RFID-enabled Visibility and Inventory Accuracy: A Field Experiment Bill Hardgrave John Aloysius Sandeep Goyal University of Arkansas Note: Please do not.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WMS – Warehouse Management Systems
Advertisements

Decomposition Method.
Statistical Analysis Overview I Session 2 Peg Burchinal Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.
OPSM 305 Supply Chain Management Class 3: Logistics Network Design Koç University Zeynep Aksin
Bill Hardgrave Auburn University U.S.A. Note: this document is copyrighted ( 2013) and confidential; do not distribute or cite without explicit permission.
Chapter 12 Inventory Management
Bill Hardgrave Auburn University Note: this document is copyrighted ( 2010) and confidential; do not distribute or cite without explicit permission.
HOW SMALL & MEDIUM RETAILERS CAN BENEFIT FROM RFID MARTY JOHNSON.
Retail Supply Chain A Brief Overview Prof. R. Sathyanarayanan.
Regression Part II One-factor ANOVA Another dummy variable coding scheme Contrasts Multiple comparisons Interactions.
2012 Trends in Inventory Auditing WIS Customer Forum Oct 2012 KPMG LLP.
Flowchart Presentation Page 4 Allen Salas Calvin Kong Claudia Fung Jack Ponvanit Mark Kang Navid Rafiee.
Clustered or Multilevel Data
E-Commerce and Supply Chain Management (SCM)
Bill Hardgrave Sandeep Goyal John Aloysius Information Systems Department University of Arkansas.
Bill Hardgrave John Aloysius Sandeep Goyal Information Systems Department University of Arkansas.
Item Level Tagging for Apparel and Footwear: Feasibility Assessment Under the direction of: Bill Hardgrave (faculty) Deb Armstrong (faculty) David Cromhout.
RFID & The Supply Chain Mandate Presented By: Pratik Mehta.
Production and supply chain process MIS2101: Management Information Systems Based on material developed by C.J. Marselis.
Linear Trend Lines Y t = b 0 + b 1 X t Where Y t is the dependent variable being forecasted X t is the independent variable being used to explain Y. In.
Bill Hardgrave (presenter) John Aloysius Sandeep Goyal Information Systems Department University of Arkansas.
Bill Hardgrave (presenter) John Aloysius Sandeep Goyal Information Systems Department University of Arkansas.
Advancing Productivity, Innovation, and Competitive Success The Association for Operations Management Achieving Inventory Accuracy G.L. (Jerry) Kilty,
RFID In Retail Neco Can Vice President - Partner ATTEVO Inc.
Regression Part II One-factor ANOVA Another dummy variable coding scheme Contrasts Multiple comparisons Interactions.
Chapter 14 Introduction to Multiple Regression
ALISON BOWLING THE GENERAL LINEAR MODEL. ALTERNATIVE EXPRESSION OF THE MODEL.
Chapter 24 Stock Handling and Inventory Control 1 Marketing Essentials Chapter 24 Stock Handling and Inventory Control Section 24.1 The Stock Handling.
CHAPTER 6 INVENTORIES After studying this chapter, you should be able to: 1Describe steps in determining inventory quantities 2Explain the basis of accounting.
RFID Myths, Facts and Reality. What is RFID? Radio frequency identification or RFID Generic term for technologies that use radio waves to automatically.
Regression Part II One-factor ANOVA Another dummy variable coding scheme Contrasts Multiple comparisons Interactions.
Lesson 2: Purchasing. Objectives You will: ► Explain how purchasing impacts sales and profit ► List qualities of a good buyer ► Describe the lifecycle.
Bill Hardgrave (presenter) John Aloysius Sandeep Goyal Information Systems Department University of Arkansas.
RFID Research Center at the University of Arkansas “Examining the Business Value of RFID” Note: this document is copyrighted ( 2008) and confidential;
Statistical Models for the Analysis of Single-Case Intervention Data Introduction to:  Regression Models  Multilevel Models.
1 Dumex Malaysia Workshop 1 Finished Goods Inventory at Nilai FGS July 9, 2008.
Lecture 4 Introduction to Multiple Regression
INTDQ Inv 1 © The Delos Partnership 2003 Inventory Accuracy How to get to 98 % in the Stores and in Work-in-Process.
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Beni Asllani University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Supply Chain Management Operations Management - 5 th Edition.
Inventories – Part II Chapter 8 1. Using FIFO, the earliest batch purchased is considered the first batch of merchandise sold. The physical flow does.
Categorical Independent Variables STA302 Fall 2013.
Does RFID Improve Inventory Accuracy? Bill Hardgrave University of Arkansas RFID Research Center Note: this document is copyrighted ( 2008) and confidential;
General Linear Model.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 14-1 Chapter 14 Introduction to Multiple Regression Statistics for Managers using Microsoft.
ABSTRACT In today’s market, when we look at how businesses are structured in order to deal with competition, we see that supply chain management is the.
Advance Inventory Planning Integration Overview Pedro Pinto.
RFID-enabled Visibility and Inventory Accuracy: A Field Experiment Bill Hardgrave John Aloysius Sandeep Goyal University of Arkansas Note: Please do not.
The General Linear Model. Estimation -- The General Linear Model Formula for a straight line y = b 0 + b 1 x x y.
Material Requirements Planning Chapter 2. MRP in MPC.
MBF1413 | Quantitative Methods Prepared by Dr Khairul Anuar 8: Time Series Analysis & Forecasting – Part 1
HED 460 Data Management What are all the different types of data companies might wish to collect? Which company divisions would use which parts of the.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Manufacturing Planning and Control MPC 6 th Edition Chapter.
Calculation Summary Card Calculating Shopper Numbers Calculating an amount as a % = The value of the amount you want to know as a % The total number X.
Supply Chain Management
American Lighting Products
Roland Leitz, Andreas Solti, Alexander Weinhard, Jan Mendling
SUR-2250 Error Theory.
Designing a Production Plan
Fashion Merchandising
The Effect of the Reference Price on Consumer Decision: A Natural Field Experiment Antonio Filippin University of Milan Daniela Grieco Bocconi University.
Multiple Regression Analysis and Model Building
Physical Inventory Training
Inventory Web Innovations 2017.
Performance Indicator 1.05
MBF1413 | Quantitative Methods Prepared by Dr Khairul Anuar
The Multiple Regression Model
Analysis of Covariance
Physical Distribution
Warehousing Management
Presentation transcript:

RFID-enabled Visibility and Inventory Accuracy: A Field Experiment Bill Hardgrave John Aloysius Sandeep Goyal University of Arkansas Note: Please do not distribute or cite without explicit permission.

Premise Does RFID improve inventory accuracy? Huge problem –Forecasting, ordering, replenishment based on PI –PI is wrong on 65% of items –Estimated 3% reduction in profit due to inaccuracy What can be done? –Increase frequency (and accuracy) of physical counts –Identify and eliminate source of errors

Causes of Inventory Inaccuracy PI inaccuracy causes Results in overstated PI? Results in understated PI? Can case-level RFID reduce the error? Incorrect manual adjustment Yes Improper returnsYes No Mis-shipment from DC Yes Cashier errorYes No

Examples – Manual adjustment  PI = 12  Actual = 12  Casepack size = 12  Associate cannot locate case in backroom; resets inventory count to 0  PI = 0, Actual = 12 (PI < Actual)  Unnecessary case ordered

Examples – Cashier error Product AProduct B PI10 Actual10 Sell 3 of A and 3 of B, but Cashier scans as 6 of A PI = 4 Actual = 7 (PI < Actual) PI = 10 Actual = 7 (PI > Actual)

Proposition RFID-enabled visibility will improve inventory accuracy RFIDVisibility Inventory accuracy Out of stocks Excess inventory

Read points - Generic Store Backroom Storage Sales Floor Door Readers Backroom Readers Box Crusher Reader Receiving Door Readers

RFID Data LocationEPCDate/timeReader DC :15inbound DC :54conveyor DC :23outbound ST :31inbound ST :14backroom ST :54sales floor ST :45sales floor ST :49box crusher

The Study All products in air freshener category tagged at case level Data collection: 23 weeks 13 stores: 8 test stores, 5 control stores –Mixture of Supercenter and Neighborhood Markets Determined each day: PI – actual 10 weeks to determine baseline Same time, same path each day

The Study Looked at understated PI only –i.e., where PI < actual Treatment: –Control stores: RFID-enabled, business as usual –Test stores: business as usual, PLUS used RFID reads (from inbound door, sales floor door, box crusher) to determine count of items in backroom Auto-PI: adjustment made by system For example: if PI = 0, but RFID indicates case (=12) in backroom, then PI adjusted – NO HUMAN INTERVENTION

Results - Descriptives 12% -1% 12% - (-1%) = 13%Numbers are for illustration only; not actual

Results - Descriptives

Random Coefficient Modeling Three levels –Store –SKU –Repeated measures Discontinuous growth model Covariates (sales velocity, cost, SKU variety)

Factors Influencing PI Accuracy (DeHoratius and Raman 2008) Cost Sales volume Sales velocity SKU variety Audit frequency (experimentally controlled) Distribution structure (experimentally controlled) Inventory density (experimentally controlled)

Results: Test vs. Control Stores Linear Mixed Model of Test versus Control Stores VariablesEffects (Intercept) *** Velocity *** Variety Item cost Sales Volume Test ** Period Test: Dummy variable coded as 1 - stores in the test group; 0 - stores in the control group Period: Time variable with day 1 starting on the day RFID-based autoPI was made available in test stores * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001

Variable Coding For discontinuity and slope differences: Add additional vectors to the level-1 model –To determine if the post slope varies from the pre slope –To determine if there is difference in intercept between pre and post

Results: Pre and Post AutoPI Results of Linear Mixed Effects VariablesEffects (Intercept) *** Velocity ** Variety Item cost * Sales volume PRE ** TRANS *** POST *** Pre: Variable coding to represent the baseline period Trans: Variable coding to represent the transitions period—intercept Post: Variable coding to represent the treatment period p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001

Results: Discontinuous Growth Model Model of Understated PI Accuracy over Time Intervention

Results: Effect on Known Causes of PI Inaccuracy * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001

Results: Interaction Effects

Implications What does it mean? –Inventory accuracy can be improved (with tagging at the case level) –Is RFID needed? Could do physical counts – but at what cost? –Improving understated means less inventory; less uncertainty Value to Wal-Mart and suppliers? In the millions! –When used to improve overstated PI: reduce out of stocks even further –Imagine inventory accuracy with item-level tagging …