Material Gamma Ray Astronomy at MPE For further information contact Helmut Steinle, MPE – NaIBGO component22 keV122 keV1.275 MeV4.4 MeV.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Neutron Spectrometer (ANS) Geant4 Simulations
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
RHESSI Studies of Solar Flare Hard X-Ray Polarization Mark L. McConnell 1, David M. Smith 2, A. Gordon Emslie 4, Martin Fivian 3, Gordon J. Hurford 3,
Gamma-Ray Spectra _ + The photomultiplier records the (UV) light emitted during electronic recombination in the scintillator. Therefore, the spectrum collected.
GEANT4 Simulations of TIGRESS
Study of plastic scintillators for fast neutron measurements
The MAGIC telescope and the GLAST satellite La Palma, Roque de los Muchacos (28.8° latitude ° longitude, 2225 m asl) INAUGURATION: 10/10/2003 LAT.
Geiger-Muller detector and Ionization chamber
Geant4 Low Energy Polarized Compton Processes Gerardo Depaola * Francesco Longo + Francesco Longo + * National University of Córdoba (Argentina) + University.
The best collimator configuration (material, number of collimators, collimator shape) is determined by minimizing the ratio R, where N ae is the number.
Chapter 8 Planar Scintigaraphy
Activity for the Gerda-specific part Description of the Gerda setup including shielding (water tank, Cu tank, liquid Nitrogen), crystals array and kapton.
Using FLUKA to study Radiation Fields in ERL Components Jason E. Andrews, University of Washington Vaclav Kostroun, Mentor.
RHESSI Studies of Solar Flare Hard X-Ray Polarization Mark L. McConnell 1, David M. Smith 2, A. Gordon Emslie 4, Martin Fivian 3, Gordon J. Hurford 3,
Liquid Xenon Gamma Screening Luiz de Viveiros Brown University.
GAMMA RAY SPECTROSCOPY
J. Tinslay 1, B. Faddegon 2, J. Perl 1 and M. Asai 1 (1) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Menlo Park, CA, (2) UC San Francisco, San Francisco, CA Verification.
Accurate  Spectroscopy for Ultracold Neutrons Jeff Martin University of Winnipeg See also: J.W. Martin et al, Phys. Rev. C (2006) J.W. Martin.
Simulations with MEGAlib Jau-Shian Liang Department of Physics, NTHU / SSL, UCB 2007/05/15.
Lecture 2-Building a Detector George K. Parks Space Sciences Laboratory UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
Geant4 simulation of the attenuation properties of plastic shield for  - radionuclides employed in internal radiotherapy Domenico Lizio 1, Ernesto Amato.
LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LArIAT and LBNE Jim Stewart LArIAT EPAG Chair BNL LBNE LARIAT-EPAG J. Stewart BNL T. Junk.
Rate and Gain Measurements of the 1-m long GEM detector Aiwu Zhang EIC tracking R&D weekly meeting.
Gamma calorimeter for R3B: first simulation results INDEX ● The calGamma Geant4 simulation ( a short introduction ) ● Crystal and geometry selection: –
R 3 B Gamma Calorimeter Agenda. ● Introduction ● Short presentation on the first ● Task definition for R&D period ( )
Abstract A time resolved radial profile neutron diagnostic is being designed for the National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX). The design goal is to.
Summary of Work Zhang Qiwei INFN - CIAE. Validation of Geant4 EM physics for gamma rays against the SANDIA, EPDL97 and NIST databases.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم ” وقل رب زدنى علماً “ صدق الله العظيم.
Calibration Overview – August 31, 2004 J. Fishman.
Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL)- 1 - GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 GBM Simulation and Instrument Response R. Marc Kippen Space and Atmospheric.
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003.
LRT2004 Sudbury, December 2004Igor G. Irastorza, CEA Saclay NOSTOS: a spherical TPC to detect low energy neutrinos Igor G. Irastorza CEA/Saclay NOSTOS.
Source flux accuracy from BLC analysis A. Strong MPE June 2002.
PoGO_G4_ ppt1 Study on Key Properties of PoGO by Geant4 Simulator January 28, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno History of changes:
We report the result of a beam test on a prototype of Astronomical hard X-ray/soft gamma-ray Polarimeter, PoGO (Polarized Gamma-ray Observer). PoGO is.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration November 23, Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST) Kevin Grady, Project Manager Steven Ritz,
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003 July 21, 2003 revised August 1, 2003 updated.
GLAST's GBM Burst Trigger D. Band (GSFC), M. Briggs (NSSTC), V. Connaughton (NSSTC), M. Kippen (LANL), R. Preece (NSSTC) The Mission The Gamma-ray Large.
Applications of Monte Carlo Code for a Gamma Resonance System Analysis L. Wielopolski, A. Hanson, I. Dioszegi, M. Todosow, Brookhaven National Laboratory,
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
Monte Carlo Simulation Study of In-orbit Background for the Soft Gamma-ray Detector onboard ASTRO-H Mizuno T., Hiragi K., Fukazawa Y., Umeki Y. (Hiroshima.
Determination of activity of 51 Cr source on gamma radiation measurements V.V.Gorbachev, V.N.Gavrin, T.V.Ibragimova, A.V.Kalikhov, Yu.M.Malyshkin,A.A.Shikhin.
TGF diffuse imaging and spectra as a function of altitude and location P.H.Connell University of Valencia.
GLAST User’s Committee Meeting– 1 – June 6-7, 2005 GLAST Burst Monitor (GBM) Chip Meegan NASA/MSFC.
For further information, please contact: Purpose of Calibration: - provide performance verification of the GBM detectors. - provide benchmark.
In high energy astrophysics observations, it is crucial to reduce the background effectively to achieve a high sensitivity, for the source intensity is.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle, V Wagner, A Krása, F Křížek This document can be downloaded.
PoGO_collimator_ ppt1 Study of PoGO background dependence on the collimator material/slow scintillator threshold April 21, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno.
Forward Tagger Simulations Implementation in GEMC Moller Shield Tracking Studies R. De Vita INFN –Genova Forward Tagger Meeting, CLAS12 Workshop, June.
PoGO_G4_ ppt1 Study of optimized fast scintillator length for the astronomical hard X- ray/soft gamma-ray polarimeter PoGO November 1, 2004 Tsunefumi.
Fermi GBM Observations of Gamma-Ray Bursts Michael S. Briggs on behalf of the Fermi GBM Team Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik NASA Marshall.
Fermi’s Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) Julie E. McEnery Fermi Project Scientist.
GLAST GLAST Burst Monitor Charles Meegan Principal Investigator NASA MSFC Steve Elrod Project Manager NASA MSFC
PoGO_G4_ ppt1 Study of BGO/Collimator Optimization for PoGO August 8th, 2005 Tsunefumi Mizuno, Hiroshima University/SLAC
ArgonneResult_ ppt1 Comparison of data and simulation of Argonne Beam Test July 10, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
Fermi Solar Workshop Fermi GBM for Solar Flares Michael S. Briggs (UAHuntsville)
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003 July 21, 2003 revised.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor
Background simulations: update and simulations of absorbed dose
The Crab Light Curve and Spectra from GBM: An Update
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope ACD Final Performance
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope
R. Bucˇık , K. Kudela and S. N. Kuznetsov
Gamma-ray Albedo of the Moon Igor V. Moskalenko (Stanford) & Troy A
CRaTER Science Requirements
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Presentation transcript:

material Gamma Ray Astronomy at MPE For further information contact Helmut Steinle, MPE – NaIBGO component22 keV122 keV1.275 MeV4.4 MeV Helmut Steinle 1, Andreas von Kienlin¹, Elisabetta Bissaldi¹, Giselher Lichti¹, Roland Diehl¹, Jochen Greiner¹, Charles A. Meegan², Gerald J. Fishman², Chryssa Kouveliotou², Colleen A. Wilson-Hodge², William S. Paciesas³, Robert D. Preece³, Michael S. Briggs³, P. Narayana Bhat³, Valerie Connaughton³, R. Marc Kippen 4, Andrew S. Hoover 4 GLAST Burst Monitor Understanding the GLAST Burst Monitor detector calibration: A detailed simulation of the calibration including the environment [1] Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik (MPE); [2] NASA / Marshall Space-Flight Center (MSFC); [3] University of Alabama (UAH); [4} Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL); The GLAST Burst Monitor (GBM) is the secondary instrument on NASA’s next Gamma-ray mission GLAST. It will enhance the capabilities of GLAST by locating and detecting cosmic gamma-ray bursts at lower energies by the use of 12 NaI detectors ( 10 keV to 1 MeV) and 2 BGO-detectors (150 keV to 30 MeV). The angular and energy response of each GBM detector has been calibrated using various radioactive sources at different incidence angles relative to the detector in a laboratory environment at the MPE in To facilitate the understanding of the reconstruction of the detector response, a detailed simulation of the whole laboratory environment and the calibration source setup was performed using a modified version of the CERN GEANT4 simulation software (provided by LANL). Here we summarize the results of a detailed comparison and analysis of the calibration measurements and the simulation. Emphasis is given to disentangle the contribution of the various components of the environment (furniture, source holder, detector holder, floor etc.) to the measured spectra. Components that contribute significantly to the measured spectra are identified. This results are important to derive the best calibration and response determination of our instrument and may be of interest for the calibration of future experiments. Please see also the 4 other posters that are related to this GBM calibration and simulation: P19.17 (Hoover), P19.35, P19.36 (v. Kienlin), (Kippen) Calibration Setup The full environment (laboratory) of the calibration setup was modeled. All components (walls, windows, furniture, floor, ceiling etc.) could be activated or deactivated for interactions of the radiation. The radioactive sources used for the calibration were placed onto a source holder at a fixed position near the middle of the room. The detector mounting could be rotated around three axes to change the angle of the incident radiation. The distance between detector and radioactive source was 1.16m. Scattering of Radiation A significant part of the radiation emitted isotropically by a source is scattered in various objects in the laboratory, including the air. To investigate the contribution of the various objects to the scattered radiation, the presence of this objects could be turned on/off. 22 keV ; 100 events 122 keV; 100 events MeV; 100 events NaI Detector A complete detailed model of a NaI detector and its mounting brackets (materials, components, and geometry) as it is used on the spacecraft was created. In addition, the complex holding structure, which enabled a rotation of the detector around all three axes during the calibration was modeled. The holding structure consisted of Aluminum and was mounted on a wooden stand raising it about one meter above the laboratory floor. All this was modeled with great care as this material is close to the detector! Radiation Scattered into Detector With increasing energy of the radiation, an increasing fraction of the scattered radiation reaches the detector and contributes to the “source background” (i.e. background induced by the isotropic radiation of a source present). At 22 keV, only few percent of the detected radiation are scattered photons. Most photons reach the detector directly. But at MeV a significant part of the detected radiation is from scattered photons. Percentage of detected photons direct / scattered (%): 22 keV: 94 / 6; 122 keV: 91 / 9; MeV: 75 / 25 Example: 122 keV; 100 events BGO Detector A complete detailed model of a BGO detector and its complex mounting bracket (materials, components, and geometry) as it is used on the spacecraft was created. In addition, the holding structure, which enabled a rotation of the detector around all three axes during the calibration, was modeled. The holding structure consisted of Aluminum and was mounted on a wooden stand raising it about one meter above the laboratory floor. All this was modeled in great detail as this material is very close to the detector! Modified Radiation Geometry Two methods have been applied to derive the relative contribution of objects to the detected radiation: - The radiation geometry could be modified to radiate certain directions and objects only; - the presence of objects in the simulation could be switched off. This was done in many test runs to determine the relative contribution of the components of the environment to the measured spectra. modified radiation geometry: radiation only to the right; 122 keV, 100 events. as above, but source stand and source holder deactivated; 122 keV, 100 events. Source Holder The source holder was built entirely from PVC. The disc containing the radioactive material was glued with an adhesive tape to the source holder. Great care was taken to place the source directly in front of (as seen from the detector) a small hole in the holding plate. This hole was meant to avoid direct backscatter and to guide as an “on-axis” marker. Like the detectors, the source holder rested on a wooden stand. A detailed modeling was done as the components were close to the radiating source. Summary of Results To achieve good statistics, almost all simulation runs have been made with input photons (photons emitted by the source). A collimator would have simplified the environmental model but would probably have little effect to the measurements. This, however, should be tested in a future application of the simulation software and the existing model by simulating the presence of a collimator! Radioactive Calibration Sources The radioactive material of the calibration sources was contained in a sphere of about 1 mm diameter in the center of a flat plastic disc of about 3 mm thickness and 1 cm radius. Sources used and simulated (main energies in MeV): 109 Cd (0.022), 241 Am (0.059), 57 Co (0.122, 0.134), 203 Hg (0.279), 137 Cs (0.662), 51 Mn (0.835), 22 Na (0.511, 1.275), 88 Y (0.898, 1.836) Poster #19.33; First GLAST Symposium, Stanford University, CA, USA, /08 *hs* 3D: Scattered radiation of 1 MeV NaIBGO component22 keV122 keV1.275 MeV4.43 MeV direct infall 94.0 % 91.0 % 75.0 % 70.0 % scattered rad. total 6.0 % 9.0 % 25.0 % 30.0 % walls < 0.1 % 0.6 % 12.0 % 13.0 % source holder 4.6 % 7.5 % 3.0 % 2.0 % source stand 0.1 % < 0.1 % detector stand <0.1 % 2.0 % < 0.1 % floor < 0.1 % 0.8 % 8.0 % 15.0 % other furniture < 0.1 % air 1.3 % < 0.1 %