Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EDGAR and OMB Circular Tutorial for SEAs and LEAs Bonnie Little Graham Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013 Brustein.
Advertisements

OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
THE SUPER CIRCULAR – “OMNI CIRCULAR” THE ONE-STOP SHOP FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE OMB Revised Administrative, Cost, Audit Rules Governing All Federal Grants.
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
Subrecipient Monitoring CCIA Spring Conference Sheena Tran, Rancho Santiago CCD Tania Walden, Los Rios CCD Tracy Young, Coast CCD May 2013.
The Super Circular – “Omni Circular”
New York State Education Department October 8, 2014 “The Omni Circular: What You Need to Know to Administer a 21 st Century Education Program” Presented.
Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Subpart – C Pre-Federal Award Requirements and Contents.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Subrecipient Monitoring Under the New Uniform Guidance Steven A. Spillan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
New Responsibilities of Pass Through Entities Under the Uniform Grant Guidance Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.
Omni Circular Key Area #5 Indirect Costs and the Omni Circular: What to Expect Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
Grants Management Test for Institutions of Higher Education and Nonprofit Organizations Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq.
Presented by Michael Brustein, Esq. Bonnie L. Graham, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013.
Omni Circular Key Area #6: Allowability of Meals and Conferences Jennifer Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2014.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
NRS Financial Jeopardy! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Game Show.
The Elizabeth Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution The Elizabeth Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution Bonnie Little, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OMNI CIRCULAR KEY AREA #1: TIME AND EFFORT STEVEN SPILLAN, ESQ. MIKE BENDER, ESQ. BRUSTEIN.
PRESENTED BY MICHAEL BRUSTEIN, ESQ. NEVADA AEFLA DIRECTORS A DISCUSSION OF FEDERAL ISSUES NOVEMBER 28, 2012 HYATT PLACE.
Subrecipient Monitoring and Common Findings By USDE Kristen Tosh Cowan, EsquireTiffany R. Winters, Esquire
The Impact of OMB Circulars (Super or Otherwise) on Federal Programs Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
HOW TO DRAFT COMPLIANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES BRETTE KAPLAN WURZBURG, ESQ. ERIN AUERBACH, ESQ. BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT,
1. 1. OIG Audit 2. A-133 Audit 3. Federal Monitoring 4. State (Pass Through) Monitoring 2.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
Timeliness, Indirect Costs and Other Requirements Under Part 75 Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
Brette Kaplan WurzburgSteven Spillan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015 An Overview of the New AEFLA.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Effort Takes Time and Documentation MIKE BENDER, ESQ. BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC SPRING FORUM 2015.
Obligations, Tydings and Complying with Cash Management Requirements Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit,
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
DEVELOPING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
Schoolwide Funding Consolidation Panel Panelists: Nancy Konitzer, Arizona Department of Education, Rebecca Vogler, Cincinnati Public Schools and Jose Figueroa,
How To Ensure Your Agency Has A Strong Subrecipient Monitoring System Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum
Presented by Michael Brustein Brette Kaplan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
Agency Roundtable Discussion: Subrecipient Monitoring.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
EDGAR Implementation and Utilizing Internal Controls Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2016.
Perkins V Where We Are and What to Expect Michael Brustein Steven Spillan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI) MASFPS LANSING, MICHIGAN NOVEMBER, 2008 Leigh Manasevit Brustein & Manasevit 3105 South Street NW Washington, DC (202)
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Shift to Greater Flexibility Under Federal Grants
Subrecipient Monitoring
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
Grants Management Test for State and Local Educational Agencies
GEPA Appeal: Who? What? When? Why? Where?
Uniform Grant Guidance (UG) – Subrecipient Monitoring, Risk Assessment and Award Identification Requirements October 25, 2016, AGA Central Pennsylvania.
THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FEDERAL GRANTS MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT RESOLUTION
Allowability, Time & Effort Under the New EDGAR
How to Draft & Update Compliant Policies & Procedures
“Are You Ready for WIOA?”
Time and Effort Documentation Flexibility
Perkins: Monitoring Findings and Fiscal Issues
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Audits under the New EDGAR Uniform Grants Guidance
“The Georgia and Maine Stories” Impact on Recent Judicial Precedent on Federal Grants Management Michael Brustein, Esq. Bonnie Graham,
EDGAR OVERVIEW Michael L. Brustein, Esq.
How To Conduct a Control Self-Assessment
The Impact of Deregulation on Compliance
To Accountability…and Beyond
How to Conduct a Control Self- Assessment
Using Data For cost allocation
Managing Federal grants
EDGAR 201 Steven A. Spillan, Esq.
A Tutorial on Grants Management Rules Under EDGAR
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective
Presentation transcript:

Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2014

Show me the money!!! 2BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

What was COFAR Thinking? 3BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

If A-133 cost and S/A costs come from the same pot of funds, perhaps SEAs will do a better job 4BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Will pass-through agencies embrace “performance metrics” more effectively? 5BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

A pass-through entity means a non- federal entity that provides a subaward to a subrecipient to carry out part of a federal program (e.g. ESEA, IDEA, CTE, AEFLA) 6BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Under EDGAR / A-102, pass-through responsibilities primarily described in 34 CFR – Monitoring of Subgrantees (Note – Part 76* on S/A programs will not change significantly) *And Part 75 7BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

But OMB / COFAR shifted many new responsibilities to the pass-through, over and above BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Omni Circular NPRM (February 1, 2013) proposed reduction of the number of types of compliance requirements in the compliance supplement 9BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Many pass-throughs opposed this reduction because of burden on them. OMB puntedp BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Monitoring Responsibilities of the Pass-Through CFR Non-federal entity is responsible for oversight of the operations of the federally supported activities 11BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Measuring Performance “Performance Metrics” (b) The non-federal entity must submit to the pass-through performance reports: 1.Comparing actual accomplishments to the objectives established by the federal award 2.Where the accomplishment can be quantified (e.g. cost) it may be required 3.If performance trend data is useful to federal award agency, agency should include it as requirement for performance 12BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Measuring Performance (b) (cont.) 4. Reasons why goals were not met, if appropriate 5. Explanation of other pertinent information, such as cost overruns 6. Significant developments, problems, delays, adverse conditions 7. Favorable developments 13 BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

The Big Question How will ED (OESE, OSERS, OPE, OCTAE) reconcile the OMB required performance metrics with the current statutory / regulatory performance / accountability indicators? 14BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

In many instances OMB performance metrics are more detailed 15BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Specific Requirements for Pass- Through ( ) Ensure that every subaward contains the following information relating to federal award identification: 1.Subrecipient name (must match registered name in DUNS) 2.Subrecipient DUNS # (Data Universal Numbering System) 3.Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) 4.Federal Award Date 16BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Specific Requirements for Pass- Through ( ) (cont.) 5. Period of performance start and end date 6. “Amount of federal funds “obligated” by this action”?? 7. “Total amount of federal funds “obligated” to the subrecipient” ?? 8. “Total amount of the federal award” 17BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Specific Requirements for Pass- Through ( ) (cont.) 9. Federal award project description for FFATA purposes 10. Name of federal awarding agency, pass- through agency, and contact official 11. Is the award for “research and development” ? 12. The indirect cost rate (restricted vs. unrestricted) 18BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

The pass-through must reference the requirements of the federal grant and any additional requirements imposed by the pass-through (i.e. state-administered programs) (Incorporate by reference) 19BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Compare (a)(1)(xiii) to (a)(4) on indirect costs What is the relevance of the approved federally recognized indirect cost rate in state-administered programs with a non supplant provision? Must pass-through negotiate restricted rates, and must sub-grantees use them? 20BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Pass-through must seek an assurance from subgrantees that access will be provided to records and financial statements 21BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

NEW RISK MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR PASS-THROUGHS 22BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Pass-through must evaluate each subrecipient’s risk of non compliance (federal statute / regulations / terms of award) for purpose of monitoring 23BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Risk Factors: 1.Subrecipient’s prior experience with the grant program 2.Results of previous audits 3.New personnel or substantially changed systems 4.Results of federal monitoring 24BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Pass-through may impose conditions on subgrant based on risk assessment: 1.Shift to reimbursement 2.Withhold payments until evidence of acceptable performance 3.Require more reporting 4.Require additional monitoring 5.Require additional technical or management assistance 6.Establish additional prior approvals 25BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Pass-through must monitor its subrecipients to assure compliance and performance goals are achieved 26BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Monitoring must include: 1.Review financial and programmatic reports 2.Ensure corrective action 3.Issue a “management decision” on audit findings if the award is from the pass- through 27BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Types of monitoring tools (depending on risk assessment) 1.Providing training and technical assistance 2.On-site reviews 3.Arranging for “agreed upon procedures” (less than $750,000) 28BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Pass-through must verify all subrecipients (> $750,000) have single audits 29BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Pass-through must adjust its own financial records based on audits, monitoring, on- site reviews 30BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Pass-through must consider taking enforcement action based on non compliance: 1.Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction 2.Disallow all or part of the cost 3.Wholly or partly suspend the award 4.Recommend to federal awarding agency suspension / debarment 5.Withhold further federal awards 6.Other remedies that may be legally available 31BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

The pass-through may terminate the award for “cause,” notice and opportunity for hearing ( and ) 32BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

33 Ready To Retire!!! BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC

Firm Disclaimer This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice or a legal service. This presentation does not create a client-lawyer relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC and, therefore, carries none of the protections under the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct. Attendance at this presentation, a later review of any printed or electronic materials, or any follow-up questions or communications arising out of this presentation with any attorney at Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC. You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances. 34BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC