Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 NON-DOE SPONSORED RESEARCH OVERVIEW Sponsored Projects Office Jeff Weiner July 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NIH RESEARCH CONTRACTS Rosemary M. Hamill Procurement Analyst Division of Acquisition Policy and Evaluation Office of Acquisition Management and Policy.
Advertisements

Fixed price contract: A contract that provides a price for each procurement item obtained under the contract.
University Contracting The University of Arizona Office of Research and Contract Analysis (ORCA)
Conflict of Interest, Conflict of Commitment, and Outside Activities UTSA HOP 1.33 Non-covered UTSA staff 1.
Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Subpart – C Pre-Federal Award Requirements and Contents.
University Contracting The University of Arizona Contracting & Research Services (CRS)
Mr. Seth Cowell Ethics Counselor ESC/JA (781)
Subrecipient Monitoring OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION 2010.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 NON-DOE SPONSORED RESEARCH OVERVIEW Sponsored Projects Office Jeff Weiner May 2004.
Subcontracts 101 By Mitali Ravindrakumar USC Collaboration between Parties Perform Subcontractor Analysis Sponsor - Fund Project/Subcontr act Negotiate.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
NIH RESEARCH CONTRACTS
CENTRAL CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION (CAGE CODES) DFARS Case 2003-D040 DFARS Parts 204, 212, 213 and 252 are amended to remove policy on Central Contractor.
Authorities to Accept Funds Through Agreements Louie Pectol Chief, Office of Policy and Analysis U.S. Geological Survey.
Marcy Mealy Procurement Specialist CDBG Program
June 2008LBNL Sponsored Projects Office1 DOD CDMRP LBNL has been honored by 3 Innovator Awards in the past few years. This is the highest honor in this.
Sponsored Projects Office 1 Selected slides Presented to GAO Jeff Weiner August 2008.
National Contract Management Association – Norfolk Chapter Contracting Ground Rules.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Technology Transfer and Industry Sponsored Research Challenges Prepared for Karina Edmonds May 27, 2010 Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Management.
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Three: The 1,2,3’s of.
NIH Research Contracts Richard L. Hartmann Chief, DMID Research Contracts Branch A National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Office of Business Development Training
Partnership Agreements Delegation of SBA’s Contract Execution Authority to other Federal Government Agencies.
1 CDBG Procurement Requirements For Local Officials.
NIH Research Contracts Richard L. Hartmann Chief, DMID Research Contracts Branch A National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Promoting Objectivity in Research by Managing, Reducing, or Eliminating Conflicts of Interest UT HOP UT HOP The University of Texas at Austin.
National Property Management Association Understanding the Statement of Work… Request for Proposal --- Section C.
1.  Overview of the Federal Certifications and WOSB program  Eligibility requirements  Resources and Q&A 2.
U.S. Small Business Administration
Student Affairs Buying 101 Procurement Methods Students First Topic
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators Presents… John Kolotos Carney McCullough US Department of Education CASH MANAGEMENT Current.
VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE EDUCATION FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCURE ACT OF 2002 (PPEA) Augusta County Board of Supervisors Wednesday, January 6, 2009.
Research Conflicts of Interest: Identifying and Minimizing COI from the Perspectives of Sponsors, Faculty and the IRB Research Conflicts of Interest: Identifying.
University Contracting The University of Arizona Office of Research and Contract Analysis (ORCA)
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 NON-DOE SPONSORED RESEARCH OVERVIEW Sponsored Projects Office Jeff Weiner March 2004.
FAR Part 2 Definitions of Words and Terms. FAR Scope of part (a)This part – (1) Defines words and terms that are frequently used in the FAR; (2)
Sponsored Projects Office 1 RAPID Data Quality Phyllis M. Housel Gale Sponsored Projects Office SPO Process Review Meeting August 25, 2008.
COMP 323 Research Administration for Scientists Contracts, Grants & Cooperative Agreements: How They Are Different and Why It Matters! Wednesday, February.
Departmental Administrators Training Course (DA-202)
OFFICE OF PURCHASING AND CONTRACTS PROCUREMENT OUTREACH TRAINING LEVEL I INTRODUCTORY INFORMATION.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
WORKING WITH SPO AND IAO Lynne HollyerNoam Pines Associate Director Research Administrator Industry Alliances OfficeSponsored Projects Office
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs April 4, 2011 Topic: Cost Share.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Cost Sharing James Trotter Quality Standards Manager Sponsored Projects Administration.
Daily Management of Awards Jennifer Crockett Jennifer Crockett, Director, Sponsored Projects Finance, Columbia University Tamara Hill Tamara Hill, Manager,
July 2008LBNL Sponsored Projects Office1 Bridge Funding Overview Presented by: David Garcia Contracts Officer.
RESEARCH FOUNDATION PURCHASING PROCUREMENT OUTREACH TRAINING LEVEL I INTRODUCTORY INFORMATION Award Management Services.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Contract Compliance Training. Department Personnel Office of the General Counsel (OGC) Mario K. Castillo General Counsel John Guest Deputy General Counsel.
Food Purchasing for Child Care National Food Service Management Institute The University of Mississippi
Teaming and Joint Ventures To “WIN” United States Department of Veterans Affairs Industry Day Palo Alto, CA October 1, 2015 VA Office of Small and Disadvantaged.
PROPOSAL REVIEW AND SUBMISSION FYAP May 5, 2016 Julie Wammack Sponsored Research Administration.
FAR Part 38 Federal Supply Schedule Contracting 1.
1 Changes to Regulations Governing Personal Conflicts of Interest and Organizational Conflicts of Interest Breakout Session # C08 Name: Barbara S. Kinosky,
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Contract Compliance Training
Award Set-Up and Advances
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
What is Contract Financing?
FAR Part 2 - Definitions of Words and Terms
Proposal Routing Overview
Contract Compliance Training
Request for Proposal & Proposal
The University of Texas at Arlington
Presentation transcript:

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 NON-DOE SPONSORED RESEARCH OVERVIEW Sponsored Projects Office Jeff Weiner July 2008

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Major Topics Sponsored Research Laws and Regulations Basic WFO Processes and Policies Solicitations Key Issues

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 3 WFO AT LBNL FY 07 -$140 mill for all non DOE sponsored research $121 mill was WFO FY 07 over 1300 active awards, over 900 proposal actions

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 4 Laws That Give DOE Authority to Perform Work for Others One of the most important rules of DOE WFO is that the DOE is not allowed to place itself in competition with the private sector. Policy documents with the force of law define certain activities known as “inherently governmental functions” that may only be performed by the Government itself (for example, maintaining armed forces or making laws). To acquire services or supplies that are not “inherently governmental functions,” the Government generally must go to private industry, where it solicits competitive proposals and makes the best possible deal for taxpayers’ dollars.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 5 Laws That Give DOE Authority to Perform Work for Others (continued) Given these restrictions, how can one Government agency -- say, the Department of Defense – turn to another -- the Department of Energy – to supply required services or supplies? The answer is provided in a number of public laws that authorize interagency procurement, including DOE’s Work for Others program. It is important to understand that DOE has conflicting goals in WFO. HQ Program Mangers may encourage WFO while the DOE administrative managers only see rules, regulations and compliance.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 6 Laws That Authorize DOE to Perform Work for Others Economy Act of Authorizes an agency to place orders for goods and services, subject to availability, with another Government agency when the head of the ordering agency determines that it is in the best interest of the Government to do so, and that the ordered goods and services cannot be provided by contract as conveniently or cheaply by a commercial enterprise. Atomic Energy Act of Authorizes research and development and training to be done for other Federal agencies (OFA) and for nonfederal entities. It only permits such activities if private facilities are inadequate. Therefore, this Act supports the idea of uniqueness of facilities and non-competition with the private sector.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 7 Other Government Directives -- Acquisition Regulations That Affect Work for Others FAR , Federally Funded Research and Development Center -- Establishes Government-wide policies for the establishment, use, review, and termination of federally funded research and development centers, including those managed by the Department of Energy’s management and operating (M&O) contractors. It contains a restriction on Federally Funded Research and Development centers competing for business with private sector companies. FAR Prohibits agencies from contracting for supplies or services from another agency for the purpose of avoiding competition requirements. This is to avoid 100% “pass throughs”.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 8 DOE Orders DOE 481.1C - Work for Others (Non-Department of Energy Funded Work) -- Establishes DOE policy, procedures, and responsibilities for authorizing and administering non-DOE-funded work.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 9 Pitfalls, Traps and ‘Watch-Out-Fors’ Advance Payments (nonfederal sponsor)  work cannot begin until advance payments received  universities and small business may have problems  We can be creative but need early partnership with Division and SPO

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 10 Publication Restrictions  LBNL must have freedom to publish  sponsors may restrict publication  Director approval needed  Need to read the solicitation and award Indemnification  LBNL cannot indemnify  sponsor must indemnify LBNL and government Pitfalls, Traps and ‘Watch-Out-Fors’ (continued)

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 11 Guaranteed Performance  work is “best efforts”  full cost reimbursement RFPs (Request for Proposals )  LBNL cannot be a prime contractor or subcontractor on federal RFPs – Sandia case Pitfalls, Traps and ‘Watch-Out-Fors’ (continued)

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 12 Before Investing Your Time and Effort in a Proposal let SPO Review the Solicitation to determine LBNL’s Eligibility Three basic types of solicitations: 1.U.S. Govt. – Request for Proposals (RFP’s) 2.U.S. Govt. – Other Solicitations (BAA’s, RA’s) 3.Non-Federal Solicitations Have SPO Review the Solicitation

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 13 U.S. Government Request for Proposals (RFP’s) LBNL and all DOE Labs are prohibited by DOE from being a proposer, subcontractor, or team member in a proposal to a U.S. Govt. RFP. This became DOE policy in Wipe from your memory banks the prior policy which allowed Labs to be subcontractors as long as we offered our services to all interested proposers, it is no longer valid.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 14 U.S. Government Other Solicitations These include Broad Agency Announcements (BAA’s), Research Announcements (RA’s), and others. SPO will review the following factors: Are the technical requirements stated broadly and are innovative solutions being sought to address the technical requirements. Are the evaluations and selection being based on a merit or peer review system where price is not a significant evaluated review factor. Is the Lab an eligible applicant under the solicitation? Does the Sponsor pay the full cost of projects, if not then we should not propose unless we have written permission to use other funds to support this work. If all of the above answers are affirmative then the Lab can submit an application or be a subcontractor to another eligible applicant.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 15 Non-Federal Solicitations It doesn’t matter what the Sponsor calls the solicitation, SPO will review it to determine the Lab’s eligibility. Is the Lab an eligible applicant under the solicitation? Can we be the applicant or only a subcontractor? How is the technical requirement stated? Very detailed like an RFP which will lead all applicants into submitting very similar proposals which then makes it a prohibited direct competition. Generally stated like a BAA which would allows each applicant to come in with their own innovative solution to address the requirement.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 16 Non-Federal Solicitations Are the evaluations and selection being based on a merit or peer review system where price is not a significant evaluated review factor. Does the Sponsor pay the full cost of projects, if not then we should not propose unless we have written permission to use other funds to support this work. In all cases, DOE is the ultimate decision maker on whether we can submit or not. SPO will seek DOE’s determination if we are not sure what the correct position is. SPO will advocate for LBNL’s ability to submit an application if we think it is appropriate, for example CEC RFP’s.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 17 Authorities for Sponsored Research at LBNL Only Sponsored Projects Office (SPO) has authority to submit proposals and accept awards on behalf of LBNL Delegation from UC through Lab Director PI does not have authority to submit proposals or accept awards SPO website:

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 18 Work for Others Contract between LBNL or DOE and a Federal or Nonfederal sponsor for contract R&D to be performed by LBNL a unique Laboratory capability work must fit within mission of LBNL cannot compete with private sector all costs are recovered from the sponsor requires DOE approval

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 19 Key Elements of Contracts Financial Terms - Advanced Funding Required - Total Funding Obligated by Sponsor Property General Indemnification Product Liability Indemnification Patent Rights - DOE Class Waiver or - UC Retains Rights Rights in Technical Data - LBNL Does Not Perform Proprietary Research Termination Statement of Work

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 20 Types of WFO Agreements Interagency Agreements between DOE and another Federal agency Nonfederal WFO Agreements LBNL has delegation to sign approved agreements. Generally we use 5 Exhibits.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 21 Funding Process: Other Federal Agencies Sponsor sends a funding document to LBNL, including citation of statutory authority for work and a written statement that: By entering into this agreement it is in compliance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 6.002, and to their knowledge, the work requested will not place LBNL in direct competition with the domestic private sector LBNL sends the funding document to DOE for them to sign and accept funding. * Once DOE accepts the funding, LBNL has the authority from the sponsor to begin work, open accounts, incur costs up to the funded amount, and invoice the sponsor for those costs.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 22 Funding Process: Nonfederal SPO determines which terms/conditions are needed SPO and the sponsor sign a standard contract – no additional DOE approval necessary If it’s non-standard – DOE approval is required, which can be lengthy Projects cannot begin until receipt of advance payment is received (if required)

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 23 Financial Considerations for All Awards All work is done at full cost recovery (all Lab direct and indirect costs) Most sponsors also pay Federal Administrative Charge (FAC) of 3% Some types of sponsors get FAC waived by DOE (small businesses, Universities, non profits institutions, state and local governments and class waivers, e.g. NIH DHS) Costs must be charged to correct awards Costs cannot exceed contract value, cash on hand or period of performance

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 24 Intellectual Property Considerations Generally, nonfederal sponsors get title to Lab inventions Exceptions are granted under certain DOE approved situations We are different than UC campuses Generally, Lab gets title to inventions under Federal sponsors