NSSE 2005: Student Perceptions of Enriching Educational Experiences Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 18, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
Advertisements

Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.
Using the 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement in Student Affairs Indiana State University.
You will be familiar with the five NSSE benchmarks and the survey items that make up each benchmark. You will be familiar with the comparison groups.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
October 17,  Review of CCSSE  Descriptions of HCC Students  Discussion of Benchmark Results  Item Results  Critical Thinking analysis.
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
First Year & Senior Student Experiences The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies.
Response rateFirst-year Senior GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE 2013 GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE %15%23%21% 22%21%29%26% Representativeness.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
NSSE When?Spring, 2008 Who?Freshmen and Seniors random sample How?Electronic and Snail mail follow up Respondents?30% response rate 26% freshmen.
Basic Reports and Data Dissemination Strategies Regional Users’ Workshop October 6-7, 2005.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
1 Student Learning Assessment Assessment is an ongoing process aimed at understanding & improving student learning Formative Assessment – Ongoing feedback.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2002.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Okanagan.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
NSSE – Results & Connections Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona October 2, 2013 – Academic Senate.
Presentation of Results NSSE 2003 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
1 N ational S urvey & F aculty S urvey of S tudent E ngagement (NSSE) & (FSSE) 2006 Wayne State University.
1 NSSE Columbus State University Program Overview  What do you know about college student engagement?  Why is student engagement important?
Student Engagement at Towson: NSSE 2005 Telling and Selling the Story Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 11, 2006.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
IUPUI Council on Retention and Graduation – October 13, 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement Understanding IUPUI Students: National Survey of Student.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Results from the National Survey of Student Engagement Margaret Harrigan Office of Academic Planning and Analysis University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Results of the 2003 NSSE and FSSE: Implications for Student Affairs Bowling Green State University.
1 Presentation of Results NSSE 2005 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
Highlights of NSSE 2001: University of Kentucky December 10, 2001.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 27% (down 5%)  First Year: 25% (down 5%)  Seniors: 28% (down 5%)  GGC  Overall: 35% (up 7%)  First.
 NSSE Results Austin Peay State University.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE): Overview of 2008 Results for Rutgers University.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
NSSE Data Conversations
The University of Texas-Pan American
Dissertation Findings
2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
GGC and Student Engagement
2013 NSSE Results.
Presentation transcript:

NSSE 2005: Student Perceptions of Enriching Educational Experiences Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 18, 2006

Overview  What can NSSE tell us about students who responded?  What are NSSE Enriching Educational Experiences?  What can we learn from NSSE results?

What information does NSSE provide?  Identifies institutional strengths and areas for improvement  Allows benchmarking against peers and national results  Compares student experiences by demographic groups

NSSE Project Scope  Almost 1000 different colleges and universities  From 50 states, Puerto Rico, and Canada  Data from more than 880,000 students  Institutions include historically black colleges & universities, Hispanic serving institutions, tribal colleges, and single gender colleges YearColleges/ Universities

Some Peer Institutions  Frostburg State Univ.  Morgan State Univ.  Salisbury University  California State Univ. Fresno  Florida A&M University  James Madison Univ.  Longwood University  Montclair State Univ.  Southern Illinois Univ. Edwardsville  SUNY-Potsdam  Texas A&M University  University of Wisconsin Stout

NSEE 2005 Related to Towson  543 TU first-year students  702 senior students  808 of these students started here and 437 transferred in  120 peer institutions GroupSample Size Response Rate Towson292743% Peers73,36831% Masters118,48235% NSSE266,72637%

What Do We Know About Students Who Responded to NSSE  27% male and 73% female  8% belong to fraternity or sorority  5% are student athletes  89% are full time  35% live on campus

More Information About Students  66% say they are motivated to succeed  16% identify race/ethnicity other than “white”  96% participated in orientation  54% have never used career advising

Enriching Educational Experiences

NSSE Benchmarks  Five clusters or benchmarks of effective educational practice  Generated through data collected from 225,000 randomly selected students from 518 institutions in NSSE 2005  Based on research about student success, engagement, and retention

NSSE Benchmark Clusters  Active and Collaborative Learning  Enriching Educational Experiences  Level of Academic Challenge  Student Faculty Interaction  Supportive Campus Environment

EEE Definition  Complementary learning opportunities  Occur in and out of class  Augment academic programs  Include diversity experiences, use of technology, experiential learning opportunities, and co-curricular activities

EEE Items From NSSE  Using an electronic medium to discuss or complete assignments  Having serious conversations with students  Engaging in community or volunteer service  Completing foreign language coursework

More EEE Items From NSSE  Participating in practica, internships, field experiences, co-ops or clincals  Doing independent study or self-designed major  Studying abroad  Completing senior capstone  Participating in co-curricular activities

EEE Benchmark Score  Weighted average of student level benchmark scores  Calculated from all student responses on EEE items  Compares first and senior year response  Provides scores for comparison groups and “top performing” schools

Enriching Educational Experiences (Mean Student Response for All EEE Items)

Enriching Educational Experience Score: First Year/Senior

Enriching Educational Experience Score: Started Here/Transfer

Enriching Educational Experience Score: On-Campus/Off-Campus

Enriching Educational Experience Score: Co-Curricular Participation

Enriching Educational Experience Score: Would/Would Not Come Again

Enriching Educational Experience Score: Overall Educational Experience at Towson

Co-Curricular Participation

Hours Per 7 Day Week Participating in Co- Curricular Activities: All Respondents

Hours Per 7 Day Week Participating in Co- Curricular Activities: First Year/Seniors

Hours Per 7 Day Week Participating in Co- Curricular Activities: Started Here/Transfer

Hours Per 7-Day Week Spent in Co-Curricular Activities: Would/Would Not Attend Again

Students Who Participate in No Co-Curricular Activities: Hours Worked  43% of students who work NO hours off- campus participate in NO co-curricular activities  55% of students who work NO hours on- campus participate in NO co-curricular activities  32% of students who responded work NO on-campus or off-campus hours and participate in NO co-curricular activities

Student Who Participate in NO Co-Curricular Activities: Race/Ethnicity

Other EEE Items

This Year, How Often Have You Done Each of the Following: “Often/Very Often” Used an electronic medium (listserv, chat group, Internet, instant messaging, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment 62% Had serious conversations with students of a different race or ethnicity than your own 53% Had serious conversations with students who are very different from you in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values 52%

Students Responding “Often” or “Very Often” – First Year/Senior

Students Responding “How Often” - Started Here/Transfer

Students Responding “Often” or “Very Often” - Would/Would Not Attend Again

This Year, Have You Done or Do You Plan to Do the Following: “Plan to Do/Done” Community service or volunteer work68% Foreign (additional) language coursework41% Culminating senior experience (capstone course, thesis, project, comprehensive exam, etc.) 40% Study abroad25% Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment 18% Independent study or self-designed major18%

Students Responding “Plan to Do” or “Done” – First Year/Senior

Students Responding “Plan to Do” or “Done” – Started Here/Transfer

Students Responding “Plan to Do” or “Done” – Would/Would Not Attend Again

Conclusions

Things to Think About  Positive increase from First Year to Senior Year  Similar results for native and transfer students  Perception of EEE goes up as co-curricular participation goes up  Engaged students more likely to “definitely” come again  Engaged students more likely to rank overall educational experience as “Good” or “Excellent”  Co-curricular areas have clear and positive impact on student experience

More Information  Kathy Doherty AD