Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT and ALLHAT-LLT Valentin Fuster MD Director, Cardiovascular Institute Mount Sinai Medical Center New York, NY Christopher.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
11/2/ Implications of ASCOT Results for ALLHAT Conclusions ALLHAT.
Advertisements

1 SECOND AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL BLOOD PRESSURE STUDY (ANBP-2) Enalapril/ACEI vs. HCTZ, n = 6,083 Randomized, open-label (blinded endpoint review) All CV events.
TNT: Study Design Treating to New Targets 2 5 years 10,001 Patients Clinically evident CHD LDL-C 130  250 mg/dL following up to 8-week washout and 8-week.
Stanford Prevention Research Center STANFORD SCHOOL OF MEDICINE National Trends in the Prescribing of Anti-Hypertensive Medications Jun Ma, MD, PhD Research.
Facts and Fiction about Type 2 Diabetes Michael L. Parchman, MD Department of Family & Community Medicine September 2004.
Heart Failure With Preserved And Impaired Systolic Left Ventricular Function In ALLHAT JB Kostis, B Davis, L Simpson, H Black, W Cushman, P Einhorn, M.
VBWG IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering Study.
Hypertension and The Older Patient
Heartbeat – Apr 2003 ACC 2003 ACC 2003: SPORTIF III and ASCOT Valentin Fuster MD Director, Cardiovascular Institute Mount Sinai Medical Center New York,
1 The JNC 7 recommendations for initial or combination drug therapy are based on sound scientific evidence.
Did Type of Prior Antihypertensive Therapy Influence the Heart Failure Results in ALLHAT? Richard Grimm, Barry Davis, Linda Piller, Karen Margolis, Joshua.
Lipid Lowering Substudy Trial of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial JAMA 2002;288: ALLHAT- LLT.
Results of Monotherapy in ALLHAT: On-treatment Analyses ALLHAT Outcomes for participants who received no step-up drugs.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT-LLT)
1 Presenter Disclosure Information FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: DSMB’s: Merck, Takeda Barry R. Davis, MD, PhD Clinical Outcomes in Participants with Dysmetabolic.
6 / 5 / RENAL DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED INTO 3 GROUPS BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (GFR) ALLHAT.
The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial ALLHAT study overview Double-blind, randomized trial to determine whether.
Success and Predictors of Blood Pressure Control in Diverse North American Settings: The Antihypertensive and Lipid- lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart.
Thumbs up/Thumbs down – Feb 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT: Optimal first-step therapy for hypertension Eric J Topol MD Provost and Chief Academic Officer Chairman,
Assessing A-HeFT and PEACE Eric J Topol MD Provost and Chief Academic Officer Chair, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Cleveland Clinic Foundation.
Is It the Achieved Blood Pressure or Specific Medications that Make a Difference in Outcome, or Is the Question Moot? William C. Cushman, MD Professor,
Hypertension In elderly population. JNC VII BP Classification SBP mmHgDBP mmHg Normal
Systolic hypertension not an isolated problem Michael Weber, MD Professor of Medicine Associate Dean Downstate College of Medicine State University of.
1 ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AT BASELINE AND DURING FOLLOW-UP in The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial November 9, 2003.
1 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Major Outcomes in High Risk Hypertensive.
D-1 Pravastatin-Aspirin Combination The Medical Need Thomas A. Pearson, M.D., Ph.D. Albert D. Kaiser Professor of Community & Preventive Medicine University.
Combination Therapy for Hypertension Summary and Comment by Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM Published in Journal Watch Cardiology December 3, 2008Journal Watch.
PPAR  activation Clinical evidence. Evolution of clinical evidence supporting PPAR  activation and beyond Surrogate outcomes studies Large.
1 Antihypertensive Trial Outcome Differences: Diuretic vs. Calcium Channel Blocker Compared to participants assigned to the diuretic, those assigned to.
1 Role of Diuretics in the Prevention of Heart Failure - The Antihypertensive and Lipid- Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial ALLHAT Davis.
1 Can One Evaluate An Outcomes Claim Based On An Active Controlled Study? Pfizer Response Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Rockville,
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
HvC Comparative Effectiveness Project Groups 5 and 6
AA-2-1 Jerome D. Cohen, MD, FACC, FACP Professor of Internal Medicine / Cardiology Director, Preventive Cardiology Programs St. Louis University Health.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ALLHAT Major Outcomes in Moderately.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study Purpose To evaluate whether the long-acting ACE inhibitor ramipril and/or vitamin E reduce the incidence.
Calcium channel blockers: the debate continues Clinical Trial Commentary Dr Eric Topol Chairman and Professor, Department of Cardiology Director of the.
ALLHAT Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial JAMA 2002;288:
7/27/2006 Outcomes in Hypertensive Black and Nonblack Patients Treated with Chlorthalidone, Amlodipine, and Lisinopril* * Wright JT, Dunn JK, Cutler JA.
Polypill x Aspirin Project Groups 3 and 4
Is there evidence to justify different claims for different drug classes? Presentation to: Cardiovascular & Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Food & Drug.
ALLHAT 6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (3 GROUPS by GFR)
Prevention of Events with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibition (PEACE) Trial PEACE Trial Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific Sessions.
Pre-ALLHAT Drug Use IMS Health NDTI, Year % of Treated Patients on Medication CCBs Beta Blockers Diuretics ACE Inhibitors.
1 ALLHAT Antihypertensive Trial Results by Baseline Diabetic Status January 28, 2004.
Long-term Cardiovascular Effects of 4.9 Years of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk.
6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (4 GROUPS by GFR) ALLHAT.
Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hypertensives with CHD Randomized to Amlodipine versus Lisinopril in ALLHAT Frans Leenen MD, PhD, Chuke Nwachuku MA, MPH, Dr.
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control The SPRINT Research Group* November 9, /NEJMoa R2 이성곤 /pf. 우종신.
Results from ASCOT-BPLA: Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial–Blood Pressure Lowering Arm VBWG.
Blood Pressure and Lipid Trials: Rationale, Importance and Design
What should the Systolic BP treatment goal be in patients with CKD?
Nephrology Journal Club The SPRINT Trial Parker Gregg
ACC 2005: Message from the trials
Blood Pressure and Age in Controlling Hypertension
Health and Human Services National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
ALLHAT ALLHAT Antihypertensive Trial Results by Baseline Diabetic & Fasting Glucose Status.
United States Preventive Services Task Force: Recommendations for ABPM
The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
The following slides highlight a presentation at the Hotline Session of the European Society of Cardiology Annual Congress, September 3-7, 2005 in Stockholm,
The following slides highlight a report on a presentation at the Late-breaking Trials Session and a Satellite Symposium of the American Heart Association.
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Health and Human Services National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Originally presented by Drs. Daniel Levy, Richard H. Grimm, Steven E
The following slides are from a Cardiology Scientific Update in which Dr. Gordon Moe reported and discussed an original presentation by Drs. Bjorn Dahlof,
Post-Heart Failure Mortality
The following slides highlight a report by Dr
Presentation transcript:

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT and ALLHAT-LLT Valentin Fuster MD Director, Cardiovascular Institute Mount Sinai Medical Center New York, NY Christopher Cannon MD Cardiologist Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, MA James Ferguson MD Associate Director, Cardiology St Luke's Episcopal Hospital and Texas Heart Institute Houston, TX Michael Weber MD Professor of Medicine SUNY Downstate College of Medicine Brooklyn, NY

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT and ALLHAT-LLT Special Guest Commentator Thomas G Pickering MD, PhD Director, Integrative and Behavioral Cardiovascular Health Program And Hypertension Program Mount Sinai Medical Center New York, NY

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Randomized design of ALLHAT High-risk hypertensive patients Consent / Randomize (42 418) Amlodipine Chlorthalidone Doxazosin Lisinopril Eligible for lipid- lowering Not eligible for lipid-lowering Consent / Randomize (10 355) Pravastatin Usual care Follow for CHD and other outcomes until death or end of study (up to 8 yrs).

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT: Trial design patients age >55 with hypertension and 1 additional risk factor Randomized to:  chlorthalidone (12.5 mg to 25 mg/day, n=15 255)  amlodipine (2.5 mg to 10 mg/day, n=9048)  lisinopril (10 mg to 40 mg/day, n=9054) Primary end point: fatal CHD or nonfatal MI

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT JAMA 2002; 288: ALLHAT: Primary end point

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Secondary outcomes: Amlodipine vs chlorthalidone End point Amlodipine (%) Chlorthalidone (%) Relative risk p 6-year rate of heart failure ( ) <0.001 JAMA 2002; 288:

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Summary Why did diuretics do so well in this population, when we've all been talking about how great the ACE inhibitors are? How do we unravel this surprising finding? Fuster

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT A negative study "I was frustrated by the authors immediately portraying this paper in public policy and economic terms." "I am by no means convinced that this study is anything other than what you might normally call a negative study." "I'm not convinced the discrepancies between the drugs are as obviously apparent as claimed." Weber

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT JAMA 2002; 288: ALLHAT: Blood pressure

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Heart-failure protection "I was astonished with the heart-failure result." It seems an ACE inhibitor would be a superior protector against heart failure Could the chlorthalidone be masking the symptoms of heart failure and resulting in missed diagnoses? Weber

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Blood-pressure effect It is possible the blood-pressure difference explains some, if not most, of the final results There was a consistent difference throughout the trial ACE inhibitors have been shown to be more effective in younger patients, and the age of the trial participants may be a factor in ALLHAT Pickering

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Blood-pressure difference Can the blood pressure have had significant impact when the difference was so small? Blood-pressure difference compared with chlorthalidone Amlodipine:+0.8 mm Hg Lisinopril:+2.0 mm Hg Fuster

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Stroke risk: Lisinopril vs chlorthalidone SubgroupRelative risk95% CI Nonblack Black JAMA 2002; 288:

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT: Masking heart failure It is possible the diuretics were masking some of the clinical manifestations of heart failure "I don't think that [ALLHAT] means that we should throw out all the new forms of therapy and go back to treating everybody with diuretics." Ferguson

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT: Understanding the biology "Is it the blood-pressure control or is it the specific agents?" We have confounding results and don't have the absolute answer right now We haven't had a chance to examine all the different subgroups yet Ferguson

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT: Fundamental principles "We've been going along fat, dumb, and happy thinking we've got all these great new forms of therapy and they're so much better than what we had before. And now we've got to reexamine that." We need to apply the principles of risk stratification to the world of hypertension Ferguson

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT: A surprise "I think we were all somewhat surprised." Consensus of meta-analyses was CCBs are better at preventing stroke, while ACE inhibitors are better at preventing coronary events when compared to standard diuretic and beta-blocker treatment Pickering

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT: Elderly population ALLHAT had a relatively elderly population: mean age: 67 years 57% of patients >65 We don't have as many comparative trials in the elderly Pickering

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT: Heart failure Increased heart failure was a factor involved in stopping the doxazosin arm of ALLHAT "It may be that the diuretic tends to reduce sodium retention whereas some of these agents may be associated with sodium retention if not given in combination with a diuretic." Pickering

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT HOPE: Primary end points N Engl J Med 2000; 342(3):

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT African American population There seems to be an inconsistency between HOPE and ALLHAT concerning ACE inhibitors ALLHAT was designed to have a large black population (35%) in the study ACE inhibitors may be less effective in this population Weber

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Overinterpreting the findings? 30% to 40% of the benefit seen in HOPE may come from lowering blood pressure Can argue that in the white cohort in ALLHAT, ACE inhibitors may have reduced coronary events 5% to 8% once blood pressure is factored in "I am rather concerned that the authors of the study [ALLHAT] have perhaps overinterpreted their own findings" Weber

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Biochemical changes Past studies with diuretics suggested that one of the problems with the drug was an effect on elements like fasting glucose, potassium, etc These may increase risk for people with hypertension Does ALLHAT tell us we should stop worrying so much about these things? Fuster

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT New-onset diabetes In SHEP, diabetics did well on chlorthalidone Beta blockers may help prevent new- onset diabetes ACE inhibitors have also been linked to prevention of new-onset diabetes Pickering

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT JAMA 2002; 288: ALLHAT: Fasting glucose levels

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Three patients Which would be the first drug of choice? Patient 1: Age 65; BP 170/100; no evidence of atherosclerotic disease Patient 2: Age 65; BP 170/100; previous MI, good LVF Patient 3: Age 65; BP 170/100; previous stroke

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT First patient Patient 1: Age 65; BP 170/100; no evidence of atherosclerotic disease Patient 2: Age 65; BP 170/100; previous MI, good LVF Patient 3: Age 65; BP 170/100; previous stroke

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT First patient: First drug Weber: Start with calcium channel blocker, maybe a diuretic in a black patient Pickering: Diuretic Ferguson: Diuretic Cannon: Diuretic, maybe a generic ACE inhibitor Fuster: ACE inhibitor in the past–not sure now

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Digesting ALLHAT We must teach our colleagues that the last word is not yet in on all this "This is a very complicated story, ALLHAT, we're going to have to take a few months to fully digest it." Weber

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Second patient Patient 1: Age 65; BP 170/100; no evidence of atherosclerotic disease Patient 2: Age 65; BP 170/100; previous MI, good LVF Patient 3: Age 65; BP 170/100; previous stroke

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Second patient: First drug Weber: ACE inhibitor Pickering: Beta blocker Ferguson: ACE inhibitor Cannon: Beta blocker, followed by ACE inhibitor Fuster: ACE inhibitor

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Third patient Patient 1: Age 65; BP 170/100; no evidence of atherosclerotic disease Patient 2: Age 65; BP 170/100; previous MI, good LVF Patient 3: Age 65; BP 170/100; previous stroke

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Third patient: First drug According to PROGRESS study, you should use a combination of ACE inhibitor and a diuretic Likely to start with diuretic for older patient and ACE inhibitor for younger, but will end up with both Pickering

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Third patient: First drug This patient is a quandary right now, having both manifest atherosclerotic disease and hypertension I am still biased toward ACE inhibitors and will make that the first line of therapy Cannot lose sight of the underlying atherosclerotic disease Ferguson

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Third patient: First drug I want to finish up with both ACE inhibitor and a diuretic (PROGRESS trial) so it doesn't matter which I start with "Someone who comes in with 170 systolic, you aren't going to get him down to 140 with 1 drug anyway." We all seem likely to end up with an ACE inhibitor and a diuretic as a combination Weber

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Third patient: First drug Start with an ACE inhibitor for the vascular disease risk and then titrate to blood pressure with diuretic as a follow-up drug Cannon

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Drug choice based on patient An ACE inhibitor followed by a diuretic Seems that for a patient age 65 with No manifestation of disease–start with a diuretic CAD with good VF–ACE inhibitor After a stroke–combination of ACE inhibitor and diuretic Fuster

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Implications of ALLHAT ALLHAT suggested that all of these drugs are similar in their effect "Tragically, ALLHAT never examined the sorts of combinations that we use." ALLHAT is complicated by the fact the patients weren't treated in the way they would be in the real world Weber

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT mortality Cumulative mortality rate Years to death HR (95% CI)p A/C0.96 ( )0.20 L/C1.00 ( )0.90 Chlorthalidone Amlodipine Lisinopril ALLHAT trial site

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT-LLT: Trial design patients age >55 with hypertension and 1 additional risk factor and moderate hypercholesterolemia Randomized to:  pravastatin (40 mg/day, n=15 255)  usual care Primary end point: all-cause mortality

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT-LLT: Primary results JAMA 2002; 288:

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT HPS: Mortality results Lancet 2002; 360:7-22

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT-LLT: Statin use JAMA 2002; 288:

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT-LLT: Evolving standard of care "We've been going along thinking that the statins are the answer to all of our atherosclerotic disease problems, and they're not." If usual standard of care means 30% are on statins anyway, it's hard to improve on that with a statin Ferguson

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT-LLT: Open label ALLHAT-LLT was not a double-blind trial, it was open-label Lots of dropouts (22.6% of statin arm came off their drug over the course of the trial) The big difference with other statin trials lies in the study design Cannon

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT-LLT: Designing clean studies Must construct clean, well-designed studies that can give meaningful results even in the face of an improving standard of care ALLHAT-LLT was also underpowered due to lack of enrollment Cannon

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT-LLT: Crossovers It may become more difficult to see differences in the future, the real danger is crossovers An unblinded trial makes it much easier to use the study drug as part of usual care Fuster

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT ALLHAT-LLT: LDL-C LDL-C in mg/dL Usual care Pravastatin Year of blood draw 7% * 11% 16% 23% 28% 30% * Percent decrease from baseline.

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Summary: ALLHAT In a hypertensive population, a diuretic was as good as the use of amlodipine and lisonipril "Diuretics may not be as bad as I thought." The results may be due in part to blood- pressure effects Fuster

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Summary: ALLHAT-LLT "It's not a good study." There was a lot of crossover, and that makes it difficult to draw conclusions It hasn't changed my opinion on statins Fuster

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Final word: Ferguson In both studies our preconceived notions were wrong The studies reinforce which mechanisms we should be targeting ALLHAT: focus on blood pressure in hypertensive patients ALLHAT-LLT: should still be treating cholesterol is a priority Ferguson

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Final word: Pickering ALLHAT makes me think people should be using diuretics more Current trends show diuretics being used less and less ALLHAT-LLT won't change the way I use statins in my practice Pickering

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Final word: Cannon "One will be much more apt to turn to diuretics and include them as part of combination therapy." The lesson from LLT is that one wants to do a clean trial as the way to examine if something is beneficial Cannon

Heartbeat – Jan 2003 ALLHAT Next program AHA 2002 Part 2 Valentin Fuster MD Director, Cardiovascular Institute Mount Sinai Medical Center New York, NY Christopher Cannon MD Cardiologist Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, MA James Ferguson MD Associate Director, Cardiology St Luke's Episcopal Hospital and Texas Heart Institute Houston, TX Michael Weber MD Professor of Medicine SUNY Downstate College of Medicine Brooklyn, NY