Common Core State Standards

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ELA Common Core – What We Know So Far….
Advertisements

Alaska English/Language Arts Standards. Objectives Highlight shifts in Alaska English/Language Arts Standards by Content Area.
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
Smarter Balanced Assessment a Closer Look Level 1 Part 6.
Elementary Principals CCSS Update Robyn Seifert & Rita Reimbold April 10, 2013.
CCSS/SBAC Update Sara Shore 1. SBAC Pilot Test Feb 20- May 10 Volunteer window closes Jan BalancedPilothttps://
Leadership Academy NMC Hagerty Center August 22, 2012.
Division of Assessment and Accountability Reporting ISAT Summative Scores to Parents.
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
Session 6: Writing from Sources Audience: 6-12 ELA & Content Area Teachers.
Session 1: Understanding the Organization Audience: 6-12 ELA & Content Teachers.
Reading Comprehension
Session 6: Writing from Sources Audience: K-5 Teachers.
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
SMARTER BALANCED QUESTION TYPES OVERVIEW TEXT TXT EXT Assess a broad range of content. Scoring is objective, fast, and inexpensive to score. Difficult.
Denise Wright, BCPS Elementary Instructional Coach.
Transition to Smarter Assessment December Why did Delaware need new academic standards?
© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.
An Introduction to S marter B alanced A ssessment C onsortium Family Informational Session, Winter 2014.
Evaluating Student Growth Looking at student works samples to evaluate for both CCSS- Math Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice.
COMMON CORE for SCHOOL COACHES Pat Fitzsimmons and Gail Taylor representing the VT DOE Common Core Team: Marty Gephart, CC Program Manager and MS/HS ELA.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Parent Information Session Colchester Public Schools 1.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium A Peek at the Assessment System 1 Rachel Eifler January 30, 2014.
2014 Summer Session Day 1. Today’s Agenda Stipends SCECH’s Sign-in and out! Moodle
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) September 12, 2012.
The Changing Face of Education: How Common Core Impacts Our Curriculum Beth Smith President, ASCCC Oct. 31, 2013.
Introduction and Overview Rapid City Area Schools May 2011.
Michigan State Assessments: What Do Families Need to Know?
NEW STANDARDS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY Connecticut Common Core Standards.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
THINK / PUZZLE / EXPLORE Think about what you may have read as part of the pre-reading activity for this workshop as well as what you already know about.
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS WINTER MEETING -- JANUARY 24, 2015 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
Boot Camp 2014 The 4 Cs in the Common Core. Marta Stirling School Library Coordinator, East River Joan Upell School Library Coordinator, West River.
2014 Summer Session Day 1. 3 Day Goals Planning: Writing Assessment Items and Choosing a 3 Act Task Create a 3 Act Task.
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
WALNUT HIGH SCHOOL CAASPP INFORMATION NIGHT How to Understand Your Child’s report
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
Common Core State Standards ELA and Literacy 2012 Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Publisher Meeting Today: Common Core State Standards Oregon Shifts 1 ODE.
Module 4—Literacy Strands Arts Education. Learning Outcomes Participants will: explore the relationship between the new Essential Standards and the Common.
THREE COMPONENTS OF AN SBAC ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (ELA) PERFORMANCE TASK.
SBAC Claim 1: Concepts and Procedures Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts interpret and carry out mathematical procedures with precision.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium SBAC October/November 2013 Cider Mill School.
Walnut Valley Unified School District “Understanding Your Child’s 2015 CAASPP Report” California Assessment and Accountability System Performance and Progress.
Common Core State Standards Back to School Night August 29, 2013.
Smarter Balanced 103: Item Types and Instructional Implementation Rachel Aazzerah Science & Social Science Assessment Specialist
TRIGG COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL. 6 th Grade Reading Standard% of Students scoring 80% or higher RL 6.1 Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the.
KLC Meeting Explore the two samples provided considering the following questions: What are some of the possible similarities you see in how you.
Assessment in Common Core. Essential Questions How is CAASPP different than STAR? How is SBAC different than CST? What do students have to know and be.
+ PARCC Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
BUILDING A STRONG CURRICULAR FOUNDATION - PATHWAY TO RIGOROUS CURRICULUM DESIGN (RCD) WINTER 2014 Prepared & Presented By: Maria Escalera, Heather Goodwin-Parreno,
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Update on State Assessment and CCSS Presentation to the West Hartford Parent Teacher Council.
What about the Assessment System?
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
(Analyzing Character, Setting and Plot)
Using the 7 Step Lesson Plan to Enhance Student Learning
Presentation transcript:

Common Core State Standards

Common Core Standards 1997 Standards Nouns Verbs Common Core standards and 21st Century learning is driven by the creation process. Students no longer just need "know" information. Now, they need to know what to do with it. Nouns Verbs

Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Based upon the assumption that curricular elements may all be categorized based upon the cognitive demands required to produce an acceptable response Each grouping of tasks reflects a different level of cognitive expectation, or depth of knowledge, required to complete the task

Webb, 2006

4 Major Claims for ELA/Literacy Claim #1 – Reading “Students can read closely and analytically to comprehend a range of increasingly complex literary and informational texts.” Claim #2 – Writing “Students can produce effective and well-grounded writing for a range of purposes and audiences.” Claim #3 – Speaking and Listening “Students can employ effective speaking and listening skills for a range of purposes and audiences.” Claim #4 – Research/Inquiry “Students can engage in research and inquiry to investigate topics, and to analyze, integrate, and present information.” Overall Claim for Grades 3–8 “Students can demonstrate progress toward college and career readiness in English language arts and literacy.” Overall Claim for Grade 11 “Students can demonstrate college and career readiness in English language arts and literacy.”

SBAC Assessments focus on these CLAIMS re 4 Major Claims for Math Smarter Balanced Assessments Claim #1 – Concepts & Procedures “Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts and interpret and carry out mathematical procedures with precision and fluency.” Claim #2 – Problem Solving “Students can solve a range of complex well-posed problems in pure and applied mathematics, making productive use of knowledge and problem solving strategies.” Claim #3 – Communicating Reasoning “Students can clearly and precisely construct viable arguments to support their own reasoning and to critique the reasoning of others.” Claim #4 – Modeling and Data Analysis “Students can analyze complex, real-world scenarios and can construct and use mathematical models to interpret and solve problems.”

CTA’s ELA Progressions or Spirals Tool provided by CTA for members to use in planning the implementation of the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts

CCR Anchor Standard Reading 3: RL.CCR.3 CCR Anchor Standard Reading 3: Analyze how and why individuals, events, and ideas develop and interact over the course of a text. = RL.11-12.3 Grade 11-12 students: Analyze the impact of the author’s choices regarding how to develop and relate elements of a story or drama (e.g., where a story is set, how the action is ordered, how the characters/archetypes are introduced and developed). + RL.9-10.3 Grade 9-10 students: Analyze how complex characters (e.g., those with multiple or conflicting motivations) develop over the course of a text, interact with other characters, and advance the plot or develop the theme. RL.8.3 Grade 8 students: Analyze how particular lines of dialogue or incidents in a story or drama propel the action, reveal aspects of a character, or provoke a decision. RL.7.3 Grade 7 students: Analyze how particular elements of a story or drama interact (e.g., how setting shapes the characters or plot). RL.6.3 Grade 6 students: Describe how a particular story’s or drama’s plot unfolds in a series of episodes as well as how the characters respond or change as the plot moves toward a resolution. RL.5.3 Grade 5 students: Compare and contrast two or more characters, settings, or events in a story or drama, drawing on specific details in the text (e.g., how characters interact). RL.4.3 Grade 4 students: Describe in depth a character, setting, or event in a story or drama, drawing on specific details in the text (e.g., a character’s thoughts, words, or actions). RL.3.3 Grade 3 students: Describe characters in a story (e.g., their traits, motivations, or feelings) and explain how their actions contribute to the sequence of events. RL.2.3 Grade 2 students: Describe how characters in a story respond to major events and challenges. RL.1.3 Grade 1 students: Describe characters, settings, and major events in a story, using key details. RL.K.3 Kindergarten students: With prompting and support, identify characters, settings, and major events in a story.

Using the Common Core Standards Lesson Plan Design Using the Common Core Standards

Putting the Pieces Together Common Core Standard and Rationale for the Standard Curriculum Alignment Unit Design Assessment Instruction Leading/Facilitating Learning

Aligning (CCSS) with Instruction and Assessment 1. Rewrite the CCSS in student/teacher friendly language 2. Select the CCSS for your course/grade 3. Group/organize the CCSS 4. Map/display unit/chapter knowledge and skills 5. Create assessments for CCSS 6. Create unit designs 7. Audit to determine alignment and sufficient emphasis 8. Create lessons plans and/or modules 9. Match instruction to CCSS

Resources www.edmodo.com www.illustrativemath.org Basal Alignment Project, 3-5 Anthology Alignment Project, 6-12 www.illustrativemath.org www.tcoe.org/commoncore www.achievethecore.org www.engageny.org www.teachingchannel.org