Jari Vayrynen Operations Team Leader Carbon Finance Unit World Bank March 2007 World Bank ERPA Features and Risk Profile of JI Projects.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional.
Advertisements

ISTISNA’.
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CONSULTING EGTT Workshop, September 27-29, 2004 Montreal, Canada Are Export Credit Agencies and Other Traditional Sources of Infrastructure.
Pricing, Risks and Costs in Carbon Transactions Veronique Bishop Host Country Committee Meeting February 15,
JCF March, 2006 Issues on and Requests for Joint Implementation ( “JI” ) Projects Institutional Framework on Joint Implementation ( “JI” ) Projects Yusuke.
Fundamentals of Emission Reductions Purchase Agreements HCC Annual Meeting February 15, 2004.
PROPOSAL FOR A CARBON GUARANTEE INSTRUMENT Chandra Shekhar Sinha Carbon Finance Coordinator Latin America and the Caribbean Region 1 November 15, 2010.
CERUPT The Experiences so far Reginald Hernaus Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.
The KfW Carbon Fund 37th REGULAR MEETING OF THE ALIDE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2007 May 2007.
Ensuring Effective Monitoring, Certification and Verification of Emissions by Jed Jones Lloyd’s Register.
James Grabert Manager, Joint Implementation, UNFCCC secretariat Joint Implementation Overview & Status Kyoto Protocol and Carbon Market.
UNFCCC Secretariat Overview of the CDM and the CDM project Cycle Training-Workshop to support the “Uganda Municipal Waste Compost Programme” Kampala, Uganda,
Financial Solutions Unit, FEU Treasury Department PROPOSAL FOR CARBON MARKET DEVELOPMENT GUARANTEE Energy Unit, LCR Carbon Finance Unit 1 05/30/2011, HCC.
World Bank/KenGen Workshop on CDM Project Methodologies and Preparation October 3 & 4, 2006 CDM Contracting and Legal Issues.
Conducting Carbon Projects Presented by Adam Shepherd Regional Workshop on Legal, Institutional and Financial aspects of Carbon Finance Istanbul, Turkey.
FINANCING LNG PROJECTS. Contracting for and financing LNG assets April 2006.
Joint Implementation & Gas Flaring Reduction Projects Alexandrina Platonova-Oquab Carbon Finance Unit, World Bank.
1 Georg B ø rsting Chair of the JI Supervisory Committee Joint Implementation 1-3 April 2008 Bangkok, Thailand AWG-KP 5 In-session workshop on means to.
AAU trading standards: the Latvian Approach Ilze Prūse Head of the Pilot Projects Implementation Division of the Climate and Renewable Energy Department.
Introduction to Legal and Contractual Aspects of CDM Projects
Energy Project Development A Discussion on State and Federal Incentives Presented By Dennis Plaster, General Manager.
CARBON CONTRACTS - the PCF experience September 30, 2002.
Capacity Development for Clean Development Mechanism Project Idea Note (PIN) Preparation by Kofi Asante.
Carbon Trading: The Challenges and Risks John Drexhage Director, Climate Change and Energy International Institute for Sustainable Development Agriculture.
Annual Meeting of the Host Country Committee on Carbon Finance Washington D.C. February 15-16, The World Bank Carbon Funds:
CONTRACTING FOR CARBON Legal Framework for JI Projects under the Kyoto Protocol.
CDM Investment Opportunities in Israel Presented by: Adi Dishon Project Manager.
Overview of BioCF ERPA terms December 15, 2005 The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Practical Legal Issues concerning the relationship between project proponents, investors and buyers Workshop on Landfill Gas Development and the CDM Denpasar,
Prototype Carbon Fund Training Workshop: Project Formulation for the Clean Development Mechanism Hanoi, Vietnam September 30- October 2, 2002 Eduardo Dopazo.
CDM Projects: Risks and Contracts charlotte streck pcf Sao Paulo, Brazil, November 22, 02.
UNIDO Vietnam Support for CDM projects in the Industrial sector: Pilot Project in Co-operation with the Austrian Industry Training Sessions on the Kyoto.
Carbon Finance Risk Management Marina Olshanskaya Regional Energy/Kyoto Protocol Specialist RBEC Energy and Environment Practice Meeting Wednesday 27 th.
Breaking Legal Grounds…. Implementing a PCF Project Sao Paulo, Brazil - November 20, 2002 Charlotte Streck, PCF.
1 CDM Transactions A Canadian Buyer’s Perspective CDM/JI Workshop Winnipeg March 1/06 Donald Wharton TransAlta Corporation.
What Goes Into a Good PIN and a PCF Project? PCF Training Workshop on Project Formulation under the Clean Development Mechanism Hanoi, Vietnam September.
Experiences as a ER buyer and a general outlook Olle Björk Swedish Ministry of Sustainable Development Washington
CD4CDM Ghana - Third National Workshop, Accra, 15 September 2006 Introduction to Legal & Contracting Issues in the CDM Glenn S. Hodes Energy Economist,
JOINT IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISM IN BULGARIA J I MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND WATER 26 May 2004 Daniela Stoycheva – National Focal Point on CC, BULGARIA.
Managing Risk and Uncertainty in Carbon Finance Training Workshop : Project Formulation for the Clean Development Mechanism Hanoi, Vietnam September 30.
How can CDM help project finance? Jan-Willem Martens, Bangkok, 5 April, 2005.
UNIDO Vietnam Support for CDM projects in the Industrial sector: Pilot Project in Co-operation with the Austrian Industry Training Sessions on the Kyoto.
Center of Islamic Finance COMSATS Institute of Information Technology Lahore Campus 1 Adopted from open source lecture of Meezan Bank. Customized for best.
Emission reduction value in financing clean energy projects By Jan-Willem Martens EcoSecurities.
Mechanism for Voluntary Mitigation of GHG Emissions in Colombia GEF and Carbon Finance Meeting Washington, DC - November 15 th, 2010.
Managing carbon project risks Presented by Adam Shepherd Regional Workshop on Legal, Institutional and Financial aspects of Carbon Finance Istanbul, Turkey.
C ARBON P ARTNERSHIP F ACILITY 1 A PRIL 2014 S ELLER P ARTICIPANT T RAINING K EY C OMMERCIAL A SPECTS OF SUB -ERPA S.
Carbon credits - origination to commercialisation© 2006 EcoSecurities Group plc CleanTech and Carbon in the Pacific Northwest Seattle, WA November 8, 2007.
Green Investment Scheme in Bulgaria Christo Christov, Energy Institute, Bulgaria Workshop Facilitation Green Investment Scheme: first lessons learnt and.
WB Carbon Finance Project Cycle and Role of Key Players Introduction to Carbon Finance March 10, 2004.
CDM Projects: Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects Project cycles and Technical Issues.
Financing Structures and CDM Project Risks Cairo, April 4 th –April 5 th, 2005 TIMS/EEAA Fertilizers Workshop UNEP RISOE / APEXFinancing Structures and.
GIS Development in Romania Vlad Trusca Head of Climate Change Unit Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development “REC Workshop “Facilitating GIS:
Presentation “Green Investment Schemes – greenhouse gas emissions quotas trading mechanisms in Ukraine according to the Kyoto Protocol to the Convention.
Joint Implementation by the Netherlands Maurits Henkemans Ministry of Economic Affairs Netherlands Moscow.
Practical issues in identification and development of CDM projects AIT, Bangkok, October 20, 2005 Soeren Varming Senior Consultant, Climate Change
© 2006 UNDP. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Proprietary and Confidential. Not For Distribution Without Prior Written Permission. CDM Project Cycle Anna.
CDM Project Cycle LGED Bhaban, Dhaka 8 – 9 April 2008 Presented by Khandaker Mainuddin Fellow, BCAS.
Carbon Revenue and MFIs: Making it Work Marco van der Linden Ramesh K. Gautam.
1 PDD and PIN preparation Technical Workshop on CDM Paramaribo, 18 June 2008 Adriaan Korthuis.
IBRD Emission Reductions Purchase Agreement and General Conditions BioCarbon Fund Training Seminar September 12, 2005 The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Introduction to the Project Cycle Jane Ebinger Senior Energy Specialist Sustainable Development Department The World Bank.
Incorporating Carbon Finance into Operations Integrating Carbon Finance in the Bank’s Work November 19, 2001.
HOW TO PROTECT YOUR INTEREST IN A SALE CONTRACT Focus on what you “get” when you sign!
Francisco Arango UNFCCC secretariat JI section Joint Implementation State of Play UNFCCC Technical Workshop on.
Scientific Engineering Centre “BIOMASS”IETP NAS of Ukraine Benefits to and obstacles for Joint Implementation projects Oleksandr Filonenko Bonn, February.
Green Investment Schemes - Concepts, Ideas, Challenges
Buyers' and Seller's Perspectives on JI : The Fund Perspective
Prices for Emission Reductions
World Bank ERPAs – Brief overview
Presentation transcript:

Jari Vayrynen Operations Team Leader Carbon Finance Unit World Bank March 2007 World Bank ERPA Features and Risk Profile of JI Projects

World Bank ERPAs - purpose -key features

Generation of CERs & ERPA Generation of Emission Reductions Verification by an independent auditor (Independent Accredited Entity) Issuance of ERUs by the Host Country ERUs ERPA $$

Purpose of ERPA Record agreement Record agreement Identify responsibilities Identify responsibilities Establish rights Establish rights Manage risk Manage risk

Basics of World Bank ERPAs Goals: consistency, flexibility, reducing transaction costs Goals: consistency, flexibility, reducing transaction costs Two parts Two parts General Conditions - standard terms, conditions, rights/ obligationsGeneral Conditions - standard terms, conditions, rights/ obligations Negotiated agreement - purchase amount, price, payment terms, preconditions, representations and warrantiesNegotiated agreement - purchase amount, price, payment terms, preconditions, representations and warranties

WB ERPA Features Sale and Purchase agreement Sale and Purchase agreement Object is the commodity of ERsObject is the commodity of ERs Amount, Price and Delivery/Payment ScheduleAmount, Price and Delivery/Payment Schedule Defines who does what with regard to: Defines who does what with regard to: ValidationValidation RegistrationRegistration MonitoringMonitoring Verification & CertificationVerification & Certification Provisions on payment for ERs and preparation/supervision cost recovery (if any): Provisions on payment for ERs and preparation/supervision cost recovery (if any): Payment generally upon delivery, some advance payments possiblePayment generally upon delivery, some advance payments possible Recovery of cost, if any, capped and definedRecovery of cost, if any, capped and defined Events of Defaults and Remedies Events of Defaults and Remedies E.g. under delivery of ERsE.g. under delivery of ERs Other than for willful breach, no tough penalties, preferred option to amend ER delivery scheduleOther than for willful breach, no tough penalties, preferred option to amend ER delivery schedule WB ERPAs typically do not include delivery guarantee from sellerWB ERPAs typically do not include delivery guarantee from seller

Risk Profile of JI Projects - principle of risk allocation - key elements of risk - impact on pricing - some practical considerations

Risk Allocation between Buyer and Seller Risk is allocated to the party best able to bear it Risk is allocated to the party best able to bear it Three key risk categories: Three key risk categories: Underlying project risksUnderlying project risks Kyoto Protocol risksKyoto Protocol risks ERPA structuring/terms riskERPA structuring/terms risk Rules of thumb: Rules of thumb: Project risks borne by sellerProject risks borne by seller Kyoto Protocol risk primarily borne by either the seller (ERU) or buyer (VER)Kyoto Protocol risk primarily borne by either the seller (ERU) or buyer (VER) ERPA structuring/terms risk relatively less important and matter of negotiationERPA structuring/terms risk relatively less important and matter of negotiation

Kyoto Protocol Risks (1) Risk may be allocated either to seller or buyer: Risk may be allocated either to seller or buyer: VER: buyer takes Kyoto risk >> lower priceVER: buyer takes Kyoto risk >> lower price ERU: Project owner takes Kyoto (including host country compliance) risk >> higher priceERU: Project owner takes Kyoto (including host country compliance) risk >> higher price Important price determinant because if the project does not meet Kyoto requirements, it generates no asset for Kyoto compliance needs Important price determinant because if the project does not meet Kyoto requirements, it generates no asset for Kyoto compliance needs

Kyoto Protocol Risks (2) Main component is risk of project determination Main component is risk of project determination methodology, additionalitymethodology, additionality Letter of ApprovalLetter of Approval Other component ERU issuance risks Other component ERU issuance risks Risks related to proper monitoring and verificationRisks related to proper monitoring and verification Risks related to host country actually issuing and transferring the ERUs to buyerRisks related to host country actually issuing and transferring the ERUs to buyer

Project Risks Risk of the underlying project Risk of the underlying project Construction, operation, delays, licensing/permitsConstruction, operation, delays, licensing/permits Reliability and level of complexity of the technology usedReliability and level of complexity of the technology used Generally borne by Project Entity but can be limited by e.g. Generally borne by Project Entity but can be limited by e.g. conservative ER estimatesconservative ER estimates Also a very important price determinant as has direct impact on likelihood and timing of the physical ERs being generated Also a very important price determinant as has direct impact on likelihood and timing of the physical ERs being generated

Risks related to ERPA Structure (1) ERU delivery guarantees required by buyer or not: ERU delivery guarantees required by buyer or not: 3 rd important price determinant3 rd important price determinant If guarantees provided by seller, can get 10%-30% higher price but a big risk to takeIf guarantees provided by seller, can get 10%-30% higher price but a big risk to take Large variation on how delivery guarantee definedLarge variation on how delivery guarantee defined WB ERPAs typically do not include delivery guarantee from sellerWB ERPAs typically do not include delivery guarantee from seller Advance Payments: Advance Payments: Risk to buyer that the project is not completed and does not deliver the emission reductionsRisk to buyer that the project is not completed and does not deliver the emission reductions The price may be discounted to reflect this risk taken by buyerThe price may be discounted to reflect this risk taken by buyer Can be mitigated by the seller providing a guarantee for the advanced amountCan be mitigated by the seller providing a guarantee for the advanced amount

Risk Related to ERPA Structure (2) Preparation costs: Preparation costs: If buyer pays for them, may discount the price to reflect thisIf buyer pays for them, may discount the price to reflect this Structure of delivery: Structure of delivery: If buyer has rights to all/first ERUs generated, likely to pay a higher priceIf buyer has rights to all/first ERUs generated, likely to pay a higher price

Some practical considerations/lessons learned

Other practical considerations that can manage risk and expedite process (1) Prepare technical and financial (pre-)Feasibility study Prepare technical and financial (pre-)Feasibility study Ensure clear commitment from company management (and not just operational staff): Ensure clear commitment from company management (and not just operational staff): E.g. included in the business planE.g. included in the business plan Establish clear institutional set up between project owner, advisers, and technology provider/sub-contractor important Establish clear institutional set up between project owner, advisers, and technology provider/sub-contractor important Advanced stage of negotiations with equity and debt financiers is helpful Advanced stage of negotiations with equity and debt financiers is helpful Compliance with environmental regulations, including transparent stakeholder consultations Compliance with environmental regulations, including transparent stakeholder consultations

Application of an already approved CDM methodology makes a big difference: Application of an already approved CDM methodology makes a big difference: Cuts down JI preparation time and reduces risk of non- DeterminationCuts down JI preparation time and reduces risk of non- Determination Typically point source reductions or clearly defined systems are easier: Typically point source reductions or clearly defined systems are easier: e.g. landfill gas flaring, N20 catalyzer, utilization of coal mine methanee.g. landfill gas flaring, N20 catalyzer, utilization of coal mine methane e.g. wind power project displacing coal in the national gride.g. wind power project displacing coal in the national grid Dispersed or multi-component/measure projects tend to be more challenging: Dispersed or multi-component/measure projects tend to be more challenging: expect a longer preparation timeexpect a longer preparation time e.g. transportation, household level energy efficiencye.g. transportation, household level energy efficiency e.g. complicated industrial energy efficiency improvement programs or complex district heating system upgradese.g. complicated industrial energy efficiency improvement programs or complex district heating system upgrades Other practical considerations that can manage risk and expedite process (2)

Other practical considerations that can manage risk and expedite process (3) Consider your commercial strategy for ER sales carefully: Consider your commercial strategy for ER sales carefully: Sell all ERs or part of the ERs, save some for sale at the spot market?Sell all ERs or part of the ERs, save some for sale at the spot market? Sell all ERs to one buyer or to several buyers?Sell all ERs to one buyer or to several buyers? What is the delivery schedule of the ERs to the buyer(s)What is the delivery schedule of the ERs to the buyer(s) E.g. deliver all of them in the first 2 year of the project OR, for example, deliver 400,000 ERs/year over five years? E.g. deliver all of them in the first 2 year of the project OR, for example, deliver 400,000 ERs/year over five years?

Thank you