Indicating Success in Public Child Welfare Child Outcomes, System Performance and the CFSR Process Susan Smith and Lisa Tuttle Casey Family Programs July.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vision: Develop and continuously improve a model system of family safety that: has the confidence of the citizens of Florida; is effective and efficient.
Advertisements

Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
March 29, 2012 Improving Health Outcomes for Children in Foster Care: the Role of Electronic Information Exchange.
Supervisor’s Core: Fiscal Essentials Version 2.0 July 2009.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
The Child and Family Services Review: An Agenda for Change Kathy Yurchisin Krista Hudson Kentucky CFSR Stakeholders Advisory Group.
Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs). 2 Child Welfare Final Rule (excerpt from Executive Summary) The child and family services reviews … [focus]
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
1 Milwaukee County Child Welfare Legislative Audit Bureau September 2007.
California Child Welfare Indicators Project Q Slides Center for Social Services Research School of Social Welfare University of California, Berkeley.
Background on the Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Richard P. Barth, PhD, MSW
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data 201: The Empirical Data Strikes Back* Emily Putnam-Hornstein, MSW Center.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
The C-CFSR or Some of My Best Friends are Outcome Measures National Resource Center for Child Welfare Data and Technology 8th National Child Welfare Data.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Data Are Your Friends: California’s Child Welfare Outcomes and Accountability.
State Standards and Practices for Content of Caseworker Visits with Children in Foster Care DHHS-OIG Report OEI December 2005.
Strategic Thinking to Align Initiatives and Integrate Management, Supervision, and Practice Heidi D. McIntosh, MSW Deputy Commissioner Fernando J. Muñiz,
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Inspiration  Ideas  Improvement Practice Improvement Unit District Practice Improvement Specialists District Automation Liaisons Inspiration An agent.
Program Staff Presentation 1 Program Staff Presentation.
Taking Research to Practice: Rethinking Outcomes and Performance Measures for the Child and Family Service Reviews John D. Fluke, Child Protection Research.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Using Data from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW,
Minnesota Child Welfare Program Goals Safety Permanency Well-Being.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley The Child and Family Services Review Composite Scores: A “Great Start” Barbara.
Data Driven Practice for Program Managers: Riverside County Melissa Correia Adam Darnell Casey Family Programs Daniel Webster, MSW PhD Center for Social.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
AB 636 Mental Health/CWS Partnership Sacramento, CA 3/17/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.
DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING May 2009.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
1 G-FORCE MEETING Division of Family & Children Services September 25, 2009.
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION The nation’s voice for the protection of children & animals THE CHILD WELFARE RESPONSE CONTINUUM CHRONIC ISSUES THAT HAVE PLAGUED.
Data Quality Initiative-Update May 14, Data Quality Initiative The eWiSACWIS Data Quality Initiative will support counties, the BMCW and the Special.
Training Agenda Continuous Quality Improvement Section Federal CFSR Oklahoma CFSR Oklahoma Program Improvement Plan (PIP) CFSR/Case Review Instrument.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: A Data Snapshot Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley California’s Child Welfare System: Using Data from CWS/CMS Barbara Needell, MSW,
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
Making CWLA Work for You Presentation to CWLA Southern Region and Georgia Association of Homes and Services for Children Membership October 5, 2006 Atlanta,
Quantitative Performance Measures for Juvenile Dependency Court Administrative Office of the Courts March 14, 2008.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
When permanency remains elusive: A longitudinal examination of the early foster care experiences of youth at risk of emancipating Joe Magruder, MSW Emily.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
Los Angeles County’s Department of Children and Family Services Title IV-E California Well-Being Project and Strategic Plan June 3, 2015.
An Overview of the California Foster Care System Navigating the System.
Supervisor Core Training: Managing for Results Original presentation was created for Version 1.0 by Daniel Webster, Barbara Needell, Wendy Piccus, Aron.
1 Milwaukee County Child Welfare Legislative Audit Bureau March 2007.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
Common Goals: Child Safety, Permanency and Well-Being Citizen Review Panel National Conference May 21-23, 2008 St. Paul, Minnesota Christeen Borsheim,
The Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) February 2008 Update.
AB 636 presented at the joint hearing between the ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES and the ASSEMBLY SELECT COMMITTEE ON FOSTER CARE Sacramento, CA.
Measuring Child Welfare Agency Performance: Advantages and Challenges of State, County, & University Collaboration National Association of Welfare Research.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
DHS Board Meeting DFCS Subcommittee Report Performance Highlights July 21, 2010.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Applying Data for System Improvement: Probation Agency Staff Daniel Webster,
The Role of Evaluation and Stakeholder Values in California’s Title IV-E Child Welfare Waiver Demonstration Project Evaluations Charlie Ferguson, Ph.D.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention (CBCAP) and Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF) Grantees Meeting.
Delaware's children in foster care – health service utilization May 4, 2016 Presented by: Catherine Zorc, MD, MPH, Nemours Katie Gifford, MS, Center for.
1 RBS Implementation Preparation Forum Wednesday  March 4, 2009 The RBS Evaluation: Reviewing the Basics.
CCWIP Data Analysis Training Using the CCWIP Website to Answer Questions about Key Child Welfare Outcomes Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP August 19, 2016.
CCWIP Data Analysis Training Using the CCWIP Website to Understand County Performance on CFSR 3 Measures Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP May 1, 2017.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services January 23, 2015
GOT PERMANENCE? DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING
Using the CCWIP Data Portal
Presentation transcript:

Indicating Success in Public Child Welfare Child Outcomes, System Performance and the CFSR Process Susan Smith and Lisa Tuttle Casey Family Programs July 29, 2011

Monitoring the Vision: Casey’s Dashboard Goal: Every child deserves a safe, permanent home Vision: Reduce the children in the United States in foster care in half by the year 2020 In 2005 there were ½ million children; moving to ¼ million by 2020 Monitor: Key performance indicators at a national level Evaluate: Work and efforts at the state and county level

Long term trends in entries & exits Data notes: For years before 2000, data are averaged across a two-year period. Data for 1995 and before should not be compared to data from 1996 and beyond. Data on entries and exits not available for Data from retrieved from the American Public Welfare Association/Voluntary Cooperative Information System (VCIS). Data from based on the VCIS and retrieved from the Children’s Bureau website. Data from retrieved from CWLA/NDAS. Data from based on AFCARS.

Trends In Out-of-Home Care: Slides prepared by Data Advocacy, 7/25/11 Data source: AFCARS

National Entry Rates, FY09 - improved overall entry rate Slides prepared by Data Advocacy, 7/25/11 Data source: AFCARS

National Foster Care Trends 6

U.S. Foster Care System highly simplified CHILD IN a bunch of stuff happens CHILD OUT *adapted from Lyle, G. L., & Barker, M.A. (1998) Patterns & Spells: New approaches to conceptualizing children’s out of home placement experiences. Chicago: American Evaluation Association Annual Conference But is the child safe? (Whether in foster care or at home) And what is the child’s level of well-being?

Background Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSR) Goal: Improve the performance of state child welfare systems Timeline: 1994 Federal government mandate to review and evaluate state foster care and adoption services Children’s Bureau of the Administration on Children and Families (ACF) administers the process Purpose of CFSRs: To ensure states are in “substantial conformity” with Titles IV-B and IV-E Federal Funding, within the domains of safety, permanence, and well-being.

Outcome Measures: What we have What we need Permanency C1.1 C1.2 C1.3 C1.4 Adoption C2.1 C2.2 C2.3 C2.4 C2.5 Long- Stayers C3.1 C3.2 C3.3 Placement Stability C4.1 C4.2 C4.3 valid reliable comprehensible = a good measure

Outcome Measures Data should be gathered and analyzed in a manner that facilitates understanding of how one area of practice affects another Acknowledgement to Emily Putnam-Hornstein and Barbara Needell, University of California, Berkeley, for the slide content.

Proposed Measures – outcome measures required Maltreatment Recurrence Entry to Care Abuse in Care Placement Stability Length of Stay Exits to Permanency Maintenance of Permanence

Additional Measures – optional IGNORE THIS LEVEL Reporting rate Response rate investigation rate case opening rate victimization rate re-reporting rate in-home services exits from in- home services re-reports post in-home services adoption disruption

Proposed Measures process measures - required Worker-Child Visits Timeliness of Investigations

Proposed Measures well-being measures IGNORE THIS LEVEL medical evaluation dental evaluation mental health screening school enrollment status at / after emancipation

Data-sharing / interoperability [near-term goal]

Outcome Measures…. birth home visiting family supports referralentry family preservation Measures of primary and secondary prevention services?

Data-sharing / Interoperability Longer-term vision social services data concerning vulnerable children and families current fully linked and integrated (real- time) administrative data systems for the coordinated delivery and evaluation of services future

National Dashboard

Efforts, Approaches, Outcomes

State Comparisons

State Detail in National View

State and County Level

Interactive Dashboard by State

Casey Direct Service Targets

Office numbers and targets

Conclusions Child welfare needs to be considered an integrated system of child safety and well-being, not a foster care program The Federal role is to assure accountability and compliance, which includes child safety Innovations in states and agencies lead the way in integrating and translating data into information about what works

QUESTIONS?