Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1165r0 September 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Discussion of the comments related to FILS Request Parameter Date: 2013-09-16.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission May 2010 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 M-QoS Comments Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0553r0 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Response Criteria of Probe Request Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0443r0 March 2014 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 What Is P2P Traffic in HEW Simulation Scenarios? Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0578r0 Submission 2008 May Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Forwarding in mesh containing MPs in power save Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/771r0 July 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 FILS STA Support for QoS, HT and VHT? Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/772r0 July 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Non-HT Duplicate PPDU FILS Advertisement Frame Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0327r0 March 2015 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Microsleep for HE STA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1357r3 Nov Slide 1 Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation Date: Authors: Weiping Sun, Seoul National University.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0141r0 January 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Element Fragmentation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1019r1 Submission July 2011 MediaTek, Inc Slide 1 Supporting Large Number of STAs in ah Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 May 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 1 Regarding trigger frame in UL MU Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0531r1 May 2015 Michael Fischer, FreescaleSlide 1 A Possible Solution to the Beacon Length Problem Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r1 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0103r0 January 2015 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Power Save Calibration Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide ai simulations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 March 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 CID 266 & CID 281 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0281r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Recommendations for association Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1207r1 Submission September 2013 Matthew Fischer et al (Broadcom)Slide 1 CID 205 BSSID Color Bits Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0103r0 Submission January 2008 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Peer Service Period Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0102r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 TGah Power Saving Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1091r0 September 2015 Considerations on Range Extension with SIG-A Repetition Date: Authors:
doc.: IEEE /560r1 Submission John Kowalski, Sharp November 2001 Adding Rate Parameter to the TSPEC /Queue State Element John Kowalski Sharp.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0553r4 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Response Criteria of Probe Request Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 September 2012 Jeongki Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Enhanced scanning procedure for FILS Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /2215r4 Submission August 2007 Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Proposal –Radio Resource Measurement Capability Enabled.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/535r1 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Scanning and FILS requirements Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/1367r01 Nov 2012 Hiroshi Mano (ATRD)Slide 1 TGai- Motion/Straw Poll-Nov-2012-San-Antonio Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1149r0 Submission September 2010 Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia CorporationSlide 1 Operation rules for > 40MHz Bandwidth Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0097r0 SubmissionJarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Bandwidth Specific TXOP Limits Date: Authors: January 2011.
Doc.: IEEE /0070r1 January 2012 LG Electronics Inc. Submission Link adaptation in active scanning Author: Date: January 13, 2011 NameCompanyAddressPhone .
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Doc.: IEEE /0415r0 Submission April mc CIDs 1136,1118,1458 Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1121r0 Submission HE A-Control field Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September 2015.
Doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Scanning with FILS Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/1060r0 September 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 Receive Operating Mode Indication for Power Save Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1064r0 September 2015 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Long Range, Low Power Design Criteria Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0537r0 Submission May 2010 Kazuyuki Sakoda, Sony CorporationSlide 1 General frame format comment resolution overview Date:
TBTT Information Field Type (TIFT) Clarification for P802.11REVmd
Wide Scanning Requests and Responses
How to collect STAs’ Tx demands for UL MU
LB225 CR (Link Adaptation)
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
Wake Up Frame to Indicate Group Addressed Frames Transmission
Improvement to TWT Parameter set selection
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
UL OFDMA-based Random Access Parameter Set (RAPS) element
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
Proposed Modifications in TGh Draft Proposal
CID#102 - Channel Allocation
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Resolution for CID 118 and 664 Date: Authors: Month Year
CR for CID 1105 Date: Authors: January 2019 Month Year
AP Power Down Notification
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Comments Clarification on VHT Operation Notes and VHT Action Field
CR for CID 1115 Date: Authors: May 2019
FILS Frame Content Date: Authors: February 2008
MBCA and Beacon Timing element clean up
Timing Measurement Date: Authors: Jan 2010 November 2007
Resolutions of the Remaining Power Management Comments
Peer Service Period Date: Authors: January 2008 Month Year
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
Timing Measurement Date: Authors: Jan 2010 November 2007
Proposed Resolution to CID 147 in CC12
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1165r0 September 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Discussion of the comments related to FILS Request Parameter Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1165r0 September 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 2 Abstract The presentation contains a set of clarification questions for FILS Request Parameters. FILS Request Parameters is transmitted in Probe Request frame and it sets criteria to Probe Response transmission. The discussion is related to definitions and the formats of the fields.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1165r FILS Request Parameters element CIDs 2763, 3129, 3130, 3312, 3313, 3350, 3351, 3372 and Define (transmission) resource requirement instead of PHY layer type. Discussion: The HT and VHT capabilities are simple criteria for responder. Tesource requirement is hard to estimate. Slide 3 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia) September 2013 B0B1 – B3B4B5B6 – B7 Reduced Neighbor Report Request BSS Delay Criteria HT Support Criteria VHT Support Criteria Reserved Bits: Figure 8-401cu—Parameter Control Bitmap field

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1165r0 HT and VHT support FILS Criteria If a STA wants to receive a Probe Response frame from only a HT capable STA, the STA can transmit a Probe Request frame in HT PPDU format. Similarly VHT PPDU may be used for VHT AP responses Discussion: If the HT or VHT PPDU is transmitted, the transmission time of Probe Request will be longer: PLCP header of the HT PPDU adds at minimum 8 microseconds PLCP header of the VHT frame adds at minimum 12 microseconds Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia) September 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1165r0 Reduced Neighbor Report Request Reduced Neighbor Report Request: CIDs 3349, 3371 Request element (sub-clause ) can be placed in a Probe Request frame to request that the responding STA include the requested information in the Probe Response frame. What is the difference with the Request element? Discussion: The proposed mode is default operation to request all other elements Slide 5Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia) September 2013 B0B1 – B3B4B5B6 – B7 Reduced Neighbor Report Request BSS Delay Criteria HT Support Criteria VHT Support Criteria Reserved Bits: 13112

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1165r0 Delay Criteria CIDs 3293 The maximum value (of access delay) is therefore 200us x 255 = 51ms. Is this a concern? Discussion: The delay increases exponentially as a function of traffic load and congestion. In small delays the preciseness of the delay value is more important than in large delays. Recovering from the delay requires transmission resources and time to transmit the buffered frames. The APs with large delay values are not good candidates. Slide 6Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia) September 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1165r0 Example resolutions: What the group feels on the correct granularity of the access delay criteria? 1.Keep the value as it is: 200us x 255 = 51ms 2.Increase the value to 400us: 400us x 255 = 102ms 3.Use value 200us to values and 400 us to , 200us x us x 128 = 77ms 4.Some other value / formula? Slide 7Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia) September 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1165r0 Minimum Data Rate CIDs 3352, 3374 Comment: "The Minimum Data Rate field is 3 octets long and contains an unsigned integer in units of kilobits per second that specifies the lowest total data rate specified at the MAC_SAP for transport of MSDUs or AMSDUs that the STA is going to transmit. The minimum MAC_SAP data rate does not include the MAC and PHY overheads incurred in transferring the MSDUs or A-MSDUs." What is the definition of the lowest total data rate? Is it a long-term throughput? Is it a singly linked throughput? Discussion: - The lowest total data rate is an estimation of the data amount that will be transmitted in future. Is it better to say that it is average or peak value of throughput in future? Slide 8Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia) September 2013