1 Session 9 – Government-to-government dispute settlement procedures WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding Vesile Kulaçoglu, WTO Secretariat Dar es Salaam,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

Bananas: EU vs US. By Izabella Zakaryan Andrea Zizack.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Settlement of Trade Dispute Dr. Mrs. Vijaya Katti Professor & Chairperson, IIFT New Delhi.
1 Learning Module Series Introduction to Standards and Trade.
Hamid Dom Reg WS March 04 1 INTRODUCTION THE GATS and DOMESTIC REGULATION.
Session 1: WTO Work on Transparency in Government Procurement January, Dar es Salaam Vesile Kulaçoglu,WTO Secretariat.
1 Session 6 : SCOPE AND COVERAGE OF GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT RULES January 2003, Dar es Salaam Vesile Kulaçoglu, WTO Secretariat.
Joint WTO/WB Regional Workshop on Procurement Reform and Transparency Session 4: Objectives of Procurement Regimes and Non-Discrimination and Preferences.
1 Session 9 - Government -to-government dispute settlement procedures APPLICATION OF WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES TO GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT
Joint WTO/WB Regional Workshop on Procurement Reform and Transparency Session 6: Transparency and Fair and Equitable Procedures Mr. Jean-Jacques Raoul.
Dispute Settlement in the WTO
Harmonized implementation of CDM Accreditation CDM-Accreditation Panel.
Tutorial for leadership teams of ITU-T study groups, TSAG, tariff groups and focus groups Alternative approval process (AAP) for ITU-T Recommendations.
1 Ignacio de Castro WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Solving Disputes: The Services of the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center WIPO-INSME Training.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
Addition Facts
The Municipal Board Making Your Case to the Board Presented by: William Barlow, Chair Lori Lavoie, Vice Chair.
Regulation and Credit Framework for the Conferment of Awards Quality and Standards Office.
Copyright © 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. CHAPTER 9 GATT Law and the World Trade Organization:
WTO Dispute Settlement
Brendan McGivern Partner White & Case LLP May 20, 2009 US – Continued Suspension and the Deference Standard BIICL - Ninth Annual WTO Conference Panel 4:
Chapter 3 Dispute Settlement System and Trade Policy Review Mechanism 14/21-SEP-2006.
Shared Information and Mutual Assistance Book V – Mutual Assistance Book VI – Administrative Information Management Presentation for the EU Ombudsman /
An introduction to… INTRODUCTION FROM THE SEA Wendy Jackson NZ Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade 1.
Univ. - Prof. Dr. Werner Meng, Europa Institut, Saarland University, Germany LEGITIMACY OF WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT 1.
1 The Data Protection Officer at work Experience, good practices and lessons learnt Pierre Vernhes – former DPO at the Council of the EU Workshop on Data.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION: AN OVERVIEW. BACKGROUND Great Depression, Protectionism and the Consequences Bretton Woods Institutions GATT 1947 and Failure.
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Registry system data exchange General design requirements Pre-sessional Consultations on Registries 19 October 2002 New Delhi, India UNFCCC secretariat.
WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENTS
ALBERTAS ŠEKŠTELO, FCIArb 20 March 2014 State-to-State and Private Dispute Resolution Mechanisms under the WTO Documents.
WTO FORUM: ARTICLE 25 OF THE DSU Christian Albanesi Managing Counsel ICC International Court of Arbitration.
Single undertaking Article II “…2.The agreements and associated legal instruments included in Annexes 1, 2 and 3 (hereinafter referred to as "Multilateral.
Dispute Settlement In Trade & Investment Agreements
1 UWI Study Tour 7 May May 2008 Presented by: Jan Yves Remy Appellate Body Secretariat Enforcing the Agreements: D ISPUTE S ETTLEMENT IN THE WTO.
INTERNATIONAL LAW PARMA UNIVERSITY International Business and Development International Market and Organization Laws Prof. Gabriele Catalini.
Dispute settlement GATT 1947 provided for a dispute settlement system based on consultations and negotiations between Members. The Contracting Parties.
Dispute Settlement General Aspects of WTO Dispute Settlement Russian Federation, September 2012 Susan Hainsworth, ITTC, WTO.
Functions of the WTO Art. III of the WTO Agreement: 1) The WTO shall facilitate the implementation, administration and operation, and further the objectives,
The Legal System of the WTO 主讲人:宋俊荣 : 主讲人:宋俊荣 : 国际法商系.
Features of the DSU A single and coherent system of rules and procedures for dispute settlement; existence of special rules in some Multilateral Agreements.
Protection of IPRs in Accession to WTO. Accession negotiations Multilateral (rules) Bilateral (individual members’ demands)
Introduction of WTO Rules. It was several years later than he thought of the correct response: comparative advantage. “That it is logically true need.
International Trade Regulations: the Law of the WTO Professor Mohammad F. A. Nsour Class 3 1.
1994 WTO Understanding On the Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes.
INTERNATIONAL LAW PARMA UNIVERSITY International Business and Development International Market and Organization Laws Prof. Gabriele Catalini.
STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ)
WTO Structure Highest level: Ministerial Conference Second level: 1) General Council; 2) Dispute Settlement Body; 3) Trade Policy Review Body Third level:
Trade Policy Review Mechanism Collective appreciation and evaluation of individual trade policies of Member States. It cannot be used for the enforcement.
Disputes settlement procedure (VII) Appellate Body = permanent body (7 members on a four-year term). It must be composed by persons of recognized authority.
Principles of the DSU: 1) principle of good faith: Members must exercise their judgement as to whether action under DSU would be fruitful (art. 3, para.
0 Dispute Resolution Case Study: China v. U.S. (A/D on Shrimp) (DS 422) (Panel 2012) October 7, 2015 ITRN 603 – Evan Setzer, Marin Sullivan, Gary Szabo,
How Strategic Can Ambiguity Be? The Role of Ambiguity in the Quest for Legal Certainty and the Myth of the Toothless Tiger A presentation for the SLSA.
SPS Workshop Taipei, 5-6/12/2001 WTO Dispute Settlement and the SPS Agreement.
Package of agreements annexed to the WTO Agreement
Unit I: An overview of WTO law —WTO Dispute Settlement
The WTO The Uruguay Round Trade Liberalization
Alcoholic beverages (1996)
INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW DISPUTE SETTLEMENT
Complaints under the DSU
Presentation transcript:

1 Session 9 – Government-to-government dispute settlement procedures WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding Vesile Kulaçoglu, WTO Secretariat Dar es Salaam, January 2003

2 WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding The Work of the Working Group on Transparency in Government Procurement The Work of the Working Group on Transparency in Government Procurement

Dispute Settlement in the WTO a central element in providing security and predictability to the multilateral trading system (DSU, Article 3:2)

4 DS: Purpose A system favouring mutually agreed solutions A system favouring mutually agreed solutions A rule-oriented system A rule-oriented system A system intended to secure withdrawal of inconsistent measures A system intended to secure withdrawal of inconsistent measures Multilateralism v. unilateralism Multilateralism v. unilateralism

5 Functions of the DS system (Art. 3.2 DSU): … to preserve the rights and obligations of Members under the covered agreements, and to clarify the existing provisions of those agreements in accordance with customary rules of interpretation of public international law…

6 DS: Principles Exclusive application of WTO rules on dispute settlement to disputes related to the WTO Exclusive application of WTO rules on dispute settlement to disputes related to the WTO Uniform application to all WTO Agreements Uniform application to all WTO Agreements

7 Dispute settlement in the WTO: Overview A mechanism aimed at securing compliance with the Agreements A mechanism aimed at securing compliance with the Agreements detailed procedures automaticity in the proceedings deadlines implementation aimed at securing conformity of measures

8 Dispute settlement in the WTO Overview An integrated system : An integrated system : Applies to all the multilateral agreements a single set of rules for all disputes only a few specific rules in some agreements

9 Main stages of the dispute settlement process Consultation phase Consultation phase Panel and Appellate Body review Panel and Appellate Body review Adoption of report by the DSB Adoption of report by the DSB Implementation Implementation

10 Function of panels (Art. 11 DSU): …a panel should make an objective assessment of the matter before it, including an objective assessment of the facts of the case and the applicability of and conformity with the relevant covered agreements…

11 Task of panels review the facts and arguments submitted by the parties to a particular dispute review the facts and arguments submitted by the parties to a particular dispute Panel findings Panel findings Composition of panels Composition of panels

12 Panel Procedures: deadlines As a general rule, 6 months from composition/terms of reference to issuance of final report of the panel to the parties As a general rule, 6 months from composition/terms of reference to issuance of final report of the panel to the parties (Art DSU) As a general rule, 9 months from establishment of panel to consideration of report for adoption (if no appeal) 12 months where report is appealed (Art. 20 DSU)

13 Task of the Appellate Body review on appeal the issues of law addressed by panels review on appeal the issues of law addressed by panels The Appellate Body may uphold, modify or reverse the legal findings and conclusions of the panel (Art DSU) Composition of the Appellate Body Composition of the Appellate Body

14 Appellate review Review limited to issues of law and legal interpretations developed by the panel (Art DSU) Review limited to issues of law and legal interpretations developed by the panel (Art DSU) Appeal only open to parties to the dispute Appeal only open to parties to the dispute Standing appellate Body 7 members persons of recognised authority and expertise in international trade law unaffiliated with any government

15 Report of the Appellate Body: The Appellate Body may uphold, modify or reverse the legal findings and conclusions of the panel (Art DSU) The Appellate Body may uphold, modify or reverse the legal findings and conclusions of the panel (Art DSU) Adoption of Appellate Body report: by reverse consensus within 30 days of circulation to Members Adoption of Appellate Body report: by reverse consensus within 30 days of circulation to Members

16 Implementation (I) Recommendations: Recommendations: If violation: recommendation that the Member bring the measures into conformity (Article 19 DSU) Within 30 days of adoption of report, Member concerned informs the DSB of its intentions in respect of implementation of the recommendations and rulings (Article 1 DSU)

17 Implementation (II) Determination of reasonable period of time for implementation: proposed by Member and approved by DSB, or proposed by Member and approved by DSB, or mutually agreed by the parties, or mutually agreed by the parties, or determined through arbitration: guideline for the arbitrator: 15 months from the date of adoption (Article 21.3 DSU) determined through arbitration: guideline for the arbitrator: 15 months from the date of adoption (Article 21.3 DSU)

18 Implementation (III) Surveillance by the DSB: Status reports on implementation Surveillance by the DSB: Status reports on implementation If Member fails to bring measure into conformity within reasonable period of time, possibility of temporary measures: compensation or suspension of concessions (retaliation) If Member fails to bring measure into conformity within reasonable period of time, possibility of temporary measures: compensation or suspension of concessions (retaliation)

19 Implementation (IV) Compensation (Article 22 DSU): Voluntary Voluntary Negotiated Negotiated Compatible with WTO Agreements Compatible with WTO Agreements If no compensation agreed within 20 days after expiry of reasonable period of time…. If no compensation agreed within 20 days after expiry of reasonable period of time….

20 Implementation (V) Suspension of concessions : same sector/other sector/ other agreement level of suspension: equivalent to the level of nullification or impairment (Art DSU) level of suspension: equivalent to the level of nullification or impairment (Art DSU) authorization to suspend: within 30 days of expiry of reasonable period of time authorization to suspend: within 30 days of expiry of reasonable period of time arbitration on level of suspension or principles of Art DSU arbitration on level of suspension or principles of Art DSU