The Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP): The Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP): A new dimensional questionnaire for measuring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standardized Scales.
Advertisements

Mani Rafiee Ph.D. student of general psychology Allameh Tabatabaiee university.
Patient-reported Measures: KCCQ and CHF outcomes Aanand D. Naik, MD Houston Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence.
Development and Psychometric Properties of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS) Jonathan S. Abramowitz, PhD University of North Carolina at.
The Technology-Rich Outcomes-Focused Learning Environment Inventory (TROFLEI): A Cross-Cultural Validation Anita Welch, Claudette Peterson, Chris Ray,
Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118) as a clinical instrument Dineke Feenstra, Helene Andrea and Joost Hutsebaut APA Annual Meeting, 2009.
Personality and Life Satisfaction: A Facet-Level Analysis Ulrich Schimmack Shigehiro Oishi R. Michael Furr David C. Funder.
DEVELOPMENT OF A PREFERENCE-BASED, CONDITION SPECIFIC PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE FOR USE WITH VENOUS ULCERATION Simon Palfreyman 1, John E Brazier.
Infant AND TODDLER SENSORY PROFILE
Reliability and Validity of Research Instruments
There is a need to validate existing patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) to provide evidence on their validity. Subsequently, short measures can.
A Review of 3 Relationship Adjustment and Satisfaction Assessment Instruments.
Assessing Borderline Personality Disorder in the Primary Care Setting Presented by: Jonathan Betlinski, MD Date: 11/13/2014.
Jan Weiss, PT, DHS, CLT-LANA
Outcome Assessment. Purposes of Outcome Assessment  Treatment planning  Treatment monitoring  Accountability to others.
Negative Urgency, Distress Tolerance and Problematic Alcohol Use Abstract Purpose: This study aimed to explore the relations among Negative Urgency, Distress.
Outcomes for Biofeedback Training and Psychotherapy in a University Counseling Center Barbara Morrell, Ph.D, Dianne Nielsen, Ph.D., Matt Reiser, David.
Reliability, Validity, & Scaling
National Outcomes and Casemix Collection Training Workshop
Psychometric Characteristics of the Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale Robyn L. Walker 1, Michael E. Clark 1,2, Ronald J. Gironda 1,2 1 James A. Haley Veteran’s.
BACKGROUND Evolutionary Personality Psychology is the study of individual differences in evolved systems for social behavior. The most familiar and best.
Seth Bernstein, Ph.D. ABHA Executive Director Jeb Brown, Ph.D
Temperament and Personality in Adolescents Ruth Spence, Matthew Owens, Ian Goodyer Background During the transition from childhood.
PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT ACROSS CULTURES Imported and Indigenous Instruments.
Presented By: Trish Gann, LPC
Trait Resilience and Distress Among Family Caregivers of Children with Severe Disabilities Receiving Pulmonary Services Courtney Francis 1, Ryan T. Blucker.
The emotional distress of children with cancer in China: An Item Response Analysis of C-Ped-PROMIS Anxiety and Depression Short Forms Yanyan Liu 1, Changrong.
FDA Approach to Review of Outcome Measures for Drug Approval and Labeling: Content Validity Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in.
Personality and professional interests in Angolan university students Liliana Faria 1, Joana Carneiro Pinto 2 & Nazaré Loureiro 3 1 Universidade Europeia;
BACKGROUND Cost-effectiveness of Psychotherapy for Cluster C Personality Disorders and the Value of Information and Implementation Djøra I. Soeteman 1,2,
TRAP: A long term outcome and process study of a residential treatment for treatment refractory adolescents with personality disorders Dineke Feenstra.
The Effectiveness of Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive Behavior Therapy in the Treatment of Personality Disorders: A Meta-Analysis. By Falk Leichsenring,
Purpose The present study examined the psychometric properties of the SCARED in order to begin establishing an evidence base for using the SCARED in pediatric.
Lecture 6: Reliability and validity of scales (cont) 1. In relation to scales, define the following terms: - Content validity - Criterion validity (concurrent.
Borderline Congress, Berlin, July
Treatment of adolescents with severe (borderline) personality disorder Joost Hutsebaut & Dineke Feenstra September 2008, Basel.
Using Participatory Action Research to Develop and Validate the Core Competency Measure (CCM) Stephen S. Leff, Ph.D., Nathan Blum, M.D., Abbas Jawad, Ph.D.,
Economic evaluation of psychotherapy for personality disorders: burden of disease and cost-effectiveness Djøra Soeteman Viersprong Institute for Studies.
1 The Economic Burden of Personality Disorders  Djøra Soeteman, Jan J.V. Busschbach, Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen, Roel Verheul  Viersprong Institute for.
Assessing Mental Health Among Latino Consumers of Mental Health Services Susan V. Eisen, PhD, Mariana Gerena, PhD, Gayatri Ranganathan, MS, Pradipta Seal.
Do Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Predict Dementia at 1- and 2- Year Follow-Up? Findings from the Development of Screening Guidelines and Diagnostic.
Treatment selection in patients with personality disorders: The role of patient characteristics Helene Andrea Janine van Manen, Anna Bartak, Jan van Busschbach,
Reliability and validity of the adapted Spanish version of the Early Onset Scoliosis-24 questionnaire María del Mar Pozo-Balado, PhD Hiroko Matsumoto PhD.
Psychometric Properties of the Ambulatory Surgery-Inventory of Nausea, Vomiting and Retching (AS-INVR)
Civility Among Healthcare Employees: The Impact on Patients AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting June 2005  Boston, MA Mark Meterko PhD 1, David Mohr.
Severity Indices for Personality Problems (SIPP): Factor structure, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change Helene Andrea (PhD) Roel Verheul (PhD)
BORDERLINE PERSONALITY; TRAIT AND DISORDER Morey and Zanarini.
Ryoichi J. P. Noguchi, Michael M. Knepp, Sheri L. Towe, Chad L. Stephens, Jared A. Rowland, Christopher S. Immel, & David W. Harrison, Ph.D. INTRODUCTION.
Copyright © The REACH Institute. All rights reserved. Tools to Know and Love.
Psychosocial difficulties in head and neck cancer; the development of an evidence based measurement instrument Lucy Ziegler Rob Newell.
Test-Retest Reliability of the Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB) Dr. Leighton Chan, MD, MPH Chief, Rehabilitation Medicine Department.
The burden of disease in patients with personality disorder indicated for psychotherapy: Arguments for necessity of care Djøra Soeteman, MSc
Measures Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: Prostate (FACT-P). The FACT-P (Cella et al., 1993; Esper et al., 1997) is a widely-used self-report measure(e.g.,
Depression, Worry, and Psychosocial Functioning
Serhii Dembitskyi, PhD Institute of Sociology NAS of Ukraine
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF CIS
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL)
NIH: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Ron D. Hays Functional Vision and Visual Function November 10, 2016, 8:55-9:15am.
Measurement: Part 2.
Frank L. Gardner PhD, Meredith Story MA and Justine Benedicks BA
Reliability and validity of the BREQ-2 for measuring high school students’ motivation for physical education Stuart Forsyth¹, David Rowe¹, and Nanette.
Cognitive Remediation
Multiculturalism and Its Links to Hostility
Measurement: Part 2.
Introduction Methods Discussion Hypotheses Results References
MMPI-2 Items by NEO-PI-R Facet Limitations & Future Directions
CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION
First study published in JOGS.
Dr. Muhammad Ajmal Zahid Chairman, Department of Psychiatry,
Measurement: Part 2.
Presentation transcript:

The Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP): The Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP): A new dimensional questionnaire for measuring (mal)adaptive personality functioning Helene Andrea (PhD) 1 Roel Verheul (PhD) 2 Joost Hutsebaut (PhD) 2 Dineke Feenstra (MSc) 1 Espen Arnevik (PhD) 3 1 Viersprong Institute for Studies on Personality Disorders (VISPD), Halsteren, the Netherlands 2 Center for Psychotherapy de Viersprong, Halsteren, the Netherlands 3 Dept Research & Education, Ulleval University Hospital, Oslo, Norway APA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 18 May 2009

Contents Background  Why a new questionnaire  Psychometrics (factor structure, reliability) New results  Discriminant validity (symptomatic measurements)  Convergent validity (personality measurements)  Sensitivity to change Discussion & further research

Why a new questionnaire Dimensional measurement that combines:  Broad scope of central elements personality pathology  Relating maladaptive to adaptive capacities  Developed to measure change  Easy to administer (self-report & limited number of items) Verheul, Andrea et al (2008). Psychol Assessment, 20, 23-34

Overview SIPP-questionnaire 118 items, 16 facets (subscales), 5 higher-order domains  Lower score = more maladaptive level of functioning  Higher score = more adaptive level of functioning Examples Fully disagree Partly disagree Partly agree Fully agree ItemFacet/subscaleDomain I usually have adequate control over my feelingsEmotion regulation Self-control I can easily accept people the way they are, even when they are different RespectSocial concordance Website: Publication: Verheul, Andrea et al (2008). Psychol Assessment, 20, 23-34

Results confirmative factor analysis Domain Facet (subscale) Self control Emotion regulation Effortful control Identity integration Purposefulness Enjoyment Self-respect Stable self-image Self-reflexive functioning Relational capacities Enduring relationships Intimacy Feeling recognized Social concordance Aggression regulation Frustration tolerance Cooperation Respect Responsibility Responsible industry Trustworthiness Website:

Psychometric qualities final model 1.Good model fit among different populations: 2.Good internal consistency facets (median Cronbach’s .77; range ) 3.Good test-retest reliability (median ICC.92; range ) NChi-sqRMSEANNFICFISRMR PD-pts (test sample) Additional PD-pts Mental health pts General population Website:

Validity studies New results I: Validity studies

StudypopulationNSCL-90CIPNEO-PI-RDAPP PD multi-centre (Netherlands) 1483XX PD Viersprong (Netherlands) 112X PD Ulleval Hospital (Norway) 114XX General population (Netherlands) 468X Method: Study samples & Instruments SCL-90: Symptom Check List (Derogatis, 1983; Arrindell et al, 2003) CIP: Circumplex of Interpersonal Problems (Pederson, 2000) NEO-PI-R: NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (Costa & McCrae, 1992) DAPP: Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology (Livesley & Jackson, 2002)

SIPP & Symptomatic distress (SCL) SIPP SIPPSCL Self- control Identity Integration Relational capacities Responsi- bility Social con- cordance Total score (Norway) Total score (Netherlands) Correlation SCL-subscale >.50 Hostility (-0.60) Depression (-0.68) Interpers. sensitivity (-0.52) --Hostility (-0.56) Overall median correlation: Discriminative validity (partially) present

Comparison with other personality measures (I): SIPP – NEO / CIP SIPP NEO Self-controlIdentity Integration Relational capacities Responsi- bility Social concordance Neuroticism Extraversion Openness to experiences Agreeable- ness Conscien- tiousness CIP-total N=114 PD (Norway) Higher correlations refer to plausible associations

SIPP DAPP higher order Self-controlIdentity Integration Relational capacities Responsi- bility Social concordance Emotional dysregulation Dissocial behavior Inhibition Compulsivity Overall median correlation: Partially convergent, partially discriminative validity Verheul, Andrea et al (2008). Psychol Assessment, 20, Comparison with other personality measures (II): SIPP – DAPP

 Evidence for meaningful associations with other personality measurements (convergent validity)  Also evidence for lower associations with symptomatic measurements (discriminative validity) Summary Validity Studies

Sensitivity to change New results II: Sensitivity to change

Method Setting PD patients % (n) Average treatment duration Outpatient26% (n=156)13.8 (sd 7.3) months Day hospital35% (n=214)9.1 (sd 4.0) months Inpatient39% (n=238)7.6 (sd 3.5) months  Follow ups: 1 year and 3 years after start treatment

SIPP domains at baseline and follow-ups More adaptive scores after treatment Effect sizes: 0.73 & 1.02 Effect sizes: 0.95 & 1.17 Effect sizes: 0.57 & 0.69 Effect sizes: 0.18 & 0.58 Effect sizes: 0.18 & 0.40

Discussion Discussion Values of the SIPP  Dimensional measurement core components personality pathology Self-control, identity integration, relational capacities, social concordance, responsibility  Promising psychometric results Factorial model, reliability, validity  More adaptive scores after treatment

Further research  SIPP as outcome instrument in effectiveness studies  Predictive validity: - Symptomatic improvement necessary for improvement on SIPP? - Improvement on SIPP necessary for functional improvement?  SIPP part of studies DSM-V personality disorders workgroup

Availability of the SIPP  Diagnostic version: 118 items, 16 facets, 5 domains Outcome version (SIPP-SF): 60 items, 5 domains  Available in Dutch, English, Norwegian, Spanish and Italian  In exchange for research data  Websites: (click on heading sipp-main menu; five subpages) 