Two-Fluid Effective-Field Equations. Mathematical Issues Non-conservative: –Uniqueness of Discontinuous solution? –Pressure oscillations Non-hyperbolic.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

A mathematical model of steady-state cavitation in Diesel injectors S. Martynov, D. Mason, M. Heikal, S. Sazhin Internal Engine Combustion Group School.

Advertisements

Fluid Mechanics Research Group Two phase modelling for industrial applications Prof A.E.Holdø & R.K.Calay.

Lecture 15: Capillary motion

Nathan N. Lafferty, Martin L. deBertodano,

1 Pressure-based Solver for Incompressible and Compressible Flows with Cavitation Sunho Park 1, Shin Hyung Rhee 1, and Byeong Rog Shin 2 1 Seoul National.

RANS predictions of a cavitating tip vortex 8th International Symposium on Cavitation Tuomas Sipilä*, Timo Siikonen** *VTT Technical Research Centre of.

Lecture 17 - Eulerian-Granular Model Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics Instructor: André Bakker © André Bakker (2002) © Fluent Inc. (2002)

UNICAMP THE HEIGHT OF LIQUID METHOD FOR FREE SURFACE FLOWS Flow simulations of real processes often involve fluids that are separated by a sharp interface.

IMPACT CAPE-B: Critical Power Analysis Code for BWR Fuel Bundle - Evaluation Method - Analytical Step Calculation Method 4. Detection of Dryout 2. Spacer.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Collaboration Meeting May 26 – 28, CERN, Geneva Target Simulations.

Homework 3: Use the Fixed Grid --Volume of Fluid Method with Structured Cartesian CVFEM mesh To track Filling Front h=1 h = 0 2 r = 1 3 Hand in 1. Code.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2005, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.

Prediction of Fluid Dynamics in The Inertial Confinement Fusion Chamber by Godunov Solver With Adaptive Grid Refinement Zoran Dragojlovic, Farrokh Najmabadi,

Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.

Direct numerical simulations of droplet emulsions in sliding bi-periodic frames using the level-set method See Jo Wook Ryol Hwang*

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Targetry Meeting May 1 - 2, Oxford, GB Target Simulations Roman.

Knut Vaagsaether, Vegeir Knudsen and Dag Bjerketvedt

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review March 16-17, 2006, FNAL, Batavia, IL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak Computational.

The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.

Instructor: André Bakker

Fixed and Fluidized Beds

1 E. Romenski, D. Drikakis Fluid Mechanics & Computational Science Group, Cranfield University, UK CONSERVATIVE FORMULATION AND NUMERICAL METHODS FOR MULTIPHASE.

Mechanistic Modeling and CFD Simulations of Oil-Water Dispersions in Separation Components Mechanistic Modeling and CFD Simulations of Oil-Water Dispersions.

Simulation of Droplet Drawback in Inkjet Printing

ICHS4, San Francisco, September E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi Joint Research Centre - Institute for Energy and Transport

Pressure drop prediction models o Garimella et al. (2005) o Considered parameters o Single-phase pressure gradients o Martinelli parameter o Surface tension.

Modelling of the particle suspension in turbulent pipe flow

A Hybrid Particle-Mesh Method for Viscous, Incompressible, Multiphase Flows Jie LIU, Seiichi KOSHIZUKA Yoshiaki OKA The University of Tokyo,

Viscous Stress Terms for the RELAP5-3D Momentum Equations Adam Kraus and George Mesina RELAP5 International Users Seminar 2010 September 20-23,

Compressible Flow Introduction

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.

R. Oran csem.engin.umich.edu SHINE 09 May 2005 Campaign Event: Introducing Turbulence Rona Oran Igor V. Sokolov Richard Frazin Ward Manchester Tamas I.

Page 1 SIMULATIONS OF HYDROGEN RELEASES FROM STORAGE TANKS: DISPERSION AND CONSEQUENCES OF IGNITION By Benjamin Angers 1, Ahmed Hourri 1 and Pierre Bénard.

SIMULATION OF GAS PIPELINES LEAKAGE USING CHARACTERISTICS METHOD Author: Ehsan Nourollahi Organization: NIGC (National Iranian Gas Company) Department.

Example Problem The parallel axis theorem provides a useful way to calculate I about an arbitrary axis. The theorem states that I = Icm + Mh2, where Icm.

Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Target Meeting Numerical Simulations for Jet-Proton Interaction Wurigen Bo, Roman Samulyak Department of Applied Mathematics.

Approximate Riemann Solvers for Multi-component flows Ben Thornber Academic Supervisor: D.Drikakis Industrial Mentor: D. Youngs (AWE) Aerospace Sciences.

Progress Report on SPARTAN Simulation of IFE Chamber Dynamics Farrokh Najmabadi and Zoran Dragojlovic HAPL Meeting March 3-4, 2005 Naval Research Laboratory.

Content  Turbulent Validation  Thermal Validation  Simple Model Test  Plans for Next Period.

1 SATELLITESSATELLITES 2 Newton’s Law of Gravitation M1M1 M2M2 r F F.

A car of mass 1000 kg moves with a speed of 60 m/s on a circular track of radius 110 m. What is the magnitude of its angular momentum (in kg·m 2 /s) relative.

Numerical Investigation of Hydrogen Release from Varying Diameter Exit

CFD Applications for Marine Foil Configurations Volker Bertram, Ould M

2D Jet Simulation Updates Jan.23 rd 2014 Yan Zhan SUNY Stony Brook 1.

Numerical simulation of droplet motion and two-phase flow field in an oscillating container Tadashi Watanabe Center for Computational Science and e-Systems.

HIGH PRESSURE HYDROGEN JETS IN THE PRESENCE OF A SURFACE P. Bénard, A. Tchouvelev, A. Hourri, Z. Chen and B. Angers.

Multi-Physics Adjoints and Solution Verification

Tokyo 2015 A Workshop on CFD in Ship Hydrodynamics URANS Simulation of Surface Combatant using CFDShip-Iowa V.4 S. Bhushan and F. Stern IIHR-Hydroscience.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 2nd Oxford - Princeton High Power Targetry Meeting November 6 - 7, Princeton, NJ Mercury Jet Target.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, BNL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak in collaboration with Y.

Heat and Mass Transfer Laboratory 1 Hussein Dhanani Sebastian Schmidt Christian Metzger Assistant: Marcel Christians-Lupi Teacher: Prof. J.R Thome Condensation.

1 Simulation of the Couplex 1 test case and preliminary results of Couplex 2 H. HOTEIT 1,2, Ph. ACKERER 1, R. MOSE 1 1 IMFS STRASBOURG 2 IRISA RENNES 1.

Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology STUDY OF EFFECT OF GAS INJECTION OVER A TORPEDO ON FLOW-FIELD USING CFD.

Mixing Length of Hydrogen in an Air Intake Greg Lilik EGEE 520.

FOILING MOTH CENTERBOAD ON O PEN FOAM COURSE: ADVANCED FLUID DYNAMICS PROFESSOR: JAN PRALITS STUDENT: ALESSANDRO CHIAPPALONE.

Titolo presentazione sottotitolo

Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling

Transient Mixed Flow Modeling Capability in SRH-2D for Culverts and Bridges Yong G. Lai.

A Multiscale Approach to Mesh-based Surface Tension Flows

Workshop 5 Cavitating Centrifugal Pump

Isothermal Two-Phase Pipe Flow Sim

From: The Sedov Blast Wave as a Radial Piston Verification Test

Pressure drop prediction models

Konferanse i beregningsorientert mekanikk, Trondheim, Mai, 2005

E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi

Solving Equations involving Decimal Coefficients

High Accuracy Schemes for Inviscid Traffic Models

Numerical Investigation of Hydrogen Release from Varying Diameter Exit

Fundamental Eqs for modeling clouds

Presentation transcript:

Two-Fluid Effective-Field Equations

Mathematical Issues Non-conservative: –Uniqueness of Discontinuous solution? –Pressure oscillations Non-hyperbolic system: Ill-posedness? –Stability –Uniqueness How to sort it out?

Remedy for hyperbolicity: Interfacial pressure correction term and virtual mass term

Modeling – Interfacial Pressure (IP) Stuhmiller (1977):

Here, we have

Faucet Problem: Ransom (1992) Hyperbolicity insures non-increase of overshoot, but suffering from smearing Location and strength of void discontinuity is converged, not affected by non- conservative form Effect of hyperbolicity Solution convergence

Modeling – Virtual Mass (VM) Drew et al (1979)

 VM is necessary if IP is not present, the coefficients are unreasonably high for droplet flows.  Requirement of VM can be reduced with IP.

Numerical Method Extended from single-phase AUSM + -up (2003). Implemented in the All Regime Multiphase Simulator (ARMS). -Cartesian. -Structured adaptive mesh refinement. -Parallelization.

A case with 40% liquid fraction U gas =1km/s  L =0.4, liquid mass =400kg V L =150m/s(in radial) Liquid area: l=2m, r=0.4m L=60m R=12m Axis ( Grid size 10cm, calculation time :0-150ms Calculation domain:,L=60m,R=12m )

Liquid fraction, pressure and velocity contours of particle cloud for time ms. Lquid fraction (Min: Max:10 -3 ) Pressure (Min:1bar-Max:7bar) Gas Velocity (Min:0m/s -Max:1,000m/s)

Droplet radius R = 3.2mm, incoming shock speed M = 1.509

Current and future works Complete the hyperbolicity work on the multi-fluid system. Complete the adaptive mesh refinement into our solver – ARMS Expand Music-ARMS to solve 3D problems. Introduce physical models: Surface tension model Turbulence model Verification and validation. Real world applications.