Working group on multimodal meaning representation Dagstuhl workshop, Oct. 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Computer Systems & Architecture Lesson 2 4. Achieving Qualities.
Advertisements

Berliner XML Tage. Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Oktober 2004 SWEB2004 – Intl Workshop on Semantic Web Technologies in Electronic Business Intelligent.
Status on the Mapping of Metadata Standards
Profiles Construction Eclipse ECESIS Project Construction of Complex UML Profiles UPM ETSI Telecomunicación Ciudad Universitaria s/n Madrid 28040,
1 University of Namur, Belgium PReCISE Research Center Using context to improve data semantic mediation in web services composition Michaël Mrissa (spokesman)
ARCHITECTURES FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS
An overview of EMMA— Extensible MultiModal Annotation Michael Johnston AT&T Labs Research 8/9/2006.
What is Software Design?. Systems Development Life- Cycle Planning Analysis Design Implementation Design.
Empirical and Data-Driven Models of Multimodality Advanced Methods for Multimodal Communication Computational Models of Multimodality Adequate.
RRL: A Rich Representation Language for the Description of Agent Behaviour in NECA Paul Piwek, ITRI, Brighton Brigitte Krenn, OFAI, Vienna Marc Schröder,
A FRAMEWORK BASED ON WEB SERVICES ORCHESTRATION FOR BIOINFORMATICS WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT Laboratory for Bioinformatics (LBI), Institute of Computing (IC)
Marakas: Decision Support Systems, 2nd Edition © 2003, Prentice-Hall Chapter Chapter 1: Introduction to Decision Support Systems Decision Support.
The RDF meta model: a closer look Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations.
1 Component Description Ariadne Client/Server Architecture Interactive Systems Labs Prepared by: Matthias Denecke Date.
Chapter 10: Architectural Design
1 TECO-WIS, 6-8 November 2006 TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON THE WMO INFORMATION SYSTEM Seoul, Republic of Korea, 6-8 November 2006 ISO 191xx series of geographic.
Domain-Specific Software Engineering Alex Adamec.
Business Domain Modelling Principles Theory and Practice HYPERCUBE Ltd 7 CURTAIN RD, LONDON EC2A 3LT Mike Bennett, Hypercube Ltd.
10 December, 2013 Katrin Heinze, Bundesbank CEN/WS XBRL CWA1: DPM Meta model CWA1Page 1.
18 June, 2013 Katrin Heinze, Bundesbank CEN/WS XBRL CWA1: European Filing Rules Data Point Meta Model Data Point Methodology Guidance European Taxonomy.
Lecture 1, 7/21/2005Natural Language Processing1 CS60057 Speech &Natural Language Processing Autumn 2005 Lecture 1 21 July 2005.
TMF - a tutorial TMF - Terminological Markup Framework Laurent Romary - Laboratoire Loria.
Knowledge Mediation in the WWW based on Labelled DAGs with Attached Constraints Jutta Eusterbrock WebTechnology GmbH.
ONTOLOGY SUPPORT For the Semantic Web. THE BIG PICTURE  Diagram, page 9  html5  xml can be used as a syntactic model for RDF and DAML/OIL  RDF, RDF.
Tutorial for SC 32/WG 1 e-Business Standards Prepared for: SC Kunming Plenary Meeting Wenfeng Sun, Convenor ISO/IEC JTC1 SC32 WG1 (eBusiness)
CLARIN web services and workflow Marc Kemps-Snijders.
BiodiversityWorld GRID Workshop NeSC, Edinburgh – 30 June and 1 July 2005 Metadata Agents and Semantic Mediation Mikhaila Burgess Cardiff University.
TDT4252/DT8802 Exam 2013 Guidelines to answers
Ontology Development Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University Harvard Medical School.
Slide 1 Wolfram Höpken RMSIG Reference Model Special Interest Group Second RMSIG Workshop Methodology and Process Wolfram Höpken.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Towards Translating between XML and WSML based on mappings between.
Status report of : Framework for generating ontologies ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting, Redwood City, USA, November 17, 2010 Dongwon Jeong,
Recognition of meeting actions using information obtained from different modalities Natasa Jovanovic TKI University of Twente.
Copyright © 2013 Curt Hill The Zachman Framework What is it all about?
SDMX Standards Relationships to ISO/IEC 11179/CMR Arofan Gregory Chris Nelson Joint UNECE/Eurostat/OECD workshop on statistical metadata (METIS): Geneva.
ISO TC 37 / SC4 Language Resources An overview (Ammended 2-5 février 2002) Laurent Romary.
1 MFI-5: Metamodel for Process models registration HE Keqing, WANG Chong State Key Lab. Of Software Engineering, Wuhan University
EuroRoadS for JRC Workshop Lars Wikström, Triona Editor of EuroRoadS deliverables D6.3, D6.6, D6.7.
ET-ADRS-1, April ISO 191xx series of geographic information standards.
Towards multimodal meaning representation Harry Bunt & Laurent Romary LREC Workshop on standards for language resources Las Palmas, May 2002.
ENTERFACE 08 Project 2 “multimodal high-level data integration” Mid-term presentation August 19th, 2008.
Elizabeth Furtado, Vasco Furtado, Kênia Sousa, Jean Vanderdonckt, Quentin Limbourg KnowiXML: A Knowledge-Based System Generating Multiple Abstract User.
©Ferenc Vajda 1 Semantic Grid Ferenc Vajda Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Jan 9, 2004 Symposium on Best Practice LSA, Boston, MA 1 Comparability of language data and analysis Using an ontology for linguistics Scott Farrar, U.
A comprehensive framework for multimodal meaning representation Ashwani Kumar Laurent Romary Laboratoire Loria, Vandoeuvre Lès Nancy.
Toward a Unified Scripting Language 1 Toward a Unified Scripting Language : Lessons Learned from Developing CML and AML Soft computing Laboratory Yonsei.
Referring to Objects with Spoken and Haptic Modalities Frédéric LANDRAGIN Nadia BELLALEM & Laurent ROMARY LORIA Laboratory Nancy, FRANCE.
Software Requirements: A More Rigorous Look 1. Features and Use Cases at a High Level of Abstraction  Helps to better understand the main characteristics.
TMF - Terminological Markup Framework Laurent Romary Laboratoire LORIA (CNRS, INRIA, Universités de Nancy) ISO meeting London, 14 August 2000.
Information Dynamics & Interoperability Presented at: NIT 2001 Global Digital Library Development in the New Millennium Beijing, China, May 2001, and DELOS.
The RDF meta model Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations of XML compared.
SEAMLESS: Demo Version 1.4 “Presenting current developments and welcoming your feedback” For contact:
Goteborg University Dialogue Systems Lab Comments on ”A Framework for Dialogue Act Specification” 4th Workshop on Multimodal Semantic Representation January.
SemAF – Basics: Semantic annotation framework Harry Bunt Tilburg University isa -6 Joint ISO - ACL/SIGSEM workshop Oxford, January 2011 TC 37/SC.
ONION Ontologies In Ontology Community of Practice Leader
EEL 5937 Content languages EEL 5937 Multi Agent Systems Lecture 10, Feb. 6, 2003 Lotzi Bölöni.
Understanding Naturally Conveyed Explanations of Device Behavior Michael Oltmans and Randall Davis MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab.
OBJECT-ORIENTED TESTING. TESTING OOA AND OOD MODELS Analysis and design models cannot be tested in the conventional sense. However, formal technical reviews.
Conversational role assignment problem in multi-party dialogues Natasa Jovanovic Dennis Reidsma Rutger Rienks TKI group University of Twente.
Software Architecture for Multimodal Interactive Systems : Voice-enabled Graphical Notebook.
WP6 Emotion in Interaction Embodied Conversational Agents WP6 core task: describe an interactive ECA system with capabilities beyond those of present day.
© 2005 Blueprint Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved Categorizing Web Services WGISS DSTT Discussion.
Metadata Issues in Long-term Management of Data and Metadata
SysML v2 Formalism: Requirements & Benefits
Kenneth Baclawski et. al. PSB /11/7 Sa-Im Shin
Chapter 2 Database Environment Pearson Education © 2009.
Chapter 2 Database Environment.
Ontology-Based Approaches to Data Integration
Semantic Markup for Semantic Web Tools:
Chapter 2 Database Environment Pearson Education © 2009.
Presentation transcript:

Working group on multimodal meaning representation Dagstuhl workshop, Oct. 2001

Scope What should we consider as meaning? –How the processing of the input should lead to some update of the information state of the system (domain model, discourse model, user model, bla, bla, bla etc.); Such a representation: –Should support both interpretation and generation; –Should support any kind of multimodal input and output; –Should support the variety of semantic theories;

Objectives –Provide interface formats within a MM dialogue architecture Incremental construction (reference interpretation etc.) up to a final representation (e.g. fixed frame à la MUC) or system action/feedback; Should also be a basis for the definition of annotation schemes of MM semantic content. –Specification and comparison of application-specific representations Towards a framework allowing one to compare existing representations (e.g. M3L) or define a new one, while ensuring some level of interoperability between these.

What it is not A domain model representation, or an ontology –There is OIL, DAML, Topic Maps etc. A representation of lower-level linguistic or gestural information (e.g. syntax, etc.) –Some features may be percolated, though, or pointed to… A representation of the underlying processes –Focus on the output of what is done by a given module

Basic constraints Uniformity (representation for various types of inputs and outputs) Incrementality (usable at various stages) –Before/after fusion, semantic/pragmatic aspects Extensibility –Method for designing schemas (XML or others), rather than one specific schema Clear and explicit semantics

Methodology Basic components –Represent the general organization of any semantic structure –Parameterized by data categories taken from a common registry application specific data categories General mechanisms –To make the thing work General categories –Descriptive categories available to all formats

Basic components (1) Temporal structures (“events”) –Dialogue turns/utterance –Gestures –Actions on/in the task Referential structures (“participants”) –Individuals and objects participating in an event Comprises spatial structures

Basic components (2) Restrictions (on temporal and referential structures) –E.g. Gesture types, Linguistic modifiers, Dialogue acts, etc. Dependency structures (linking events and referential structures) –E.g. Participant roles (cf. AGENT-SOURCE- GOAL), Discourse/rhetorical structure, temporal relations

Example Typology of gesture types (registry) –Communicative gestures (wave) –Designation gestures –Shrug –Nod Movement attributes (intensity, etc.) One given format will choose among these, or even define its own categories

General mechanisms Links –Internal links –To lower levels (syntactic structures, prosodic cues, gestural trajectories, etc.) –To domain model (types and instances) Alternatives (cf. ambiguities) –E.g. disjunction of internal links

General categories Architectural –Producer (consumer?) of the information, confidence, devices Environmental –Time stamps, spatial information (speaker’s position, graphical configurations, gestural trajectories etc.) Interactional –Speaker (user state?), other addressees etc.

Combining basic components and data categories Just to illustrate things…

Example utterance present wanttogo … sing agent In black: basic components and mechanisms (meta-model of semantic representation) In blue: parameter component chosen from reference registries Categories Values Pointer to speaker’s characteristics Peter: I want to go …

utterance <dialAct cert=“0.8”>Order <dialAct cert=“0.3”>Inform present active none wanttogo … I Pronoun sing first … Paris ProperNoun third … Nancy ProperNoun third … agent source goal I want to go from Paris to Nancy

utterance Order present active none wanttogo … gestural :xxxxxx designation I … here adverb there adverb co-designation I want to go from here to there

Future work SIGSEM Working group on meaning representations (ACL) –Liaison with ISO TC37/SC4 - linguistic resources Preparation of a working draft –Liaison with Isle –Liaison with SIGMedia and SIGDial –W3C/VoiceXML