This workshop will focus on…

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Table of Contents – Part B HINARI Resources –Clinical Evidence –Cochrane Library –EBM Guidelines –BMJ Practice –HINARI EBM Journals.
Advertisements

SEARCHING EVIDENCE THROUGH THE COCHRANE LIBRARY
Action Research Not traditional educational research often research tests theory not practical Teacher research in classrooms and/or schools/districts.
Evidence-Based Medicine
Research article structure: Where can reporting guidelines help? Iveta Simera The EQUATOR Network workshop.
Introducing... Reproduced and modified from a presentation produced by Zoë Debenham from the original presentation created by Kate Light, Cochrane Trainer.
Systematic Reviews Dr Sharon Mickan Centre for Evidence-based Medicine
Secondary Data Analysis: Systematic Reviews & Associated Databases
Scoping the literature for your research bid Unit 4.
Medical Library & Peyton T. Anderson Learning Resources Center Macon, GA Memorial University Medical Center Health Sciences.
Student Learning Development, TCD1 Systematic Approaches to Literature Reviewing Dr Tamara O’Connor Student Learning Development Trinity College Dublin.
Doug Altman Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, UK
 Finding the right information to answer a given question often depends on the source of the information  Searching for evidence that has already been.
8. Evidence-based management Step 3: Critical appraisal of studies
Reading the Dental Literature
Critical Appraisal Dr Samira Alsenany Dr SA 2012 Dr Samira alsenany.
(HINARI) PubMed Conduct systematic reviews of the literature Limit to specific populations & publication types Utilize EBM built-in filtersbuilt-in filters.
Accessing Sources Of Evidence For Practice Introduction To Databases Karen Smith Department of Health Sciences University of York.
Problem Identification
NURS 505B Library Session Rachael Clemens Spring 2007.
Evidence-Based Nursing Practice: Literature Search
Introduction to evidence based medicine
Critical Appraisal of an Article by Dr. I. Selvaraj B. SC. ,M. B. B. S
Novel Tools and Resources for an Evidence Based Practice Barbara Walker, Ph.D.
Clinical Information Resources Sandra A. Martin, M.L.I.S. Health Sciences Resource Coordinator Instructor of Library Services John Vaughan Library Room.
By Kousar Taj A Seminar Paper on LITERATURE REVIEW.
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE
Evidence based implementation for quality and health promotion in hospitals Professor Jos Kleijnen Director Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University.
Reading Scientific Papers Shimae Soheilipour
The Library and The Center for Knowledge Management Evidence-Based Nursing Practice: Literature Search.
CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE
THE COCHRANE LIBRARY ON WILEY INTERSCIENCE. Presentation Agenda Brief introduction of Evidence-Based Medicine theories The Cochrane Collaboration – origins,
How to Write a Critical Review of Research Articles
Systematic Reviews.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Locating and Reviewing Related Literature Chapter 3 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright.
Chapter 3 Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Locating and Reviewing Related Literature This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright.
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
QAH HospitalPortsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust 10/12/2015Page 1 Stepping up to Evidence Based Practice - Ideas into Action 3 Debra Ugboma January 2010 Finding.
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
Clinical Writing for Interventional Cardiologists.
Planning an Applied Research Project Chapter 3 – Conducting a Literature Review © 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
How to write a scientific article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
Clinical Information Resources Sandra A. Martin, M.L.I.S. Health Sciences Resource Coordinator Instructor of Library Services John Vaughan Library Room.
Medical searching Kazem Heidari. Reading in medicine Browsing  Reading for fun of it  Books and journals are used. Reading for information  Approach.
1 How to find literature - A very short introduction - How to start smart Students IIC/IID Medical Library, August 2013.
Evidence Based Practice RCS /9/05. Definitions  Rosenthal and Donald (1996) defined evidence-based medicine as a process of turning clinical problems.
Objectives  Identify the key elements of a good randomised controlled study  To clarify the process of meta analysis and developing a systematic review.
Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. Cochrane_QuickRefBooklet.indd 114/8/15 5:41 pm.
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :呂宥達 Date : 2005/10/27.
Critical Appraisal : The Librarian’s Role Andrew Booth and Louise Falzon.
Is the conscientious explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decision about the care of the individual patient (Dr. David Sackett)
LITERATURE REVIEW ARCHELLE JANE C. CALLEJO, PTRP,MSPH.
Evidence-Based Information Retrieval and Resources GEMP 2 © Dr Glenda Myers WHSL 18 th March 2008.
Internet Resources for Evidence-Based Practice Ben Skinner KnowledgeShare.
Protocol Launch Meeting and Research Skills Course September 16 th 2015, RCS England Searching the Literature.
Table of Contents – Part B HINARI Resources –Clinical Evidence –Cochrane Library –EBM Guidelines –BMJ Practice –HINARI EBM Journals.
Primary studies Secondry studies. Primary studies Experimental studies Clinical trial studies Surveys studies.
Sources of systematic reviews Arash Etemadi, MD PhD Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Evidence-Based Public Health Practice: Using Research and Data to Improve Your Programs Week 2, Part 1: Step 3 of 6--Use the research literature to guide.
Evidence-Based Mental Health PSYC 377. Structure of the Presentation 1. Describe EBP issues 2. Categorize EBP issues 3. Assess the quality of ‘evidence’
Ghada Aboheimed, Msc. Review the principles of an evidence based approach to clinical practice. Appreciate the value of EBM Describe the 5 steps of evidence.
Evidence-Based Practice Finding the evidence Ben Skinner
Elsevier Science (USA) items and derived items copyright © 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. Reviewing the Literature Prepare by :Dr/Amira.
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University
Critical Reading of Clinical Study Results
Things to Remember… PubMed
(HINARI) PubMed Conduct systematic reviews of the literature
Chapter 3 Finding Relevant Evidence to Answer Clinical Questions
Evidence-Based Public Health
Presentation transcript:

Literature review: How to search, evaluate, synthesize, and present the evidence

This workshop will focus on… Searching through the literature for relevant sources; Evaluating the findings from your search; Synthesizing these findings; and Presenting the results.

But WHY do we need to conduct a literature review?

A literature review can help us to… Address an information need Find out whether the evaluation question has been asked before Find out what has been done in similar settings Determine what best practices already exist Discover what tools might be useful in our evaluation

Evaluate your practice What is the problem we need to solve? The Evidence to Practice Process What is the question we need answered? Select first choice resource where an answer may be found (e.g. the Cochrane library) Select second choice resource Design search strategy and carry out search Appraise and summarize the evidence Good Evidence Poor or insufficient evidence Assess the relevance of the evidence to your local situation and target groups Note: The Evidence to Practice Process is included in the Supplementary Materials handout (see page 14). Consider implications for your practice and resources, and those of the organizations you work with Improvement Apply the evidence to practice Evaluate your practice No improvement © 2003, Evidence Network: What Works for Children?

Where do we start?

Searching through the Literature

Define the Problem The target population E.g., Age, sex, ethnic group, diagnostic group The intervention The therapy that is of interest to your program The outcome The changes you would like to see in your target population

Find the Information Academic libraries Online databases Primary source: The original publication of new data, results, and theories Stice, E., Shaw, H., Burton, E., & Wade, E. (2006, April). Dissonance and healthy weight eating disorder prevention programs: a randomized efficacy trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(2), 263-275. Retrieved September 18, 2008, from PubMed database. Secondary source: Summarizes or comments on primary sources in the context of the particular idea under study Pratt, B.M. & Woolfenden, S.R. (2002, April). Interventions for preventing eating disorders in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2. Retrieved September 18, 2008, from the Cochrane database.

Online databases with free content… Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/crdweb/ Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) http://www.cochrane.org/ Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) Database http://www.tripdatabase.com The International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment http://www.inahta.org/ British Medical Journal www.bmj.com/ Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) http://www.doaj.org/ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) http://www.samhsa.gov/ebpWebguide/index.asp Centre of Excellence evidence database http://www.onthepoint.ca/EvidenceDB/ Note: Databases are described in the Supplementary Materials handout (see pages 3 – 5).

Online databases with limited free content… PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ York University Health Research Guide http://www.library.yorku.ca/ccm/rg/nk/health.jsp British Medical Association (BMA) http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/Evidencebasedhealthinformationon Note: Databases are described in the Supplementary Materials handout (see pages 3 – 5).

Databases available only by subscription… PsycINFO – American Psychological Association (APA) http://www.apa.org/psycinfo/ Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED) http://www.bl.uk/collections/health/amed.html EMBASE http://www.embase.com/ Note: Databases are described in the Supplementary Materials handout (see pages 3 – 5).

Guidelines available online… Guidelines are a rich source of evaluated evidence, particularly if the question is about treatment or diagnosis of a relatively common medical condition Available for free: UK National Electronic Library for Health Guidelines Finder http://rms.nelh.nhs.uk/guidelinesfinder US National Guideline Clearing House at http://www.guidelines.gov Guidelines International Network (GIN) at http://www.g-i-n.net BMJ Publishing Group’s Clinical Evidence http://www.clinicalevidence.org/ceweb/conditions/index.jsp Note: Guidelines are described in the Supplementary Materials handout (see page 5).

Search through the Database Use key words from your question as search terms Use restrictions to refine the search A clearly defined patient group and intervention are the major parameters in most subject searches 3. Search by author, journal title etc. Note: Tips for searching databases are included in the Supplementary Materials handout (see page 6).

Approaches to research… Qualitative In-depth information about people’s experiences Focus on subjective meanings Typically small samples Emphasis on credibility and trustworthiness Quantitative Information about how different variables are related to one another Focus on objective measurement Typically large samples Emphasis on causality, reliability, validity

Types of studies you may find… Systematic reviews Randomised controlled trials Quasi-experimental design Evaluation studies with non-experimental designs Case control studies Cohort studies Population surveys Qualitative research Note: There are descriptions of the types of studies you may find in the Supplementary Materials handout (see page 7 – 9).

Evaluating the Results

Initial questions to consider… Do the title and abstract suggest a fit between the source and your evaluation? Are the articles peer reviewed? Is the study original? Who is the study about? Is it reasonable to expect that the results might apply to your target group? Are the claims made by the study plausible? Note: Questions to consider are included in the Supplementary Materials handout (see pages 11 – 12).

Have the authors addressed all outcomes of interest? What does the study add to what we already know? The authors’ credentials: are the authors associated with the field of study? Do they have relevant clinical experience? Are there any issues related to “researcher bias” that are not addressed? Note: Questions to consider are included in the Supplementary Materials handout (see pages 11 – 12).

The Purpose and Method Are the research questions clear, specific and answerable? Is the study design appropriate? Do the question, method and analysis of results match up? Is the sample appropriate? If a comparison group was used, was it really comparable to the group receiving the intervention? Did some people 'drop out' of the study, and if so, have the authors accounted for this in their conclusions? Note: Questions to consider are included in the Supplementary Materials handout (see pages 11 – 12).

Results and Conclusions Is the material presented in a way that is transparent and detailed in a way that can be easily examined and evaluated? How large is the effect of the intervention, if there is one? How precise is the estimate of the effect? How likely is it that the result was due to chance? Have the authors clearly shown how they came to their findings? Does the author explain study limitations? Do the conclusions match the findings? Are the conclusions supported by the analysis? Note: Questions to consider are included in the Supplementary Materials handout (see pages 11 – 12).

Synthesizing the Findings

Initial questions to consider… What are the most relevant sources? What are some common elements across sources? What is unique about each source? What are the key ideas/concepts being conveyed? Why would this be important? What are the limitations/gaps in the literature? (Note: this is particularly important, because it speaks to your contribution to the literature – i.e., your work may help fill this gap) Note: Tips for synthesizing findings are included in the Supplementary Materials handout (see page 13).

Develop a Summary Table Title and Publication Information Type of Source and Approach Overall Goal Main Ideas and Conclusion Limitations   Note: A sample of this summary table is included in the Supplementary Materials handout (see page 10).

Presenting the Findings

Planning the Literature Review What are the goals of the review? Who is the audience? What are your key messages? How should the review be organized?

Tips for Writing the Literature Review Use the right word in the right place Avoid awkward, rambling and run-on sentences Avoid sentence fragments Use clear, plain language Always use examples or statements to substantiate your point Feel free to use an active voice Note: Tips for writing the literature review are included in the Supplementary Materials handout (see page 13).

Next Steps Selecting measures? Framework design? Other ideas?

Visit our website for more information: www.onthepoint.ca Note: Sites to visit for more information are included in the Supplementary Materials handout (see page 14).