARMYDA-5 (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) Study Prospective, multicenter, randomized trial investigating influence.
ARMYDA-4 (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) study Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double blind trial investigating.
Left Main Trifurcation Disease: Early and Long-Term Outcomes Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention I.Sheiban, A.Gerasimou, F. Sciuto, P.Omedè, G. Biondi.
Do Tirofiban And ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcomes Trial Presented at AHA Scientific Sessions Nov. 15, 2000.
SIROLIMUS-ELUTING STENTS EFFECTIVELY INHIBIT NEOINTIMAL PROLIFERATION AS COMPARED TO BARE METAL STENTS IN DISEASED SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFTS: 6-month IVUS.
A Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-­ Eluting Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds vs. Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: One-Year Angiographic and.
Trial Design Issues Associated with Evaluation of Distal Protection Devices in Diseased Saphenous Vein Grafts Bram D. Zuckerman, MD, FACC Medical Officer,
FRONTIER Registry The Guidant MULTI-LINK FRONTIER ™ Coronary Stent System for the Treatment of Pts with Native De Novo or Restenotic Bifurcation Coronary.
Side Branch Stenting Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Bifurcation Lesions Trial Presented at The American College of Cardiology Scientific Session 2006.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Evaluating a Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon in Patients TReated with Endothelial Progenitor Cell CapTuring Stents for De Novo.
A Prospective, Randomized Evaluation of Supersaturated Oxygen Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction.
Treatment of bifurcation lesions is a complex problem Different techniques are commonly used (Y-/T-stenting, „culotte“ technique, „kissing stent“ technique…)
ADMIRALADMIRAL Abciximab before Direct Angioplasty and Stenting in Myocardial Infarction Regarding Acute and Long term follow-up ADMIRAL Study ADMIRAL.
Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bivalirudin in Acute Coronary.
Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial Myeong-Ki.
The MASTER Trial A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Evaluation of a PET Micronet Mesh Covered Stent (MGuard) in STEMI Sigmund Silber, MD, PhD FESC,
ISAR-CABG Objective To compare the efficacy of DES with BMS in a randomized trial powered for clinical events Sample 610 patients with de novo SVG lesions.
ARMYDA-4 (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) study Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double blind trial investigating.
The SAFER Trial Evaluation of the Clinical Safety and Efficacy of the PercuSurge GuardWire in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention As presented at TCT 2000.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Prospective Application of Pre-Defined Intravascular.
Gregg W. Stone MD for the ACUITY Investigators A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Bivalirudin in Acute Coronary Syndromes Final One-Year Results from the.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Smoking Is Associated With Adverse Clinical Outcomes.
Cardioprotective Effects of Postconditioning in Patients Treated with Primary PCI Evaluated with Magnetic Resonance Jacob T Lønborg Niels Vejlstrup, Erik.
Northeast Georgia Heart Center State of the Art Review: Bypass graft Interventions J. Jeffrey Marshall, MD, FSCAI Past President SCAI, Director.
Philippe Généreux, MD for the Tryton Bifurcation Trial Investigators Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York City.
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Percutaneous Treatment of Protected and Unprotected.
Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Effectiveness of In-Laboratory High-Dose Clopidogrel.
Prof. Dr. Sigmund Silber, FESC, FACC On behalf of the RESOLUTE
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in the treatment of long and diffuse lesions– summary of key articles Prepared by Radcliffe Cardiology 21 November2016.
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Adnan Kastrati
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
Damian Gimpel Waikato Cardiothoracic Unit Journal Club
OCT-Guided PCI What needs to be done to establish criteria?
Presented by Dr. Leif Thuesen
American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Stephan Windecker
REALITY: 8 month results
Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai, MD
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
Peter K. Smith, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Peter K. Smith, MD  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 
% Heparin + GPI IIb/IIIa Bivalirudin +
SIRIUS: A U.S. Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the SIRolImUS-Eluting Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Lesions Presented at TCT 2002.
American Heart Association Presented by Dr. Julinda Mehilli
TAXUS – Myonecrosis and sidebranch patency concerns are short-term issues with no long-term consequences, and the benefits are undeniable Jeffrey J. Popma,
12-month clinical and 13-month angiographic outcomes from a randomized trial evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. metallic drug-eluting.
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit with
Angioplasty Balloon-associated Coronary Debris and the EZ FilterWire
DANAMI 3-DEFER Trial design: Patients presenting with STEMI and in whom the operators could establish TIMI 2-3 flow without stenting or those presenting.
Atlantic Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team
Sirolimus Stent vs. Bare Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial
Glenn N. Levine et al. JACC 2011;58:e44-e122
Presentation transcript:

Proximal Protection during Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention using the Proxis™ Embolic Protection System The PROXIMAL Trial Laura Mauri, MD, MSc, FACC, David Cox, MD, FACC, James Hermiller, MD, FACC, Joseph Massaro, PhD, Joyce Wahr, MD, Sew Wah Tay, PhD, Michael Jonas, MD, Jeffrey J. Popma, MD, FACC, Jim Pavliska, BS, Dennis Wahr, MD, FACC, Campbell Rogers, MD, FACC, for the PROXIMAL Investigators J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: PROXIMAL: Overview Background: Embolic complications during stenting of degenerated saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts are reduced, but not eliminated, by distal protection. Objectives: To improve outcomes further, we investigated an embolic protection device placed proximal to the target lesion that could provide protection before lesion instrumentation, allow use of conventional guidewires, and permit embolic protection in anatomy unfavorable for distal devices.

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: PROXIMAL: Background Distal embolic protection using balloon occlusion or filters reduces post- procedural complications during SVG PCI 30 d MACE (%) FIRE Filter Wire 9.9% SAFER unprotected 16.5% 11.6% FIRE Guard Wire 9.6% SAFER Guard Wire PRIDE Tri Active 11.2% PRIDE Filter/ Guard Wire 10.1% Explanations for residual MACE despite distal protection may include embolization during crossing, incomplete capture, and events occurring after device removal

Webb et al: JIC, 2005, 18, 1-3 Angiographic Eligibility for Embolic Protection Among SVG PCI Patients Distal (20%) Proximal, non-ostial (18%) Body of Vein Graft (40%)

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: PROXIMAL: Study Device Proxis Embolic Protection System (St Jude Medical, Maple Grove, MN) Copyright ©2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Restrictions may apply.

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: PROXIMAL: Methods 594 patients undergoing stenting of 639 saphenous vein grafts were prospectively randomized, using a non- inferiority design to compare two treatment strategies: Control (distal protection whenever possible) or Test (proximal protection when possible, distal when not). The study was designed to test whether a treatment strategy in which proximal protection was used whenever possible would be non-inferior to a strategy of distal protection only. Rejection of the null hypothesis would indicate that the proximal protection strategy would have a primary endpoint rate (30 day MACE) not exceeding that of the distal protection strategy plus a pre-specified non- inferiority margin.

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: Day MACE: Death, MI (CPK-MB ≥3x ULN), urgent CABG, or Target Vessel Revascularization Power analysis: Assumed event rate for control arm = 12.7% Delta = 7% (55% relative delta) One sided α=0.05 for non-inferiority 560 randomized pts provides 80% power for non- inferiority  600 pts planned PROXIMAL: Primary Endpoint

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: PROXIMAL: Major Criteria Inclusion: Normal CK/CKMB Lesion(s) in SVG is ≥50% and <100%. Up to 2 SVGs. No limit on number of lesions Concomitant 1-2 native vessel PCI allowed ≥TIMI I Flow Device landing zone RVD ≥3.0 and  5.0 mm Exclusion: MI with 24 hours Cardiac Surgery within 60 days Lesion(s) within 5 mm of proximal anastomotic site LVEF < 20% More than 2 native lesions to be treated More that 2 SVGs to be treated

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: PROXIMAL: Study Algorithm FilterWire/ GuardWire Control FilterWire/ GuardWire Proxis Randomization No protection Proxis FilterWire/ GuardWire Proxis Proxis™ system Test arm: Use Proxis™ system whenever possible, and FW or GW when Proxis not possible (proximal lesions) Control arm: Use FW/GW whenever possible, and no protection when FW/GW not possible (distal lesions) SVG PCI 594 pts Stratified by GP IIb/IIIa use

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: Copyright ©2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Restrictions may apply. The PROXIMAL Trial

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: Baseline Clinical Features ControlTestP value N patients Age (mean yrs) NS Male gender84%87%NS Diabetes mellitus44%43%NS Hypertension89%86%NS Hyperlipidemia91% NS Smoker22%20%NS Prior MI60%59%NS Class III/IV angina75%78%NS LVEF (%) NS GP IIb/IIIa blocker use (%) NS

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: Baseline Angiographic Features ControlTestP value N patients SVG distribution Left Anterior Descending16.6%23.3%NS - Left Circumflex45.1%36.1%NS Right Coronary Artery38.3%40.6%NS Reference Vessel Diameter (mm)3.22 ± ± 0.60NS Minimal Lumen Diameter (mm)1.05± ±0.49NS Diameter stenosis (%)67.32± ±13.35NS SVG degeneration score39.32± ±21.84NS Plaque Volume105.4± ±98.1NS

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: Δ = -0.8 [-4.8, +3.2] P = for NI Primary Endpoint (30 Day MACE): Intention to Treat

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: Actual Devices Used Test arm Control arm * *81% FilterWire, 19% GuardWire

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: Copyright ©2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Restrictions may apply. 30-Day MACE Rates

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: Day MACE: “By Device” Analysis Δ = -4.6 [upper bound 95% CI -0.05] P = for NI *No protection: Primarily distal lesions randomized to Control Arm *

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: FilterWire/ GuardWire Control FilterWire/ GuardWire Proxis Randomization No protection Proxis FilterWire/ GuardWire Proxis Secondary Analysis: Outcomes in Patients With Lesions Suitable for Either Proximal or Distal Protection

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: Day MACE: Lesions Amenable to Either Proximal or Distal Protection Δ = -3.1 [-8.2, +2.0] P = for superiority, P = for NI

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: Copyright ©2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Restrictions may apply. Periprocedural Myonecrosis by Intention-to-Treat Analysis Population

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: Copyright ©2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Restrictions may apply. Mauri, L. et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: Periprocedural Myonecrosis by Device Analysis Population

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: Copyright ©2007 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Restrictions may apply. Mauri, L. et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: Periprocedural Myonecrosis by Patients Eligible for Treatment With Either Device

Mauri L. et. al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50: PROXIMAL: Conclusion A treatment strategy that included proximal embolic protection whenever possible during treatment of SVG lesions produced outcomes similar to those seen with a strategy using only distal embolic protection. These results support use of proximal protection in eligible lesions.