Company Confidential Improvement Opportunities for Audit Reporting Tony Marino and Rick Downs July 19-20, 2012 Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SC 18 Ad Hoc Task Group API Staff Issues Ed Durante, Chair.
Advertisements

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) :2009 Revision Workshop Tony Marino The Boeing Company Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop.
ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Use of PEAR’s Auditing Application of AS9101 Boston, MA July 21-22, 2011 Henry Gamboa UL.
Transition from Q1- 8th to Q1- 9th edition
ISO 9001 : 2000.
How to Document A Business Management System
The ISO 9002 Quality Assurance Management System
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Lessons Learned from Accreditation Assessments - ANAB Perspective Boston, MA July 21, 2011.
Company Confidential AS 9101E Documentation and Execution Brian Geer (Lockheed Martin) Paul Dionne (ABS QE) 9101 Revision Team 1 AAQG Auditor Workshop.
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Auditor Training and Workshop Minneapolis, MN July 30-31, 2009WELCOME! Americas Aerospace Quality Group AAQG Registration.
Boston, MA July 21-22, 2011 Tony Marino, Tom Gallagher, Larry Beck
Prepared by Long Island Quality Associates, Inc. ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements Based on ISO/TC 176/SC 2 March 2001.
TS16949 requirements Subjects –Audit planning –Recertification audit requirements –Auditing Remote supporting functions.
ASPEC Internal Auditor Training Version
ISO 9000 Certification ISO 9001 and ISO
QMS ISO 9001:2008 Introduction to QMS 9001:2008 and system auditing.
BS EN ISO 14001:2004 Madlen King BSc MSc MIEMA EMS Lead Assessor Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance Ltd BS EN ISO 14001:2004.
ISO 9000 Implementation Imran Hussain.
The Value of Using the Process Approach for Internal Auditing Frank Sidorowicz TL 9000 Program Director Orion Registrar, Inc.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 CB and Auditor Performance Expectations Boston, MA July 22, 2011 R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 AQMS Accreditation Programs ANAB Findings Atlanta, GA July 22, 2010 Steve Holladay ANAB,
1 AUDIT PROCESS Quality  Degree to which a set of inherent characteristics fulfils a need or expectation that is stated, generally.
Quality Management Systems P.Suriya Prakash Final Mech Vcet
Company Confidential 1 Revisiting CB Use of AS9101 Rev D Tim Lee 12 March 2012.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 AS9104/1 Certification Structures - Client and CB Agreement July 17, 2014 Tim Lee Chair - IAQG.
The Role of the Internal Auditor for Maintaining System Compliance and Promoting Continuous Improvement Wayne M. Uttke
ISO 9001:2000 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
Software Quality Assurance Lecture 4. Lecture Outline ISO ISO 9000 Series of Standards ISO 9001: 2000 Overview ISO 9001: 2008 ISO 9003: 2004 Overview.
Visit us at E mail: Tele:
ISO9001 Pre Assessment Team 10 PT Han Jian Da, Alphy Thomas Kanatt, Xia Xi, Wu Jun, May Lwin, Chit Khun, Mohit Srivastava, Kovalan Venkatesan.
Hints for Managing an Audit Program Kristin L. Case.
4.3 Document control 4.4 Review of requests, tenders and contracts
Non-conformity Reporting
Paul Hardiman and Rob Brown SMMT IF Planning and organising an audit.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) :2009 Revision Workshop Tony Marino The Boeing Company Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Supplemental Oversight AS9104/2A & Special.
ISO DOCUMENTATION. ISO Environmental Management Systems2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be able to:  Name.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Lessons Learned from Accreditation Assessments - ANAB Perspective July 19, 2012 Steve Holladay.
ISO 9001:2000 The 5 Phase Plan to Implementation Sterling, VA Terry & Associates Quality.
Webinar FSSC audit report 7th september 2015
ISO Registration Common Areas of Nonconformances.
Company Confidential 1 AAQG RMC 9101:2009 Revision Workshop Prepared by IAQG 9101 Team 19 July, 2010 Atlanta Ga. “It’s All About Performing” Quality Management.
It was found in 1946 in Geneva, Switzerland. its main purpose is to promote the development of international standards to facilitate the exchange of goods.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 AS9104/1 Certification Structures July 22, 2015 Tim Lee Chair - IAQG OPMT The Boeing Company RMC.
Internal Auditing ISO 9001:2015
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 July 17, 2014 Bryan Blunt IAQG OASIS Administrator OASIS Tools for Continuous Improvement / Next-Gen.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) IAF ID 4:2012 “Market Surveillance Visit” Status report July 16,
RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July 2015 Registration Management Committee Company Confidential RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Database Committee Report January 2012 (Data from 2011) San Diego, CA January 10-11, 2011.
TC176/IAF ISO 9001:2000 Auditing Practices Group.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 6 CH 5 ISO MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY Philippe Bauwin Medical.
9101 Forms July 20-21, Revision Team Paul Dionne
GD211 Training Module 5 Conclusions.
ISO/IEC
Prepared by Rand E Winters, Jr. ASR Senior Auditor October 2014
ISO 9001:2015 Auditor / Registration Decision Lessons Learned
Prepared by: Tony Marino 9101 Team Member
Determining Effectiveness of Internal Audits Presented by: Tony Gutierrez R. Darrell Taylor Minneapolis, MN July 19 & 20, 2012.
IAQG 9101:2009 Revision IAQG General Assembly Munich, 15 Oct. 2009
EN/AS/SJAC 9101 Re-Write EN/AS/SJAC 9101 Audit Process Coordination Draft IAQG Working Group Prepared by: Tony Marino The Boeing Company Supplier Quality.
Audit Findings Process
Agenda Why this group exists Who is behind it
Determining Effectiveness of Internal Audits Presented by: Tony Gutierrez R. Darrell Taylor Minneapolis, MN July 19 & 20, 2012.
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
Nonconformity Writing
Presentation transcript:

Company Confidential Improvement Opportunities for Audit Reporting Tony Marino and Rick Downs July 19-20, 2012 Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012

Workshop Approach: Review form instructions Break up into teams and review report Each team will present its critique of the report reviewed As a group we will reach a consensus on what improvements are needed We will review a QMS Matrix, NCR and PEAR Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012

QMS Process Matrix Report: For each site audited, the QMS Process Matrix shall be completed to identify which processes and quality management system clauses have been audited. NOTE 1: This form can also be used to document the audit program for a full certification cycle and the audit plans for each audit (e.g., stage 2, surveillance, recertification). NOTE 2: The standard is structured as indicated in the left hand vertical column; the organization identifies their processes and provides the listing to the audit team leader. These processes shall be listed at the top of the form. The audit team with the organization’s assistance identifies the interrelationships between the standard’s clauses and organization’s processes (e.g., organization has a design process and clause 7.3 is associated to this process). In some cases, the organization’s process may have the same name as the clause of the standard (e.g., Purchasing). Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012

QMS Process Matrix Report: 8 Identify the organization’s processes, sub- processes, and value added activities, as defined by the audited organization. Identify the name of the associated area(s) involved, if appropriate. NOTE 1: For a site, it is possible that not all organization processes are applicable and/or performed at this location. In this situation, list the applicable processes or activities within a specific process performed at this site/location. Examples of processes/sub-processes/value added activities: –Product Realization: »Manufacturing – Machining »Manufacturing – Painting »Manufacturing – Assembly »Purchasing »Design »o Design/Avionics Dept. »o Design/Door Actuators Dept. NOTE 2: If there are more processes than columns, additional forms can be used. Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012

QMS Process Matrix Report: 9 Identify the PEAR ID as completed for the process indicated in box 8. NOTE: At a minimum, for each audited product realization process a PEAR must be completed. 10 For each process, indicate the applicable 9100/9110/9120 clause(s) as follows: –Record a ”C” to denote a clause found Conforming. –Record a ”N” to denote a clause found Nonconforming. NOTE: For clauses not applicable or not evaluated the appropriate box remains empty. Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012

QMS Process Matrix Report: In your teams review the QMS Process Matrix Report provided. Come to a consensus and record any concerns and recommended improvements on your flip chart. If consensus cannot be reached record the differing thoughts on your flip chart. Select a team spokesperson. You have 10 minutes. Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012

Nonconformity Report (NCR): 7 The NCR has four sections; each section shall be completed in order, at the various stages of the NCR: –Section 1 – documented by the auditor when recording the nonconformity. –Section 2 – documented by the auditee after the containment action, root cause analysis determination, and corrective action plans are defined; and the implementation of the corrective action by the auditee has occurred. –Section 3 – documented by the auditor after verification of the implementation and effectiveness of the corrective action by the auditor. –Section 4 – documented by the auditor and audit team leader after final acceptance/closure of the NCR. NOTE: The audit team leader and auditee can agree on multiple stages for status reporting of the NCR for Section 2 (e.g., after correction, after planning the corrective action, after completion of the corrective action). Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012

Nonconformity Report (NCR): 9 Identify the primary 9100/9110/9120 clause(s) and/or customer requirement to which the nonconformity was written. 10 Determine the nonconformity classification (i.e., major, minor) according to the definitions provided in this standard (see clauses 3.2 and 3.3 of this standard). When the nature of the nonconformity needs immediate containment action, the auditee shall describe the immediate actions (‘fix now’) taken to contain the nonconforming situation/conditions and to control any identified nonconforming products. Correction shall always be recorded. NOTE: Any immediate containment action and correction can be reviewed by the audit team during the audit. Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012

Nonconformity Report (NCR): 19 Provide a detailed description of the root cause(s) of the nonconformity; that is describe how/why the nonconformity occurred. NOTE: In most cases, documenting ‘isolated case’ or ‘lack of instruction’ are not appropriate ‘root causes ’ as there are system causes in other domains (e.g., insufficient supporting or management processes). 21 Describe the action(s) to be taken to prevent the recurrence of the nonconformity. Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012

Nonconformity Report (NCR): In your teams review the NCR provided. Come to a consensus and record any concerns and recommended improvements on your flip chart. If consensus cannot be reached record the differing thoughts on your flip chart. Select a team spokesperson. You have 15 minutes. Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012

Process Effectiveness Assessment Report (PEAR) 8 Identify the process assessed; indicate the name of the process, as defined by the organization. 9 Summarize the process activities, inputs, and outputs ; including the identification of associated process interfaces. 10 Identify the applicable primary 9100/9110/9120 clause(s) for this process. 11 Describe the method used by the organization to determine process effectiveness [e.g., identification of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and associated targets, process capability data ]. Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012

Process Effectiveness Assessment Report (PEAR) 12 Annotate relevant objective evidence, observed conditions, data, information, comments, etc. to support the auditor's statement of effectiveness or ineffectiveness, as indicated in Box # Indicate to what extent the audited process was determined effective. Effectiveness: extent to which planned activities are realized and planned results achieved (reference ISO 9000). –NOTE 1: A major (ma) NCR shall be issued when the effectiveness level of the process is rated a "1". –NOTE 2: A major (ma) or minor (mi) NCR shall be issued when the effectiveness level of the process is rated a "2" (see nonconformity definitions in clause 3). Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012

Process Effectiveness Assessment Report (PEAR) In your teams review the PEAR provided. Come to a consensus and record any concerns and recommended improvements on your flip chart. If consensus cannot be reached record the differing thoughts on your flip chart. Select a team spokesperson. You have 15 minutes. Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012

Wrap Up Effective completion of new 9101 forms relies on: –Effective communication – Be brief and succinct –Instruction sheets are there to help –We are dealing with both compliance and performance »Effectiveness is not subjective, a process is either implemented (compliant) or not and either targets are met or not –Corrective Actions must address all root causes identified Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012

Questions Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Minneapolis, MN 19 – 20 July 2012