Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 2 Diagnose and Investigate Health Problems and Health Hazards.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Public Health and Healthcare Issues. Public Health and Healthcare.

Advertisements

Local Public Health System Assessment

Lesson 3 Responding to Emergency Events. For additional information or questions please contact Toledo-Lucas County Health Department APC:

Public Health Essential Service #2

National Public Health Performance Standards Program Orientation to the Essential Public Health Services.

The 10 Essential Public Health Services An Overview

Public Health Core Functions

The Laboratory Response Network

What do we do? Assessment Planning Education Outreach Information Intervention Research Convening Respond Collaboration Prevention Needs analysis Facilitation.

10 Essential Services of Public Health

Principles of Standards and Measures

WELCOME _______________________________________________________________.

Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 13—Public Health Surveillance and Epidemiological Investigation What Is It And How Will We Measure It?

Christa-Marie Singleton, MD, MPH Associate Director for Science

Performance Improvement Processes

Addressing Pediatric and School-based Surge Capacity in a Mass Casualty Event Michael Shannon, M.D. Director The Center for Biopreparedness Division of.

Somerset County Department of Health Medical Reserve Corps MRC Volunteers Amplifying their Voices in the Community Lucille Young-Talbot, MPA MRC Coordinator.

North Carolina’s Role in Preparedness. Objectives How you fit into the LRN Describe critical aspects of lab preparedness, surveillance and reporting,

The Laboratory Response Network

Introduction to North Carolina Epidemiology Teams

HISTORY OF THE ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Kevin M. Sherin, M.D., MPH Director Orange County Health Department.

Overview of Terrorism Research at the CDC Dixie E. Snider, M.D., MPH. Associate Director for Science Presented at 2003 Medical Research Summit March 6,

WELCOME. Connecting the Dots Using MAPP to Accomplish the Goals of Live Well, San Diego! County of San Diego Health and Human Services Wilma Wooten, M.D.,

Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 12—Public Health Laboratory Testing What Is It And How Will We Measure It?

What Is It And How Will We Measure It?

New Jersey’s Emergency System for Advance Registration of Volunteer Health Professionals (ESAR-VHP)

National Public Health Performance Standards Program Overview Presentation.

Public Health Accreditation: County of San Diego HHSA’s Experience.

North Carolina Healthcare Preparedness Response and Recovery Program Healthcare System Preparedness Capabilities Mary Beth Skarote Healthcare Preparedness.

Modern Public Health: Tools and Functions

Epidemiology Tools and Methods Session 2, Part 1.

Jeffery Graviet Emergency Services Coordinator, Salt Lake County Chairperson, Salt Lake Urban Area Working Group.

Homeland Security Advisory System protectivemeasures vulnerability responseFederal departments and agencies would implement a corresponding set of protective.

National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Centers for Disease Control June 14, 2011 : The Food Safety Modernization Act: Implications.

Local Emergency Response to Biohazardous Incidents Dr. Elizabeth Whalen, MD Medical Director Albany County Health Department April 8, 2005 Northeast Biological.

National Public Health Performance Standards Program Overview Presentation.

Introduction to MAPP Lowrie Ward, MPH, CPH Program Analyst, Accreditation Preparation & Quality Improvement National Association of County and City Health.

Northwest Center for Public Health Practice University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine 1 Preparing for and Responding to Bioterrorism:

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.

Augusta Health Forum Specialty Providers Home Health Parks Economic Development Colleges Employers Nursing Homes Mental Health Drug Treatment Civic.

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 4 Mobilize Community Partnerships to Identify and Solve Health.

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 7 Link People to Needed Personal Health Services and Assure the.

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 1 Monitor Health Status to Identify Community Health Problems.

BIOTERRORISM: SOUTH CAROLINA RESPONDS. OBJECTIVES l To understand the response to a bioterrorist act through use of the unified incident command system.

Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.

Wayne Dauphinee Executive Director Seventh Annual Pacific NorthWest Cross Border Workshop Seattle, WA May Forging Ahead.

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 5 Develop Policies and Plans that Support Individual and Community.

WELCOME. Who’s Here? What is Public Health? Improving health is a shared responsibility not only of health care providers, and public health officials,

A Public Health Approach to Combating Bioterrorism Tarrant County Public Health Peggy Wittie, PhD Epidemiology Surveillance & Response Manager / Bioterrorism.

PHEP Capabilities John Erickson, Special Assistant Washington State Department of Health

Bioterrorism and Emergency Preparedness November 16, 2005 Jon Huss Director, Community Preparedness Section.

Exposure Rostering: Population Tracking Following a Disaster Melissa E. Powell, MPH Michelle F. Barber, MS Preparedness, Surveillance & Epidemiology PUBLIC.

WELCOME. Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships: what is it and why should we care? National Association of County & City Health Officials.

National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 10 Research for New Insights and Innovative Solutions to Health.

Is for Epi Epidemiology basics for non-epidemiologists.

MAPP - What and Why?. MAPP is: A community-wide strategic planning tool for improving public health. A method to help communities prioritize public health.

Volunteer Emergency Response Training.  What it is and who it serves  Identify major components  Recognize authorities and assigned personnel.

Baccalaureate Education: Foundation for Public Health Nursing Practice—A Call to Action November, 2007 Baccalaureate Education: Foundation for Public Health.

PHYSICIAN ROLES AT THE HOSPITAL IN A DISASTER. (Insert Facility Name) PHYSICIAN ROLES IN THE HOSPITAL IN A DISASTER OBJECTIVES: 1.Discuss the physician.

Community Health Centers of Arkansas Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Workshop August 11, 2017 Mark Fuller.

CMS Emergency Preparedness Rule

March 2017 Regional Care Collaborative

Partnerships for Pandemic & Bioterrorism Incidents

North Carolina’s Role in Preparedness

Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Planning

Enhancing Medical Surge Capacity

Enhancing Medical Surge Capacity

Presented by: Cynthia Paes, Privacy Officer County of San Diego

North Carolina’s Role in Preparedness A Brief Overview

Presentation transcript:

Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 2 Diagnose and Investigate Health Problems and Health Hazards in the Community

2.1.1 Does the LPHS operate or participate in surveillance system(s) designed to monitor health problems and identify health threats? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Is the system: Integrated with national and/or state surveillance systems? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Is the system: Compliant with national and/or state health information exchange guidelines? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the LPHS use the surveillance system(s) to monitor changes in the occurrence of health problems and hazards? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

2.1.2 Do community health professionals submit reportable disease information in a timely manner to the state or LPHS? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

2.1.3 Does the LPHS have necessary resources to support health problem and health hazard surveillance and investigation activities? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the LPHS use information technology for surveillance activities (e.g., geographic information systems, word processing, spreadsheets, database analysis, and graphics presentation software)? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the LPHS have (or have access to) Masters or Doctoral level epidemiologists and/or statisticians to assess, investigate and analyze public health threats and health hazards? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

2.2.1 Does the LPHS maintain written protocols for implementing a program of case finding, contact tracing, source identification, and containment for communicable diseases or toxic exposures? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Are protocols in place for: Animal control? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Are protocols in place for: Vector control? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Are protocols in place for: Exposure to food-borne illness? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Are protocols in place for: Exposure to water-borne illness? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Are protocols in place for: Excessive lead levels? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Are protocols in place for: Exposure to asbestos? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Are protocols in place for: Exposure to other toxic chemicals? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Are protocols in place for: Communicable diseases? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

2.2.2 Does the LPHS have current epidemiological case investigation protocols to guide immediate investigations of public health emergencies? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Do these protocols address: Infectious disease outbreaks? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Do these protocols address: Environmental health hazards and emergencies? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Do these protocols address: Chemical threats and incidents? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Do these protocols address: Biological agent threats? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Do these protocols address: Radiological threats? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Do these protocols address: Large-scale natural disasters? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Do these protocols address: Intentional incidents? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

2.2.3 Has the LPHS designated an individual to serve as an Emergency Response Coordinator within the jurisdiction? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the individual: Coordinate with the local health departments emergency response personnel? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the individual: Coordinate with local community leaders? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

2.2.4 Can LPHS personnel rapidly respond to natural and intentional disasters? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the LPHS maintain a current roster of personnel with the technical expertise to respond to natural and intentional emergencies and disasters? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the LPHS have access to response personnel within one hour? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the LPHS have capacity to mobilize sufficient numbers of trained professionals in an emergency (i.e., surge capacity)? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the LPHS have capacity to mobilize volunteers during a disaster? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

2.2.5 Does the LPHS evaluate public health emergency response incidents for effectiveness and opportunities for improvement (e.g., After Action Reports)? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Are findings incorporated into emergency plans? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

2.3.1 Does the LPHS maintain ready access to laboratories capable of meeting routine diagnostic and surveillance needs? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

2.3.2 Does the LPHS have ready access to laboratory services to support investigations of public health threats, hazards, and emergencies? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the LPHS have access to laboratory services to support these investigations within four hours of notification? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Does the LPHS have access to at least one microbiology laboratory within four hours of notification? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

2.3.3 Does the LPHS utilize only laboratories that are licensed and/or credentialed? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

2.3.4 Does the LPHS maintain current guidelines or protocols for handling laboratory samples? 1.No (0% or absolutely no activity) 2.Minimal (1% - 25%) 3.Moderate (26% - 50%) 4.Significant (51% - 75%) 5.Optimal (greater than 75%) 10

Schools Recreation Centers Employers Transit Elected Officials Doctors EMS Law Enforcement Nursing Homes Fire Corrections Mental Health Faith Institutions Civic Groups Non-Profit Organizations Neighborhood Organizations Laboratories Home Health Community Health Centers Hospitals Tribal Health Drug Treatment Public Health Agency Thank You!